The Middle Of The Road Alternative Scam

I got asked my opinion about AVFM’s latest attack on MGTOW.  Until now, I hadn’t been following it due to a lack of time and an assumption that it was nothing more than the usual tension between MRAs and MGTOW.  Obviously, I oppose what AVFM is trying to do.  By trying to include married men as MGTOW, AVFM is trying to create a MGTOW- and call that “MGTOW”, so they can actual MGTOW, MGTOW+ to make actual MGTOW look like Atheism+.  What AVFM is doing is a very despicable and underhanded thing.

While this is about throwing out actual MGTOW to include tradcons at AVFM, it represents a deeper connection between AVFM and tradcons.  AVFM is adopting a tradcon strategy I am now calling, “The Middle Of The Road Alternative Scam”.  What tradcons try to do is present themselves as different from both feminists and MRAs/MGTOW.  Tradcons will tell you that they are neither pro-male nor pro-female, but pro-“family” or pro-“community”.  “Family” and “community” are words that really mean women and/or socialism depending on context, so it’s a way for tradcons try to trick men into supporting women.  Plus, it’s also a way for tradcons to present themselves as the group “in the middle” trying to “bring men and women together” and “fight the extremists on both sides” (i.e. the feminists on one side and the MRAs/MGTOW on the other).

AVFM is now using the same scam.  Effectively they’re trying to say, “See we have both men and women.  We’re trying to bring men and women together.  We’re neither those feminist extremists nor those MGTOW extremists.”  Since AVFM is supposed to be a MRA organization, they can’t include MRAs as one of the “extremes” they’re supposedly against, so MGTOW exclusively get that “honor”.  Thats the only real difference between the tradcon application of “the middle of the road alternative” scam and AVFM’s application of it.  Since AVFM’s use of this scam effectively aligns AVFM with tradcon ideology, now tradcons are very much at home at AVFM.

There may be some people reading this who are wondering, “what’s wrong with bringing men and women together?”  They think that I’m just an extremist who is trying to promote a war between men and women.  The problem with a middle of the road position (in the best case scenario) is that it’s a compromise position.  On one side, the position is “men should have no rights”.  The other side says, “men should have rights”.  The middle of the road position is to take half of men’s rights away.  Clearly, that’s unacceptable and absurd.  A man’s rights should never be up for compromise or negotiation.  It’s like you trying to compromise with someone who wants to poison your food.  You don’t want your food to be poisoned, but they do.  Are you actually going to meet in the middle and let them use half as much poison?  Of course not.  Don’t forget this description of the “middle of the road alternative” is assuming the best case scenario.  In reality, it’s worse.  The “middle of the road alternative” is really used as a scam or a trojan horse to subjugate men.

AVFM and the tradcons aren’t the only to use this scam.  The white vagina worshipping nationalists also use this scam, albeit only for white men and white women.  Conspiracy theorists also use this scam, but that is part some of larger issues with conspiracy theory that require a separate post.  Anytime you see this scam being used, don’t trust whoever is using it.  Many groups are using it or will use it in the future so you have to be vigilant for it.

The Christian Dating Advice Industry

Something I have been meaning to start talking about is the Christian dating advice industry, but I haven’t gotten around to it until now.  What finally got me to start writing about it was a pair of articles by Milo Yiannopoulos about MGTOW.  Both of those articles had a good number of comments (although it’s now buried in thousands of comments) where tradcons would try and convince MGTOW that there were plenty of “good women” in churches.  This is not true, and Christian dating advice isn’t true either.  Just because something is “Christian” does not mean its any better than the non-Christian equivalent if it involves women.

While Christian dating advice has its own unique quirks, most of the differences between Christian dating advice and regular dating advice are cosmetic.  The “go to church” dating advice is a good example of this.  It’s equivalent to feminist dating advice which says you should date feminists, “red pill” dating advice that says you should date “red pill” women, etc.  None of the women in any of these groups are any different.  They’re all the same.  I can tell you from personal experience that single women in church are the same types of single women you will find outside of church.  They’re desperate to get married because either they have kids, are otherwise divorced, or are otherwise “former” sluts whose looks are starting to fade.  It’s the reserves problem, but churches are worse because the single women there are actively trying to mine the reserves even more so than outside of church.

You might think that because Christianity says no sex until marriage, that would mitigate the problem.  It does not.  No sex until marriage only applies to men.  Women in church are given a pass for all their sexual sins because the church teaches that fornication is that man’s fault because of “male headship”.  It’s worse than that because the men Christian women fornicate with aren’t in church.  The single men in church are all part of the reserves so they aren’t getting any.  Since men get blamed for women’s sexual sins in churches, it’s the men in the reserves that are getting attacked from the pulpit for sins that women and men outside of church commit.  These men are doing the time, but don’t get the benefit of doing the crime/sin.  It’s a really perverse form of the gay virgin player rapist problem.  “Male headship” is also an excuse for churches to blame men and only men for divorce.  The divorce rate in churches is practically the same outside of church proving again that women are all the same.

Churches are as feminist as anything else in our gynocentric and gynocratic society.  They’re a misandrist institution.  They’re aren’t going to produce dating advice that’s fundamentally different from the rest of the dating advice industry.  Christian dating advice is a scam like almost all other dating advice.

There’s more to the Christian dating advice industry than I have covered here.  I will be covering that in future blog entries.

Comments are closed since this post is a copy of a page.  Comment on the page here.

Anita Sarkeesian Is Connected To The Dating Advice Industry

We have talked about how Anita Sarkeesian is involved with online marketing scams.  It turns out she’s worse than that.  Anita Sarkeesian is connected to the dating advice industry.  Sarkeesian worked with a man named Bart Baggett.  Baggett was listed as an author on a PUA directory since he wrote books on how to get laid using NLP, neuro-linguistic programming.  NLP is pseudoscience and a scam.

I’m both surprised and not surprised by this.  I’m surprised that Sarkeesian would so obviously be proof of everything I have been saying for a long time.  On the other hand, Anita Sarkeesian is involved in online marketing scams so it’s not surprising she would be involved with people engaging in dating advice scams.  After all, there is sort of a common link between the dating advice industry, feminism, and the war on gamers.  Dating advice is used as a ideological scam to trick men into joining up with various ideologies from feminism to misandrist forms of Christianity.  Anything that is an alternative to dating advice (and dating in general) is the enemy of the dating advice industry and anyone trying to use dating advice as a form of recruitment.  Thus, M(H)RAs and MGTOW are obvious enemies of the dating advice industry and anyone that uses dating advice to recruit men.  In this context, video games are similar to the M(H)RM and MGTOW.  This makes the dating advice industry, feminism, and anyone else invested in the MDAD (Misandrist Dating Advice Distraction) allies against video games.  Connections between the dating advice industry to feminism and other misandrist groups should be expected so if Anita Sarkeesian wasn’t a connection, it would be someone else.

I’m Thankful For #GamerGate

This Thanksgiving I’m thankful for #GamerGate because #GamerGate is everything the so called manosphere is not.  #GamerGate is actually anti-feminist.  #GamerGate actually does things instead of starting meaningless internet fights and trying to con men out of their money.

#GamerGate has accomplished more in 3 months than the so called manosphere could accomplish in 3 centuries.  #GamerGate’s latest accomplishment is getting the Federal Trade Commission to take action against the feminists masquerading as game journalists.  This may not seem like much, but the so called manosphere has never gotten the FTC to do anything.  Consider how much fraud and corruption feminists engage in.  Action by FTC will lead to larger actions by the FTC and other government agencies.  This is only the beginning, so this Thanksgiving be thankful for #GamerGate.

The False Accusation Bandwagon Effect

There have been a lot of sexual assault accusations against Bill Cosby recently.  Some of these go back 30 to 50 years, yet the women involved conveniently all decided to speak now.  Each new accusation against Cosby gets more and more bizarre and unbelievable involving women getting drugged and Cosby’s wife being in the next room when Cosby supposedly committed at least one of these sexual assaults.  The accusations against Cosby don’t pass the smell test especially since none of these women will take their accusations to an actual court room.  Even if statue of limitations is a problem, at least one of the accusations involves a case where it is still within the statue of limitations.  There’s also some disturbing racial aspects as, so far, all the women accusing Cosby of sexual assault are white.  It’s safe to assume that the accusations against Cosby are false.

If the accusations against Cosby are false, then how can all of these women be wrong?  The only point in common is Cosby, right?  While true, Cosby is a celebrity so people know who he is so that principle doesn’t apply.  Plus, women are known to copy other women’s stories of victimhood to make themselves victims.  Based on that alone, Cosby would have only needed to have sexually assaulted one women, or be falsely accused by one woman to get a bunch of women choosing to be “copycat victims”.  The copycat victim effect gets magnified by Cosby’s status as a celebrity so you have lots and lots of women all suddenly “discovering” they were sexually assaulted by Cosby at almost the same time.  This phenomena is the false accusation bandwagon effect where one false accusation by a woman creates more false accusations by other women.

There’s an additional factor to the false accusation bandwagon effect beyond women being copycat victims.  Even though what Cosby is accused of doing is a criminal offense, none of the alleged victims will press criminal charges.  Instead they will sue Cosby or use the threat of a law suit to extort money from Cosby.  Being a rich celebrity, Cosby likely has a large umbrella liability insurance policy.  That is where the money will come from that will be used to pay off these women, at least until the limit of the policy.  The insurance company holding Cosby’s policy isn’t interested in doing an investigation over something that happened 50 years ago.  Cosby’s insurance company will want to pay off the women accusing him as soon as they determine that the cost of paying off the women is less than the cost of litigation.  If it gets to that point, Cosby’s insurance company will force Cosby to agree to have them pay off the women or they will terminate Cosby’s policy.  Given the situation Cosby won’t be able to get an umbrella liability insurance policy from another insurance company, if Cosby chooses to fight this.  (A similar situation happened to the Frugal Gourmet in the 90s where all of a sudden as he got more popular he was accused of molestation of an increasing number of people.  No criminal charges were filed, and the Frugal Gourmet was never able to defend himself because his insurance company forced him to agree to pay off his accusers.)  As more women get on the false accusation bandwagon, the insurance company sees the cost of litigating a defense against the accusations go up until it hits the point where they think its cheaper to pay off the women.  In addition to the copycat victim problem, this creates a financial incentive for women to get on the false accusation bandwagon against Cosby.  The more women falsely accuse Cosby, the more likely all the women will get an easy pay day.

Given the financial implications, a cluster of accusations against a man especially a rich celebrity like Cosby doesn’t mean a thing.  Even without the financial incentive, women will get on the false accusation bandwagon as soon as one woman makes a false accusation against a man.

“Street Harassment” Is A Polite Term For Gang Stalking Conspiracy Theories

I realized something interesting about that New York City street harassment video.  Sure, it’s racist, and over 50% of it comes from the same intersection.  Sure, there’s a million ways in which it has been edited that makes it pure propaganda and not reality.  That has been covered elsewhere.  What I noticed is that the NYC street harassment video is incredibly similar to gang stalking videos.

The definition of gang stalking is organized staking by a group of people.  If you do some reading on it, gang stalking is the province of conspiracy theorists and other mentally ill people who think the government or the Illuminati is gang stalking them.  There are plenty of videos on youtube that supposedly document “evidence” of gang stalking.  Yet, the videos only show the supposed gang stalkers going about their business doing normal things.  The people who believe in gang stalking would have us believe that normal everyday actions by people are somehow evidence of a conspiracy against them.

In the NYC street harassment, much of the supposed street harassment are men saying things like, “Hello” and “Have a pleasant evening”.  In other words, the creator of the video would have us believe that normal everyday actions are supposed to be “street harassment”.  This is exactly like the nutjobs who believe in gang stalking who use normal everyday actions as “evidence” of gang stalking.  The entire concept of “street harassment” is just another gang stalking conspiracy theory.  It’s just a more polite term for gang stalking conspiracy theory.

We don’t trust people who believe in gang stalking conspiracy theories for good reason.  Since “street harassment” is just another gang stalking conspiracy theory, we shouldn’t believe women who believe in that as well.

Leftism In Disguise

Last Friday was Halloween, and it got me thinking of something I have noticed about the so called manosphere and related groups like the white vagina worshiping nationalists.  They all will tell you that they are right wing, but that isn’t true.  They are all leftists in disguise.

With the white vagina worshiping nationalists, they believe in Marxist redistribution of wealth just like regular socialists do.  The only difference is that the white vagina worshiping nationalists want wealth redistributed to the white proletariat instead of the entire proletariat like socialists do.  There is a reason why Nazi is short for national SOCIALISM.  Additionally, white vagina worshiping nationalists are pretty much indistinguishable from feminists.  Take that Viking Bitch woman who showed up here a while back.  If you try reading her blog, it becomes clear that she thinks of “Jews” as men and “whites” as women (even to the point where she accuses Jewish men of being obsessed with their penises).  If you removed the word, Jew, from her blog it would become indistinguishable from a feminist blog.  Even the name, “blonde gynocide” makes it indistinguishable from a feminist blog.  On top of that, she’s a single mother and defends single motherhood just like a feminist would except for using the white race as a defense for her bad choices that wreck society.

The so called manosphere also has plenty of leftism in disguise.  The Dickless Mangina Project has an author named RudyDeuceTruth who is indistinguishable from Hawaiian Fat Blob and other conspiracy theorists of the so called manosphere.  If I showed you RudyDeuceTruth’s writings without telling you it came from the Dickless Mangina Project, you would think it came from a conspiracy theorist in the so called manosphere.  This is because the conspiracy theory in the so called manosphere is completely leftist so it can be re-posted on a feminist blog without changing it one iota.  The “bad guys” in conspiracy theory are always rich capitalists (even if a conspiracy theorist believes that they’re taking direction from extraterrestrials or demons).  Even when conspiracy theorists are supposedly opposed to socialism, it’s because they believe socialism is a plot by said rich capitalists, not because they’re opposed to big government, Marxist redistribution of wealth, or actual socialist policies.

The so called manosphere also has a contingent of tradcons (traditionalist conservatives).  They are also hostile to capitalism and the free market.  Most of them will tell you that they’re opposed socialism too, but that’s because they associate socialism with being “godless” not because of actual opposition to socialist policies.  Many of the tradcons in the so called manosphere are Catholic and subscribe to “distributism”, an economic theory that grew out of Catholic social teaching.  They will use this to show that they are opposed to socialism in addition to capitalism, although distributism requires socialist policies like nationalization of banks.  Also, it grew out of Catholic social teaching which means it came from Catholic versions of social justice warriors or a Catholic form of leftism.  The Catholic Church is a very leftist organization.  The only reason people think otherwise is because of the Catholic Church’s opposition to abortion.  However, if you look at how the Catholic Church’s support for Obamacare until the church would have to pay for abortions, for example, it becomes obvious that the Catholic Church is nothing but a bunch of leftists who happen to be anti-abortion.

I had no trouble finding examples of manospherians actually explicitly agreeing with feminist ideas.  Obsidian, a major figure in the manosphere, said that white men in the manosphere were filled with privilege.  That’s exactly what a feminist would say and think.

What you see in all of these examples is trying to get men to believe in socialism, feminism, and other parts of leftism through the back door.  It’s leftism but the people promoting it disguise it with use of anti-semitism and rhetorical tricks.  That isn’t to say that these people don’t actually believe they’re right wing.  They do, but 99% of their political ideology is leftist with an attempt at putting it in a right wing costume.  And it doesn’t even work well since anti-semitism is now more associated with the left than the right now, for example.  What we are seeing here is the horseshoe theory of politics in action.  The white vagina worshipping nationalists, the so called manosphere, conspiracy theorists, and related groups moved so far to the right that they ended up adopting leftism, including feminism, wholesale.