This post is an exact copy of this page. I have disabled comments here so that all comments will end up on the page and not on this post. If you want to comment, leave your comments here. If you want to link to this be sure to link to the page and not this post.
There are lots of people who say that they’re against feminism but aren’t in any sense. We “know” who is and who isn’t really against feminism, but what is the objective rule to determine this? Grizzly provides us with an answer.
The difference is whether a person thinks that feminism was done BY women or TO women. If a person thinks feminism was done BY women, then they are really an anti-feminist since they are holding women accountable for their actions. If a person thinks feminism was done TO women, then they think feminism was done by some other group such as the Jews, liberal men, the Rockefellers, the NWO, communists, minorities, etc. then they aren’t an actual anti-feminist because they aren’t holding women accountable. Those people are nothing but interlopers trying to take over the mens rights community for the purposes of fighting the Jews or whatever other group they hate.
What does this mean? Conspiracy theorists, white supremacists, traditionalist conservatives, the “alt right”, and the rest of them are not actual anti-feminists. This is true in all cases with no exceptions since being a member of one of those groups means that said member thinks that feminism was done TO women. No exceptions means no exceptions. Even A Voice for Men is not truly anti-feminist because of all the conspiracy theory from John the Other and the rest of AVfM’s staff because any belief in conspiracy theory means a belief that feminism was done TO women and not by women.
It’s simple, but understanding the difference between feminism being done BY women and feminism being done TO women tells who is really against feminism and who is just a leech.
