Stoner With A Boner provided us with a link where a feminist laments how their sons are taught to rape. This link has already been commented on elsewhere extensively, so I want to talk about a couple of aspects that I haven’t seen covered elsewhere. First, what kind of mother thinks about her two year old son being a rapist in the future? A mother with serious psychological problems.
Second, if rape happens so often and so easily as that feminist says, and if dating men is as dangerous as this feminist says, then why don’t women just avoid men as much as reasonably possible? If men are such a universal threat to women, then the logical conclusion is that women should avoid men as much as reasonably possible. While feminists will say that this is “blaming the victim”, but according to them the situation is so bad for women it logically requires this response.
The reason why that we don’t see women avoiding men is because men aren’t a threat to women. All this talk from feminists about how men are violent and rapists is a lie. Women’s own actions prove this. If women were under threat from men, then they would act more like me (but with the genders reversed). As most of you know, I avoid (non family member) women as much as reasonably possible, since women intentionally make it impossible for me to discern which women will make false accusations against me. It may be an extreme action, but it’s how a person treats a group that universally threatens him. It isn’t just me. Many MGTOWs are ghosts who also mostly avoid contact with women as well.
While we can find many men going their own way or ghosting in various forms to avoid women, we don’t see any women avoiding men in a similar manner. There is no “women going their own way” or women going ghost. This is proof that men aren’t a threat to women, but increasingly the opposite is true.
