The Middle Of The Road Alternative Scam

I got asked my opinion about AVFM’s latest attack on MGTOW.  Until now, I hadn’t been following it due to a lack of time and an assumption that it was nothing more than the usual tension between MRAs and MGTOW.  Obviously, I oppose what AVFM is trying to do.  By trying to include married men as MGTOW, AVFM is trying to create a MGTOW- and call that “MGTOW”, so they can actual MGTOW, MGTOW+ to make actual MGTOW look like Atheism+.  What AVFM is doing is a very despicable and underhanded thing.

While this is about throwing out actual MGTOW to include tradcons at AVFM, it represents a deeper connection between AVFM and tradcons.  AVFM is adopting a tradcon strategy I am now calling, “The Middle Of The Road Alternative Scam”.  What tradcons try to do is present themselves as different from both feminists and MRAs/MGTOW.  Tradcons will tell you that they are neither pro-male nor pro-female, but pro-“family” or pro-“community”.  “Family” and “community” are words that really mean women and/or socialism depending on context, so it’s a way for tradcons try to trick men into supporting women.  Plus, it’s also a way for tradcons to present themselves as the group “in the middle” trying to “bring men and women together” and “fight the extremists on both sides” (i.e. the feminists on one side and the MRAs/MGTOW on the other).

AVFM is now using the same scam.  Effectively they’re trying to say, “See we have both men and women.  We’re trying to bring men and women together.  We’re neither those feminist extremists nor those MGTOW extremists.”  Since AVFM is supposed to be a MRA organization, they can’t include MRAs as one of the “extremes” they’re supposedly against, so MGTOW exclusively get that “honor”.  Thats the only real difference between the tradcon application of “the middle of the road alternative” scam and AVFM’s application of it.  Since AVFM’s use of this scam effectively aligns AVFM with tradcon ideology, now tradcons are very much at home at AVFM.

There may be some people reading this who are wondering, “what’s wrong with bringing men and women together?”  They think that I’m just an extremist who is trying to promote a war between men and women.  The problem with a middle of the road position (in the best case scenario) is that it’s a compromise position.  On one side, the position is “men should have no rights”.  The other side says, “men should have rights”.  The middle of the road position is to take half of men’s rights away.  Clearly, that’s unacceptable and absurd.  A man’s rights should never be up for compromise or negotiation.  It’s like you trying to compromise with someone who wants to poison your food.  You don’t want your food to be poisoned, but they do.  Are you actually going to meet in the middle and let them use half as much poison?  Of course not.  Don’t forget this description of the “middle of the road alternative” is assuming the best case scenario.  In reality, it’s worse.  The “middle of the road alternative” is really used as a scam or a trojan horse to subjugate men.

AVFM and the tradcons aren’t the only to use this scam.  The white vagina worshipping nationalists also use this scam, albeit only for white men and white women.  Conspiracy theorists also use this scam, but that is part some of larger issues with conspiracy theory that require a separate post.  Anytime you see this scam being used, don’t trust whoever is using it.  Many groups are using it or will use it in the future so you have to be vigilant for it.

Anita Sarkeesian Is Connected To The Dating Advice Industry

We have talked about how Anita Sarkeesian is involved with online marketing scams.  It turns out she’s worse than that.  Anita Sarkeesian is connected to the dating advice industry.  Sarkeesian worked with a man named Bart Baggett.  Baggett was listed as an author on a PUA directory since he wrote books on how to get laid using NLP, neuro-linguistic programming.  NLP is pseudoscience and a scam.

I’m both surprised and not surprised by this.  I’m surprised that Sarkeesian would so obviously be proof of everything I have been saying for a long time.  On the other hand, Anita Sarkeesian is involved in online marketing scams so it’s not surprising she would be involved with people engaging in dating advice scams.  After all, there is sort of a common link between the dating advice industry, feminism, and the war on gamers.  Dating advice is used as a ideological scam to trick men into joining up with various ideologies from feminism to misandrist forms of Christianity.  Anything that is an alternative to dating advice (and dating in general) is the enemy of the dating advice industry and anyone trying to use dating advice as a form of recruitment.  Thus, M(H)RAs and MGTOW are obvious enemies of the dating advice industry and anyone that uses dating advice to recruit men.  In this context, video games are similar to the M(H)RM and MGTOW.  This makes the dating advice industry, feminism, and anyone else invested in the MDAD (Misandrist Dating Advice Distraction) allies against video games.  Connections between the dating advice industry to feminism and other misandrist groups should be expected so if Anita Sarkeesian wasn’t a connection, it would be someone else.

Leftism In Disguise

Last Friday was Halloween, and it got me thinking of something I have noticed about the so called manosphere and related groups like the white vagina worshiping nationalists.  They all will tell you that they are right wing, but that isn’t true.  They are all leftists in disguise.

With the white vagina worshiping nationalists, they believe in Marxist redistribution of wealth just like regular socialists do.  The only difference is that the white vagina worshiping nationalists want wealth redistributed to the white proletariat instead of the entire proletariat like socialists do.  There is a reason why Nazi is short for national SOCIALISM.  Additionally, white vagina worshiping nationalists are pretty much indistinguishable from feminists.  Take that Viking Bitch woman who showed up here a while back.  If you try reading her blog, it becomes clear that she thinks of “Jews” as men and “whites” as women (even to the point where she accuses Jewish men of being obsessed with their penises).  If you removed the word, Jew, from her blog it would become indistinguishable from a feminist blog.  Even the name, “blonde gynocide” makes it indistinguishable from a feminist blog.  On top of that, she’s a single mother and defends single motherhood just like a feminist would except for using the white race as a defense for her bad choices that wreck society.

The so called manosphere also has plenty of leftism in disguise.  The Dickless Mangina Project has an author named RudyDeuceTruth who is indistinguishable from Hawaiian Fat Blob and other conspiracy theorists of the so called manosphere.  If I showed you RudyDeuceTruth’s writings without telling you it came from the Dickless Mangina Project, you would think it came from a conspiracy theorist in the so called manosphere.  This is because the conspiracy theory in the so called manosphere is completely leftist so it can be re-posted on a feminist blog without changing it one iota.  The “bad guys” in conspiracy theory are always rich capitalists (even if a conspiracy theorist believes that they’re taking direction from extraterrestrials or demons).  Even when conspiracy theorists are supposedly opposed to socialism, it’s because they believe socialism is a plot by said rich capitalists, not because they’re opposed to big government, Marxist redistribution of wealth, or actual socialist policies.

The so called manosphere also has a contingent of tradcons (traditionalist conservatives).  They are also hostile to capitalism and the free market.  Most of them will tell you that they’re opposed socialism too, but that’s because they associate socialism with being “godless” not because of actual opposition to socialist policies.  Many of the tradcons in the so called manosphere are Catholic and subscribe to “distributism”, an economic theory that grew out of Catholic social teaching.  They will use this to show that they are opposed to socialism in addition to capitalism, although distributism requires socialist policies like nationalization of banks.  Also, it grew out of Catholic social teaching which means it came from Catholic versions of social justice warriors or a Catholic form of leftism.  The Catholic Church is a very leftist organization.  The only reason people think otherwise is because of the Catholic Church’s opposition to abortion.  However, if you look at how the Catholic Church’s support for Obamacare until the church would have to pay for abortions, for example, it becomes obvious that the Catholic Church is nothing but a bunch of leftists who happen to be anti-abortion.

I had no trouble finding examples of manospherians actually explicitly agreeing with feminist ideas.  Obsidian, a major figure in the manosphere, said that white men in the manosphere were filled with privilege.  That’s exactly what a feminist would say and think.

What you see in all of these examples is trying to get men to believe in socialism, feminism, and other parts of leftism through the back door.  It’s leftism but the people promoting it disguise it with use of anti-semitism and rhetorical tricks.  That isn’t to say that these people don’t actually believe they’re right wing.  They do, but 99% of their political ideology is leftist with an attempt at putting it in a right wing costume.  And it doesn’t even work well since anti-semitism is now more associated with the left than the right now, for example.  What we are seeing here is the horseshoe theory of politics in action.  The white vagina worshipping nationalists, the so called manosphere, conspiracy theorists, and related groups moved so far to the right that they ended up adopting leftism, including feminism, wholesale.

 

This Could Have Been Partially Inspired By My Blog

Over at the KotakuInAction reddit, there’s a page about Anita Sarkeesian’s connections to online marketing scams.  It references the Scamworld video and even mentions Eben Pagan/David DeAngelo and game.  With that last part, it’s like the reddit entry could have been partially inspired by my page on The Syndicate.

Was part of the reddit entry inspired by this blog?  Probably not, but that doesn’t matter.  My ideas are based on observing reality.  That’s why someone on the KotakuInAction reddit can come up with the same conclusions as me.  Typically, I just get there first.  It’s frustrating waiting for others to catch up, but over time more and more men will come around to my thinking.  A man who is dealing with reality and not a mangina can’t help it.

Impotent Threats

There’s a hashtag called #NeverKissAGamer that got started by some mangina opposed to #GamerGate.  Looking at the tweets for it, #NeverKissAGamer has been turned into a joke which makes sense because it is a joke.

When I first heard of it, my first thought was, “how are women going to not kiss me more than they do now?”  It’s not like women can kiss me less than zero times.  It’s an impotent threat.

You may say that while it is true for me, most gamers aren’t kissless virgins so it wouldn’t be an impotent threat for them.  The fact is that it is an impotent threat to them as well.  Most people don’t make dating, sex, and relationship decisions based on politics and ideology.  And when they do, they don’t do it long term.  This is an impotent threat even for a gamer that has a harem of women.

A central fallacy of dating advice, or even just dating, sex, and relationship issues in general, that most people engage in is deriving their ideas on the subject from their preferred political ideology and not observation and scientific testing.  This is true in the so called manosphere, on Dr. Manginalove’s website, feminist websites, etc.  (This is a subject I will discuss more at some point in the future.)  Thus, all these groups think that they can make threats to men denying them dating, sex, & relationships based on their political ideology.  Since people almost never base their dating/sex/relationship lives on a political agenda, such threats are impotent.

It Costs Roosh $6500 To Get Laid Each Time He Gets Laid

Aaron Sleazy has a new post where someone did a calculation on how much it effectively costs Roosh each time he gets laid.  It costs Roosh $6500 each time to get laid.  That’s not a typo.  Roosh would have been better going to hookers, even expensive ones.

This may sound absurd, but it’s not.  Consider all of the expenses a man has just to get laid and/or get a girlfriend.  Chances are it’s much more than you would expect.  There’s a saying, “you don’t get rich writing checks”.  You don’t get rich spending money to chase women.  This is one of the reasons why I’m rich.

Also, this is another example of game being a complete failure.  It’s ROI (return on investment) is the same if not worse than placebo.

The Hypoagency Scam Women Use To Manipulate Men

A lot of you have already seen this video where Whoopi Goldberg points out that a woman shouldn’t hit a man and expect that a man won’t hit back.  The other women in the video are aghast at what Whoopi Goldberg is saying.  There’s an acronym for this, DHMIAG, or “don’t hit me I’m a girl”.  What’s missing from that acronym is the second part, “but I can hit men because I’m a girl”.

This is an example of how women use hypoagency, the idea that women are never actors but only acted upon, to manipulate men.  Hypoagency is also tied to women being “weaker” than men.  In the DHMIAG example, there are two things going on.  First, if a woman hits a man it’s assumed to be a man’s fault.  The woman is only reacting to what the man did so he “deserved” it.  Second, the man isn’t supposed to hit back, that is engage in self defense, against women because it was somehow his fault that she hit him.  Third, the man isn’t supposed to hit back because the women is basically equivalent a child or a pet.

When described in this fashion, it sounds pretty demeaning to women in theory.  Yet, women across the political spectrum from liberal feminists to conservative traditionalists argue in favor of women having hypoagency.    Supposedly, this means that women are treated as “inferior”, but in reality that isn’t the case.  On the feminist side, this shows up in lobbying the government for special treatment (affirmative action, transfer payments that only go to women etc.) since women are supposedly in a “weaker” position, yet women get all this free stuff.  This was what the Hobby Lobby case was all about.  Women are supposedly incapable of getting their own birth control so employers have to pay for it.  It’s using “weakness” as an attempt to get free stuff.

On the traditionalist side, it’s even more obvious.  In traditional Christian churches, for example, it is taught that women are the “weaker vessel” and are “inferior” to men.  What ends up happening is that the church says that men are supposed to “lead” but if women sin, then it’s all the fault of a man (typically a husband) for failing to lead.  Even though women are supposedly in an “inferior” position in church, women conveniently are exempt from all responsibility and accountability.  This is why women are the biggest defenders of traditionalism.

While in the DHMIAG example women have the equivalent status of a child or a pet, it’s important to remember that most people treat children and pets very well.  And it’s not like women are treated like children or pets all the time.  Women can move back between child/pet and independent adult status as is convenient for them.  And that’s how all these examples work regardless of whether it’s on the feminist or the traditionalist side of the political spectrum.

Women know that most men are honorable so that men will instinctively defend those they perceive as weak.  So women present themselves as “weak” to manipulate men into giving them whatever woman want.   Women use our honorable nature against us in a very insidious and evil manner.

Anytime you hear a woman arguing for their “inferiority” or “weakness” in some area, it’s an attempt to manipulate you.  The thing to remember is that women have political power so even though men are on average stronger than women, for example, it doesn’t matter.  Political power trumps all, but part of the hypoagency scam is to distract you from that.