The Kooks Aren’t MRAs

The SPLC decided to quote my post where I talk about the problem of kooks invading the MRM giving fodder to the SPLC.

This is a lesson that some MRAs are beginning to learn for themselves. “With all of the kooks inhabiting the manosphere, it was easy for the SPLC to smear anti-feminism,” one MRA site sadlyconcluded after our article appeared. “The problem is larger than just AVfM. Even rational anti-feminist blogs and organizations like the False Rape Society and SAVE [Stop Abusive and Violent Environments] are being tarnished with the same brush because the MRM ‘leadership’ has failed to deal with the kooks.”

Does the SPLC admit that FRS and SAVE are rational?  It looks like the SPLC screwed up on that one.

The SPLC gets it wrong because they want to smear the MRM by linking it to white supremacism and other fringe movements.  What has happened is that the MRM has become a target for every fringe marginalized group of kooks from white supremacists to conspiracy theorists to traditionalist conservatives to Roissyite gamers to various other groups who are trying to annex the MRM can convert MRAs into members of their own movements.  These groups are where the kooks are coming from.  The kooks aren’t MRAs.  They pretend to have similar views to MRAs in order to make their own movements larger.  They think that the growing numbers of disaffected men can be harnessed for their own ends.  This doesn’t work, and those fringe groups reveal their true colors and start attacking the MRM.  (Often, this will involve some accusations that the MRM is feminism because MRAs want equality for men.)  A good place for examples of this is Inmalafide which the SPLC calls a MRM website despite the fact that nearly all the people there now hate the MRM to varying degrees.

The SPLC will never admit to this reality.  If they did, then they wouldn’t be able to fake having a legitimate argument against the MRM.  That’s why its key for them to link the MRM to blogs like Inmalafide and Roosh despite the fact that both sites have made it clear that they are anti-MRM.  The SPLC is trying to the same thing the kooks are, but for different reasons.

Staying On Topic

I made some updates to How To Tell Real Anti-Feminists From Fake Anti-Feminists page to make it clear that all women didn’t conspire to create feminism as Alek suggested.

On that page InT made a good point.

A good diagnostic, I’ve found: Real anti-feminists stay on topic, for the most part. Fake anti-feminists always veer off into their own pet topics. A recent example is the alt-right types and their obsession over the Trayvon Martin shooting. I don’t think you’d see these clowns anywhere near as obsessed about, say, Thomas Ball’s immolation, or the latest family court tragedy.

This is an excellent test.

What does the Federal Reserve have to do with anti-feminism? Nothing.
What does the paleo diet have to do with anti-feminism? Nothing.
What does game have to do with anti-feminism? Nothing.
What do the Jews have to do with anti-feminism? Nothing.
What do the Rockefellers have to do with anti-feminism? Nothing.
What does the NSA have to do with anti-feminism? Nothing.
What does Trayvon Martin have to do with anti-feminism? Nothing.

Even though these topics and more have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with anti-feminism, the so called manosphere spends more time on any one of these topics than anti-feminism. If they really care about fighting feminism then they would stay on topic. Since they can’t, then they don’t really care about fighting feminism. It’s that simple whether it’s Hawaiian Fat Blob or John the Other and the rest of A Voice for Men.

How To Tell Real Anti-Feminists From Fake Anti-Feminists

This post is an exact copy of this page.  I have disabled comments here so that all comments will end up on the page and not on this post.  If you want to comment, leave your comments here.  If you want to link to this be sure to link to the page and not this post.

There are lots of people who say that they’re against feminism but aren’t in any sense.  We “know” who is and who isn’t really against feminism, but what is the objective rule to determine this?  Grizzly provides us with an answer.

Because they still put white women on pedestals so badly, they can’t help but think of feminism as something that was done TO white women rather than something that was done BY white women. So even though they’re anti-feminism, they’ve done the weird mental trick of still being woman worshippers, making them truly insane and schizophrenic.

The difference is whether a person thinks that feminism was done BY women or TO women.  If a person thinks feminism was done BY women, then they are really an anti-feminist since they are holding women accountable for their actions.  If a person thinks feminism was done TO women, then they think feminism was done by some other group such as the Jews, liberal men, the Rockefellers, the NWO, communists, minorities, etc. then they aren’t an actual anti-feminist because they aren’t holding women accountable.  Those people are nothing but interlopers trying to take over the mens rights community for the purposes of fighting the Jews or whatever other group they hate.

What does this mean?  Conspiracy theorists, white supremacists, traditionalist conservatives, the “alt right”, and the rest of them are not actual anti-feminists.  This is true in all cases with no exceptions since being a member of one of those groups means that said member thinks that feminism was done TO women.  No exceptions means no exceptions.  Even A Voice for Men is not truly anti-feminist because of all the conspiracy theory from John the Other and the rest of AVfM’s staff because any belief in conspiracy theory means a belief that feminism was done TO women and not by women.

It’s simple, but understanding the difference between feminism being done BY women and feminism being done TO women tells who is really against feminism and who is just a leech.

The Rigid Orthodoxy Of The Red Pill

In the manosphere, lots of guys claim to take the “red pill”.  They act like this means they are independent thinkers, but they are not.  The red pill is an orthodoxy that is as rigid as the blue pill they say they fight.  George had a good comment about this.

I like this whole black pill thing more and more. The *red pill* business is just another iteration of the same old mainstream ideas from the opposite perspective. The *red pill* never really questions the premises of these ideas, it just builds a different delusion from these premises. The best example of this is game – instead of questioning the premise that you need to supplicate to women, it accepted this premise and just developed a different way of supplication.

These days the whole red pill universe has become just another tired old rigid orthodoxy, with every new blog, or new ebook just reiterating the same old stuff. No one ever says anything heretical or new, and if you do, you are shouted down. In this sense it has followed the development of the left, which started off as a rebellion, calcified into an orthodoxy, while still retaining its original mythology of being subversive and counter-cultural as an important part of its self-image.

I always thought that independent, heretical individuals who dont subscribe to any movement or body of ideology are the ones most likely to have the skeptical frame of mind to arrive at the truth. Those who like ideology will just settle down in game or paleo and will ignore all the contrary evidence and internal contradictions. They are not after truth but after the feeling of being subversive and the comfort of being part of a movement. Truly independent individuals truly seeking for truth will eventually see the falsity of game and paleo and all the rest and develop a heterodox view of the world without belonging to any label.

This made me think about everything the red pills believe in.  Here’s a list.

1. Game
2. The Paleo Diet
3. Conspiracy Theory (This can include everything from 9/11 conspiracy theories to conspiracy theories about me.)
4. Meaningless “Self Improvement” (This means self improvement without objective metrics.)
5. Ron Paul
6. White Nationalism (Whether this should be included in the list is debatable)

If anyone thinks something is missing from this list, mention it in a comment so I can include it if it makes sense.   If you deviate from any of these things (except maybe white nationalism) because you’re an independent thinker like myself, you will be treated as a “heretic”.  There is no room in this orthodoxy either.  If you did some objective self improvement like improving your employment and/or financial situation, the red pills would attack it for some bullshit reason like “it supports Goldman Sachs”.  (Yes, I have actually seen them use this.)  For number 5 I said Ron Paul, not Libertarianism.  That is deliberate.  When it comes to politics, the red pills support Ron Paul and Ron Paul only.  They don’t support libertarian candidates, libertarian minded individuals, or the Libertarian Party.  They consider those three things to be “controlled by the banksters”.

Nothing the red pills say or do is subversive.  As Geroge said, they don’t question premises like needing to supplicate to women.  They also don’t get attacked like truly subversive people would.  Instead they perform attacks on real independent thinkers, that they claim is done to them.  The red pills are everything they claim their enemies to be.

Herman Cain Makes David Futrelle Piss In His Pants

Herman Cain could use this hand to bitchslap feminists.

Many of you have noticed that I got written up in a post at Manboobz for my support of Herman Cain and the truth.  All Futurelle proved was that he is illiterate.  He did notice one thing, that I put my money where my mouth is.  That’s not limited to this case.  I always put my money where my mouth is.  I donated to the Herman Cain campaign more money than any of the boobs at Manboobz have seen at one time.

If you think about, it’s clear that Herman Cain makes David Futrelle piss in his pants.  Here we have a man running for president that in a tiny way fought back against feminism.  Even just a small action worries manginas like Futrelle.  Right now we have Herman Cain correctly identifying what happened to him as false accusations.  In the next presidential election we will have a candidate or candidates that will be slightly more anti-feminist.  In the election after that the anti-feminism in the candidates grows and so on for each subsequent election.  Between 2024 and 2032, I could become a viable candidate for president.  Think about that and think about how much Futrelle will be pissing in his pants when that happens.

To Avoid Criticism I Get Accused Of Leading A Conspiracy To Invade Blogs

A while ago I discovered the truth about Susan Walsh of Hookingupmorons and her duplictious nature.  Over time others have discovered the same thing, and they are shouting it from the rooftops at Dalrock’s blog.  I wasn’t aware of this until Ted pointed it out a couple of hours ago.

Despite my lack of involvement in that debate, because Susan Walsh and her sychophants can’t handle the truth, one of her sycophants made up a conspiracy theory that I had orchestrated a conspiracy to invade Dalrock’s blog.  It’s an amazing level of absurdity.  For this to even being to make sense, Susan Walsh and her sycophants have to believe that I have the time and resources of a major computer network to pull off such an operation.  I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised a gamer would believe that.  Most gamers are unable to hold down jobs that pay more than minimum wage so to them I look like a trillionaire.

The gentlemen exposing the truth about Susan Walsh have done some great work.  The desperation of her sycophants to manufacture a conspiracy theory involving me proves that they are losing.  More and more people are learning the truth about Susan Walsh, and a conspiracy theory about me isn’t going to stop that.  It’s only going to accelerate the process since people will ask questions like why would someone defending Susan Walsh need to invoke a conspiracy theory about someone who wasn’t involved in that particular debate.

I’m not angry about being written up in a conspiracy theory like this.  I’m amused, and it only proves I’m right.

Game Malware

I didn’t have plans to comment on Mangina Johnson again, but someone who wishes to remain anonymous sent me an email about how Mangina Johnson’s site is now considered a malware distribution site.  He sent me the following image taken from his chrome web browser as proof.  (Click on the image to see it in it’s full size.)

Figuratively, “game” can be considered interpersonal malware as it’s all a scam and doesn’t really exist.  We now have an example of a gamer website distributing malware both in a figurative sense and a literal sense.

A Scam That Sucks At Being A Scam

A while back I pointed out how The 21 Convention was a scam.  This inspired its mangina organizer to show up here and show us how he is a dickhead.  Recently there was one of these scam conventions in Europe.  How many people showed up for what Mangina Johnson calls, “The men’s conference of the century, and a panorama event for life on earth as a man”?

36

That’s it.  Only 36 people.  I would be surprised if that’s enough people to cover all of the expenses of a convention.  I could get ten times as many people for a conference on how to pick your nose.  Not only is The 21 Convention a scam.  It’s a scam that sucks at being a scam.  That explains why Mangina Johnson spent so much time here and tried to troll The Spearhead for customers dupes to go to his scam.  He’s desperate, especially when you look at how moronic and whiny his customer base is.  It takes a special level of idiot to be taken in by this scam evidenced by that link and how few men attended.

Game Wastes Your Money

I noticed I was getting some hits from this webpage probably because of the following.

Can you imagine White & Nerdy hanging out at the sarging forums telling everyone how psyched he is to meet new women and how he just bought a years supply of condoms “just in case”?

Of course you can’t, but the reason is not what this mangina says.   It’s because I don’t waste time or money on stupid shit like that.  But that is how a gamer thinks and acts.  They all blabber on at places like the sarging forums because if game actually was getting them laid they wouldn’t have time to post stupid crap on the sarging forums or anyplace else.

And why is it everything with game involves spending lots of money on useless shit?  I wouldn’t buy a years supply of condoms unless I knew I was going to need a years worth of condoms in the next 12 months.  Why?  Because it’s a waste of money.  Condoms expire so you will end up throwing out condoms you don’t use.  Gamers don’t seem smart enough to figure this out.  They probably use expired condoms all the time.  It’s a good thing that game doesn’t exist or else gamers would be getting STDs left and right and knocking up women with the resulting child support bills.

It’s important to point out gamer bullshit like this because they are all either scammers or victims of the game scam.  The purpose of a scam is to get you to spend money on the scam.  With game that involves spending money on useless shit like books about game, DVDs about game, conferences about game, and so on.  A scam may also get you to waste money on things either not related to the scam or tangentially related to the scam.  That way you’re conditioned to spend money on useless shit so you won’t notice you’re wasting money on the scam’s “products”.  That is likely what happened to this mangina.  He is used to wasting money on game bullshit products so the idea of wasting money buying a boatload of condoms seems perfectly normal to him.  To anyone like myself who knows how to manage money, it’s clear how stupid it is.

Game like all scams causes you to waste your money.  There’s a reason why I have a truckload of money and assets.  It’s because I didn’t waste it on scams like game.

The 21 Convention Is A Fraud And A Scam

Recently this blog was visited by a Certified Real Man Mangina calling himself “Anthony Dream Johnson”.  That’s not his real name.  It’s Anthony Paul Johnson.  That alone should set off your bullshit meter.  I guess he was butthurt that I and lots of other commenters at The Spearhead discovered very quickly that he is full of shit.  Men involved in mens rights can easily detect mangina bullshit from 15 miles away and this mangina was no different.

I have seen Johnson’s type before.  Five to seven years ago guys like him were doing seminars on how to get rich buying real estate.  I remember how several years ago I was travelling in Arizona and I got accosted three times by the real estate seminar guys.  And that was just in Arizona.  They made the same bullshit money back guarantee that Johnson does.  (Johnson claims that no one offers a money back guarantee like his but I know from experience Johnson is either lying or full of shit.  So much for his “integrity”.  If anyone talks about their “integrity” half as much as Johnson does, you know they’re lying and/or full of shit.)  If I did what these real estate idiots said was a guaranteed path to riches I would have lost a fortune.  Instead I made a fortune doing pretty much the opposite.

This is why Johnson’s convention preys on younger guys.  I’m only 33 I have seen the last two generations of bullshit con artists come and go.  Now that real estate is dead and there is no investment bubble on the horizon the con artists are going after men.

The biggest thing a con artist is afraid of is the light of truth.  That’s why Johnson accused me of being insane and ready to go on a violent rampage (which is code red and code white shaming langauge).  That and the fact that I upped the ante of his offer by wanting a written, signed, and notarized statement admitting the 21 convention is a scam instead of a refund if I went and wasn’t satisfied.  What’s ironic about that is that it’s not virgins who can’t get laid that go on violent rampages.  It’s guys who are into game and pick up bullshit like Sodini and Gunwitch.

I looked at Johnson’s blog and discovered he was a Libertarian.  Libertarians claim to believe that individuals have the right to self defense against criminals and oppresive government.  I defend myself against oppressive feminist government but where is Mr. Libertarian Johnson on feminism?  Nowhere.  He has talked very little about it and certainly has not done anything to combat feminism.  Like most Libertarians he is blind to the fact that women are responsible for big government.  Johnson is against fighting back against women and manginas, two groups responsible for feminism, saying the following.

I have never seen this blog before, but I am both saddened and disgusted in finding it. From what I can gather, the focus of the blog is a negative — to fight back against “women and manginas”.

This is tantamount to becoming “better men”. Better by whose standards?

I for the record, stand in diametric opposition to these things in the light of a primary focus or purpose for anything.

When you are attacked as I have been, you FIGHT BACK.  You DEFEND YOURSELF.  Libertarianism recognizes this right because it’s self defense.  What I talk about won’t make you “better” men (which in Johnson’s case means becoming a better slave for women) because what I’m fighting for is FREEDOM.  Johnson doesn’t understand what freedom is.

No. In fact, there is no greater difference that can be had. Man is an individual. Life is good. Your own happiness is the highest moral purpose possible — not the happiness of any other person on earth, not the satisfaction of some deity, nor the appeasement of any group of men — not any cause man can attempt to delegate the responsibility for his own life and his own happiness out to .

I don’t agree with this but let’s go with it for the sake of argument.  Women trying to destroy my job or throw me in jail because they find me unattractive are a direct threat to my happiness.  To be happy I have to fight women and manginas.  I’m not surprised Johnson can’t be consistent with his own philosophy.  What’s more likely is that his real operating philosophy is worshipping women, being a mangina.  Here’s the proof.

Anyway, in the (paraphrased) words of Nathaniel Branden, viewing women as the greatest of nature’s creations is central to life on earth as a man. It is central to being male.

Not only is this being a mangina but it’s an insult to great men who have advanced civilization like Issac Newton and the monks who preserved knowledge during the dark ages.  I will have no part in a philosophy that insults such great and important men.  We can only draw the conclusion that Johnson is a fraud and a con artist and that his convention is a scam.