Hating women is a good thing. It can save your life. I don’t just mean examples such as how hating women means you won’t end up in situations where you could get falsely accused of a crime even though that is an example of how hating women can help you. I mean it literally. Hating women prevents men from comitting suicide.
On Friday, celebrity chef, author and TV host Tony Bourdain committed suicide in France while filming his show, Parts Unknown, for CNN. Bourdain’s body was found by his best friend (and fellow chef) Eric Ripert who noticed that Bourdain had been in dark mood the last few days before his suicide. In other words, something happened to Bourdain in the days leading up to his suicide that caused him to choose to take his own life. What could have happened to Bourdain in the few days leading to his death?
Bourdain’s girlfriend was Asia Argento, one of the #MeToo women, accusing Harvey Weinstein of rape rather than admit she “semi-prostituted” herself to Weinstein. Bourdain had been a very outspoken mangina in his support of Argento and #MeToo. In the last few days, evidence surfaced that Argento was cheating on Bourdain with a French journalist. Additionally, Argento posted a picture of herself on Instagram in a Sid Vicious shirt that said on it, “Fuck Everyone” with the caption, “You know who you are,”. A lot of people in the food world have called Bourdain, “The Sid Vicious of cooking”. Argento deleted the post shortly after his death was reported. Bourdain’s friend, Mark Simone, believed that Argento was cheating on Bourdain the whole time they were together.
Based on this, it is likely that Bourdain found out that Argento was cheating on him and that Argento is a total liar. He realized that he had been used by Argento for work (since Argento had directed a few episodes of Bourdain’s CNN show, Parts Unknown), and that he had been had with his support for #MeToo/Argento against Weinstein. Bourdain’s previous relationships with women were also pretty horrid. There have been rumors that Bourdain’s second wife, Ottavia Busia, cheated on him while they were married. Bourdain and Busia got married only after several weeks of meeting each other so regardless of whether she cheated on him they probably should never have been married in the first place. Bourdain’s first wife, Nancy Putkoski (who was older than him), is likely the person who introduced him to drugs. Bourdain described their married life as being criminals together. Bourdain became suicidal after he divorced her.
Bourdain’s self image and mental state was completely dependent on women. This had been noticed by John Tesar, another chef, when he made a comment about Bourdain’s first wife that caused an angry reaction from Ottavia Busia. Tesar said the following about it.
“She [Ottavia Busia] got mad at me,” he says. “I made a comment about his first wife [Nancy Putkoski] on The Braiser, and his new wife got pissed off. She wears the pants. Trust me. He’s always been dragged around by his dick. A lot of guys are. It’s nice that he always marries women with strong personalities to take care of him because then he can just wander around, get stoned, drink and tell stories. He’s like f–king Ernest Hemingway.”
Bourdain was not different from many incels whose self image and mental state is completely dependent on women. Both love women and are completely dependent on them (despite lacking a woman in the case of incels). There is a lot suicidal ideation in incels forums because of this. It’s basically the same as what Bourdain went through. Like Bourdain many incels have committed suicide because they were mentally completely dependent on women. We are used to thinking as incels as almost some separate species, but in reality they are no different than other men. Bourdain and incel men are practically the same despite Bourdain being able to get women.
What would have helped both Bourdain and incel men is hating women. When a man hates women, his self image and mental state is not dependent on women. A woman’s actions can not cause a man who hates women to become depressed or suicidal. Hating women saves men from committing suicide. Suicide rates are increasing among men, and there is a reason why. It’s because too many men are dependent on women. The media is trying to hide the fact that the nearly all sucide is done by men by constantly bringing up Kate Spade’s suicide along with Bourdain’s suicide and by blaming guns. Women are using men, emotinally (and sometimes physically) abusing men more and more causing men to commit suicide. (I’m fairly certain that the opioid epidemic also is due to women use and abuse of men as well.) Hating women protects a man against women so it is how men can save their lives.
If Anthony Bourdain hated women, he would be alive today. That is a fact.
In the book 1984, there is an alleged group called The Brotherhood that is trying to overthrow the state of Oceania. The Brotherhood is alleged because given the nature of propaganda and lack of information on Oceanian society, there is no way to know if it really exists. The main chracter even asks at one point if The Brotherhood is real and is told that even if lives decades he will never know. Effectively The Brotherhood does not exist because even if it did, the way the government of Oceania describes The Brotherhood is completely different than reality. What is called The Brotherhood does not exist. The government of Oceania constantly produces propaganda on how The Brotherhood is wrong yet according to them The Brotherhood never stops being a threat. That same propaganda says that anything bad that happens is caused by The Brotherhood. No matter what happens The Brotherhood is able to cause major damage and only seems to get more powerful.
Incels are treated the same way The Brotherhood in 1984 is because incels are blamed for bad things (or things that are considered bad by dominant political ideologies even if sad things aren’t actually bad) that they had nothing to do with. Incels are constantly connected to #GamerGate, the MRM, and to MGTOW, but the worst is blaming acts of criminal violence on incels. Lots of people believe that the most recent school shooting was caused by an incel because of this story about how the shooter was supposedly rejected by a girl. The response to that article has been things like, “Sounds like he was another incel”, “You’ll never get a date now, virgin”, “So, another incel takes his frustrations out on innocent people. Great.”, “there exist terrifying similarities between the way the most incels and serial killers think”, and “It might be at the point where we have to take out the incels before they do it to us.” It turns out that this story is completely wrong and anti-incel propaganda. The source of this story is the mother of the girl that allegedly rejected the shooter who had no way of knowing whether this happened. The mother of the girl that allegedly rejected the shooter was not involved in her daughter’s life so this is all made up.
This is not the only example of incels being falsely accused of violence/terrorism. Alek Minassian, the guy in Toronto who ran over those people in a van, is an incel right? Tim Pool, the only journalist to investigate whether Alek Minassian was an incel, discovered that there is no evidence that Alek Minassian is an incel. Minassian’s facebook profile is only linked to known trolls and the post itself was posted when Minassian was already in custody.
The Florida school shooting earlier this year was also blamed on the shooter allegedly being an incel. In this case the shooter had a girlfriend but this is used as evidence that he was an incel. Once comment at that link said, “Yeah but it still fits the m.o. of the average incel. Abusive towards women”. In 1984 terms, this is an example of double think where domestic violence is blamed on incel men even though incel men can’t be committing any domestic violence since they never have a wife or a girlfriend. This is a reoccuring theme I have noticed in discussions about incel men even though it is impossive for incel men to commit domestic violence by definition.
It’s not just school shootings and other violent acts that are falsely blamed on incel men. People are acting like incels are hiding under their beds. That can be seen with Ellen Pao’s recent tweet about how incels have embedded in tech companies as if incel men are a conspiracy invading and taking over tech companies. Incels are also often referred to as a “movement”. Incels are not a movement. They are group of men with a similar condition. Referring to incels as a “movement” is to attempt to imply there is some sort of coordination between incels and organization of incels. This is not the first time the idea of an “incel domestic terrorist organization” has been pushed. I have previously documented how there have been demands that boys suspected of being potential incels start being tracked in third grade, that incel men be tracked by the NSA, that incel men be castrated, and concetration camps be created for incel men.
There are some differences between how The Brotherhood is treated in Oceania in 1984 and how incels are treated. In 1984 the government of Oceania would never say that The Brotherhood had infiltrated and taken over ministries of the government. Incel men have been accused of infiltrating (or having sympathiers in) law enforcement and the national security establishment. According to people who believe this, this is why shootings by incels keep happening and “nothing is done” about them. One of them said:
The FBI has already had several chances to stop these guys, but Agent No Reply continues to be Agent No Show.
I know there are many fine officers of law enforcement, but how many MRAs are there in LEA, FBI, CIA, NSA, Homeland Security? How many white nationalists? Percentage higher than that of the general population? Any way to even know?
It’s not like these are particularly feminist agencies (Google the stats for female officers and agents. 80+% male is typical.).
Are women’s safety issues being downplayed or outright silently dismissed because the guys in charge of our safety are part of the problem?
Another important difference is the source of anti-incel propaganda. In 1984, all of the propaganda about The Brotherhood came from the Oceanian government, specifically the Ministry of Truth. When it comes to incels, there is no top down government ministry of truth producing anti-incel propaganda. Anti-incel propaganda is a grassroots bottom up phenomenon. This is one reason why government agencies are accused of being infiltrated by incels or sympathetic to incels. The government has no policy of purging incels or worrying about incels since it has no reason to do so. While there is no government ministry of truth producing anti-incel propaganda, the techniques and tactics used against incels by individuals volunteeting to produce anti-incel propagada are very similar to those used in 1984.
War has been declared on incel/forever alone/forever unwanted men. Ellen Pao, the woman who started a sexism lawsuit to hide her own incompetence and atrocious behavior, is demanding that tech companies fire all of their incel/FA/FU male employees.
This isn’t a joke. It is being taken very seriously as can be seen from this article at Newsweek. Since no incel/fa/fu man is stupid enough to bring up their status at work, the only way mass firings of incel/fa/fu men can be accomplished is by demanding men provide detailed reports of their sexual histories and current sexual encounters. Or maybe we will see mass firings of men who women don’t find attractive regardless of their status.
If you find yourself questioned about your sexual status at work, your answer should be that you won’t answer until you consult with legal counsel. It doesn’t matter if you have a lawyer or not. This should throw up a roadblock to them firing you.
This has to be the biggest single hypocrisy in the history of the world. Women have whined how they didn’t wanted to be judged on their sexual activity. Women have whined about sexual harassment and made false accusations of sexual harassment. Now, we have a woman proposing mass sexual harassment against men and judging men on their (lack of) sexual activity.
Don’t think that not being an incel means you can escape from this. If you’re not getting laid enough, you will be fired with all of the incel/fa/fu men. If you’re not attractive enough to women, you will be fired with all of the incel/fa/fu men. If some woman simply wants to be rid of you, she will falsely accuse you of being an incel to get you fired.
Last weekend there was a new episode of Billions on Showtime. Billions is about a billionaire hedge fund manager, Bobby “Axe” Axelrod, and a US Attorney, Chuck Rhoades, that is after him. This episode was a case study on how women can open you up to manipulation, not just from women, but from other men as well.
The first example from this episode was how Axe manipulated another hedge fund manager. The other hedge fund manager was “broke” due to his own actions. “Broke” in this case means that the other hedge fund manager only had 40 million dollars. Axe reminds the other hedge fund manager about his daughter’s private school, horse, and his multiple properties. The real reason that the other hedge fund manager can’t live on 40 million is his wife and daughter. Axe makes a deal with the other hedge fund manager to prop him up, but at the end of the episode Axe changes the deal to be more favorable to him. The other hedge fund manager just has to accept the changes because otherwise his wife will divorce him.
The second example involved Chuck’s (former) best friend Ira. Ira had invested in this ice juice company that went IPO. Chuck manipulated it so that Axe would attack the ice juice company with the goal of using it against Axe. Axe played into it by paying people to pretend that ice juice made them sick. As a result Ira had a pending law suit against Axe. While this was going on, Ira had a girlfriend he wanted to propose to but couldn’t because she was a gold digger and only into Ira for his money. (There is a scene in this episode demonstrating the degree to which she was a gold digger where she adds a lot of white truffles to her pasta at an expensive restaurant while Ira looks like he is about to have a heart attack with the amount of money he is spending.)
Later in the episode Axe offers a deal to Ira where he will buy Ira’s now worthless ice juice shares for 30 million dollars and his testimony against Chuck. To make sure Ira goes for it Axe meets Ira at a jeweler (as in engagement rings) to remind Ira of how he can’t propose to his girlfriend because he lost most of his money. Ira takes the deal rather than let his law suit against Axe proceed because he is too much of a mangina to dump his gold digger girlfriend. Like the hedge fund manager, Ira still had plenty of money, just not enough to impress the women in his life.
In both of these cases neither man was manipulated by a woman. Yet, their desire to be manginas caused them to get manipulated by another man. Women open you up to manipulation not just from them, but from other men as well. The lesson that should be learned is that the way to have any control whatsoever over your own life is to completely remove women from your life.
Red Shambhala wrote the following about Deep Green Resistance in response to my last blog entry.
Hostility to technology is one more thing feminists and various kinds of tradcucks and right-wingers have in common, btw.
Different kinds of right-wingers might not be able to agree on since when exactly technology has become bad (since the smartphone? since social media? since mass media? since the industrialization?) but they all share this deep hostility and this idea that it was only modern media that allowed women to go crazy. Without technology, their reasoning goes, women had to drop their act and rely on men again to protect them from the mammoths.
The simple fact that it depends on in whose hands a technology is and what interests these groups have, is somehow beyond them. People can rather imagine the end of electricity than the end of the surveillance state. It’s sad.
With women, there seem to be those who really do have this kind of romanticized views on pre-industrial socities. “Deep Green Resistance” is one of these groups where tehy seem to claim that most modern diseases are only the result of modernity and that people in a foggy distant stone age didn’t really have major diseases or problems with, say, their teeth or bones or whatever.
Deep Green Resistance is about trying to return to a mythical past. To call their view of the past romanticized is correct but an understatement. They have a deep paranoia about both the future and even the modern world.
Despite what the Deep Green Resisters may say, it is not about the environment in any way. This can be best seen by looking at women and their relationship to makeup and skincare products. If a woman truly cared about the environment (instead of using the environment for meaningless virtue signaling), she would stop using makeup and skincare products completely. The chemicals used for such products pollute the environment yet women demand more and more of them just as they demand more and more useless junk whose creation also pollutes the environment. When it is pointed out to women that they are consumerists polluting the environment, they come up with bizarre defenses like saying that they are engaging in subersive anti-capitalism, self-preservation, political warfare, and fighting Donald Trump. (Also, women will also tell us how “natural” their makeup and skincare products are so clearly they believe that their makeup and skincare products would somehow survive a return to a pre-industrial world.)
Deep Green Resistance is extremely pervasive. It can be found in most poltical ideologies and among most groups. From women we get paranoia about everything from space exploration to sexbots. Space and sexbots aren’t going to be something that can be used in the short term (and perhaps not even the mid term) yet women are paranoid about it. They insticually know that technology will help men (even in cases where it won’t happen for a long time like with space and sexbots) and that drives women to wanting to return to a pre-industrial world.
The manuresphere is also Deep Green Resistance. The single best example is the paleo diet. It’s right there in the name. Somehow if you just eat the diet that according to them our ancestors ate you will never have to worry about most diseases. In reality, our ancestors ate whatever was available just to survive. If you lived in a pre-industrial society, and tried eating paleo, it won’t protect you from disease. One of the first problems would be scurvy, and it gets worse from there.
Conspiracies theories are also Deep Green Resistance. Whether the conspiracy theory is about the “patriarchy”, the Jews, the Illuminati, bankers or any other group, every conspiracy theory says that technology serves the group in charge. Even the women in STEM push follows this model because it is based on the belief is that white men are conspiring to control technology as a form of oppression. Having more women work in technology would be destructive but that would be fine for the Deep Green Resisters. Even the events that led to #GamerGate had some Deep Green Resistance in its mix because gamers are pro-technology men by definition.
Deep Green Resistance can also be found in false beliefs about history. Feminsts believe that matriarchial socities existed before the historical record and were overthrown my patriarchial societies with (minimal) technology. The manuresphere along with tradcucks believes that modern technology has corrupted women (and this it due to men weilding technology). All of this is wrong.
Technology has exposed the true nature of women, and that is the big reason why they hate technology so much. And that is why we must oppose Deep Green Resistance wherever it comes from.
A feminist wrote for NBC News that wanting to explore and colonize Mars was equivalent to grabbing a woman’s pussy. Additionally, that feminist attacked men such as Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Richard Branson for putting their money, resources, and energy into space exploiration. It then continues to attack all men.
The Friday before SpaceX’s launch, legendary astronaut Buzz Aldrin reiterated to me over lunch that it is imperative that we talk about space exploration in terms of “migration,” rather than using words like “colonize” or “settle” when talking about going to Mars.
Through a feminist lens, Aldrin’s deliberate word choice revealed an important reality of the space race: This 21st century form of imperialism is the direct result of men giving up on the planet they have all but destroyed.
As if history hasn’t proven that men go from one land to the next, drunk on megalomania and the privilege of indifference.
The raping and pillaging of the Earth, and the environmental chaos that doing so has unleashed, are integral to the process of colonization. And the connection of the treatment of Mother Earth to women is more than symbolic:Study after study has shown that climate change globally affects women more than men.
The TL;DR for that last sentence is “world ends, women hardest hit”.
Later in the article, it says that women care about the enviornment more than men. Women aren’t doing anything for the environment except “caring” about it. It’s meaningless virtue signaling. Elon Musk, who this article specifically references, has done more for the enviornment than all women combined.
The environment is a red herring. It is not the real issue. The real issue is that on Earth there is nowhere to escape the gynocracy. Space changes that. What this feminist is afraid of (and should be afraid of) is that any man worth his salt will leave Earth once the option is available. When productive men leave Earth en masse, the Earth will be exposed for the global Uganda which it is. Women can’t go into space because we can’t afford to take dead weight with us into space. There are scientific studies now about how women treat each other like crap in the workplace. All female companies quickly descend into nothing but catfighting until the company implodes. Women aren’t going to act any better just because they are in space so what does that mean? Space is the harshest enviornment there is so if women are brought along people will die. We can’t afford to have women in space.
Even if the gynocracy spread to Mars, it does not matter. Anyone can go to the next planet or the next star system since the technology is already developed. Once you’re in space there is always a place beyond the gynocracy’s reach. In other words, going to space is the ultimate form of ghosting for men. The gynocracy can never catch up, and that is what the feminist who wrote the article is worried about, not the environment.
Donald Trump recently defended due process on Twitter.
Trump’s defense of due process is very weak. That’s because he says “some [allegations] are true”. While that tecnically could be true, the problem is that the women and manginas who have declared war on due process will not be swayed by attempts to meet in the middle. They will consider Trump’s charity and reasonableness to be weakness on which they can pounce. Trump is so used to the idea that he is a great negoitatior that he is (possibly without realizing it) negoitating away due process. Also, we should not forget that Trump called for the death penalty for the Central Park 5 even after their convictions were overturned due to DNA evidence.
The sad thing about this is that Trump is now the strongest defender of due process among public figures with this weak defense of due process. Other politicians are folding like a cheap suit in the face of nonsense accusations from women such as when Al Fraken resigned from the Senate. And it’s not just elected officals. The manginas at Reason, a Libertarian publication, decided to attack Trump for defending due process even though they had to shred every Libertarian principle they claim to believe in and cherish.
Trump’s defense of due process is weak, but he is better than anyone else in the public sphere because he actually defended due process.
I’m sure all of you have seen eHarmony’s commercials (such as this) where eHarmony claims to use a “scientific” system. Tamerlame let us know that eHarmony was banned from saying their system was scentifically proven since eHarmony failed to provide any evidence that science was involved in their system. This should not be a surprise to anyone who reads this blog as this is no different to how gamers tried to claim game was “scientific” and failed to provide evidence.
There is no science to be found in any form of dating advice because they are all scams. This is not obvious to most people as most people’s understanding of science is a combination of yelling “SCIENCE!” like in the “She blinded me with science” song, fake science such as that from the “I fucking love science” crowd/site, and Neil deGrasse Tyson memes. In reality, science is a process involving such things as gathering evidence, testing hypotheses in experiments, and verification by attempting to replicate results.
In other words, most people wouldn’t know what science is even if science bitchslapped facts into people. Most people just yell, “SCIENCE!” to maintain the pretense that they didn’t manufacture their beliefs out of thin air because it benefitted them. This is why when dealing with scams like dating advice we can never let up when it comes to demanding that they produce evidence that shows their claims are correct (even though we know they are unable to do so).
With all the false rape and false sexual harassment accusations out there such as the #MeToo movement and it being Christmas soon, how long will it be until Santa is falsely accused of sexual harassment or rape? I am not joking. Facts like Santa not exististing will not stop women from saying that Santa groped them or that Santa raped them.
There are already women saying that girls sitting on Santa’s lap leads to women getting raped. (Boys also sit on Santa’s lap but that fact is conviently left out.) Rubbish like that is a small step to women making false accusations against Santa. Listen and believe is going to take on a new dimension.
I found the like above by coming with a totally insane idea, women falsely accusing Santa, a mythical person, of raping them. Then I did a google search. That was enough.
Next Easter, I’m sure women will be falsely accusing the Easter bunny of raping them. That will be followed by women making false accusations of rape against mythical gods like Zeus.
Andrea Ramsey, a Democrat who was going to run for Congress, was forced to drop out of the race because she was accused of sexually harassing a man. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) refused to support Ramsey’s campaign because of the sexual harassment accusation. This is not a joke. This has actually happened.
It gets even better when you read what Ramsey said about this.
“In its rush to claim the high ground in our roiling national conversation about harassment, the Democratic Party has implemented a zero tolerance standard. For me, that means a vindictive, terminated employee’s false allegations are enough for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) to decide not to support our promising campaign. We are in a national moment where rough justice stands in place of careful analysis, nuance and due process.”
No one heard Ramsey talk about “careful analysis” when Al Franken was forced to resign.
No one heard Ramsey talk about “nuance” when Garrison Keillor was thrown into a 1984 style memory hole for an accident.
No one heard Ramsey talk about “due process” when Trump was (and still is) being falsely accused of sexual assault or when Emily Lindin said that it would be necessary for innocent men to lose their jobs due to false accusations of sexual assault and harassment to “fight the patriarchy”.
Instead of whining about it, Ramsey could try to take some action. She could support some Republican candidates for Congress or perhaps even run as one herself. Or she could try suing the DCCC. At a minimum the Democrats aren’t applying the same standard to all of their elected representatives. Chuck Schumer has been accused of sexual harassment. Of course, it’s an incredibly obvious false accusation. However, that does not matter. The Democrats should force him to resign since that is the policy of the Democratic party now. Ramsey could claim that she is being discriminated against.
I am certain Ramsey will not do any of that or anything else to actually fight back. Like with mangina Al Franken she will decide that its more important for women that she falls on her sword. I will shed no tears for her even if she’s innocent. Like Franken, she’s getting exactly what she deserves for her refusal to fight.