Gang Stalking Paranoia Is One Of Many Reasons Why You Can’t Trust Gamers

I found this comment that I can’t tell is lying or paranoia.

I suspect W&N is one of my ‘haters’ that always makes it a point to downvote any comments I post over at the Spearhead.

It’s hilarious.

I could log on and write: “great article! good job!” and I get several down votes.

Since I don’t bother upvoting or downvoting comments on The Spearhead I know that Hawaiian Libertarian Neo-Marxist (AKA Keoni Galt) is either lying or suffering from paranoid delusions at least about me.  I wondered if this is larger than just me so I looked at some of his comments to see if they were getting downvoted like he claims.  I didn’t have the time to ferret out all of his comments but here are a few.

These comments also have a lot of upvotes.  Maybe there are comments where he gets a lot of downvotes but I doubt it because the evidence shows that it’s not happening.  Plus, if he comments when logged in and its for an article he wrote, upvoting and downvoting is disabled.  So where is this massive conspiracy to downvote his comments?  For the few downvotes there actually are, I’m sure I will get blamed for them because of his paranoia.

So what’s really going on with this guy since looking at the evidence shows he’s wrong?  There are two possiblities.

  1. He’s lying
  2. He’s suffering paranoid delusions

Either one is possible but I lean towards the idea that he’s suffering paranoid delusions.  He’s already accused other authors at The Spearhead of working for the Great Rockefeller Conspiracy he believes in simply because they pointed out facts.  That’s a paranoid delusion at a high level.  What he describes is very close to the pathology of people who believe they’re being gang stalked.

What is gang stalking?  It’s stalking by a group.  While it has “gang” in the name it has nothing to do with street gangs.  It can be done by any group.  Paranoia about gang stalking is common among conspiracy theorists.  (If you believe you know “the truth”, the next step is to paranoia about some dark group being after you.)  Peter Andrew Nolan, a conspiracy theorist notorius for his paranoia who has managed to get himself banned from nearly every mens rights blog and forum out there, believes that Freemasons gang stalk people.  It doesn’t surprise me that Hawiian Libertarian Neo-Marxist would believe in a variant of gang stalking where there is a conspiracy to downvote his comments.

Whether he’s lying or suffering paranoid delusions doesn’t really matter.  What matters is that in either case, nothing that comes out of his mouth can be trusted.  For instance, why should you believe him about game?  He provides no examples of how his life can be objectively measured to be different or better.  You can only trust what he says and since he clearly has problems with reality, you can’t trust what he says.  To a lesser degree this is true of most gamers.  Here’s a sanity check for dealing with gamers.  If a gamer has the success he claims, then he wouldn’t have time to be a post whore and keyboard jockey.  He would be too busy being successful with women.  Nearly all gamers are spending way too much time on the internet posting about game.  The only two examples of gamers I can think of that this MAY not be true of are The Fifth Horseman and Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech.  (And those two are also the only gamers out there who don’t attack guys who can’t get laid or choose not to get laid.  That is not a coincidence because if you’re really successful with women why would you attack someone who isn’t succesful with women?)

Whether it’s an extreme case of lying or paranoia like Hawaiian Libertarian Neo-Marxist or your basic gamer that spends too much time on the internet to be sucessful, you can’t trust what gamers are telling you.

About these ads

10 responses to “Gang Stalking Paranoia Is One Of Many Reasons Why You Can’t Trust Gamers

    • What Roissy is talking about is being stalked by WOMEN. Being gang stalked in the cases I’m pointing out is being done by MEN. Since gang stalking in these cases have to do with conspiratorial organizations it does not provide a DHV. More importantly they aren’t telling WOMEN about being the victim of gang stalking. They telling other MEN.

      • Those who don’t believe in game the way it is shown to people (where the person gaming has obvious advantages) or those who recommend people not to be a pussy-beggar are obviously going to be hated by those who have their entire worldview fed by game.
        I.e. women who want men to go on dates with different women so they all have the chance to squeeze the guy for dinner/favours/gifts, those who manufacture the goods and clothes to so-called “look presentable”, PR companies who depend on you spending to allow them to gain mindshare, governments who need whipping boys (they are proposing a man-tax in the EU now, worded as “a 5% tax cut for women”… meaning a 5% tax increase FOR men…)
        Your blog is good work for men who need to recognise that most women only see them as a source of entertainment or resources, and especially the men who are honest, genuine and forthright – keep it going!

        • W & N wrote :
          Whether he’s lying or suffering paranoid delusions doesn’t really matter.

          I’m guessing he’s just smarting from some of the comments he’s gotten over at the Spearhead, that’s why he’s gone over to the blog you linked to.
          That way he gets to have a few high-5s and attaboys from other people who don’t like you.

          What matters is that in either case, nothing that comes out of his mouth can be trusted.

          He’s just one guy, admittedly with more than his fair share of nutty ideas.
          I don’t think you can generalize to all gamers.

          For instance, why should you believe him about game?

          I don’t, I just follow other bloggers who discuss game like TFH, PMAFT.
          or even Roissy himself. Their common denominator is that they’re all
          better grounded in reality than Keoni Galt.

          My own position on game differs from yours in that I believe that it exists, but that the juice may not be worth the squeeze in many cases. But each man has to decide as an individual what’s right for him.

        • I don’t, I just follow other bloggers who discuss game like TFH, PMAFT.
          or even Roissy himself. Their common denominator is that they’re all
          better grounded in reality than Keoni Galt.

          My own position on game differs from yours in that I believe that it exists, but that the juice may not be worth the squeeze in many cases. But each man has to decide as an individual what’s right for him.

          Roissy is several people now (effectively) so it’s hard to talk about him specifically. I still haven’t seen him go after anyone. In that he’s like TFH and PMAFT. When it comes to those three (and others like them) I think they’re misguided and misinterpreting things but it’s an honest disagreement. When it comes to Keoni Galt and the rest of the nutjob brigade, if you want game to not be defined by their lack of reality, then you guys who believe in game have to do something about it. I understand that you don’t want to start pointless flame wars especially since Keoni Galt and the nutjob brigade will just wear you down and eventually start accusing you of being part of a Rockefeller conspiracy like Keoni Galt did to PMAFT, but if you want game to not be defined by them you and the rest of the honest gentlemen like PMAFT, TFH, Roissy, etc. have to do something about them. If that happens I will honestly reevaluate game in the new context you provide.

  1. I don’t know anything about the person in question, but as some have pointed out here before…anyone who spends a lot of time commenting on blogs obviously has time to do it. People with real-life vibrant social lives would not get all upset about what others say on some blog. I don’t agree with everything I read on this blog, but so what? If I don’t like it I don’t have to read it. I believe in letting people have their say. The fact that others attack the owner of this blog suggests strongly that the attackers don’t have the great social life that they claim. It’s interesting to see how many self-proclaimed gamers leave comments on blogs between 10:00pm – 12:00 pm on Friday and Saturday evenings. If they’re so successful what are they doing online during those times? (of course, perhaps they’re in different time zones, etc…still, one wonders). And, again, if they really were successful they’d spending their energies just enjoying their times with their honey(s) and not railing on other guys. That’s how I see it.

    • The fact that others attack the owner of this blog suggests strongly that the attackers don’t have the great social life that they claim. It’s interesting to see how many self-proclaimed gamers leave comments on blogs between 10:00pm – 12:00 pm on Friday and Saturday evenings. If they’re so successful what are they doing online during those times? (of course, perhaps they’re in different time zones, etc…still, one wonders). And, again, if they really were successful they’d spending their energies just enjoying their times with their honey(s) and not railing on other guys. That’s how I see it.

      That’s a very good point. Even accounting for time zone differences which if they’re in North America aren’t much, they don’e have the great social life they claim. Many of the gamers are married so that doesn’t apply as such but even then wouldn’t they be spending time with their wives/families if game delivered in helping their marriages?

  2. So you think I’m “paranoid” or “lying” when I SUSPECT you may be one of the folks that happens to down vote my commentary at the Spearhead? LOL

    • Looking at some of your comments there are no more than two people downvoting your comments. Since it’s only one in some cases, that seems pretty random. I don’t think you’re paranoid or lying because you think I’m downvoting your comments. I think you’re paranoid or lying because you claiming a group of people are downvoting your comments when that obviously isn’t happening. Two downvotes or less does not consitute a group of haters downvoting you. You did this to yourself.

      You obviously have a problem with reality. I’m surprised you didn’t accuse me of working for the Rockefellers like you have accused other in the portion of your comment that I blocked. I suppose it’s easier to do that then deal with the reality that your wife has your balls in her purse.

  3. Pingback: Susan Walsh | The Black Pill

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s