This Could Have Been Partially Inspired By My Blog

Over at the KotakuInAction reddit, there’s a page about Anita Sarkeesian’s connections to online marketing scams.  It references the Scamworld video and even mentions Eben Pagan/David DeAngelo and game.  With that last part, it’s like the reddit entry could have been partially inspired by my page on The Syndicate.

Was part of the reddit entry inspired by this blog?  Probably not, but that doesn’t matter.  My ideas are based on observing reality.  That’s why someone on the KotakuInAction reddit can come up with the same conclusions as me.  Typically, I just get there first.  It’s frustrating waiting for others to catch up, but over time more and more men will come around to my thinking.  A man who is dealing with reality and not a mangina can’t help it.

Impotent Threats

There’s a hashtag called #NeverKissAGamer that got started by some mangina opposed to #GamerGate.  Looking at the tweets for it, #NeverKissAGamer has been turned into a joke which makes sense because it is a joke.

When I first heard of it, my first thought was, “how are women going to not kiss me more than they do now?”  It’s not like women can kiss me less than zero times.  It’s an impotent threat.

You may say that while it is true for me, most gamers aren’t kissless virgins so it wouldn’t be an impotent threat for them.  The fact is that it is an impotent threat to them as well.  Most people don’t make dating, sex, and relationship decisions based on politics and ideology.  And when they do, they don’t do it long term.  This is an impotent threat even for a gamer that has a harem of women.

A central fallacy of dating advice, or even just dating, sex, and relationship issues in general, that most people engage in is deriving their ideas on the subject from their preferred political ideology and not observation and scientific testing.  This is true in the so called manosphere, on Dr. Manginalove’s website, feminist websites, etc.  (This is a subject I will discuss more at some point in the future.)  Thus, all these groups think that they can make threats to men denying them dating, sex, & relationships based on their political ideology.  Since people almost never base their dating/sex/relationship lives on a political agenda, such threats are impotent.

It Costs Roosh $6500 To Get Laid Each Time He Gets Laid

Aaron Sleazy has a new post where someone did a calculation on how much it effectively costs Roosh each time he gets laid.  It costs Roosh $6500 each time to get laid.  That’s not a typo.  Roosh would have been better going to hookers, even expensive ones.

This may sound absurd, but it’s not.  Consider all of the expenses a man has just to get laid and/or get a girlfriend.  Chances are it’s much more than you would expect.  There’s a saying, “you don’t get rich writing checks”.  You don’t get rich spending money to chase women.  This is one of the reasons why I’m rich.

Also, this is another example of game being a complete failure.  It’s ROI (return on investment) is the same if not worse than placebo.

The Hypoagency Scam Women Use To Manipulate Men

A lot of you have already seen this video where Whoopi Goldberg points out that a woman shouldn’t hit a man and expect that a man won’t hit back.  The other women in the video are aghast at what Whoopi Goldberg is saying.  There’s an acronym for this, DHMIAG, or “don’t hit me I’m a girl”.  What’s missing from that acronym is the second part, “but I can hit men because I’m a girl”.

This is an example of how women use hypoagency, the idea that women are never actors but only acted upon, to manipulate men.  Hypoagency is also tied to women being “weaker” than men.  In the DHMIAG example, there are two things going on.  First, if a woman hits a man it’s assumed to be a man’s fault.  The woman is only reacting to what the man did so he “deserved” it.  Second, the man isn’t supposed to hit back, that is engage in self defense, against women because it was somehow his fault that she hit him.  Third, the man isn’t supposed to hit back because the women is basically equivalent a child or a pet.

When described in this fashion, it sounds pretty demeaning to women in theory.  Yet, women across the political spectrum from liberal feminists to conservative traditionalists argue in favor of women having hypoagency.    Supposedly, this means that women are treated as “inferior”, but in reality that isn’t the case.  On the feminist side, this shows up in lobbying the government for special treatment (affirmative action, transfer payments that only go to women etc.) since women are supposedly in a “weaker” position, yet women get all this free stuff.  This was what the Hobby Lobby case was all about.  Women are supposedly incapable of getting their own birth control so employers have to pay for it.  It’s using “weakness” as an attempt to get free stuff.

On the traditionalist side, it’s even more obvious.  In traditional Christian churches, for example, it is taught that women are the “weaker vessel” and are “inferior” to men.  What ends up happening is that the church says that men are supposed to “lead” but if women sin, then it’s all the fault of a man (typically a husband) for failing to lead.  Even though women are supposedly in an “inferior” position in church, women conveniently are exempt from all responsibility and accountability.  This is why women are the biggest defenders of traditionalism.

While in the DHMIAG example women have the equivalent status of a child or a pet, it’s important to remember that most people treat children and pets very well.  And it’s not like women are treated like children or pets all the time.  Women can move back between child/pet and independent adult status as is convenient for them.  And that’s how all these examples work regardless of whether it’s on the feminist or the traditionalist side of the political spectrum.

Women know that most men are honorable so that men will instinctively defend those they perceive as weak.  So women present themselves as “weak” to manipulate men into giving them whatever woman want.   Women use our honorable nature against us in a very insidious and evil manner.

Anytime you hear a woman arguing for their “inferiority” or “weakness” in some area, it’s an attempt to manipulate you.  The thing to remember is that women have political power so even though men are on average stronger than women, for example, it doesn’t matter.  Political power trumps all, but part of the hypoagency scam is to distract you from that.

Scams Are Everywhere In The Dating Industry

I talk a lot about scams in dating advice, but pretty much everything involved in dating has scams embedded in it.  Online dating certainly isn’t safe.  Netcraft has discovered that criminals are running MASSIVE phishing scams against online dating sites.  Netcraft describes how the online dating phishing scams work.

Online dating fraud is often orchestrated by criminal gangs who use fake profiles to trick victims into developing long distance relationships. Once the fraudsters have gathered enough sympathy and trust from a victim, they will exploit this by claiming they need money to pay for travel costs, or to afford medical treatment for a family member. After the money has been stolen, the criminals will make up further reasons why they need more money. In some cases, the fraudsters blackmail their victim into sending money – if the victim has sent any explicit photos or videos to the criminals, they may threaten to send them to the victim’s friends and family.

The amount of money involved in these scams can be considerable. In 2011, a woman in Britain was tricked into sending more than $59,000 to a pair of fraudsters who pretended to have inherited millions of dollars from a military friend in Nigeria. The fraudsters – who were actually a mother and daughter in America – managed to net more than a million dollars before being jailed in 2013.

When I read this I realized that other than the parts that make this an organized scam, this isn’t much different than what the average woman does, especially when she taps into the reserves.  Everything in the dating world whether its dating advice or online dating is a ready made venue for fraud.  Whether its just a woman looking for a man to fix her financial problems or a criminal organization running a massive phishing scam, it’s all the same.  The world of dating is filled with so much deception that it creates a venue that criminals can use easily.  Fraud attracts more fraud so a venue where women are trying to defraud men will naturally attract actual criminals sooner or later.  There’s no way of protecting online dating sites from criminals since the fundamental nature of everything involved in the dating industry is fraudulent.

When you use an online dating site, do you know if you are dealing with an actual woman or a criminal organization?  No, you don’t.  And in some ways it doesn’t matter.  It’s all about defrauding you.  In the dating industry, scams are everywhere and fundamental to the way it operates so you should just avoid it.

The Dating Advice Industry Drove Elliot Rodger Insane

I’m sure all of you have heard about Elliot Rodger, a young man who killed several people in Santa Barbara by now.   He is another murder driven insane by game similar to George Sodini and Gunwitch.  While the gamers have been doing damage control by pretending Rodger was “anti-game” because he visited PUAHate a few times (which has sadly but understandably been taken down).  Before PUAHate went down, I read it regularly and never saw any comments from Rodger.  That’s how little he actually posted there.  (At least some of the so called manosphere probably realizes this so they are already manufacturing conspiracy theories about how the shootings were really a false flag to discredit the so called manosphere.)

Rodger’s manifesto was filled with manospherian ideology and terminology (as well as dating advice ideology and terminology from sources other than the so called manosphere) to the point where he referred to himself as an “alpha male”.  That’s not how an a man truly against game thinks.  All Rodger’s few visits to PUAHate prove is that he knew at some level something was wrong with all the manospherian and dating advice bullshit he was reading was a complete lie.  The world of dating advice is filled with so many logical contradictions in addition to outright lies that it’s easy to sense something is wrong.  Unfortunately, Rodger didn’t spend more time on PUAHate (or better yet MGTOW websites) because trying to believe all of the logical contradictions and lies in dating advice will drive you insane.  That’s what happened to Rodger, and he cracked leading to the shootings.

The dating advice industry is going to turn more men into killers with their scams.  While the so called manosphere is using Rodger as an excuse to push game, other purveyors of dating advice are doing the same thing.  The “Strategic Dating Coach” promises that his system can prevent more Rodgers.

rodgerdatingcoachOther purveyors of dating advice say the same thing and try to pretend that they’re different than the so called manosphere.  A good example of this is at the Dickless Man Project where another dating coach pretends to attack the idea of the alpha male and other manospherian BS just to repackage it under a different name.  The only differences between various purveyors of dating advice is minor aspects of style and presentation.  The substance is all the same so the dating advice industry is guaranteed to produce more Rodgers, Sodinis, and Gunwitches.

The Reserves

In many countries, the military has a reserve.  In the US, each service has a reserve component, and there is the National Guard.  The reserves are made up of citizens who may get activated when extra troops are needed to supplement the standing military.  When they’re not activated, the reserves train on a regular basis.  In the US, the reserves train one weekend a month and two additional weeks a year.

I have noticed a disturbing parallel to the military reserves in the world of dating advice.  A piece of dating advice I have been given numerous times is, “Just wait until X” where X was “you’re out of high school”, “you’re out of college”, “you’re 25″, “you’re 30″, etc.  In other words, there was going to be some point in time in the not too distant future when all of sudden women were going to be interested in me.  That point in time was always not now, but later.  As time went on, and it didn’t happen people just kept moving the goalposts from after high school, to after college, and so forth.  (Goalpost shifting is common in dating advice.)  This piece of dating advice is not unique to me.  I find it all over the place even when I’m not looking for it such as with this example on the Dickless Man Project.

I would also suggest something I heard from a sex advice columnist. Roughly paraphrased: “Don’t focus on getting your teenaged self laid. Think about getting your 22 year old self laid, and work on becoming a good person (and good future sex partner) in the meantime.”

On the surface, it sounds like this piece of dating advice is just to get men to shut up for a while about not getting laid/not having a girlfriend.  In reality, what is going on is much more sinister.  Notice how the quote above doesn’t say to just wait, but to “work on becoming a good person”.  (It also says to work on being a good future sex partner, but that’s impossible without practice.  This is another example of doublethink in dating advice.)  Whether it’s the so called manosphere, feminists like Dr. Nerdlove Manginalove, or anyone else peddling dating advice, they all spend almost all of their time on nebulous and meaningless “self improvement” and political ideologies instead of how to meet women and get laid/get a girlfriend.  The last thing any of the dating advice peddlers want to see is a man successful with women.

The reason why the dating advice peddlers don’t want you to successfully get women is about more than just money.  It’s not just about keeping you as a paying customer.  Many of the dating advice peddlers don’t even sell anything.  Wanting to make you become a feminist, white nationalist, conspiracy theorist, paleo dieter, etc. is a big part of it, but that isn’t the only reason.

The dating advice peddlers want to keep you in the dating equivalent of the reserves.  If you have something women want like money, eventually there will be women who will show interest in you.  Their interest will be fake, and they will probably be plotting their divorce before you get married.  However, given enough time, there will be women who will at least fake interest in you.  Women are only interest in the 20% of men they find attractive.  Women ignore all other men for the most part until they start realizing that their looks are fading.  This can happen as early as her late 20s or as late as her 30s.  Women have nothing to show for the decades of screwing around with the 20% of men except STDs, a ruined vagina, lots of financial debt, and maybe some kids.  When it’s clear that one of the men in the 20% won’t commit to her, out of desperation she will try to get a man in the 80% before her looks fade.  She needs a stupid man to pay her debts, pay for her kids if she has them or give her kids before she hits menopause.  For women to be able to do this, there has to be men waiting in reserve for her.  The 20% of attractive men aren’t enough to go around.

The problem is why should a man be in the reserves.  There’s no benefit for us in getting together with a ruined former slut with a STD especially if she has kids.  It’s not like we would even get sex out of the deal.  As soon as we’re locked in, our relationships/marriages with them would become mostly if not completely sexless.  We’re all better off going our own way and opting out of anything having to do with women.  To combat this, the dating advice peddlers are trying to keep us on the MDAD treadmill by distracting us with meaningless crap that has nothing to do with meeting women and getting laid/relationships with women.  Self improvement bullshit is perfect for this since it doesn’t have any objective metrics for measuring improvement so they can keep you going in circles until a woman fakes interest in you.  Ideological bullshit is also perfect since gynocentric ideologies such as feminism, white nationalism, the red pill, etc. since it keeps you focused on serving women without getting anything in return for your service.  By distracting you from being aware that you aren’t getting together with women, the dating advice peddlers are keeping you in a position of weakness for when a woman fakes interest in you.

When a man decides to give up on women, he is dropping out of the reserves.  This is something women recognize as an existential threat to them because women are incapable of doing anything except manipulating men.  A man who has dropped out of the reserves can’t be manipulated by women any longer.  This is why giving up on women generates more vitrol from women than men who physically abuse women do.

If you’re part of the reserves, drop out.  All that’s waiting for you are debts, STDs, and a sexless marriage that will end in divorce with you losing half or more of your assets.

Comments are closed since this post is a copy of a page.  Comment on the page here.