As we know women make a lot of false accusations whether it’s about rape, sexual harassment, or lots of other things. When they get caught making false accusations, they (and their mangina defenders) often will use the excuse that they were just trying to start a conversation (or dialogue or discussion). Obviously, it’s bullshit, but that doesn’t stop others from using the same excuse, namely conspiracy theorists. For example, Smultronstället said this.
I guess it is because of this that I still have kind of a soft spot in my heart for Alex Jones. Because these infowars-guys … say what you want about them, but at least they recognized that they were ruled by people who had different INTERESTS, who were not simply misinformed but malicious.
Let’s remember the context of this. Alex Jones has falsely accused a lot of men of raping and sexually abusing children. (This is something we see every conspiracy theorist do.) PizzaGate is one of the biggest examples, but far from the only one. The Chobani corporation is suing Alex Jones because Jones falsely accused Chobani and its owner facilitating the rape and sexual abuse of children. Raping or sexually abusing children is one of the most vile crimes in existence. Falsely accusing someone of that crime is equally as vile. Yet, conspiracy theorists like Smultronstället defend this by saying that at least Alex Jones started a conversation about how the “ruling class” having different interests than the rest of the population. Putting aside that the issue of whether the “ruling class” has different interests to the rest of the population is more complex than that, it is clear that the nearly all of “ruling class” has no interest in raping and sexually abusing children, just like everyone else.
Just as both women and conspiracy theorists expect us to “listen and believe”, both groups think it is perfectly acceptable to falsely accuse men of the most vile of crimes. In fact, the false accusations that women and conspiracy theorists make are practically the same. The only difference is whether men are falsely accused of raping women or of raping children. Since they’re so similar it’s not a surprise that when caught by their lies, they both use the excuse that they were just trying to “start a conversation”.
Alex Jones was one of the conspiracy theorist morons promoting PizzaGate. (PizzaGate was the false accusation that Comet Pizza in DC was child sex abuse ring for the Democrats.) A few days ago, Alex Jones “apologized” for promoting PizzaGate. Why did Alex Jones issue an “apology” for PizzaGate? It has to be the first time he has ever done so. It is because he was about to run into real legal trouble. The day he “apologized” was the last day he could “apologize” for PizzaGate and not be sued for libel under Texas law.
In other words, Alex Jones is a coward if he actually believes in conspiracy theory. Regardless Alex Jones proved that conspiracy theory is bullshit since this is just an example of how conspiracy theorists won’t stand up for their beliefs if they run into any real trouble. (What else can you expect from a man who was against government surveillance but then changed his mind as long as Trump was in charge?) It gets in the way of their scams selling “male enhancement” products and other garbage.
In the past I have talked about The Gay Virgin Player Rapist canard, how men who stand up for themselves against gynocratic thinking get accused of being multiple contradictory bad things at once. For example, being gay yet also a rapist of women. A gay man would not have any interest in raping women. Or, being a virgin yet also a player or a rapist. How could a virgin be a player or a rapist since either would mean that the “virgin” can’t be a virgin? It’s inherently contradictory and impossible. The reason why a man gets attacked as a gay virgin player rapist is because the attackers are really saying, “this man doesn’t bow to gynocratic thinking”. Each part of gay virgin player rapist is something that negatively impacts women. Gay men and virgin men aren’t spending their money on women. Players play women which mean women don’t get what they want. And rapists are just evil. The gay virgin player rapist canard is the Just World Fallacy run amok by attempting to paint a man as maximally evil even though it makes no sense and is impossible due to the contradictions.
I have realized that the gay virgin player rapist canard needs in some cases to be expanded when I read this comment where I was simultaneously accused of being a loser, a virgin, and a (Jewish) overlord. (The author of that comment believes that Jews run the world and that I’m Jewish. Thus, according to him I am one of the rulers of the world.) Obviously, this is contradictory. If I was such a loser, how can I be a part of the group that rules the world? How could I be a virgin? My fellow Jewish overlords would just give me some sex slaves or something.
The Loser Overlord canard is very common among everyone from white vagina worshiping nationalists to feminists. All of anti-semetic thought argues that both the Jews are defective, yet they are so intelligent, capable, and powerful that they run the world. To feminists, men who disagree with them are both losers, yet these losers are a part of the patriarchy that rules the world. It’s all the same contradictory argument that is impossible due to the contradictions.
All this proves is that women and manginas are incapable of rational thought. Otherwise, I would get better attacks that would at least be internally consistent instead of mishmash of contradictions.
Back when I changed the name of this blog and my username to “The Black Pill”, no one used the term, “black pill”. I meant for it to stand for rationality, evidence based thinking and reasoning, freedom for men from the yoke of gynocracy, and all around rejection of being a mangina. Both the red and the blue pill concepts worship women (albeit in different ways), and male adherents of both pill are manginas. Others have adopted the term, “black pill”, to mean nihilism, giving up, and hopelessness. Many black pillers are manginas. Thus I need to separate myself from them. This requires changing my username and the name of this blog.
The blog is now called, “Freedom from the Gynocracy”. The content will not change as being free from the gynocracy has been what this blog is all about even before it was called the black pill. I’m changing my username to, “The Man In The Orbital Castle”. Those of you familiar with the book, “The Man In The High Castle”, will recognize it as a variant on that.
It’s time to give up the pills.
I found a picture that shows how massive female entitlement is. This is a picture of the womens march in Portland last weekend. On top are the entitled women protesting. Below is a camp of the homeless. Notice how all the homeless are all men.
Where I got this picture from made it clear that the women in the Portland womens march did nothing to help these homeless men. (If the women were aware of the homeless men at all, I’m sure that the women falsely accused the homeless men of male entitlement.) The women above are throwing a temper tantrum because they might have to pay for their own birth control & abortions instead of the government. The men below are suffering from actual problems including homelessness, unemployment, and in many cases mental illness. (And that’s actual mental illness not the bullshit women make up.)
This picture shows that any accusation of male entitlement is a lie, and that women are the entitled ones.
Over the holidays, I was able to get together with a friend I haven’t talked to in a while. His work takes him to the former Soviet Union, central Asia, and the Middle East a lot. Since he had the opportunity for more on the ground knowledge about the situation in the Middle East than anyone else I know, I asked him if he saw any groups worse than ISIS on the horizon. I expected him to either answer, “I don’t know”, “No”, or give the name of some Islamic Fundamentalist group. Instead he started talking about these groups in the former Soviet Union. These groups were all secular but had crazy beliefs such as strange mathematical theories. If these groups had the opportunity, they would do things like nuke cities that they thought their wacky mathematical theories said was in the wrong place, for example. I said to him that I was expecting him to name an Islamic Fundamentalist group not the groups that he did. He explained that as horrific as ISIS is, they still have to obey Islam. They still have to obey the Koran. They can’t diverge from Islam without causing problems for themselves so that puts a lid on just how bad ISIS or any Islamic Fundamentalist group can get. The groups from the former Soviet Union that he described have no such limitations because they are completely secular. They don’t have to worry about their coreligionists reigning them in or obeying a holy text. This gives them complete freedom to believe or do the most horrific things possible. My friend described them as secular cults. These groups all had many of the components of being a religious cult but without a belief in a god or gods.
As my friend described these groups from the former Soviet Union, I noticed how similar these groups were to everything from the alt-right, neoreaction, the manuresphere, white vagina worshipers, to social justice warriors/intersectional feminists and other feminists. All of these groups believe nonsense with religious fervor. Look at how often white vagina worshipers show up to comment on this blog despite it being a waste of time for them. They do it because they’re the secular equivalent of religious zealots, and they don’t understand how illogical it is to waste their time on this blog. I have even seen social justice warriors described as “if Pat Robertson was a woman born in 1990 to an atheist family in a deep blue state but otherwise was completely the same”. The actual Pat Robertson can’t diverge from the Bible without causing problems. On the other hand, social justice warriors don’t have that limitation.
We are living in the age of the secular cult, and secular cults are wrecking havoc with everything. Feminism, in particular, controls the political apparatus of western countries and uses that control to wage war on men. Russia is in a sorry state so expect the secular cults in the former Soviet Union to get popular when Russia falls apart. In fact, I expect with all of the anti-Russia paranoia going on now that the CIA or some other part of the government will start funding the secular cults in Russia to destabilize Russia. That may have already begun. It’s the same problem as with Syria where the US government has been so obsessed with getting Assad that the US government is funding Islamic terror groups it should be fighting against. Secular cults aren’t treated as the threat they are so they get propped up by people thinking they can control them for their own ends. Also, secular cults prop each other up so that they can fight endless wars with each other.
I have no idea on how to solve the problem of secular cults. The problem is global so there is no place to reasonably escape to except maybe Japan, and how long can the Japanese hold out against them?
StonerWithABoner asked, “Mr. Black Pill (or anyone else here) can you explain this too me?
When O’bama talked about a stimulus plan, all the “right leaning guys” like Bernie Chapin and Crappity Crapitalism said that it was Keynesian economics and was as irresponsible as using a credit card to buy yourself out of debt….
Now, Trumpy wants to borrow money to build, build,build because rates are low. But isn’t this essentially the same or at least 70% similar to O’bummer’s stimulus program? Why aren’t the alter-righties crying about fiscal responsibility, smaller gov’t and states rights? Is it because a domineering “alpha male” is suggesting these plans?
Unless I am confusing something, then they seem to be exhibiting similar behavior to feminists. When times are good, demand the high paying jobs but when they are on a sinking ship, demand women (and a far secondary children) first. Seems like they change colors on a whim and have no cohesive ideology except to scapgoat low status men with darker skin for all their massive personal failures…”
I can explain this. It’s the Horseshoe theory of politics in action where the farther right you go politically, you become more left and vice versa. This is a phenomena that I have noticed before in the manuresphere. In other words, the manuresphere’s politics is indistinguishable from the left they (claim to) abhor. They were only against massive spending when Obama wanted to do it. Now, that Trump is suggesting the same thing they are all for it.
This is something we see over and over again with nearly all political factions. They are all feminists and manginas. The only difference between all these political factions is that they have cosmetic differences between them. Everything they do is for the benefit of women and the subjugation of men (or what they believe to be the benefit of women and the subjugation of men). The manuresphere isn’t different than nearly all political factions.
That being said I expect that sooner or later (probably sooner), the manuresphere will start denouncing Trump once they figure out that Trump has no use for them. When that happens the manuresphere will be like, “We were always at war with
Eastasia Eurasia Trump.”