Despite the lack of evidence and scientific experiments proving game, lots of men believe they are doing game and that game worked for them. While we know the myriad problems with this, we can understand how it happened for gamer men. There are women who believe in game, but since they aren’t trying to pick up or have LTRs with women, why would they believe in game? None of the reasons apply to women. Everything I said in my last post about evidence and scientific experiments applies triple for women so what gives?
Various women are explicitly or de facto pro-game. This includes well known feminists like Amanda Marcotte to Susan Walsh, owner of hooking up stupid. These women can’t be invested in game like a man is, so why are they promoting game in any form? They are promoting game for the purpose of supporting anti-male agendas and attempting to derail the MRM. There is no other reason for a woman to be pro-game when gamers refuse to or are physically unable to produce evidence that game exists. If such evidence existed, then it would make sense for a woman to be pro-game. Since such evidence does not exist, there is no legitimate reason for a heterosexual woman to be emotionally and mentally invested in strategies to pickup or have LTRs with heterosexual women. With other cults and scams like Scientology, there are reasons for someone outside of it to end up pro-Scientology, for example. It’s because a person outside of Scientology can be brainwashed into the cult. In the case of game, that can’t apply to heterosexual women (because hetero women do not pickup or have LTRs with other hetero women), but only to heterosexual men outside of game. Unlike with other cults and scams, we are very limited in the possible reasons for a heterosexual woman to be pro-game. The only reason left for women to be pro-game is because she is using game to promote an anti-male agenda.
Some of you reading this might say something like that a pro-game woman just wants to help men improve. That can’t be in this case because, if she was really interested in helping men, she would be very concerned about actually knowing that she is promoting something that helps men. She would need to have evidence, and since there is no evidence for game around, those reasons aren’t possible. The only explanations for the existence of pro-game women we are left with is that they are pursing anti-male agendas.
Even many gamers think what I have said about pro-game women in true. Using Susan Walsh as an example, there are several gamers who think she is pursing an anti-male agenda. Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech was banned from hooking up stupid for realizing the truth about her. Rollo Tomassi called Susan Walsh a “false flag operation”. Even many gamers only have the explanation of pursing an anti-male agenda for the existence of pro-game women.
