I have talked in the past about how feminists are pro-game. This seems pretty odd since it makes no sense that game or other forms of dating advice or any of the endless blather about “nice guys” would have anything to do with feminism if feminism was about equality between men and women. It only makes no sense if you don’t realize that feminism is about enslaving men. If you realize that feminism is really about enslaving men, then it makes perfect sense that feminists would be obsessed with game/dating advice/”nice guys”/etc. It’s all part of their Misandrist Dating Advice Distraction (MDAD for short) to deflect any and all opposition to feminism by lying that such opposition is all about dating issues.
One of the biggest threats to the MDAD are anti-gamers so sooner or later feminists were going to go after them. That happened recently at Jezebel when they attacked the site PUAHate. PUAHate is a website dedicated to exposing how game and the larger “seduction community” is a scam. The feminists at Jezebel both in the original story and the comments say that this really means that the PUAHate guys are really creepy misogynist losers who can’t get laid. This is equivalent to Bernie Madoff using a defense that the victims of his scam weren’t actually being scammed because they’re creepy misogynist losers. Some of the comments from the feminists are even equivalent to Naziism such as this one that talks about preventing “creepy genes” from being passed on.
Just replace creepy with black or Jew to see how Nazi-like that statement is, especially since creepy just means unattractive.
Like with dating advice in general (but more so), there is nothing that exposing how the “seduction community” is a scam has to do with feminism (if feminism was about equality between men and women). In fact, it’s possible to want to expose the “seduction community” for the scam that it is and be a feminist. Since feminism is really about enslaving men, and feminists use the MDAD to hide this fact, anything that gets in the way of the MDAD is a threat. This is doubly true for the anti-gamers. Pointing out how the “seduction community” is running a scam changes the argument about dating advice into one about its effectiveness. The MDAD rests on two pillars, that any problems a man has with feminism are really dating problems and that there is feminist approved dating advice (whether its game or something other type of dating advice) can solve that problem. The anti-gamers are directly attacking the second pillar by showing that the dating advice of the feminists and “seduction community” is nothing but a scam. Since the second pillar is a scam, then it becomes obvious that the first pillar is also a lie.
There is actually a deeper problem with anti-gamers that the feminists at Jezebel or elsewhere don’t consciously realize they have. This is because many members of the “seduction community” sell things. The “seduction community” has the potential to run into problems with anti-fraud laws, truth in advertising laws, etc. just as the paleo dieters that sell things have. Men who are victims of the game scam aren’t just reading random blogs. They are buying books, DVDs, game seminars and boot camps. This moves the whole MDAD from being an internet and cultural argument into the realm of business law. The “seduction community” could not survive any type of legal challenge about the effectiveness of their products. The result of such a legal challenge at a MINIMUM would be that the “seduction community” would have to use disclaimers like “for entertainment purposes only” like psychics have to use since the “service” psychics provide is fraudulent in any other context. Even something as simple as a disclaimer like “for entertainment purposes only” is an admission that the whole thing is BS. Imagine if feminists from Amanda Marcotte with her “non-sexist dating advice” to Susan Walsh and her promotion of game, all had to use disclaimers like “for entertainment purposes only”. It would lessen the power of the MDAD if not destroy it.