Stoner With A Boner provided us with a link where a feminist laments how their sons are taught to rape. This link has already been commented on elsewhere extensively, so I want to talk about a couple of aspects that I haven’t seen covered elsewhere. First, what kind of mother thinks about her two year old son being a rapist in the future? A mother with serious psychological problems.
Second, if rape happens so often and so easily as that feminist says, and if dating men is as dangerous as this feminist says, then why don’t women just avoid men as much as reasonably possible? If men are such a universal threat to women, then the logical conclusion is that women should avoid men as much as reasonably possible. While feminists will say that this is “blaming the victim”, but according to them the situation is so bad for women it logically requires this response.
The reason why that we don’t see women avoiding men is because men aren’t a threat to women. All this talk from feminists about how men are violent and rapists is a lie. Women’s own actions prove this. If women were under threat from men, then they would act more like me (but with the genders reversed). As most of you know, I avoid (non family member) women as much as reasonably possible, since women intentionally make it impossible for me to discern which women will make false accusations against me. It may be an extreme action, but it’s how a person treats a group that universally threatens him. It isn’t just me. Many MGTOWs are ghosts who also mostly avoid contact with women as well.
While we can find many men going their own way or ghosting in various forms to avoid women, we don’t see any women avoiding men in a similar manner. There is no “women going their own way” or women going ghost. This is proof that men aren’t a threat to women, but increasingly the opposite is true.
There’s a new blog called, Mating Selfishness, that several of us are writing for now. It’s about the double standards in dating and everything related to dating.
I just contributed my first article for it, which is an adaptation of my writings on The Feminist Time Machine. While I will occasionally write for Mating Selfishness, my main blog will still be here.
It turns out that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, one of the Boston bombers, has a lot of women who are attracted to him. (Here are 27 examples of women finding him hot from Twitter.) I am not surprised by this. Women found Hitler and Stalin attractive too. Women will find any man attractive who is against everything that is good about civilization or is just all around evil and willing to engage in murder, particularly mass murder. This is just another example why being feminist is practically synonymous with being against civilization.
What are women telling men here? If you want to get laid and/or get a girlfriend, the quickest and best way to do it is to become a terrorist. This means that we will see more terrorist acts in the future, not because of ideology but just to get laid. In particular, this is something that (Roissyite) gamers will likely attempt to do. They can’t keep lying about getting laid forever, and terrorism to get laid will seem like the answer to their problems. Thus I see that Roissyite gamers and the Paleo-Game Cult will go straight to terrorism soon. In a way I’m looking forward to it since it will lead to them getting put in prison where they will be too busy getting ass raped by Bubba to interfere with the MRM. (Plus, Roissyite gamers and the Paleo-Game Cult are so incompetent at everything that they never will successfully pull off a terrorist attack so we don’t have to worry about innocent people getting harmed by them.)
All of you know by now that Matt Forney revealed himself to be Ferdinand Bardamu. This means a lot of things. It means that while Paul Elam was defending “Ferdinand Bardamu” to me, Matt Forney/Ferdinand Bardamu was attacking him practically at the same time. Paul Elam really can pick his allies. That’s not as important as other aspects of this revelation. All of you should remember that I was accused by manospherians of being the same person as Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech. While that’s a flattering comparison, what Matt Forney’s revelation proves is that the reason why I was accused of being PMAFT is not because there’s any evidence of us being the same person. It’s because the manospherians make use of multiple identities for the purpose of deception like Matt Forney did, and they project it on to their enemies.
This is part of a larger pattern within the so called manosphere and related communities like the conspiracy theorists and the gamers. They lie, scam, and commit fraud. Too much of the disagreement with the so called manosphere, the Paleo-Game Cult and the gamers contains an implicit assumption, that the manosphere, the Paleo-Game Cult and the gamers are honest but misguided people. This is not the case. They may believe what they’re selling (although we have to question just how many of them are true believers vs. scammers). Even the true believers are willing to lie and deceive you. Whenever I have attacked the manosphere, gamers, the Paleo-Game Cult or even dating advice in general, a large component of my attacks has always been pointing out their lies, scams, and fraud. This is because I don’t have a difference of opinion with these people. This isn’t a matter a differing worldviews. The so called manosphere, the Paleo-Game Cult, the gamers, and others involved in the dating advice industry are LYING to you. They are trying to DEFRAUD you. They are trying to SCAM you.
There are examples of lies, scams, and fraud in related communities like the conspiracy theorists. For example, Hawaiian Fat Blob has often said that the Illuminati and devil worshipers ruling the world were nothing more than attempts to discredit “real” conspiracy theory. It turns out he was lying about this. He admitted that he believes in the Illuminati and that things are run by devil worshipers. Just like the gamers, conspiracy theorists are lying to you and trying to defraud you. (This is one of the reasons why I have said before that conspiracy theorists will stab the MRM in the back eventually.)
Whether it’s the gamers, the conspiracy theorists, or any of the other related manosphere groups, our strongest argument against them is their own lies, scams, and attempts at fraud. We must constantly speak up about their lies, scams, and fraud.
One thing you will hear when pointing out dating advice scams is the “defense” of, “It’s not a scam because I’m giving it away for free.” In some cases this is because they are generating enough free content as a loss leader to hook you into buying their books and DVDs. In many other cases, this is because the scam isn’t about money. It’s about ideology. In this type of scam they aren’t trying to steal your money, but your time and you.
This is the case for a lot of the so called manosphere. Most men aren’t as successful as they would like to be with women so the so called manosphere preys on that so suck men in not just into game but other forms of rubbish like the paleo diet and conspiracy theory. (They fake being against feminism for similar reasons.) While a lot of them want to make money off their scams, for the rest of them they just want more people to indulge their delusions of being persecuted by the government and to add to the Paleo-Game Cult.
Ideological dating advice scams aren’t limited to the so called manosphere. Feminists do the same thing. Just like the so called manosphere, feminists will use dating advice as a scam to trick men into becoming feminists. One of the best examples of this is Dr.
Nerdlove ManginaloveNerdhate. Most of his articles attack the group he is supposed to be helping, nerds. He is preying on them to turn them into feminist manginas like him. For obvious reasons, the most despicable scams are probably those that target the elderly. In terms of dating advice scams, targeting nerds is equivalent to targeting the elderly in other scams.
One advantage we have in dealing with ideological dating advice scams is that the scammers will screw up. Eben Pagan, a pure monetary dating advice scammer, was much smarter than these people. He kept himself focused on making money and knew that he needed to get out of the dating advice scam while he was ahead (which he did). Since the ideological scammers are zealots, they are blinded by their devotion to their ideologies won’t be able to see where they are going to screw up like how an Eben Pagan could. This makes it easier for us to fight the ideological dating advice scammers and expose their real agendas.
There’s a fallacy called The Just World Fallacy where it is believed that “human actions eventually yield morally fair and fitting consequences, so that, ultimately, noble actions are duly rewarded and evil actions are duly punished”. This is a common fallacy in dating advice because dating advice fails pretty easily. Rather than admit that their advice was a failure, purveyors of dating advice will attack the men who tried to use their dating advice. The attacks on these men will include everything from accusations of “entitlement” to “misogyny”. The idea is that the dating advice wasn’t wrong or a scam, but the men using it were so odious to women that the men deserved to be rejected by women. Why this is a logical fallacy is obvious. Just because a woman rejects a man doesn’t mean that he’s defective, guilty of “entitlement”, or guilty of “misogyny”. Saying that men who get rejected by women must have something wrong with them is like saying homeless people are homeless because something is defective about them. Both concepts are wrong.
The Just World Fallacy can only go so far in defending dating advice from men discovering it’s a scam. Even if a man actually is “entitled” or a “misogynist” now (even though that’s unlikely), that wasn’t the case most of the time he was rejected by women. Even if said man accepts the Just World Fallacy as true with respect to dating advice, the problem is that man will realize that he still got rejected when he shouldn’t have. This creates a problem for the purveyors of dating advice so they will end up invoking the Feminist Time machine.
What happens with the feminist time machine is that a man who realizes that according to the Just World Fallacy should have not been rejected by women in the past will be accused of being “entitled” and/or a “misogynist” in the past even though he didn’t realize it. The feminist time machine says that women could practically see into the future to know that a man would be an “entitled misogynist” in the future so women preemptively rejected him and were right to do so. (This is similar to the plot of the short story and move, Minority Report.) This turns the Just World Fallacy into the Just All of Space and Time Fallacy.
The problem with the feminist time machine is that it is a paradox. The only way it can be made to make sense is if women were intentionally trying to turn a man into a misogynist. Since that is absurd, the feminist time machine is also absurd, but despite being a fallacy it will be used to attack men whose only crime is being unlucky with women.
This post is an exact copy of this page. I have disabled comments here so that all comments will end up on the page and not on this post. If you want to comment, leave your comments here. If you want to link to this be sure to link to the page and not this post.
With all of the recent white vagina worshiper BS on this blog, I haven’t had a chance to comment on Adria Richards. This is another case of a false sexual harassment accusation which I have experience with. What happened was that two tech guys, we’re having a completely private conversation. Adria who is clearly always on the search to drum up a false accusation pretty much made up her “complaint”. The tech guys were talking about dongles and forking a repository. Both of those are common tech terms. Dongles can have a sexual connotation, but forking a repository doesn’t. (For those of you who don’t know, “forking a repository” means making a copy of a collection of source code.) What Adria Richards did was use a private conversation that had nothing to do with her and twist it to a different meaning. She was in no way sexually harassed.
The way Adria Richards handled the whole situation also proves she wasn’t harassed. She took a picture of the guys who supposedly harassed her, including innocent bystanders who were lucky not to lose their jobs along with one of the tech guys, “Mr. Hank”. All of this was done without anyone’s permission. This picture was tweeted to the world, and “Mr. Hank” lost his job as a result. Adria Richards had a big smile on her face while she was taking that picture. That’s not the action of someone who has just been harassed.
In addition, Adria Richards has a history of this type of behavior. I’m not surprised by that.
The only good news out of this whole incident is that Adria Richards lost her job. That’s what she deserved for making a false sexual harassment accusation. I hope that she’s radioactive in the tech industry now so no more tech guys become the victim of her false sexual harassment accusations. Of course, she will probably get paid by some feminist organization now to be a professional victim, but she hopefully won’t be near guys in the tech industry.
There is a petition to reinstate “Mr. Hank” at his job. I’m undecided on support it because rather than stand up for himself (and men) he apologized to Adria Richards.
Regardless of anything else, this is a good example of why you should avoid women as much as possible anywhere. You can get a false sexual harassment accusation anywhere even outside of your job that causes you to lose your job. Even if it doesn’t cause you to lose your job, you can still be publicly attacked like these guys were.