Something you will hear from not only gamers but all pushers of dating advice is that dating is a numbers game. They say that you need to talk to as many women as possible and ask them out. Of course, gamers and everyone else pushing dating advice hardly ever talk to girls. Thus, they don’t know if dating is actually a numbers game. A guy actually tried the numbers game advice. In this video, he describes his results.
That’s right. It didn’t work. He asked out tons of women, and it got him absolutely nowhere. Anytime when someone talks about dating being a numbers game, they are full of shit.
At the Dalrock blog recently, they were talking about abortion. Rather than hold women accountable for making the choice to abort their babies, they blame anyone and everyone else starting with a super secret pagan takeover of the culture. Only one man, Boxer, objects to this delusion.
as a result the culture drifts further from Christ, we drift closer to superstitious pagan practices.
Please. In saying this, you’re displacing the blame from women to men. This is the same motivation that the kooks here are driven by when they blame Jews, illuminati, etc. You (and they) always excuse the behavior of feral wimminz by creating some boogeyman who is actually in charge — the hidden demon always being male.
Pagan societies that were viable never allowed women to kill their children for convenience sake (see Julius Caesar’s Gallic Wars for two clear examples of viable pagan cultures).
Women and their white-knights have seized some social control, and thus they’re pushing society closer to a Christian matriarchy. What religious or cultural customs are extant doesn’t matter. When feral wimminz and their enablers take over a society, this is the result.
Blame the Jews, blame the NWO, blame the Illuminati, blame lizardmen from Planet X, just don’t blame a (white) woman. At least one man stood up to that. Boxer continued in another comment.
The abortion trend really has nothing to do with religion, and most of the feral wimminz who get abortions have nothing to do with “pagan practices”. They remain protestant, catholic and jewish wimminz, same as they were before.
By bringing up nonsense about “pagan practices”, you’re opening the door for us to blame some pre-Christian resurgence, rather than the actual christian wimminz, who are (lest we forget) doing the killing of the babies. This is the same tactic as the kooks who blame Jewish conspiracies, illuminati, etc. for wimminz bad behavior. All these other groups open the door to displacing blame from where it really belongs.
Human sacrifice in general – and child sacrifice in particular – are common in pagan cultures. There are exceptions, but they are exceptions. Furthermore, non-ritual infanticide and abortion were common among the Greeks, Romans and most other pagan cultures.
1. You have provided no historical sources for this contention. Can you kick one out to support this nonsense?
2. Neither the Greeks, nor the Romans, nor “most other pagan cultures” murdered babies with the ferocity of the Christian/Jewish society you live in. Stats for the abortion trend are right here. Thus, by your own logic, murdering babies must be a Christian/Jewish sacrament, as Christians and Jewish wimminz do it more than anyone else, by a long mile.
There is no such thing as a Christian matriarchy.
Yes, there is. You’re living in one, right now.
Try blaming the actual Christian and Jewish wimminz who are murdering their own children, rather than blaming “pagans” (that don’t exist) for this shit. It’s less palatable to face the truth, but much more effective.
Then the comments turn into a No True Scotsman argument about why Christian women aborting their babies aren’t really Christian. The argument continues in the comments until someone says, more or less, that there’s a super secret moloch pagan conspiracy. It turns out that doesn’t mean what you would think it does. It means that women are possessed by demons.
[M]ost importantly, it’s all a conspiracy, started by a resurgence of the Moloch cult. These Moloch pagans are all around us. We need to fight the Moloch worshippers!”
There is a cant used among American Protestants/Evangelicals to which you are not privy. It uses the same words as the rest of American English, but there is a shared context about how to think about certain words; for example pagan or Moloch
In this case: You see both the worship of Christ and the (now defunct) worship of Moloch as sociological phenomenon. We don’t. We know there are spirits, and we know that the spirit(s) who animated Moloch worshippers in the past, and that they still exist and move.
Neither you nor we have ever heard anyone say they worship Moloch. Because your worldview is blind to the spiritual, and since you have no evidence of a current sociological phenomenon of Moloch, then the idea of a conspiracy of Moloch strikes you are ridiculous. But we don’t need to witness people praise Moloch to know that they act in service to the spirit(s) of Moloch; who are demons.
There you have it. Christian men believe that women only have abortions (or commit sin in general) because they are possessed by demons. Thus, Christian men are think women are completely blameless. They should have stuck with the super secret moloch pagan conspiracy. At least that’s physically possible.
It’s amazing the length manginas will go to avoid holding women accountable for their actions. Even if demons actually exist, the Christian manginas are fighting an imaginary enemy. It doesn’t matter if demons exist or not. “Demons made me do it” is not a legitimate defense for anything even if they actually exist. Women are acting on their own choices but the Christian manginas would rather believe that women have no agency, moral or otherwise. Thus, they invent stories about demons possessing women because they can’t face the reality that women are acting on their own agency.
Women who are supposedly anti-feminist really aren’t in any meaningful sense. Take what this “woman against feminism” said.
Who needs feminists when you have female “anti-feminists”?
Various things have happened that have convinced me that peak manuresphere has been reached, and that the manuresphere is on its way to imploding. First, Roosh is closing down Reaxxion, his attempt to suck #GamerGate in the manuresphere. Roosh says that it’s because Reaxxion was not getting enough views. While that is likely true, the few times I looked at that site, it always had the same crowd in the comments section that his other sites had. In other words, #GamerGate was not interested in the manuresphere, and Reaxxion only served to cannibalize traffic from Roosh’s other sites since it could not generate new viewers. Reaxxion’s failure is also a failure for Roosh when it comes to reaching out to younger men. Younger men aren’t interested in the manuresphere, as I talked about before.
Second, Mitchel informed us that AVFM has gone all in when it comes to joining hands with Roosh. Before AVFM could blame anything having to do with Roosh on Obsidian, but now they can’t. So why go all in with Roosh? AVFM has the same demographic problem that Roosh and the manuresphere has.
Third, these sorts of problems can be seen elsewhere in the manuresphere. The following comment describes the state of Roissy’s blog.
The comments at Heartiste nowadays deal exclusively with omega males whining that some colored men are sexually involved with white women, and not enough whites are angry about this. 99% of their ideology, at least going by the Heartiste comments, are of a ‘restrict outside competition’ nature by bottom-rung males, ironically on a blog that used to be about Game. Heartiste’s traffic is now only a fraction of what it was 5 years ago, as a result.
The manuresphere has already reached its peak and is in the first stages of imploding. This includes AVFM. AVFM and the manuresphere are trying to stop the bleeding by cannibalizing their assets and de facto mergers (such as with AVFM and Roosh). This will not work as it will drive away readership who were only interested in one or the other and not both. The manuresphere’s collapse will continue.
If there’s anything left of the manuresphere after the collapse, it will be owned by Alex Jones. (Roosh is already a wholly owned subsidiary of Alex Jones.) If we’re lucky the collapse of the manuresphere will take out Alex Jones and other conspiracy theorists.
JudgyBitch ran an article written by former AVFM news director Ty Henry declaring Bill Cosby to be guilty. This was an article that was rejected by AVFM. It has the usual lie that since the women VOLUNTARILY took drugs that Cosby gave them, he raped them.
After saying he conferred quaaludes to women to have sex, I can reasonably infer that he did not answer the question as to whether the women consented to the drugs because he was guilty. Indeed, that’s because his attorneys instructed him not to answer. Of course, that begs the question, why would he be instructed not to answer in a proceeding all go into knowing testimony will likely be sealed?
Which is why, had I heard him make the same statements in a criminal trial, I would vote “guilty.”
There is many reasons that Cosby’s lawyers would not want him to answer that question. No one has even accused Cosby of shoving drugs down these women’s throats so it was all voluntary. We know this so the real question is why would an alleged female MRA run an article that AVFM rejected. In fact, let’s look at what Paul Elam had to say about why this article was rejected by AVFM.
Sorry for using the comments for this but I think it is important that all those participating in this discussion be aware of something going on here.
The piece that Ty Henry submitted to AVFM, and which was rejected, is not the same piece that he submitted to JudgyBitch.com. So any notion that you just read what AVFM rejected is untrue.
His original piece included the term “Bill Cosby is a serial rapist,..” a flat declaration of guilt. That was the precise reason why the piece was rejected. He was also offered the opportunity to retool the piece, sans the declaration of guilt, which we would have been more likely to run.
Mr. Henry is well aware of this, as I personally informed him of such.
This posting amounts to a bait and switch on the readers, one that I do not attribute to the blog owner, but do suspect that it was very much intentional on the part of Mr. Henry. It also serves as validation as to why Mr. Henry was terminated as AVFM’s news director. To allow this piece to run as seen above, while knowing it was not the same piece AVFM rejected, paints a picture of someone clearly outside the requirements we have at AVFM for journalistic ethics.
First, we have a bait and switch going on here. Second, while the revised article may not include the term, “serial rapist”, it still declares him guilty on the basis of lies as can be seen from the first excerpt above. I don’t know if JudgyBitch knew this was a bait and switch, but it almost doesn’t matter. She should have known better than to run an article declaring Bill Cosby guilty if she really was a female MRA. Ty Henry should know better too.
With MRAs like these who needs feminists?
The group that hacked the Ashley Madison database has released a single name from the database. They should release all of the names in the database. If there was a kickstarter or something to pay them the hackers to release the names in the database, I would commit serious money to it. That’s provided they didn’t include the credit card numbers because I’m against credit card fraud.
Every person who has ever used that website is guilty of defrauding their spouse so it’s not like there would be any victims here.
There’s this PUA in Canada that was going around talking to women. Instead of being impressed with his game, they filed complaints with the police. While this has to do with how the PUA was recording the conversations he was having with these women (such recordings are not illegal in Canada), that shouldn’t make a difference. In fact, it was the PUAs behavior that made the women suspicious. None of the women knew that they were being recorded while PUA was talking to them. The PUA’s behavior was suspicious enough for the women to do some digging on the internet and find out that they were being recorded. If game actually existed then the PUA should have been able to game these women into not being suspicious and not filing complaints with the police.
This is just another example of how game does not exist.