She Would “Do Something” About Me If She Could

Back in April I wrote about a person on Reddit who thinks the government should be tracking me.  This was their comment.

I really hope some government agency is watching this guy, because I’m genuinely pretty sure he’s going to snap, kill a woman and wear her skin around his house.

This person is still obsessed with me.  First, she made a completely off topic comment about me on Reddit just to start talking about me.  Then, she says she would “do something” about me if she could.

I’m very worried he’s going to kill someone and would do something if I could.

EDIT: He linked to one of my comments! I’m the second quote. I really want the government tracking him because he thinks most women want most men dead and that’s the sort of thing that would actually justify a shooting rampage.

What is more likely here, that I would go on a shooting rampage, or she would shoot me if she could?  Obviously, it’s the latter.  She’s obviously paranoid and by her own admission the only thing stopping her from doing something to me is the opportunity.  (That and ideally, she wants to hide behind the government.)

This reminds me of how conspiracy theorists talk about the Jews, the Rockefellers, etc.  According to the conspiracy theorists, they are going to murder you, and somebody should “do something” about them.  Someone other than the conspiracy theorists, that is.  It’s a combination of paranoia and incompetence just like with the woman talking about me on Reddit.

About these ads

29 responses to “She Would “Do Something” About Me If She Could

    • Very true. I have to remember that one. Damselling is the combination of paranoia and incompetence.

      That makes me think of another point. She’s not afraid that I’m actually going to go on a shooting rampage. She can’t deal with that I’m a competent individual capable of doing things unlike her.

      • Incompetence relates back to neoteny – the appearance of childlikeness (in order to extract resources, protection, etc). So does paranoia,in a way. Damselling is “treat me like a child – protect me and give me free stuff”.
        The point being, feminists, you can’t both damsel and also expect to be treated as an adult.

        • “Incompetence relates back to neoteny,” if that were true, then Europeans and East Asians would be noticeably incompetent relative to other human groups (East Asians are neotenous to the *extreme*). This is not the case though; if anything, both groups excel at developing technology and building stable civilizations. Just because a quality is more characteristic of women than of men doesn’t make it bad.

        • Perhaps, but asians as a group do not make use of an appearance of childlikeness (I’m not even sure you are right about that, but whatever) to make their lives easier. After all, even if they look relatively childlike to you, they don’t look that way to one another.
          What I’m saying is that the “ditz” trope – using the appearance of incompetence to get free stuff – is a feature of feminine childlikeness, and this falls under the umbrella of feminine neoteny, which has been discussed quite a bit and is a useful term to google.

  1. Speaking of incompetence.

    The meme floating around the last few years among feminists is that women are “more oppressed than ever.” Even after 40 plus years of feminism.

    One example, but there are countless others:

    http://www.theguardian.com/books/2010/mar/06/charlotte-raven-feminism-madonna-price

    If you take a poll, people will unanimously say that feminism was implemented. They can even give specific examples of how feminism was implemented.

    But the only people who are currently saying that it failed and women are “more oppressed than ever” are feminists who make their living off of government grants and donations to promote feminism.

    This can only mean that:
    a) Feminism was implemented but it had never had any contact with reality, in which case the proponents were always incompetent and are further proven to be incompetent and evil to continually ask for more funding for it.
    OR
    b) Feminism did accurately describe reality but the proponents were too incompetent to explain it to everyone. Thus it was never implemented.
    OR
    c) Feminism did accurately describe reality, the proponents did explain it correctly, thus it was implemented but somewhere along the way the latest generation of women did not get the updated message, thus proving that the proponents really did NOT explain it and were incompetent.

    Since women are, in the vast majority, very enthusiast about feminism, (and manginas jump on board as well and promote it in all news outlets) it should have been very easy to explain. Therefore (A).

    • OR
      d) That those particular feminists who were paid (directly and indirectly) to implement it are simply no damn good at their jobs.

      If women are really “more oppressed than ever”, why don’t they backlash against that generation of feminists who, having the vote, having a political base, having all sorts of funding, so utterly failed at making any progress? If women are more oppressed than ever, why is Germaine Greer (etc etc) still a goddamn hero?

  2. And the thing is, for all the ranting about dangerous men, where’s OUR Valerie Solanas?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_Solanas

    I’m not seeing any campuses with a Men’s Centre named after Ted Bundy, and no one’s rushing to produce plays based on George Soldini’s nutty writing. Apparently, you have to be a chick for people to find violent insanity ‘artistic’.

  3. “I really hope some government agency is watching this guy, because I’m genuinely pretty sure he’s going to snap, kill a woman and wear her skin around his house.”

    Women, women, women… Always wanting the government to do everything for them.. And blackpill has to pay for it..

  4. What is more likely here, that I would go on a shooting rampage, or she would shoot me if she could?

    The former. Hear about that shooting yet? Women rarely murder for political reasons without the assistance of men.

    But it is likely the government is tracking you. Have you heard of Main Core? Even the communist and Judeocetric Wikipedia admits it exists:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Core

    Eight million Americans are on that list. Unless you have done a very good job with internet proxies your probably on it too. Or maybe they realize that you, despite your stated opposition to feminism, are really a useful idiot for the Jews?

    • Women rarely murder for political reasons without the assistance of men.

      That’s a distinction without a difference.

      Eight million Americans are on that list. Unless you have done a very good job with internet proxies your probably on it too. Or maybe they realize that you, despite your stated opposition to feminism, are really a useful idiot for the Jews?

      Or maybe they’re actually concerned with real threats to national security and aren’t interested in wasting time on some rich dude with a blog.

      • EIGHT MILLION people. You think there are eight million al Queda supporters out there? There aren’t that many Muslims in the country. If you are a white heterosexual male who has said anything remotely threatening to the Zionist order, you are probably on that list.

  5. Actually, that would be pretty cool if the next Snowden sent you an email out of the blue for a confab.

    I had an incident with a crazy chick. I’d written an article for the newspaper on the occasion of Y2K, not knowing they owned several other papers scattered around the country, which also ran it. I got a call on the phone from some wackadoodle (fortunately) a thousand miles away. She considered herself clairvoyant, and already had her wardrobe picked out for her eventual appearance on the then-big Larry King talk show when whatever she was babbling about came true, which thankfully didn’t involve me personally.

    25% of women are on prozac-like drugs, and another 10-15%, the really crazy ones, like being crazy for the power their terrorism gives them over others and have no intention of changing. Squeaky wheels and all that.

    BP, have you thought of seeking gubmint protection? Like, don’t they have asylum programs for dissidents from other countries?lol

    • BP, have you thought of seeking gubmint protection? Like, don’t they have asylum programs for dissidents from other countries?lol

      Eventually, the government is bound to get tired of pandering to women’s bullshit. At that point I might just get government protection.

      • Like I say, us men need a second governent to protect us from the first, which has been taken over by women and either blockheaded or insane men.

        At least you know the ship is sinking when the rats start coming up from the depths to jump overboard.

        The rat race is over… and the rats won! lol

  6. One thing we have to realize is that being all scared of unsexy guys actually makes women feel sexy. They get the same endorphin rush from being all creeped out by incels as they do from putting on makeup and lingerie…or buying shoes.

    • This is so obvious to not even be worth stating, but “unwanted attention” can be a huge ego trip for women to the point where they’re inclined to believe just about anything qualifies, including minor faux pas or failed attempts at being friendly in the workplace and so on. One doesn’t have to be cat calling baboon, sleaze or stalker to be considered creepy these days; merely being unattractive whilst existing in the same space is enough.

  7. Sorry to hear about your troubles with this woman. At least if she tries to start anything on your blog you could always ban her…does reddit do anything about cyberstalking if she persists in mentioning you?

    • I don’t care enough to do anything if she just continually talks about me. That’s just free publicity. Beyond that I don’t expect her to do anything because she thinks someone else should “do something”.

      • Alright, that’s cool then. If it’s not a bother to you then fine…You have a point, about her wanting a mystical “someone else” to do something about you. At least it means she most likely won’t.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s