Hiding Female Incompetence Isn’t Going So Well

The last couple of weeks have really bad for women and manginas attempting to hide female incompetence.  First, Amazon has been caught deleting negative reviews of Hillary Clinton’s new book.  Amazon can’t hide the facts.  Hillary was a shitty candidate who ran a shitty campaign last year and then wrote a shitty book about it.

Second, there has been an attempt to hide the incompetence of Susan Maudlin, the now former CISO (Chief Information Security Officer) of Equifax, in the recent Equifax data breach by scrubbing the internet of information about Susan Maudlin.  Clearly, that’s not working since the attempt was noticed.  It’s pretty obvious that Susan Maudlin only got the CISO job at Equifax because she’s a woman.  She lacked the experience and aptitude necessary for such a job, and that is one reason why the Equifax data breach happened.

More and more, men are waking up to the fact that women don’t belong in the jobs they have.  It’s not surprising women and manginas would try to hide female incompetence to stop this trend.  Since the internet never forgets, they got caught.

Advertisements

Women Think That Gazpacho Is Creepy

Yesterday, I was out getting lunch that recently added gazpacho, a cold Spanish tomato soup, to their menu.  I overheard two women ahead of me in line talking about the new gazpacho.  One of the women asks the other what gazpacho is.  The other woman says that it’s like salsa that you drink.  The first woman says that gazpacho is creepy.  The second woman agreed.  After that I made sure to get some gazpacho with my lunch because I was not going to let women ruin gazpacho especially by calling gazpacho creepy.

I have been saying for a long time that women calling men creepy is bullshit.  However, this proves it.  Women are willing to call traditional Spanish cuisine creepy which is complete rubbish by itself.  If a soup can be creepy, than any man being called creepy is meaningless.

Why The Issue Of Social Acceptability Matters

In my last post, I introduced how the issue of social acceptability is important when it come to dating, sex, and relationships.  It is also important to address why this issue is important.  This can be explained with the following example.

A man who is lost and happens to be alone gets falsely accused of being of rapist (to the point of being reported to the police) simply for asking for directions.  We know this would not have happened if this man was accompied by a woman.  This man could have had a girlfriend or a wife (or be gay but that is besides the point here).  Since his wife or girlfriend (if he had one) was not with him, his status was the same as an incel so he gets falsely accused of being a rapist.

Since this can happen to men with girlfriends or wives, it’s a thousand times worse for a man who has trouble getting a girlfriend.  This shows that the issue of social acceptability in dating, sex, and relationships goes far beyond just being able to get a girlfriend or get laid.  If a man is unaccompanied by a woman for too long, he is in danger of being falsely accused of being a rapist.

What A Girlfriend Can Do For You That No One Else Can? Provide Social Acceptability

Dr. Manginalove has a new post on the Dickless Mangina Project.  (Like with most of his other posts, the only comments come from men pointing out everything that is wrong with what Dr. Manginalove says.)  Manginalove starts out with the following.

There’s a very common issue I see among guys who’re looking for a girlfriend: they’re just not ready for one yet. Many guys go full-tilt boogie into finding themselves a girlfriend as soon as possible without having laid the emotional groundwork.

Many guys?  Try every guy.  When guys start looking for a girlfriend, they don’t give a shit about “emotional groundwork”.  And why should they?  Enough guys are able to get a girlfriend and/or get laid without doing “emotional groundwork”.  That proves that this so called “emotional groundwork is completely unnecessary.  What Manginalove is trying to do here is invoke the Just World Fallacy and Feminist Time Machine and hope you don’t notice.  Unsurprisngly, Manginalove does not define what this “emotional groundwork” is supposed to be because doing so would get many comments from men showing that they are meet whatever criteria Manginalove would come up with.  Because of that Manginalove is using circular reasoning trap to say if you have never had a girlfriend, then you have done “emotional groundwork”.  The evidence for not having done the “emotional groundwork” is that you have never had a girlfriend.  There is no objective criteria anywhere.  Thus, we can only conclude that Manginalove is lying.  It gets worse from there.

What Do You Expect To Get From A Girlfriend (That You Can’t Get From Anyone Else?)
One of the first things I ask people who are desperate for a relationship is simple: why?

“…I thought that was obvious, Doc.”

It’s a more important question than you’d think. One of the biggest mistakes that a lot of guys make – especially guys who are socially inexperienced – is that they expect their future girlfriend to be all things to them. They want companionship, emotional intimacy, a helpmate, someone who’ll make them feel special. They want someone who’ll make them want to get up in the morning and that they’ll look forward to seeing at the end of the day. Oh, and blowjobs on the regular.

Which is great and all… but the thing that many guys fail to ask is why they’re not getting these already from their other relationships.

OK. Maybe not the blowjobs.

(Or maybe those too. I’m not judging.)

One of the things that tends to kill relationships is the tendency for men to put all their emotional eggs into one particular basket. Thanks to the way that we’re socialized, straight men are taught to try to get all their emotional needs met by their romantic partners.

This is a canard I have seen a lot (which deserves its own article at some point), that the real problem is that dateless men lacking friends.  Unless a man is bisexual, this makes no sense, yet we see this canard over and over again.  There are aspects of this that involve trying to trick dateless men into homosexuality to get rid of them (which isn’t done as much as it was a couple of decades ago), as seen with Manginalove’s “joke” about blowjobs.  However, that is missing the point.  First, sexual relationships are by definition more intimate than non-sexual relationships.  It’s not unreasonable to have a deeper trust of your girlfriend than just your friends.

Second, and more important, having a girlfriend and having friendships are connected but in the opposite direction that Manginalove says.  If you never had a girlfriend, you are in danger of losing friends through no fault of your own.  There are men I have been friends with for decades that I have lost as friends as soon as they got a girlfriend.  I have talked to and known many other men who experienced the same thing.  (All my enemies reading this will say that it’s because of my behavior or some other nonsense.  I can prove that wrong since in several cases the girlfriends never met me.)  What happened was that their girlfriends didn’t want undesirable single men around.  The men go along with this because the girlfriends can provide sex.  I can’t.  It’s not that having friends makes it easier to find a girlfriend.  It’s that having a girlfriend is the only way to keep many of your friends.  This is a bigger problem than even that.  A lot of social activity takes places only between couples or people who are in couples.  Obviously, to be a part of that social activity, you don’t need to be in a couple all the time, but you do need to be in a couple at least in a semi-regular basis.  It’s a case of the poor getting poorer and the rich getting richer.  Or in this case the dateless getting more dateless.  In other words, the only way for a dateless man to stop this downward spiral is to get a girlfriend, any girlfriend.

While there are other answers to the question of what a girlfriend can provide that no one else can, the ultimate and final answer to that question is social acceptability.  Without social acceptability men lose their friends, get shut out of social activity, and have more trouble getting a girlfriend in the first place.  The only comment to Manginalove’s post makes this clear.

So to sum it up. Another article from DNL about how men always have to change, and be deserving. Not a single word about what women are expected to change. You know what DNL, maybe if women stopped judging men by their lack of previous girlfriends. Then maybe men wouldn’t be so desperate to get girlfriends. I know you grasp this concept perfectly well when it comes to “slut-shaming”. But somehow the shaming that women do seem to be a totally taboo subject to you.

Dateless men get falsely accused of everything from being useless and disorganized (as Manginalove does in his post) to being terrorists in waiting (even though the evidence says the complete opposite).  The only way for most men to avoid this fate is to get a girlfriend.  Thus, many men are desperate to get a girlfriend.  It’s that simple.  Since dating advice for men is female centric, it is assumed the only reasons why men pursue women is being horny and entitlement for women’s bodies.  While there is truth about the being horny part, the entitlement canard is a total lie.  I have talked to lots of dateless men.  Not one of them believes they are entitled to women’s bodies.  What they want is social acceptability and to not get falsely accused of being a potential terrorist.

Dating advice ignores the issue of social acceptability being tied to having a girlfriend because it makes women look bad and brings up uncomfortable questions about women.

Conspiracy Theorists Are Not “Starting A Conversation”

As we know women make a lot of false accusations whether it’s about rape, sexual harassment, or lots of other things.  When they get caught making false accusations, they (and their mangina defenders) often will use the excuse that they were just trying to start a conversation (or dialogue or discussion).  Obviously, it’s bullshit, but that doesn’t stop others from using the same excuse, namely conspiracy theorists.  For example, Smultronstället said this.

I guess it is because of this that I still have kind of a soft spot in my heart for Alex Jones. Because these infowars-guys … say what you want about them, but at least they recognized that they were ruled by people who had different INTERESTS, who were not simply misinformed but malicious.

Let’s remember the context of this.  Alex Jones has falsely accused a lot of men of raping and sexually abusing children.   (This is something we see every conspiracy theorist do.)  PizzaGate is one of the biggest examples, but far from the only one.  The Chobani corporation is suing Alex Jones because Jones falsely accused Chobani and its owner facilitating the rape and sexual abuse of children.  Raping or sexually abusing children is one of the most vile crimes in existence.  Falsely accusing someone of that crime is equally as vile.  Yet, conspiracy theorists like Smultronstället defend this by saying that at least Alex Jones started a conversation about how the “ruling class” having different interests than the rest of the population.  Putting aside that the issue of whether the “ruling class” has different interests to the rest of the population is more complex than that, it is clear that the nearly all of “ruling class” has no interest in raping and sexually abusing children, just like everyone else.

Just as both women and conspiracy theorists expect us to “listen and believe”, both groups think it is perfectly acceptable to falsely accuse men of the most vile of crimes.  In fact, the false accusations that women and conspiracy theorists make are practically the same.  The only difference is whether men are falsely accused of raping women or of raping children.  Since they’re so similar it’s not a surprise that when caught by their lies, they both use the excuse that they were just trying to “start a conversation”.

Alex Jones Proved Conspiracy Theory Is BS And A Scam

Alex Jones was one of the conspiracy theorist morons promoting PizzaGate.  (PizzaGate was the false accusation that Comet Pizza in DC was child sex abuse ring for the Democrats.)  A few days ago, Alex Jones “apologized” for promoting PizzaGate.  Why did Alex Jones issue an “apology” for PizzaGate?  It has to be the first time he has ever done so.  It is because he was about to run into real legal trouble.  The day he “apologized” was the last day he could “apologize” for PizzaGate and not be sued for libel under Texas law.

In other words, Alex Jones is a coward if he actually believes in conspiracy theory.  Regardless Alex Jones proved that conspiracy theory is bullshit since this is just an example of how conspiracy theorists won’t stand up for their beliefs if they run into any real trouble.  (What else can you expect from a man who was against government surveillance but then changed his mind as long as Trump was in charge?)  It gets in the way of their scams selling “male enhancement” products and other garbage.

The Gay Virgin Player Rapist Loser Overlord

In the past I have talked about The Gay Virgin Player Rapist canard, how men who stand up for themselves against gynocratic thinking get accused of being multiple contradictory bad things at once.  For example, being gay yet also a rapist of women.  A gay man would not have any interest in raping women.  Or, being a virgin yet also a player or a rapist.  How could a virgin be a player or a rapist since either would mean that the “virgin” can’t be a virgin?  It’s inherently contradictory and impossible.  The reason why a man gets attacked as a gay virgin player rapist is because the attackers are really saying, “this man doesn’t bow to gynocratic thinking”.  Each part of gay virgin player rapist is something that negatively impacts women.  Gay men and virgin men aren’t spending their money on women.  Players play women which mean women don’t get what they want.  And rapists are just evil.  The gay virgin player rapist canard is the Just World Fallacy run amok by attempting to paint a man as maximally evil even though it makes no sense and is impossible due to the contradictions.

I have realized that the gay virgin player rapist canard needs in some cases to be expanded when I read this comment where I was simultaneously accused of being a loser, a virgin, and a (Jewish) overlord.  (The author of that comment believes that Jews run the world and that I’m Jewish.  Thus, according to him I am one of the rulers of the world.)  Obviously, this is contradictory.  If I was such a loser, how can I be a part of the group that rules the world?  How could I be a virgin?  My fellow Jewish overlords would just give me some sex slaves or something.

The Loser Overlord canard is very common among everyone from white vagina worshiping nationalists to feminists.  All of anti-semetic thought argues that both the Jews are defective, yet they are so intelligent, capable, and powerful that they run the world.  To feminists, men who disagree with them are both losers, yet these losers are a part of the patriarchy that rules the world.  It’s all the same contradictory argument that is impossible due to the contradictions.

All this proves is that women and manginas are incapable of rational thought.  Otherwise, I would get better attacks that would at least be internally consistent instead of mishmash of contradictions.