My blog got linked to a forum somewhere and I got accused of being a “nice guy”. I am not a “nice guy”. That’s because there is no such thing as a “nice guy”.
The “nice guy” is a self contradictory myth. The word nice has a meaning in the dictonary. Instead “nice guy” includes a bunch of different things from having a lot of female friends but no girlfriend (this should make it obvious even to an imbecile that I’m not a “nice guy” since I have no female friends), getting walked over, someone who is trying to “manipulate” women, and a lot of other bullshit. The “nice guy” idea throws together a lot of contradictory bullshit that is all negatives in an attempt to create an attack against men. It is similar to the “gay virgin rapist” I talked about before. A man can’t be both gay and a rapist (of women). A man can’t be both a rapist and a virgin. It’s impossible. In the same way the “nice guy” can not exist either.
Like with the “gay virgin rapist” the “nice guy” is a myth that is used to attack men.
We have all heard the bullshit canard before that has been used against me and many other men:
You think women owe you sex.
Or some variant of this. Some stupid woman commenting at In Mala Fide made me realize that this is another case of women projecting their own attitudes on to men. (Sure women only WANT sex from the so called “alphas” but they think they are owed sex from men regardless.) The stupid woman said, “Being completely chaste is at this point a foregone concern and more importantly, I would not want have wanted to live my young adult life as a virgin.” Of course being a virgin is the worst possible thing that could happen to her. (This is also more proof that anti-virgin ideas and attitudes are fundamentally female and any man who believes such ideas is prima facie a mangina.) I recommend reading the whole comment so you can gain insight to how women think with sections like, “Even if one has never “ridden the alpha cock carousel,” many beta men are still too boring and servile to be worthy long-term mates for any non-dishrag woman. Is it so much to ask that a man be legitimately interesting, and keep a woman on her toes?” This woman claims to have Aspergers. I don’t buy that but if she did that means normal women are worse.
Finding out that women believe men owe them sex should surprise no one. Women believe men owe them their money too.
We constantly hear “not all women are like that”. It gets said so often it has its own acronym: NAWALT. If not all women really are like that why don’t the women who aren’t like that make that clear to everyone? Why don’t they differentiate themselves? It’s in their best interests to do so. Instead these “good women” always pick female solidarity instead of showing us how they “aren’t like that”.
I can count the number of women I know of who have differentiated themselves on one hand with fingers left over. And I only know they exist because of the internet. Most women may claim to “not be a feminist”. Sure they aren’t a feminazi like Andrea Dworkin but nearly all woman practice a form of soft feminism or crypto-feminism. When it comes time to show us that they are “not a feminist” these women always will pick female solidarity.
Even women who claim to support mens rights really don’t. Anyone who has been around the manosphere for a while has seen countless examples of women who first claim to support us then tell us how everything we say is wrong. Many of these women will claim to be against both feminism and mens rights but this is nothing but Clintonian triangulation bullshit. These women are always on manosphere sites and blogs telling us we’re wrong. They never go to feminist sites and blogs to do this. If they were truly against both they would do this. Since they don’t these women are engaging in Clintonian triangulation bullshit.
If there’s lots of “good women” out there why don’t they act like it? Why do they act in such a way completely contrary to being a “good woman”? The answer is obvious. They aren’t.
Here’s some interesting stuff from The Spearhead. I found this comment which tells us just how noxious women are.
Women are NEVER going to call for men’s rights in marriage and society. It’s just not going to happen. They are purely ME focused animals, and they’re neither capable of logic nor feeling empathy for a man. Last night, I was told to my face I was “worse than Hitler” by an educated and churchgoing woman, simply for pointing out more men than women have lost their jobs in the Great Recession.
I bet this “educated and churchgoing” woman will tell you up and down that she’s “not a feminist”. This shows the problem is not some cadre of feminazis but a broad based problem with women in general. The man was called “worse than Hitler” just for pointing out how more men than women have lost their jobs recently. If that gets the “worse than Hitler” treatment from women then it’s clear women are the main obstacle to men’s rights.
Occasionally at The Spearhead they show comics from Lone Nut Comics. The authors of Lone Nut Comics had this to say at The Spearhead.
Since we started making these cartoons, commenters have accused me of being a virgin, gay and a rapist. I imagine most Spearhead writers and readers are also accused of being “gay, virgin, rapists” so here’s a cartoon that has some fun at the expense of our accusers.
I don’t know if I have been accused of being a “gay, virgin, rapist” all at once but it has probably happened somewhere despite the obvious problem that one can’t be a virgin and a rapist at the same time. Speaking of virgins I found this comment attached to that post.
Lol accused of being virgin? That is a great compliment. Virgin male = power. Virgin male = nondomesticated. In a profane vagina worshipping vagina culture male virginity is only shamed because it represents the remedy that weakling men hate themselves too much to admit.
Much discussion and attention should be givin to the male virgin. It appears to threaten the social structure when a male does not waste his seed in the lowest bidder’s vertex. Instead he feeling worthy of something better totally negates all female power over him and his emotional dependence on them. Indeed he can be said to be a true human being. And perhaps even a free man.
There’s a lot of truth in this comment. There’s nothing for me to add.
I found this comment on The Spearhead from a former criminal investigator and street officer on women. It’s very enlightening on female behavior. Remember that this is a former criminal investigator not just some random dude on the internet. Here is the relevant part of the comment.
In fact, as a former criminal investigator and street officer I have observed the deadly effects of feminism on women. Many women feel that they are entitled to browbeat, berate, and abuse men without consequences. By rule of law they would be right.
This confirms what I have suspected about women and their behavior. I have noticed about women’s behavior toward me that they have no problem doing immoral and illegal things to me with no remorse or conscience whatsoever. And this isn’t limited to me either. I posted this image a few posts ago about a woman who wanted to get child support out of her babysitter.
This woman has no thought about the man who was nice enough to watch her kids except as a resource to be bled dry. It doesn’t end there. Blogs like the False Rape Society detail the massive numbers of women who destroy men’s lives with false rape charges. Women who don’t care about penis size will tell men that they do as a form of psychological torture. The Duke “sex thesis” exposes details about men that most likely violate various privacy laws (either civilally or criminally). (This will definitely be the case if a book deal or movie about the “sex thesis” goes through.) Divorce is done primarily by women to steal half or more of a man’s assets and destroy men’s relationships with their children. For those of you following Chainring’s conversation with a slut at the MGTOW board the slut admitted to being a hooker for a while. How many STDs has she and the many other women like her passed on? I could go on forever with examples.
Women everywhere are doing these things and more. Yet there is no realization of the fact that all of this behavior is immoral. Most of it is outright illegal although the feminized state refuses to prosecute it. Women have do not recognize men as human beings just resources to be bled dry. Women’s actions represent a manner of thinking that is similar to PARASITES. What happens when a parasite infects your body and your body does nothing to fight back? You die pretty quickly. That is what wee see women doing to civilization. KILLING IT because women have no consequences for their actions as was pointed out by at The Spearhead. Women get away with everything. We need to start fighting back against women or else the body (civilization) will die.
Bill Price the head of The Spearhead wrote the following in a post about legal changes in the UK where men are losing legal rights and women are gaining them.
I used to think some of the more radical solutions men are proposing, such as never living with a woman, were going a bit far, but they are looking more and more rational every day. Every day brings new news of the eroding legal status of men and the ascent of women. When women really have the reins – and it looks like they may actually pull it off – one can only imagine what an avalanche of injustices will come pouring down from on high.
Time and time again just like Price has noted the more radical/extremist views when it comes to dealing with feminism and women end up being right. What has “compromise” or “moderation” gotten men? Less than nothing because things just get worse for men.
What is “compromise”? Are you going to say that men should only have half the freedom that we are supposed to have? That’s absurd and why we need more militancy and extremism. When we men give a millimeter women take 1000 miles.
We need to take a stand. That includes radical/extreme solutions such as never living with a woman and keeping your interactions with women to a minimum. The reason to do this isn’t just some higher calling of freedom for men. It might save your neck. As my experiences with sexual harassment bullshit show being able to legitmately say I had no/had little interaction with that woman is a powerful defense.
There are those who say that through “moderation” we will get more women on our side. The last few decades have proven that to be bullshit. Where are women when men are losing their freedom? Cheering those who are taking away our freedom. We need to try something difference and being extreme and millitant is different. The only way we are going to stop what is happening to us men is if we force the issue by outright refusal to let women do anything to us. Women will be angry about this but they hate anything men do other than absolute supplication so we might as well be as harsh as possible. Whether we’re millitant in fighting for freedom for ourselves or just slightly beyond absolute supplication to women, the female response is the same. We should pick the option where we’re doing as much as possible to fight for our freedom. Women’s lives are going to be made miserable as a result. That is a good thing. Maybe they will understand that there are consequences for their actions.