The War On MGTOW Is Out In The Open Now

For a while now, we have been dealing with a secret war on MGTOW.  This consisted of bullshit like we have seen and still see at AVFM or Hawaiian Fat Blob that married men can be MGTOW and from conspiracy theorists telling us that we need to man up and marry sluts to stop the fictional depopulation agenda.  This was designed to subvert MGTOW by making us fight nonexistent enemies and devaluing the term, MGTOW, into meaninglessness.  How can a married man truly go his own way?  He can’t because by getting married he is under the complete control of his wife and the state.  His wife can divorce him at any time, take half or more of his assets, and take his kids (if he has any) away from him.  Tradcon bullshit about marriage doesn’t change these real facts.  When a man gets married, he is no longer going his own way whether he likes it or not.

For that matter, why can’t a male feminist be said to be going his own way?  Obviously he can’t because he is going the way of women.  However, if a married man can be said to go his own way, then so can a male feminist.  Thus saying that married men can go their own way makes the term, MGTOW, meaningless.  Even the so called “MGTOW manifesto” which talks about restoring masculinity in men and femininity in women has been rejected because it’s another attempt to make MGTOW meaningless.

Actual MGTOW rejected these attempts to redefine MGTOW into meaninglessness.  Sooner or later one of the groups would trigger a movement from waging a secret war on MGTOW to waging an open war on MGTOW.  That’s what happened when PrisonPlanet/Infowars (Alex Jones’s band of conspiracy theorists) released their video on “neomasculinity” (which should really be called neo pussy begging) that attacks MGTOW.  Bar bar eviscerated PrisonPlanet’s “neomasculinity” video on his blog and in this video.

I like that the war on MGTOW is completely out in the open now.  It not only proves everything that I have been saying about how conspiracy theorists are manginas, but we will no long have to suffer idiots talking out of both sides of their mouth with bullshit like “a married man is going his own way”.  From now on no one can seriously say that manuresphere unity is a virtue.

The manuresphere is facing its demographic time bomb (along with manuresphere adjacent groups like PrisonPlanet), and this is just the first of series of desperate actions we will see from them.

There Is One Good Reason To Boycott Mad Max: Fury Road

If you are looking for a reason to boycott Mad Max: Fury Road, I can give you one if you care about that.  And no, it’s not any of the Return of Kings Court Jesters reasons.  It’s because they hired Eve Ensler, the feminist author of the Vagina Monologues as a consultant.

The reason why she was a consultant was to “educate” the actors about sex trafficking.  I’m sure she knows a lot about that with how she calls the rape of a 13 year old by an adult woman, a good rape, in the Vagina Monologues.

This is something that Return of Kings Court Jesters won’t talk about despite pointing out Eve Ensler’s involvement in the movie.  Maybe it’s because they’re are too busy blaming Jewish men for the actions of women.

Roosh Is The Ideal Adversary

Mitchel asked the question, why does the media give Roosh a platform?  This is an important question to ask.  If you’re enemies are giving you a platform, it’s because they’re planning on kicking it out from under you at the right moment.  That is pretty much what happened when Roosh went on the Dr. Oz show.

This point was made by Uncle Malky on Barbarossaaa’s blog.

Roosh is the ideal adversary. Here is a guy who writes multiple books on the topic of seduction (how to be a PUA) and has next door to 0 PR skills. He has to e-beg to keep his sorry-ass website going fer Chrissakes! All his big talk about how “Betas need to learn game.” HA HA HA! The average store manager at Trader Joe’s has more “game” than this clown.

Roosh gets a media platform because he is the perfect adversary for them.  He walks into traps that would be obvious for just about anyone else.  Plus, Roosh fails to make use of opportunities even while in those traps.  For example, he could have asked the women on Dr. Oz who were attacking him about his fat shaming views if they would be attracted a homeless guy on the street.  Roosh couldn’t even do that.  Braininavat pointed out that the media gives Roosh a platform because they understand him.  Part of that is because he won’t ask the hard questions given the opportunity.

To summarize, the media treats Roosh as a court jester, and Roosh is too stupid to realize it.

The Good Men Project Says It’s All Right To Punch A Woman Who Says That You Are A Loser Who Can’t Get Laid Or A Creep

Apparently, feminists are pissed that Black Widow, a character from Marvel comics/Marvel movies got called a slut.  When you consider the name, Black Widow, it’s clear that she is a slut.  However, pointing this out is making feminists very angry even though Black Widow doesn’t exist.  (Maybe feminists don’t realize that Black Widow isn’t an actual person.)  In particular, one of the authors at the Dickless Mangina Project wants to punch any man who uses the world slut.

You can call me a slut (fair warning – you might get punched in the face if you do)

The Dickless Mangina Project thinks it’s fine for women to punch men who use the word slut.  Since they’re fine with that, that must also mean that they fine with men punching women accuse them of being losers who can’t get laid or of being “creepy”.  Otherwise, they would be hypocrites.

So next time a woman says that you’re a loser who can’t get laid or accuses you of being a virgin (regardless of whether you are one or not) or says you’re creepy, punch her.  That’s how the Dickless Mangina Project says you should handle that.

Roosh Proves That The Manuresphere Is The C (As In Cuckold) Team

I have called the manuresphere the C team (that’s C as is Cuckold) before because the scams of the manuresphere are not only completely derivative but they are incapable of using them to enrich themselves.  The manuresphere has no original ideas.  For example, Game came from Eben Pagan (a.k.a. David DeAngelo).  The manuresphere is a bunch of con artists, but they’re really bad at being con artists.  They can’t even come up with their own scams.  Like with game, they have to copy them from con artists that aren’t complete failures.

Thus, I was not surprised when Grizzly informed us that Roosh was owned by Dr. Oz.   (You can watch Dr. Oz’s interview with Roosh here, and see Roosh being flabbergasted that the Dr. Oz show would lie to him here.)  Dr. Oz is a quack and a con artist, but much more successful than anyone in the manuresphere.  (Science based medicine has several pages documenting Dr. Oz’s fraudsDr. Oz’s fraud is so bad that there is a movement among the faculty at the medical school of Columbia University to have him removed from his teaching post there.)  Roosh going on the Dr. Oz show is equivalent to a first grader trying to understand calculus.

Roosh like the rest of the manuresphere does not realize that as con artists go they are the bottom of the barrel.  Pretty much any other con artist can eat them for lunch like Dr. Oz did.  That’s why the manuresphere is the C (as in cuckold) team.

Why Isn’t Paul Nungesser Suing Emma Sulkowicz Or Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand?

Paul Nungesser, the German student studying at the University of Columbia who was falsely accused of rape by Emma Sulkowicz (a.k.a. mattress girl), is suing Columbia University, its president and trustees and the visual arts professor that allowed Emma Sulkowicz’s mattress project to go forward.  This law suit is necessary because all these people aided and abetted Emma Sulkowicz’s false rape accusation.  However, there are two names missing from this list, Emma Sulkowicz herself, and Democrat senator Kirsten Gillibrand, who has been harassing Nungesser and calling him a rapist despite being exonerated by both Columbia University and the police.

Why are Sulkowicz and Gillibrand not being sued by Nungesser?  It’s because they’re women.  Too many men, have internalized “never hit a girl” to a point where they can’t hold a woman responsible for her actions.  I suspect this is the case with Nungesser (or his lawyer).  While there’s a long list of people who aided and abetted Sulkowicz who deserved to be sued into homelessness, they were all acting on the behalf of Sulkowicz, not the other way around.

I have noticed that in many cases when a woman does something evil and/or illegal, there is a search for the man behind her who is “really” running things.  Unfortunately, #GamerGate provides a good example.  A lot of gamergaters believe that Jonathan McIntosh, Anita Sarkeesian’s partner at Feminist Frequency, is really running the show and that Sarkeesian is just a puppet.  While I’m sure McIntosh is glad to have Sarkeesian as the public face of Feminist Frequency and does contribute his share, Sarkeesian contributes her share as well.  She is not McIntosh’s puppet, and all the gamergaters who believe this are doing is giving Sarkeesian an out if she decides to cash out.  Sarkessian is her own agent, so she is responsible for the lies she has told.  She needs to be held accountable for that.

The same thing exists in conspiracy theory.  Women are never agents of their own.  They’re always agents of the Jews, the bankers, aliens, or demons (who are all conveniently described as men).  It’s the same with traditionalist conservatives too.

What all of these groups have in common is that they’re working hard at avoiding the reality that they need to fight women.  If Nungesser is successful in his lawsuit, it will only help on the margins.  It may convince a few men not to aid and abet the criminal activity of women like Sulkowicz.  However, it won’t change the mind of most manginas since they will be more than happy to be martyrs for women.  To stop false rape accusations and everything else women do, we need to attack the source of the problem.  That means going after women’s lackeys is not enough.  We need to go after women.

More Evidence That “Creepy” Is A Pejorative Equivalent To Nigger

Whenever a woman uses the word, creepy, against a man, it’s equivalent to calling a black person a nigger.  Here’s an example that shows this to be true.

If a man takes a picture of a woman it’s “creepy”, but if the genders are reversed it’s perfectly fine.  This proves that “creepy” is no different than nigger because Anita Sarkeesian is not applying a consistent standard.  This is similar to applying a different standard to whites and blacks which is common is racist ideas.  Thus, “creepy” and nigger are being used in the same way.