Where Are The Grandmothers?

I asked a few years ago why all these supposed “good women” never do anything to show themselves and differentiate themselves from all the evil women out there.  The obvious answer is because there are so few good women out there as to make them practically nonexistent.  That there are so few female MRAs and similar women is proof of that.

The problem of the lack of “good women” is worse than you think because there are plenty of cases where it would benefit the “good women” to make themselves known and differentiate themselves.  We’re not just talking about cases where “good women” should be doing things to help men just out of the goodness of their hearts.  We’re talking about cases where if nothing else the “good women” should be doing things that would help men but generate benefits for them at the same time.

On another blog a while ago, I read about the perfect example of this.  During divorce, which happens frequently and is mostly caused by women, women get custody of the children most of the time.  This means that men lose access to their children especially since women can prevent men from seeing their children with impunity.  Even when courts order that men get visitation, they won’t bother enforcing it.  Thus, a divorced man’s access to his children is completely dependent on his ex-wife.  For many divorced men this means being completely shut out of their children’s lives.

A divorced man losing contact with his children isn’t the only victim here.  The divorced man’s parents also lose contact with his children.  The children lose a relationship with their paternal grandparents.  This brings up a question, why aren’t mothers of divorced men fighting for their sons when it comes to visitation and custody issues after a divorce?  You don’t see any organization of grandmothers fighting the divorce courts on this issue.  They aren’t joining any fathers’ rights groups.

This isn’t just a case of these mothers should be helping their divorced sons out of the goodness of their hearts (although that should be reason enough for them).  These grandmothers (presumably) lose contact with their grandchildren because their sons do.  It would benefit these women to help their sons on this issue because they would regain a relationship with their grandchildren.  It directly benefits grandmothers to fight for their sons visitation and custody rights.  Since this obviously isn’t happening even though it would benefit the mothers of divorced sons, there are only two possibilities why grandmothers aren’t doing this:

1. Women are willing to sacrifice a relationship with their grandchildren just to stick it to men, even their own sons.  In other words women hate men more than they love their grandchildren.
2. While the divorced son loses visitation with his children, the grandmother is getting visitation from her son’s ex-wife but is complicit in cutting her own son out of her grandchildren’s life.  A woman is willing to conspire with her son’s ex-wife against her own son, her own flesh and blood, because she hates men.

Either one of these is pretty evil.  Women don’t just hate men in general.  They hate their own sons (and other men in their own families).  Women are willing to sacrifice their own sons on the altar of supporting other women EVEN WHEN IT PERSONALLY HURTS THEM.  This example pretty much puts the issue of “good women” to bed.

On a side note, this is another reason why white vagina worshiping nationalists are full of shit.  They talk a lot about duty to kin and racial solidarity, but this example proves that women are stabbing their own male kin in the back.  They’re stupid to trust to their female kin or white women in general.  Of course, white vagina worshiping nationalists are fine with white men being stabbed in the back by white women as long as white babies are produced.

stoner and tarnished, your parents, while abusive, succeeded in producing White children. You would even call yourselves “normal” White children. But a Negro, even if he was one of the very few moral and talented negros, can never produce White children.

There you have it, an example that shows “good women” are incredibly few in number and shows another reason why white nationalists are white vagina worshipers.

Pufferfish Game

Pretty soon the new buzz in the so called manosphere will be pufferfish game.  It’s where you try to inflate yourself to take up as much room as possible because it’s alpha to take up as much room as possible.  This was the subject of today’s Dilbert comic so the so called manosphere is guaranteed to steal it.

Like everything else the so called manosphere does, it won’t work.  If the manosphere wants to take up as much space as possible, they should do what they’re already doing, being as fat as possible.

If You’re Going To Do The Time

I found this idiot feminist woman who pretty much said that hating women is 100% correlated with being a man who women find unattractive.  We know that women find 80% of men (give or take) unattractive so this brings up a question.  If women find you unattractive, why shouldn’t you hate women?  Even if you don’t hate women, you will still be treated as if you do if women find you unattractive.  If you’re going to do the time, you might as well do the crime.

Some may answer my question with how hate (and bitterness) will supposedly eat you up inside.  If that is really the case, then it’s going to be worse trying to not hate women while women are acting as if you do.  (Remember you have already been determined to be a woman hater due to your lack of attractiveness.)

Others may answer with how the whole thing is entrapment.  Women want unattractive men to hate them so that they can use that as “evidence” of how we’re a threat to women.  This is a valid point, but we will still be accused of hating women so not hating women doesn’t prevent this entrapment.  If anything working hard at not hating women, just leaves you vulnerable.

I’m forced to conclude there is no reason to not hate women.  For those of us whose “crime” is being unattractive to women, it’s the only logical option.

The White Supremacist’s 14 Words Of Misandry

I have realized that we need to start calling white supremacists/white nationalists a new name, white vagina worshipers.  White vagina worshipers are not opposed to feminism.  They’re just opposed to something they the Jews did.  They attack actual anti-feminists as working for the Jews too.  (And they have attacked me specifically as working for the Jews.)

The ultimate reason that these people are white vagina worshipers comes from their “14 words”.  The “14 words” refer to two slogans they use, each of which is 14 words long.  The first slogan is, “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White Children.”  This slogan is misandrist in an implicit way.  Anything about “the children” is a front for women.

The second slogan is, “Because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from the earth.”  This one is explicitly misandrist and proves that white nationalists or white supremacists or whatever they want to call themselves are only interested in serving white women.  They worship the white vagina.  This is why we can never trust white vagina worshipers to be anti-feminist.

Even Spambots Have Figured Out The So Called Manosphere

A couple of days ago the blog got an interesting comment.

The so called manosphere will attack you for failing to get laid, but it will attack you for successfully get laid too.

This comment was originally in my spam filter.  It also had a link to some website selling pills which I edited out.  Normally, I would have just deleted this comment as I normally delete anything from spambots.  In this case, I let it through because despite being from a spambot, it was an insightful comment.

If you actually get laid, the so called manosphere will attack you.  (See the attacks on PMAFT for an example.)  If you don’t get laid and are honest about not getting laid, then you will get attacked.  That’s is what happened to me.  To be a part of the so called manosphere, you have to not get laid but be dishonest and say you get laid.  This was so obvious that a non-sentient spambot figured it out.

Even spambots have figured out the so called manosphere.

Are Women A Threat To National Security?

The scandal around General Petraeus continues to get weirder.  There’s another general involved with his own woman and a FBI agent sending shirtless pics via email.

This thing could have been a bonanza for foreign intelligence services.  For all we know it was.  Thus, I have to ask the question, are women a threat to national security?  Obviously, the answer is yes.  If Petraeus and that other general distrusted women, then they wouldn’t be in a scandal.  Petraeus would still have his job.

We’re now at a point where the only type of person that can be trusted with national security has the same opinion of women that I do.

What Is With Women Who Say They Support Me?

There are three groups of women who come to my blog.  The first are women who hate me and come to attack me.  The invasion from Manboobz due to my post about how dating advice doesn’t need female approval is a good example of this.  They are the largest group of women who come here.  The second group is female MRAs, like Hestia, Laura Grace Robbins, etc.  They aren’t around that often because usually there isn’t a reason for them to be here, and they are so few in number.  They are the smallest group who come here.  There is a third group that comes here that’s slightly bigger than the female MRAs.  These are women who say that they support me, but who aren’t female MRAs.  The most recent example is a woman using the username, kotoula01.  Read what she said.

Jeezuz, that last post by Martian Bachelor about the New Aristocrats was spot on! I am a 46 yo mother of 5 sons in their 20s. I adore my sons absolutely. They struggle and have to work at such physically difficult jobs because they are men, and it’s ‘expected’ of them. I ask them ” have you met any nice girls lately” and the answer is always the same: ‘there are no nice girls mom, only sluts’ That is sad.

Femcunt has to realize that a new class of people has been given special privileges such as outlined in this description of the New Aristocrats, and it is patently unfair and I don’t blame men like Black Pill for raging against this. I have no idea where my sons are going to find good women, feminine women to settle down with and make families. Not in this country (Canada) that’s for sure. They certainly realize the dangers of spreading their seed in the wrong place…and how they will lose everything if they piss off the wrong female.

Black Pill, I do agree with your position and I’m glad you’re trying to raise awareness. It’s a friggen uphill battle.

Sounds good, right?  Not so fast.  I did a search of her username and found her blogger account.  From reading the blogs that she follows from her blogger profile, I found out what she is really about.  Most of the blogs that she follows are of no consequence, but there are conspiracy theorist blogs like “NWO Intel Briefing”, a paleo diet blog called “The Paleo Diet”, and a couple of Roissyite game blogs including Athol Kay’s BS.  She’s really about Roissyite game, the paleo diet, and conspiracy theory.  Even from her comment you can tell what she’s really worried about is not getting any grandchildren, not her sons.

In the archives of this blog are the occasional comment from a woman like kotoula01.  I also have gotten the rare email via the contact from from women like this.  Typically, they didn’t keep their motivations hidden like kotoula01 did.  These women fell into three groups.

  1. White supremacists and other Jew haters who blamed the Jews for feminism.  They tried to convince me the problem was really non-white women, and anything a white woman may have done to me was really because they were tricked by Jews.  The implication of that is that I shouldn’t hold white women responsible for their actions despite their guilt and hatred for me.  These women were trying to recruit me into anti-semitism.
  2. Conspiracy theorists who blamed the Rockefellers or some other conspiracy theorist mythical evil for feminism.  They tried to convince me that the problem was some sort of shadowy conspiracy so women were really tricked by the Rockefellers or whoever else they think is “really” behind feminism.  The implication was the same as the Jew haters in that I shouldn’t hold women responsible because it’s “not their fault”.  These women were trying to recruit me into conspiracy theory.
  3. Traditionalist conservatives who blamed “liberals” for feminism.  These women might actually fall into one of the other groups, but I never talked to them long enough to find out.  They might have a point in that feminism started out in the left side of politics, but feminism is really the ideology of women and women’s interests so that makes that irrelevant.  Like most MRAs in the last few years, I have realized that traditional conservatives are just as feminist as their liberal counterparts.  These women were trying to recruit me into traditional conservatism.

All three groups of women are effectively lying about being anti-feminist.   None of them are willing to hold women accountable for their actions.  (This makes them completely different from true female MRAs.)  They are all trying to transfer responsibility to some irrelevant third party whether its the Jews, the Rockefellers, liberals, or someone else.  It’s all somebody else’s fault to them.

I’m actually insulted by their attempts to recruit me into their alternate forms of feminism.  They think that I must be so desperate for female attention that I will go along with their crap just to have contact with a woman.

Some of you think that I’m being too harsh on these women and throwing away potential allies for no reason.  The problem with that is that these women are offering me absolutely nothing.  Even if I was inclined to believe that any of these scapegoats was really responsible for women’s bad, immoral, and in many cases illegal behavior, why should I?  Is my life going to be better for believing the Jews or the Rockefellers or whoever else is responsible for feminism?  No.  It’s not going to stop women from trying to destroy my job/business, steal my assets, and steal my freedom.  Are these groups going to protect me from that in any way?  No.  Do any of these groups women who are truly not feminist?  No.  The truth is that joining up with any of these groups would just put me into a position for more women to attack me.

What would happen if I joined any of these groups?  If I joined the Jew haters, eventually I would be attacked for not doing my “duty to the white race” since I wouldn’t be getting married to a female white supremacist and having white children.  Even if I wanted to do that, the Jew hating women would still hate me and not want anything to do with me.  I would also be attacked for not accepting these women’s past as sluts and man haters since I would hold these women accountable for their actions and not blame the Jews.  If I joined the conspiracy theorists, eventually I would be attacked for not doing my “duty” to fight the (non-existent) “depopulation agenda” by getting married and having children.  Like with the Jew haters, the conspiracy theorist women wouldn’t marry me because they sill hate me and not want anything to do with me.  I would be attacked here as well for not accepting these women’s pasts and holding them accountable for their actions instead of blaming the Rockefellers or whoever else the conspiracy theorists want to blame this week.  If I joined the traditionalist conservatives, eventually I would be attacked for not doing my “duty to God” since I wouldn’t be getting married and having children just like with the Jew haters and the conspiracy theorists.  The problem is the same since traditionalist conservative women will still hate me and not want anything to do with me.  Again, I would be attacked for not accepting these women’s past and holding them accountable for their actions instead of blaming “liberals”.  All these groups make a big deal about being “pro-family” so that means I would end up a pariah because there is no way I could form a “family”.

If I were to join any of these groups, it would be a completely one sided relationship where they benefit 100%, and I would never benefit.  These women aren’t potential allies.  They are parasites with their own anti-male agenda.

Strangely Appropriate

Inmalafide is back in a manner of speaking.  Someone took over the domain and make it a mirror of the internet shock site, goatse.  (I’m not providing a link to inmalafide because I will not link to goatse.)  For those of you who do not know what goatse is, you are very lucky.  The wikipedia page about it does a good job of explaining it.  (This link is safe to look at.)

In a way this is strangely appropriate.  Inmalafide was metaphorically equivalent to goatse when Bardamu was around.  Now, it’s literally a goatse website.  That is the fate that inmalafide deserves.