You may have noticed a few lame trolls today. That’s because ManginaBoobz linked to my post about my desire to leave this planet of women and manginas behind. Besides discovering that the readership of ManginaBoobz is homophobic (although they may only be homophobic against male homosexuals), I’m surprised that ManginaBoobz didn’t write about my World Of Ptavvs post or the related post, Zoe Quinn Is A Thrint. I’m really disappointed.
I have a question for all you white vagina worshipping nationalists reading this. Why do you come here? You aren’t going to convince me of anything, and this blog is very obscure. Yet, you people keep showing up. Why?
I asked a few years ago why all these supposed “good women” never do anything to show themselves and differentiate themselves from all the evil women out there. The obvious answer is because there are so few good women out there as to make them practically nonexistent. That there are so few female MRAs and similar women is proof of that.
The problem of the lack of “good women” is worse than you think because there are plenty of cases where it would benefit the “good women” to make themselves known and differentiate themselves. We’re not just talking about cases where “good women” should be doing things to help men just out of the goodness of their hearts. We’re talking about cases where if nothing else the “good women” should be doing things that would help men but generate benefits for them at the same time.
On another blog a while ago, I read about the perfect example of this. During divorce, which happens frequently and is mostly caused by women, women get custody of the children most of the time. This means that men lose access to their children especially since women can prevent men from seeing their children with impunity. Even when courts order that men get visitation, they won’t bother enforcing it. Thus, a divorced man’s access to his children is completely dependent on his ex-wife. For many divorced men this means being completely shut out of their children’s lives.
A divorced man losing contact with his children isn’t the only victim here. The divorced man’s parents also lose contact with his children. The children lose a relationship with their paternal grandparents. This brings up a question, why aren’t mothers of divorced men fighting for their sons when it comes to visitation and custody issues after a divorce? You don’t see any organization of grandmothers fighting the divorce courts on this issue. They aren’t joining any fathers’ rights groups.
This isn’t just a case of these mothers should be helping their divorced sons out of the goodness of their hearts (although that should be reason enough for them). These grandmothers (presumably) lose contact with their grandchildren because their sons do. It would benefit these women to help their sons on this issue because they would regain a relationship with their grandchildren. It directly benefits grandmothers to fight for their sons visitation and custody rights. Since this obviously isn’t happening even though it would benefit the mothers of divorced sons, there are only two possibilities why grandmothers aren’t doing this:
1. Women are willing to sacrifice a relationship with their grandchildren just to stick it to men, even their own sons. In other words women hate men more than they love their grandchildren.
2. While the divorced son loses visitation with his children, the grandmother is getting visitation from her son’s ex-wife but is complicit in cutting her own son out of her grandchildren’s life. A woman is willing to conspire with her son’s ex-wife against her own son, her own flesh and blood, because she hates men.
Either one of these is pretty evil. Women don’t just hate men in general. They hate their own sons (and other men in their own families). Women are willing to sacrifice their own sons on the altar of supporting other women EVEN WHEN IT PERSONALLY HURTS THEM. This example pretty much puts the issue of “good women” to bed.
On a side note, this is another reason why white vagina worshiping nationalists are full of shit. They talk a lot about duty to kin and racial solidarity, but this example proves that women are stabbing their own male kin in the back. They’re stupid to trust to their female kin or white women in general. Of course, white vagina worshiping nationalists are fine with white men being stabbed in the back by white women as long as white babies are produced.
stoner and tarnished, your parents, while abusive, succeeded in producing White children. You would even call yourselves “normal” White children. But a Negro, even if he was one of the very few moral and talented negros, can never produce White children.
There you have it, an example that shows “good women” are incredibly few in number and shows another reason why white nationalists are white vagina worshipers.
Pretty soon the new buzz in the so called manosphere will be pufferfish game. It’s where you try to inflate yourself to take up as much room as possible because it’s alpha to take up as much room as possible. This was the subject of today’s Dilbert comic so the so called manosphere is guaranteed to steal it.
Like everything else the so called manosphere does, it won’t work. If the manosphere wants to take up as much space as possible, they should do what they’re already doing, being as fat as possible.
I found this idiot feminist woman who pretty much said that hating women is 100% correlated with being a man who women find unattractive. We know that women find 80% of men (give or take) unattractive so this brings up a question. If women find you unattractive, why shouldn’t you hate women? Even if you don’t hate women, you will still be treated as if you do if women find you unattractive. If you’re going to do the time, you might as well do the crime.
Some may answer my question with how hate (and bitterness) will supposedly eat you up inside. If that is really the case, then it’s going to be worse trying to not hate women while women are acting as if you do. (Remember you have already been determined to be a woman hater due to your lack of attractiveness.)
Others may answer with how the whole thing is entrapment. Women want unattractive men to hate them so that they can use that as “evidence” of how we’re a threat to women. This is a valid point, but we will still be accused of hating women so not hating women doesn’t prevent this entrapment. If anything working hard at not hating women, just leaves you vulnerable.
I’m forced to conclude there is no reason to not hate women. For those of us whose “crime” is being unattractive to women, it’s the only logical option.
There’s a new blog called, Mating Selfishness, that several of us are writing for now. It’s about the double standards in dating and everything related to dating.
I just contributed my first article for it, which is an adaptation of my writings on The Feminist Time Machine. While I will occasionally write for Mating Selfishness, my main blog will still be here.
I have realized that we need to start calling white supremacists/white nationalists a new name, white vagina worshipers. White vagina worshipers are not opposed to feminism. They’re just opposed to something they the Jews did. They attack actual anti-feminists as working for the Jews too. (And they have attacked me specifically as working for the Jews.)
The ultimate reason that these people are white vagina worshipers comes from their “14 words”. The “14 words” refer to two slogans they use, each of which is 14 words long. The first slogan is, “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White Children.” This slogan is misandrist in an implicit way. Anything about “the children” is a front for women.
The second slogan is, “Because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from the earth.” This one is explicitly misandrist and proves that white nationalists or white supremacists or whatever they want to call themselves are only interested in serving white women. They worship the white vagina. This is why we can never trust white vagina worshipers to be anti-feminist.