There are three groups of women who come to my blog. The first are women who hate me and come to attack me. The invasion from Manboobz due to my post about how dating advice doesn’t need female approval is a good example of this. They are the largest group of women who come here. The second group is female MRAs, like Hestia, Laura Grace Robbins, etc. They aren’t around that often because usually there isn’t a reason for them to be here, and they are so few in number. They are the smallest group who come here. There is a third group that comes here that’s slightly bigger than the female MRAs. These are women who say that they support me, but who aren’t female MRAs. The most recent example is a woman using the username, kotoula01. Read what she said.
Jeezuz, that last post by Martian Bachelor about the New Aristocrats was spot on! I am a 46 yo mother of 5 sons in their 20s. I adore my sons absolutely. They struggle and have to work at such physically difficult jobs because they are men, and it’s ‘expected’ of them. I ask them ” have you met any nice girls lately” and the answer is always the same: ‘there are no nice girls mom, only sluts’ That is sad.
Femcunt has to realize that a new class of people has been given special privileges such as outlined in this description of the New Aristocrats, and it is patently unfair and I don’t blame men like Black Pill for raging against this. I have no idea where my sons are going to find good women, feminine women to settle down with and make families. Not in this country (Canada) that’s for sure. They certainly realize the dangers of spreading their seed in the wrong place…and how they will lose everything if they piss off the wrong female.
Black Pill, I do agree with your position and I’m glad you’re trying to raise awareness. It’s a friggen uphill battle.
Sounds good, right? Not so fast. I did a search of her username and found her blogger account. From reading the blogs that she follows from her blogger profile, I found out what she is really about. Most of the blogs that she follows are of no consequence, but there are conspiracy theorist blogs like “NWO Intel Briefing”, a paleo diet blog called “The Paleo Diet”, and a couple of Roissyite game blogs including Athol Kay’s BS. She’s really about Roissyite game, the paleo diet, and conspiracy theory. Even from her comment you can tell what she’s really worried about is not getting any grandchildren, not her sons.
In the archives of this blog are the occasional comment from a woman like kotoula01. I also have gotten the rare email via the contact from from women like this. Typically, they didn’t keep their motivations hidden like kotoula01 did. These women fell into three groups.
- White supremacists and other Jew haters who blamed the Jews for feminism. They tried to convince me the problem was really non-white women, and anything a white woman may have done to me was really because they were tricked by Jews. The implication of that is that I shouldn’t hold white women responsible for their actions despite their guilt and hatred for me. These women were trying to recruit me into anti-semitism.
- Conspiracy theorists who blamed the Rockefellers or some other conspiracy theorist mythical evil for feminism. They tried to convince me that the problem was some sort of shadowy conspiracy so women were really tricked by the Rockefellers or whoever else they think is “really” behind feminism. The implication was the same as the Jew haters in that I shouldn’t hold women responsible because it’s “not their fault”. These women were trying to recruit me into conspiracy theory.
- Traditionalist conservatives who blamed “liberals” for feminism. These women might actually fall into one of the other groups, but I never talked to them long enough to find out. They might have a point in that feminism started out in the left side of politics, but feminism is really the ideology of women and women’s interests so that makes that irrelevant. Like most MRAs in the last few years, I have realized that traditional conservatives are just as feminist as their liberal counterparts. These women were trying to recruit me into traditional conservatism.
All three groups of women are effectively lying about being anti-feminist. None of them are willing to hold women accountable for their actions. (This makes them completely different from true female MRAs.) They are all trying to transfer responsibility to some irrelevant third party whether its the Jews, the Rockefellers, liberals, or someone else. It’s all somebody else’s fault to them.
I’m actually insulted by their attempts to recruit me into their alternate forms of feminism. They think that I must be so desperate for female attention that I will go along with their crap just to have contact with a woman.
Some of you think that I’m being too harsh on these women and throwing away potential allies for no reason. The problem with that is that these women are offering me absolutely nothing. Even if I was inclined to believe that any of these scapegoats was really responsible for women’s bad, immoral, and in many cases illegal behavior, why should I? Is my life going to be better for believing the Jews or the Rockefellers or whoever else is responsible for feminism? No. It’s not going to stop women from trying to destroy my job/business, steal my assets, and steal my freedom. Are these groups going to protect me from that in any way? No. Do any of these groups women who are truly not feminist? No. The truth is that joining up with any of these groups would just put me into a position for more women to attack me.
What would happen if I joined any of these groups? If I joined the Jew haters, eventually I would be attacked for not doing my “duty to the white race” since I wouldn’t be getting married to a female white supremacist and having white children. Even if I wanted to do that, the Jew hating women would still hate me and not want anything to do with me. I would also be attacked for not accepting these women’s past as sluts and man haters since I would hold these women accountable for their actions and not blame the Jews. If I joined the conspiracy theorists, eventually I would be attacked for not doing my “duty” to fight the (non-existent) “depopulation agenda” by getting married and having children. Like with the Jew haters, the conspiracy theorist women wouldn’t marry me because they sill hate me and not want anything to do with me. I would be attacked here as well for not accepting these women’s pasts and holding them accountable for their actions instead of blaming the Rockefellers or whoever else the conspiracy theorists want to blame this week. If I joined the traditionalist conservatives, eventually I would be attacked for not doing my “duty to God” since I wouldn’t be getting married and having children just like with the Jew haters and the conspiracy theorists. The problem is the same since traditionalist conservative women will still hate me and not want anything to do with me. Again, I would be attacked for not accepting these women’s past and holding them accountable for their actions instead of blaming “liberals”. All these groups make a big deal about being “pro-family” so that means I would end up a pariah because there is no way I could form a “family”.
If I were to join any of these groups, it would be a completely one sided relationship where they benefit 100%, and I would never benefit. These women aren’t potential allies. They are parasites with their own anti-male agenda.
No problemo,soon you will meet the right girl and settle down and have a family.
Then all will be well again.
Until you’re in front of the black robed agents of misandry.
Women will always try to find someone else to blame for their actions. It means that they don’t have to take responsibility for their actions and can them blame some convenient scape goat and deflect any attention away from their true nature; which is of course to be degrading and to degrade others.
If feminism wasn’t around to blame, then they would find some convenient other target: the media, peer pressure, minor deities, the devil, behavioural conditioning, anything. It’s all about maintaing the visage of innocence.
Why are you so afraid of being attacked? No being escapes this world attack free, be the attacker.
I’d have a good debate with you about whether feminism really started off as left wing. The suffragette were absolutely conservative (being closely tied to the womens christian temperance society).
Feminism never really was a left wing ideology until it piggybacked with other REAL rights movements. In typical female fashion it found the nearest males (M.L.K. and Malcolm X) and stole their ideas.
The Womens Christian Temperance Movement seems pretty left wing in terms of modern US politics in the sense that it is the opposite of Libertarianism which is generally regarded as right wing. However, feminism is too broad to be truly considered “leftist”. Feminism has its roots in the WKKK (the Women’s Klu Klux Klan) although you can find both left wing and right wing aspects in the KKK. Feminism because it is the ideology of women and their interests really isn’t left or right. It’s both.
Correct.
Another one from the archives:
Both conservatives and liberals are protective of women and thus reinforce the traditional male-female sex roles, but they use different rationalizations for that protectiveness.
The conservative expects women to receive special protection via social custom. The liberal expects women to receive special protection via government programs.
The conservative assumes most women want the traditional female roles, and the traditional female role requires men to protect women. The liberal assumes men’s old roles were power and privilege designed to serve men rather than be men’s way of protecting women, so the liberal feels women need protection to compensate for the male power structure.
Both conservative and liberal therefore conclude that men should protect women, and no one should protect men. . .Special protection with real equality is oxymoronic. . .Men’s concerns do not fall on a continuum between conservatism and liberalism, but in a triangular relationship.
– Warren Farrell
I happened to be looking into the history of the WCTU not long ago, and those witches were also the original (anti-)smoking nazis.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but many feminists WERE Jewish, e.g. Betty Friedan.
Many feminists were Jewish. Many other feminists were white, black, etc. There are feminists from every walk of life in existence. I see no reason to single out the Jewish feminists. All that does is provide an out for non-Jewish feminists. I refuse to let that happen.
Many influential feminists were not Jewish.
Interestingly enough, those three groups pretty much cover about 90% of the people attracted to Roissyite philosophy as well. I guess the only difference is that female Roissyites are not too proud to try to ingratiate themselves to you and manipulate you for their own ends, while male Roissyites consider you some threat to their very existence. Fascinating….
I suspect that it’s only a tiny minority of Roissyite women that are trying to recruit me.
“Traditionalist conservatives who blamed “liberals” for feminism”
I would have changed that first sentence to:
“Traditionalist conservatives who EXCLUSIVELY blamed ‘liberals’ for feminism”.
I know you explained it in the rest of the paragraph, but, that first sentence – ugh…
Female MRA’s are as stupid as feminists and male MRA’s. These three groups have three things in common.
1.) Hate Women (Especially traditional women such as housewives)
2.) Hate Patriarchy (Traditional gender roles that purport a male leader and a female follower)
3.) Want male supremacy without male responsibility. (“In essence give me custody of the kids but I do not have to be the breadwinner as a woman is capable to work”)
Disgusting!
So you are all just a bunch of whiny haters. But yes female MRA’s are sooo dumb.
What is your feeling on domestic violence laws? Do you feel enough is being done to help male victims of domestic violence?
Feminists love women.
There has never been a Patriarchy. That is a feminist myth so why do you believe in it if you’re not a feminist like you say?
Why are you defending the feminist status quo?