The Christian Dating Advice Industry

Something I have been meaning to start talking about is the Christian dating advice industry, but I haven’t gotten around to it until now.  What finally got me to start writing about it was a pair of articles by Milo Yiannopoulos about MGTOW.  Both of those articles had a good number of comments (although it’s now buried in thousands of comments) where tradcons would try and convince MGTOW that there were plenty of “good women” in churches.  This is not true, and Christian dating advice isn’t true either.  Just because something is “Christian” does not mean its any better than the non-Christian equivalent if it involves women.

While Christian dating advice has its own unique quirks, most of the differences between Christian dating advice and regular dating advice are cosmetic.  The “go to church” dating advice is a good example of this.  It’s equivalent to feminist dating advice which says you should date feminists, “red pill” dating advice that says you should date “red pill” women, etc.  None of the women in any of these groups are any different.  They’re all the same.  I can tell you from personal experience that single women in church are the same types of single women you will find outside of church.  They’re desperate to get married because either they have kids, are otherwise divorced, or are otherwise “former” sluts whose looks are starting to fade.  It’s the reserves problem, but churches are worse because the single women there are actively trying to mine the reserves even more so than outside of church.

You might think that because Christianity says no sex until marriage, that would mitigate the problem.  It does not.  No sex until marriage only applies to men.  Women in church are given a pass for all their sexual sins because the church teaches that fornication is that man’s fault because of “male headship”.  It’s worse than that because the men Christian women fornicate with aren’t in church.  The single men in church are all part of the reserves so they aren’t getting any.  Since men get blamed for women’s sexual sins in churches, it’s the men in the reserves that are getting attacked from the pulpit for sins that women and men outside of church commit.  These men are doing the time, but don’t get the benefit of doing the crime/sin.  It’s a really perverse form of the gay virgin player rapist problem.  “Male headship” is also an excuse for churches to blame men and only men for divorce.  The divorce rate in churches is practically the same outside of church proving again that women are all the same.

Churches are as feminist as anything else in our gynocentric and gynocratic society.  They’re a misandrist institution.  They’re aren’t going to produce dating advice that’s fundamentally different from the rest of the dating advice industry.  Christian dating advice is a scam like almost all other dating advice.

There’s more to the Christian dating advice industry than I have covered here.  I will be covering that in future blog entries.

Comments are closed since this post is a copy of a page.  Comment on the page here.

Anita Sarkeesian Is Connected To The Dating Advice Industry

We have talked about how Anita Sarkeesian is involved with online marketing scams.  It turns out she’s worse than that.  Anita Sarkeesian is connected to the dating advice industry.  Sarkeesian worked with a man named Bart Baggett.  Baggett was listed as an author on a PUA directory since he wrote books on how to get laid using NLP, neuro-linguistic programming.  NLP is pseudoscience and a scam.

I’m both surprised and not surprised by this.  I’m surprised that Sarkeesian would so obviously be proof of everything I have been saying for a long time.  On the other hand, Anita Sarkeesian is involved in online marketing scams so it’s not surprising she would be involved with people engaging in dating advice scams.  After all, there is sort of a common link between the dating advice industry, feminism, and the war on gamers.  Dating advice is used as a ideological scam to trick men into joining up with various ideologies from feminism to misandrist forms of Christianity.  Anything that is an alternative to dating advice (and dating in general) is the enemy of the dating advice industry and anyone trying to use dating advice as a form of recruitment.  Thus, M(H)RAs and MGTOW are obvious enemies of the dating advice industry and anyone that uses dating advice to recruit men.  In this context, video games are similar to the M(H)RM and MGTOW.  This makes the dating advice industry, feminism, and anyone else invested in the MDAD (Misandrist Dating Advice Distraction) allies against video games.  Connections between the dating advice industry to feminism and other misandrist groups should be expected so if Anita Sarkeesian wasn’t a connection, it would be someone else.

Impotent Threats

There’s a hashtag called #NeverKissAGamer that got started by some mangina opposed to #GamerGate.  Looking at the tweets for it, #NeverKissAGamer has been turned into a joke which makes sense because it is a joke.

When I first heard of it, my first thought was, “how are women going to not kiss me more than they do now?”  It’s not like women can kiss me less than zero times.  It’s an impotent threat.

You may say that while it is true for me, most gamers aren’t kissless virgins so it wouldn’t be an impotent threat for them.  The fact is that it is an impotent threat to them as well.  Most people don’t make dating, sex, and relationship decisions based on politics and ideology.  And when they do, they don’t do it long term.  This is an impotent threat even for a gamer that has a harem of women.

A central fallacy of dating advice, or even just dating, sex, and relationship issues in general, that most people engage in is deriving their ideas on the subject from their preferred political ideology and not observation and scientific testing.  This is true in the so called manosphere, on Dr. Manginalove’s website, feminist websites, etc.  (This is a subject I will discuss more at some point in the future.)  Thus, all these groups think that they can make threats to men denying them dating, sex, & relationships based on their political ideology.  Since people almost never base their dating/sex/relationship lives on a political agenda, such threats are impotent.

At Least Elliot Rodger Didn’t Reenact The 40 Year Old Virgin

At the Dickless Man Project there is a lament that Elliot Rodger is no longer a member of The Reserves.  The article isn’t phrased in that manner but that is its message.

Despite what the Dickless Man Project says, giving it time would not have made things “better” for him.  Would there have been women who eventually would have faked interest in him for his wealth and/or ability to provide?  Would he have been able to lose his virginity eventually like the examples in the Dickless Man Project article?  Probably, yes, but so what?  It’s not an improvement to be pursued by  desperate STD ridden “former” sluts especially if they have kids who only want you for what you have.  While all of the examples in the Dickless Man Project may be “happy” now (although it’s likely their wives don’t have sex with them anymore), they won’t be so happy when their wives surprise them with a divorce.  And it’s a guarantee that will happen once their wives have sucked them dry.

What the men in the Dickless Man Project article went through was the same thing Steve Carell’s character in The 40 Year Old Virgin did albeit younger.  Catherine Keener’s character got everything, and Steve Carell’s character got nothing.  Yet, we are expected to believe this is a good thing.  The whole movie is propaganda for keeping men in the reserves.

At least Elliot Rodger didn’t reenact The 40 Year Old Virgin movie and stayed out of the reserves.

The Reserves

In many countries, the military has a reserve.  In the US, each service has a reserve component, and there is the National Guard.  The reserves are made up of citizens who may get activated when extra troops are needed to supplement the standing military.  When they’re not activated, the reserves train on a regular basis.  In the US, the reserves train one weekend a month and two additional weeks a year.

I have noticed a disturbing parallel to the military reserves in the world of dating advice.  A piece of dating advice I have been given numerous times is, “Just wait until X” where X was “you’re out of high school”, “you’re out of college”, “you’re 25″, “you’re 30″, etc.  In other words, there was going to be some point in time in the not too distant future when all of sudden women were going to be interested in me.  That point in time was always not now, but later.  As time went on, and it didn’t happen people just kept moving the goalposts from after high school, to after college, and so forth.  (Goalpost shifting is common in dating advice.)  This piece of dating advice is not unique to me.  I find it all over the place even when I’m not looking for it such as with this example on the Dickless Man Project.

I would also suggest something I heard from a sex advice columnist. Roughly paraphrased: “Don’t focus on getting your teenaged self laid. Think about getting your 22 year old self laid, and work on becoming a good person (and good future sex partner) in the meantime.”

On the surface, it sounds like this piece of dating advice is just to get men to shut up for a while about not getting laid/not having a girlfriend.  In reality, what is going on is much more sinister.  Notice how the quote above doesn’t say to just wait, but to “work on becoming a good person”.  (It also says to work on being a good future sex partner, but that’s impossible without practice.  This is another example of doublethink in dating advice.)  Whether it’s the so called manosphere, feminists like Dr. Nerdlove Manginalove, or anyone else peddling dating advice, they all spend almost all of their time on nebulous and meaningless “self improvement” and political ideologies instead of how to meet women and get laid/get a girlfriend.  The last thing any of the dating advice peddlers want to see is a man successful with women.

The reason why the dating advice peddlers don’t want you to successfully get women is about more than just money.  It’s not just about keeping you as a paying customer.  Many of the dating advice peddlers don’t even sell anything.  Wanting to make you become a feminist, white nationalist, conspiracy theorist, paleo dieter, etc. is a big part of it, but that isn’t the only reason.

The dating advice peddlers want to keep you in the dating equivalent of the reserves.  If you have something women want like money, eventually there will be women who will show interest in you.  Their interest will be fake, and they will probably be plotting their divorce before you get married.  However, given enough time, there will be women who will at least fake interest in you.  Women are only interest in the 20% of men they find attractive.  Women ignore all other men for the most part until they start realizing that their looks are fading.  This can happen as early as her late 20s or as late as her 30s.  Women have nothing to show for the decades of screwing around with the 20% of men except STDs, a ruined vagina, lots of financial debt, and maybe some kids.  When it’s clear that one of the men in the 20% won’t commit to her, out of desperation she will try to get a man in the 80% before her looks fade.  She needs a stupid man to pay her debts, pay for her kids if she has them or give her kids before she hits menopause.  For women to be able to do this, there has to be men waiting in reserve for her.  The 20% of attractive men aren’t enough to go around.

The problem is why should a man be in the reserves.  There’s no benefit for us in getting together with a ruined former slut with a STD especially if she has kids.  It’s not like we would even get sex out of the deal.  As soon as we’re locked in, our relationships/marriages with them would become mostly if not completely sexless.  We’re all better off going our own way and opting out of anything having to do with women.  To combat this, the dating advice peddlers are trying to keep us on the MDAD treadmill by distracting us with meaningless crap that has nothing to do with meeting women and getting laid/relationships with women.  Self improvement bullshit is perfect for this since it doesn’t have any objective metrics for measuring improvement so they can keep you going in circles until a woman fakes interest in you.  Ideological bullshit is also perfect since gynocentric ideologies such as feminism, white nationalism, the red pill, etc. since it keeps you focused on serving women without getting anything in return for your service.  By distracting you from being aware that you aren’t getting together with women, the dating advice peddlers are keeping you in a position of weakness for when a woman fakes interest in you.

When a man decides to give up on women, he is dropping out of the reserves.  This is something women recognize as an existential threat to them because women are incapable of doing anything except manipulating men.  A man who has dropped out of the reserves can’t be manipulated by women any longer.  This is why giving up on women generates more vitrol from women than men who physically abuse women do.

If you’re part of the reserves, drop out.  All that’s waiting for you are debts, STDs, and a sexless marriage that will end in divorce with you losing half or more of your assets.

Comments are closed since this post is a copy of a page.  Comment on the page here.

Creep Week Makes As Much Sense As Jew Week

Dr. Manginalove just finished what he calls Creep Week.  This is an event he has regularly.  Dr. Manginalove having a creep week is like a white supremacist blog having a Jew week.

Imagine you went to a dating advice website, and it was filled with conspiracy theories about Jews and Blacks.  The only dating advice that website had was not to act Jewish or Black (and acting Jewish or Black was defined completely by antisemitism and racism).  That’s what Dr. Manginalove is doing with “creeps”.  (Remember that “creeps” are just men who women find unattractive and nothing else.)

Demonization of a group or groups are commonplace in dating advice. In the so called manosphere they demonize Jews and minorities.  Dr. Manginalove and other feminist purveyors of dating advice demonize unattractive men with the “creep” label.  They even demonize each other.  Their use of demonization belongs at a KKK rally not as part helping men get laid and establish relationships.

Why are purveyors of dating advice engaging in this kind of demonization?  It isn’t just a matter of demonizing people for getting in the way of their income stream.  Eben Pagan and other purely financial dating advice con artists do the least amount of demonization.  It’s because the purpose of dating advice is not helping men get laid/establish relationships, but tricking you into supporting a (totalitarian) ideology.  Since no totalitarian ideologies work, they need a demon to blame everything on.  That demon can be Jews, minorities, unattractive men, or some other group.  It all comes back to dating advice not actually being about dating but the (totalitarian) ideology of its purveyors.

Honest Dating Advice Would Tell You To Avoid Most Women

One of the reasons why dating advice is a scam almost all of the time is the refusal to admit that most women are unsuitable for dating (and relationships).  If the purveyors of dating advice were honest, then they would tell men not to date most women.  While you can find lists of “women to avoid” on the internet and elsewhere, when it comes to brass tacks in dating advice, those women don’t exist.  (Or their situations are somehow a man’s fault so you should still date them.)

On average women are significantly more likely to have STDs, debt, a higher number of sex partners, etc., and the psychological problems associated with them than the average man is.  (This is due to the effects of the 80/20 rule.)  For the average man, most women are a losing proposition even if dating advice had a sure fire way to get them into bed/make them your girlfriend.  This is why many men have decided to go their own way/go ghost/opt out.  The value proposition for most women simply isn’t there.  Nearly all dating advice refuses to recognize this sobering fact.

Why do purveyors of dating advice refuse to admit the state of most women?  The first reason is financial.  There is no money in it.  Because telling men not to date (and by extension not get into relationships and marriages with) most women doesn’t require books, DVDs, and seminars.  It only requires a paragraph of text which can’t be sold.  The second reason is ideological.  Dating advice is used as a gateway into tricking men into various ideologies from feminism to red pill “Christianity”.  All of these ideologies are similar in that they don’t have men’s best interests in mind and that they are gynocentric.  A statement of fact such as most women are unsuitable for dating (and relationships and marriage) can not be used to trick men into gynocentric ideologies that are bad for them.  It directly contradicts their ideologies and is an admission that their ideologies are nothing but lies.