The Hypoagency Scam Women Use To Manipulate Men

A lot of you have already seen this video where Whoopi Goldberg points out that a woman shouldn’t hit a man and expect that a man won’t hit back.  The other women in the video are aghast at what Whoopi Goldberg is saying.  There’s an acronym for this, DHMIAG, or “don’t hit me I’m a girl”.  What’s missing from that acronym is the second part, “but I can hit men because I’m a girl”.

This is an example of how women use hypoagency, the idea that women are never actors but only acted upon, to manipulate men.  Hypoagency is also tied to women being “weaker” than men.  In the DHMIAG example, there are two things going on.  First, if a woman hits a man it’s assumed to be a man’s fault.  The woman is only reacting to what the man did so he “deserved” it.  Second, the man isn’t supposed to hit back, that is engage in self defense, against women because it was somehow his fault that she hit him.  Third, the man isn’t supposed to hit back because the women is basically equivalent a child or a pet.

When described in this fashion, it sounds pretty demeaning to women in theory.  Yet, women across the political spectrum from liberal feminists to conservative traditionalists argue in favor of women having hypoagency.    Supposedly, this means that women are treated as “inferior”, but in reality that isn’t the case.  On the feminist side, this shows up in lobbying the government for special treatment (affirmative action, transfer payments that only go to women etc.) since women are supposedly in a “weaker” position, yet women get all this free stuff.  This was what the Hobby Lobby case was all about.  Women are supposedly incapable of getting their own birth control so employers have to pay for it.  It’s using “weakness” as an attempt to get free stuff.

On the traditionalist side, it’s even more obvious.  In traditional Christian churches, for example, it is taught that women are the “weaker vessel” and are “inferior” to men.  What ends up happening is that the church says that men are supposed to “lead” but if women sin, then it’s all the fault of a man (typically a husband) for failing to lead.  Even though women are supposedly in an “inferior” position in church, women conveniently are exempt from all responsibility and accountability.  This is why women are the biggest defenders of traditionalism.

While in the DHMIAG example women have the equivalent status of a child or a pet, it’s important to remember that most people treat children and pets very well.  And it’s not like women are treated like children or pets all the time.  Women can move back between child/pet and independent adult status as is convenient for them.  And that’s how all these examples work regardless of whether it’s on the feminist or the traditionalist side of the political spectrum.

Women know that most men are honorable so that men will instinctively defend those they perceive as weak.  So women present themselves as “weak” to manipulate men into giving them whatever woman want.   Women use our honorable nature against us in a very insidious and evil manner.

Anytime you hear a woman arguing for their “inferiority” or “weakness” in some area, it’s an attempt to manipulate you.  The thing to remember is that women have political power so even though men are on average stronger than women, for example, it doesn’t matter.  Political power trumps all, but part of the hypoagency scam is to distract you from that.

Scams Are Everywhere In The Dating Industry

I talk a lot about scams in dating advice, but pretty much everything involved in dating has scams embedded in it.  Online dating certainly isn’t safe.  Netcraft has discovered that criminals are running MASSIVE phishing scams against online dating sites.  Netcraft describes how the online dating phishing scams work.

Online dating fraud is often orchestrated by criminal gangs who use fake profiles to trick victims into developing long distance relationships. Once the fraudsters have gathered enough sympathy and trust from a victim, they will exploit this by claiming they need money to pay for travel costs, or to afford medical treatment for a family member. After the money has been stolen, the criminals will make up further reasons why they need more money. In some cases, the fraudsters blackmail their victim into sending money – if the victim has sent any explicit photos or videos to the criminals, they may threaten to send them to the victim’s friends and family.

The amount of money involved in these scams can be considerable. In 2011, a woman in Britain was tricked into sending more than $59,000 to a pair of fraudsters who pretended to have inherited millions of dollars from a military friend in Nigeria. The fraudsters – who were actually a mother and daughter in America – managed to net more than a million dollars before being jailed in 2013.

When I read this I realized that other than the parts that make this an organized scam, this isn’t much different than what the average woman does, especially when she taps into the reserves.  Everything in the dating world whether its dating advice or online dating is a ready made venue for fraud.  Whether its just a woman looking for a man to fix her financial problems or a criminal organization running a massive phishing scam, it’s all the same.  The world of dating is filled with so much deception that it creates a venue that criminals can use easily.  Fraud attracts more fraud so a venue where women are trying to defraud men will naturally attract actual criminals sooner or later.  There’s no way of protecting online dating sites from criminals since the fundamental nature of everything involved in the dating industry is fraudulent.

When you use an online dating site, do you know if you are dealing with an actual woman or a criminal organization?  No, you don’t.  And in some ways it doesn’t matter.  It’s all about defrauding you.  In the dating industry, scams are everywhere and fundamental to the way it operates so you should just avoid it.

At Least Elliot Rodger Didn’t Reenact The 40 Year Old Virgin

At the Dickless Man Project there is a lament that Elliot Rodger is no longer a member of The Reserves.  The article isn’t phrased in that manner but that is its message.

Despite what the Dickless Man Project says, giving it time would not have made things “better” for him.  Would there have been women who eventually would have faked interest in him for his wealth and/or ability to provide?  Would he have been able to lose his virginity eventually like the examples in the Dickless Man Project article?  Probably, yes, but so what?  It’s not an improvement to be pursued by  desperate STD ridden “former” sluts especially if they have kids who only want you for what you have.  While all of the examples in the Dickless Man Project may be “happy” now (although it’s likely their wives don’t have sex with them anymore), they won’t be so happy when their wives surprise them with a divorce.  And it’s a guarantee that will happen once their wives have sucked them dry.

What the men in the Dickless Man Project article went through was the same thing Steve Carell’s character in The 40 Year Old Virgin did albeit younger.  Catherine Keener’s character got everything, and Steve Carell’s character got nothing.  Yet, we are expected to believe this is a good thing.  The whole movie is propaganda for keeping men in the reserves.

At least Elliot Rodger didn’t reenact The 40 Year Old Virgin movie and stayed out of the reserves.

The Reserves

In many countries, the military has a reserve.  In the US, each service has a reserve component, and there is the National Guard.  The reserves are made up of citizens who may get activated when extra troops are needed to supplement the standing military.  When they’re not activated, the reserves train on a regular basis.  In the US, the reserves train one weekend a month and two additional weeks a year.

I have noticed a disturbing parallel to the military reserves in the world of dating advice.  A piece of dating advice I have been given numerous times is, “Just wait until X” where X was “you’re out of high school”, “you’re out of college”, “you’re 25″, “you’re 30″, etc.  In other words, there was going to be some point in time in the not too distant future when all of sudden women were going to be interested in me.  That point in time was always not now, but later.  As time went on, and it didn’t happen people just kept moving the goalposts from after high school, to after college, and so forth.  (Goalpost shifting is common in dating advice.)  This piece of dating advice is not unique to me.  I find it all over the place even when I’m not looking for it such as with this example on the Dickless Man Project.

I would also suggest something I heard from a sex advice columnist. Roughly paraphrased: “Don’t focus on getting your teenaged self laid. Think about getting your 22 year old self laid, and work on becoming a good person (and good future sex partner) in the meantime.”

On the surface, it sounds like this piece of dating advice is just to get men to shut up for a while about not getting laid/not having a girlfriend.  In reality, what is going on is much more sinister.  Notice how the quote above doesn’t say to just wait, but to “work on becoming a good person”.  (It also says to work on being a good future sex partner, but that’s impossible without practice.  This is another example of doublethink in dating advice.)  Whether it’s the so called manosphere, feminists like Dr. Nerdlove Manginalove, or anyone else peddling dating advice, they all spend almost all of their time on nebulous and meaningless “self improvement” and political ideologies instead of how to meet women and get laid/get a girlfriend.  The last thing any of the dating advice peddlers want to see is a man successful with women.

The reason why the dating advice peddlers don’t want you to successfully get women is about more than just money.  It’s not just about keeping you as a paying customer.  Many of the dating advice peddlers don’t even sell anything.  Wanting to make you become a feminist, white nationalist, conspiracy theorist, paleo dieter, etc. is a big part of it, but that isn’t the only reason.

The dating advice peddlers want to keep you in the dating equivalent of the reserves.  If you have something women want like money, eventually there will be women who will show interest in you.  Their interest will be fake, and they will probably be plotting their divorce before you get married.  However, given enough time, there will be women who will at least fake interest in you.  Women are only interest in the 20% of men they find attractive.  Women ignore all other men for the most part until they start realizing that their looks are fading.  This can happen as early as her late 20s or as late as her 30s.  Women have nothing to show for the decades of screwing around with the 20% of men except STDs, a ruined vagina, lots of financial debt, and maybe some kids.  When it’s clear that one of the men in the 20% won’t commit to her, out of desperation she will try to get a man in the 80% before her looks fade.  She needs a stupid man to pay her debts, pay for her kids if she has them or give her kids before she hits menopause.  For women to be able to do this, there has to be men waiting in reserve for her.  The 20% of attractive men aren’t enough to go around.

The problem is why should a man be in the reserves.  There’s no benefit for us in getting together with a ruined former slut with a STD especially if she has kids.  It’s not like we would even get sex out of the deal.  As soon as we’re locked in, our relationships/marriages with them would become mostly if not completely sexless.  We’re all better off going our own way and opting out of anything having to do with women.  To combat this, the dating advice peddlers are trying to keep us on the MDAD treadmill by distracting us with meaningless crap that has nothing to do with meeting women and getting laid/relationships with women.  Self improvement bullshit is perfect for this since it doesn’t have any objective metrics for measuring improvement so they can keep you going in circles until a woman fakes interest in you.  Ideological bullshit is also perfect since gynocentric ideologies such as feminism, white nationalism, the red pill, etc. since it keeps you focused on serving women without getting anything in return for your service.  By distracting you from being aware that you aren’t getting together with women, the dating advice peddlers are keeping you in a position of weakness for when a woman fakes interest in you.

When a man decides to give up on women, he is dropping out of the reserves.  This is something women recognize as an existential threat to them because women are incapable of doing anything except manipulating men.  A man who has dropped out of the reserves can’t be manipulated by women any longer.  This is why giving up on women generates more vitrol from women than men who physically abuse women do.

If you’re part of the reserves, drop out.  All that’s waiting for you are debts, STDs, and a sexless marriage that will end in divorce with you losing half or more of your assets.

Comments are closed since this post is a copy of a page.  Comment on the page here.

Slaughtering The Most Sacred Of Cows

My last blog certainly generated some reactions.  All these reactions had something in common.  They completely avoided what I actually said.

Somehow my last blog got noticed by the conspiratard and blue pill reddits.  I got attacked multiple times for being a virgin/incel. Here are a couple of examples.

Another incel! Those guys are the craziest.

I think it goes incel > MGTOW > Red Pill > MRAs > PUAs

Is another incel dude with too much free time and an internet connection?

This just proves my point, especially since someone else said a government agency should be tracking me for being a virgin.

I really hope some government agency is watching this guy, because I’m genuinely pretty sure he’s going to snap, kill a woman and wear her skin around his house.

Because the government shouldn’t be watching terrorists, drug dealers, or organized crime.  No, the government should track some nobody with a blog because he isn’t getting laid.  (I bet the person who wrote this is against NSA spying on us except when it’s done to male virgins.)  Again, this proves my point.  Others accused me of being part of the True Forced Loneliness movement and believing that women are having meetings to murder men.  Neither is true.  The reason why I brought up the SunshineMary example in my last blog is to point out that women are incapable of organizing the mass murder of men.  Ironically, women are dependent on men doing it for them.  Thus, you have pathetic attempts at manipulating men like such as with the Sunshine Mary example.  While the genocide of men isn’t going to happen, we still have the problem that the evil of wanting men dead is festering among women.  Just because they can’t implement it doesn’t mean that women don’t desire it.

QTS brought up an interesting point in that the people who criticized me don’t bother criticizing real nutjobs.

Yet you never condemn the white nationalists and conspiracy theorists who think that the Jews and bankers are out to murder us. If Black Pill is going off the deep end here, then why do you support those much farther off the deep end? The manosphere is filled with kookery like Return of Kings telling us that Communists are hiding under our beds, but you think Black Pill is the the crazy one for seeing that women regard large numbers of men as tools as best or garbage to be disposed of at worst.

Black Pill may not be the most objective here, although he has a point about women using men to do their dirty work and viewing us as discardable, but you are a hypocrite.

I find it very interesting that Peter Andrew Nolan, someone who actually has threatened women and broken the law of multiple countries, or the edenist nutjobs who believe that they are all the second coming of the neanderthals don’t get this treatment.  I’m just as obscure as them if not more obscure so it’s not like they should go unnoticed.  The reason why I got these reactions and the real nutjobs don’t is because I went after the most sacred of cows, women.  That’s all that happened here.  If I wrote rants about how the Rockefellers were behind feminism or how the world is secretly run by the coneheads (the edenists actually believe this), no one would care.  I was attacked because I’m NOT insane and for dealing with real world facts.

Hitler Screwed Up Female Plans For Male Genocide

Women want most men dead.  There is plenty of evidence for this such as the #KillAllMen and #KillMostMen Twitter hashtags.  Women regularly talk about how they want to reduce the male population to between 1% and 10% of what it is now.  There’s the SCUM Manifesto which advocated eliminating the male genderA Voice For Men exposed RadFemHub’s desire to mass murder men.

The desire to kill most men isn’t limited to feminists, radical or mainstream.  Most women want to see most men dead.  They just have different ideas about what group they want to survive.  (Typically, it maps to whatever group of men a woman finds attractive.)  However, the average woman usually won’t describe it in feminist terms so it’s not as obvious.  Red pill woman, SunshineMary called for the death of all non-Christian men.

I see that SunshineMary is posting all about “allies” and “morality”.

Here is what she wrote to PUA’s on her site, after mentioning them as possible “allies”:

The minute we have driven off our common enemy, it is my hope that the men of the tribe of Christ will kill your kind

What red pill woman, SunshineMary, wants is to eliminate most men through attrition.  That way she can have men do all the killing and can maintain plausible deniability.  (You can think of this as the mirror reflection of the “I was just following orders” excuse that was used by many Nazis at Nuremberg.)  SunshineMary doesn’t explicitly call for the death of most men here.  Yet, that is the result of what she wants.  Don’t be fooled because she defines this first as Christians and PUAs vs. everyone else and then Christians vs. PUAs (and presumably anyone else who survived).  SunshineMary is calling for the death of most men just like a feminist is but with slightly different terms.  This is similar to how most women want most men (i.e. the men they find unattractive) dead but don’t define their desires in terms of explicit misandry.

I know I’m going to get people saying, “Well, most men want most women dead too”.  That is not true.  For example, Stalin was a man yet his purges disproportionately murdered men.  Stalin’s purges were effectively very feminist.  Men don’t have the desire the genocide women as the example of Stalin demonstrates.  Yet, the reverse is horrifyingly true.

There have been many genocides throughout history from the Holocaust, the Holodomor, the Genocide of the Armenians, and others.  What was unique about the Holocaust is that it forced the world to take notice of genocide.  Hitler once said that no one remembered the genocide of the Armenians which happened only a few decades before the Holocaust, and he was right.  The Holocaust forced us to see the reality of genocide.  It didn’t stop genocides from never happening again, but we know how to recognize them now.  The Holocaust was the Streisand Effect of genocides.

Because the Holocaust forced us to witness the horrific reality of genocide, we can recognize women’s desires to genocide most men for what they are.  We get the benefit of knowing that women want us dead.  Otherwise we wouldn’t know until we all ended up in concentration camps for unattractive men.  This has made it more difficult for women to see their genocidal desires implemented.  In other words, Hitler screwed up female plans to genocide most of us men.

Honest Dating Advice Would Tell You To Avoid Most Women

One of the reasons why dating advice is a scam almost all of the time is the refusal to admit that most women are unsuitable for dating (and relationships).  If the purveyors of dating advice were honest, then they would tell men not to date most women.  While you can find lists of “women to avoid” on the internet and elsewhere, when it comes to brass tacks in dating advice, those women don’t exist.  (Or their situations are somehow a man’s fault so you should still date them.)

On average women are significantly more likely to have STDs, debt, a higher number of sex partners, etc., and the psychological problems associated with them than the average man is.  (This is due to the effects of the 80/20 rule.)  For the average man, most women are a losing proposition even if dating advice had a sure fire way to get them into bed/make them your girlfriend.  This is why many men have decided to go their own way/go ghost/opt out.  The value proposition for most women simply isn’t there.  Nearly all dating advice refuses to recognize this sobering fact.

Why do purveyors of dating advice refuse to admit the state of most women?  The first reason is financial.  There is no money in it.  Because telling men not to date (and by extension not get into relationships and marriages with) most women doesn’t require books, DVDs, and seminars.  It only requires a paragraph of text which can’t be sold.  The second reason is ideological.  Dating advice is used as a gateway into tricking men into various ideologies from feminism to red pill “Christianity”.  All of these ideologies are similar in that they don’t have men’s best interests in mind and that they are gynocentric.  A statement of fact such as most women are unsuitable for dating (and relationships and marriage) can not be used to trick men into gynocentric ideologies that are bad for them.  It directly contradicts their ideologies and is an admission that their ideologies are nothing but lies.