25 comments on “Example #25608345 Why Women Can’t Be Trusted With Civilization

  1. Take a place like Australia (we would need a place that big), evacuate it of people and any technology, and exile women (and manginas) who attack civilization. If they make it clear civilization has no value to them, then send them to a place without civilization that has only two rules. One, no leaving and two, any attempts at technology above a hunter gatherer level will be monitored for and destroyed.

    John Norman wrote about something like this in his novels about the planet Gor. Weapons technology above the level of the longbow was interdicted, although certain other types of advanced technology were allowed. It didn’t work out terribly well for women, who were extremely dependent on men for protection. It wasn’t just from other men either; Gor was populated with dangerous animals and even sentient creatures that were enemies to humans.

    I already said this but we need a science and technology strike against women.

    Nice idea but I think as a species we’ve locked ourselves into a feedback loop of expanding technology. In other words, scientific and technological progress will keep increasing rapidly until we hit a wall imposed by the laws of physics. I don’t see that as a problem though because although the technological breakthroughs of the last century or so have advantaged women over men in Western societies, I believe the scales will tip in men’s direction in the 21st century.

    • The idea behind a science and technology strike against women isn’t that science and technology development stops but women don’t benefit from it. Women’s actions have shouted that they want to live as hunter gatherers so let them.

      I would say that wherever we exile these anti-civilization women (and manginas) that even longbows are too much technology. It’s only hunter gatherer level of technology, period. A better idea instead of clearing out a place like Australia would be to create a virtual reality of a hunter gatherer world. The rules of the virtual reality would prevent technological development. We either hook up these women and manginas to the virtual reality or upload their minds and let them live out their lives as their actions say they want.

  2. If she were a man in a women’s prison she’d be under indictment for rape right now.

    Also note how she was allowed to resign rather than get fired, so she could protect her pension and won’t have a bad mark on her record when applying for another job.

  3. The idea behind a science and technology strike against women isn’t that science and technology development stops but women don’t benefit from it. Women’s actions have shouted that they want to live as hunter gatherers so let them.

    Ok, I can get behind that.

    I would say that wherever we exile these anti-civilization women (and manginas) that even longbows are too much technology.

    Longbows would be relatively useless to them anyway, due to the huge amount of strength and level of training required for effective use. The English at the time of the Battle of Agincourt just about managed to do it by revolving their whole culture around producing bowmen. That’s one of the liabilities of all that nasty male-produced technology – it tends to be inaccessible to the unwashed masses unless some more nasty males work very hard to make it usable by them.

    It’s only hunter gatherer level of technology, period. A better idea instead of clearing out a place like Australia would be to create a virtual reality of a hunter gatherer world. The rules of the virtual reality would prevent technological development. We either hook up these women and manginas to the virtual reality or upload their minds and let them live out their lives as their actions say they want.

    That would work for me. My guess is that any of the manginas who survived would change their spots rather quickly. All the “feminist utopia” type groups would either be obliterated completely or reduced to digging grubs out of the ground.

  4. Pingback: Linkage is Good for You: Tease Edition

  5. So because women won’t have sex with a creep like you, you’re going to throw us all into some disturbed computer prison?

    This entire blog is why there must be more feminism not less. The author of this blog is highly dangerous and should be in jail. If that takes making up false charges against him then that must be done for the greater good.

    • And people say women don’t think like a hive mind…
      They sure do, when it gets in their head that “somehow, somewhere, a man will have to get with me!”
      Well, hate to bother you with facts, but men through their participation in dirty, dangerous and demeaning jobs, die in greater numbers at work than women.
      So that means you women will have to share the men that are left.
      Since most women have shown the tendency to accept part of a “winner” rather than all of a “loser”, rather than be alone… so don’t complain about alphas cheating on you if you prefer them – it’s a hazard you live with when you made the choice to be with one.
      What’s creepier than that?
      Since if legally paired up, you couldn’t get what you wanted(a share of the alpha)… but you feel the need to tell the guy you’re married/living with that he disappoints you in every way?

    • So black pill is a creep, yet violent prisioners who are bad boys are not?

      LOLOLOL

      Creep is a term used for harmless non violent men by feminists.

      • More specifically, ‘creep’ is a term used by women for men that they find unattractive.

        Men that tend to be anti-social, unpopular, awkward,etc. “Creepy”.

        • Its a catch all term to describe any man women don’t like. Those are just some of the types commonly associated.

          It can even refer to a man women find attractive, but rejects their advances. “He doesn’t like me so he’s a creep”.

  6. Amanda says:
    So because women won’t have sex with a creep like you, you’re going to throw us all into some disturbed computer prison?

    This entire blog is why there must be more feminism not less.

    Not a problem – feminists have a habit of breeding themselves out of existence. Think of Germaine Greer and Andrea Dworkin.


    The author of this blog is highly dangerous and should be in jail.
    If that takes making up false charges against him then that must be done for the greater good.

    This troll is too funny.

  7. There’s only one problem with this… the human race would die out. Men need women to have children and women need men to have children (though women could do with sperm banks for some time, they would still eventually need men). This blog is crazy in so many ways. Its true no one should be discriminated against because of wether or not the chose to have sex,and no one should be falsely accused of any crime, but this is a little much. Men and women do have their differences, but there are admirable and condemnable qualities in both genders. I have stumbled across this site and I wish I hadn’t because it is full of hate. I find it unfortunate that you seem to believe there is not one good woman in the world. Men and Women really aren’t that different, you should maybe get to know more women (in a non sexual way) really well and your mind would maybe shift. We’re all people and most men and most women do not base their life around making life more difficult for the opposite sex. You should stop focusing on how you can hate women or anyone else for that matter. If you win and find more women to hate, you’re just filled with hatred, and If you can’t find anyone to hate at that time you’re just frustrated. This is really a lose lose senario. I guess everyone is entitled to feel however they want, but do yourself the favor and let go. The people who have wronged you in the past only win by making you angry, and by the looks of this blog they have been wining for a long time now.

    • So by speaking up, someone is full of hate?
      I guess people who speak up against racism are racist against everyone else?
      If the people who wronged him have been “winning”, why are the people who haven’t wronged him directly, coming on-site to tell him that he should be quiet?
      … unless they have a direct stake in him being good, productive and compliant?
      e.g. women who have baby rabies and want a provider since they can’t snag an alpha, but want the provider to be ignorant of their motivation?
      e.g. alphas who want someone else to take their leavings?
      e.g. people who think socialisation has stayed the same since the ’50s?

    • There’s only one problem with this… the human race would die out.

      The human race will not die out. Technology can replace the uterus.

      Its true no one should be discriminated against because of wether or not the chose to have sex

      I notice that you didn’t include men who are involuntary virgins (such as myself) as a group that shouldn’t be discriminated against.

      I find it unfortunate that you seem to believe there is not one good woman in the world.

      There’s somwhere between 6 and 9 good women in the world.

      I have to reiterate what P Ray asked, “So by speaking up, someone is full of hate?
      I guess people who speak up against racism are racist against everyone else?
      If the people who wronged him have been “winning”, why are the people who haven’t wronged him directly, coming on-site to tell him that he should be quiet?
      … unless they have a direct stake in him being good, productive and compliant?
      e.g. women who have baby rabies and want a provider since they can’t snag an alpha, but want the provider to be ignorant of their motivation?
      e.g. alphas who want someone else to take their leavings?
      e.g. people who think socialisation has stayed the same since the ’50s?”

  8. Wait.. you guys are involuntarily virgins. I think this site is a product of sexual frustration that needs to be released. I’m sure someone would have sex with you really like no matter how vile you maybe. There are loads and loads of desperate and horny people in the world. Especially with the internet, I’m sure if you don’t give off the creep vibes that you give off on this blog in real life, someone would have sex with you. It might not be a Victoria’s Secret model, and she may in fact have daddy issues… but someone would have sex with you no matter what you happen to look like.

    • I don’t disagree that people will have sex with you no matter what you look like. I do disagree with sex without the love, or sex for the purposes of gaining a favour, or sex for money.
      I’m only after sex after marriage(with a virgin), which is to say, I’ll probably have to build myself up with enough status to get what I want – every other rejected man who understands the majority of expedient females will probably do that.
      Leaving the bitter, old, banged-out, STD-riddled women to their cats, psychoses and emotional wastelands.
      “If the kitten didn’t want me, I don’t want the cat”.

      • Except in reality, a lot of girls graduate high school without their virginity, most will have a string of chump boyfriends and alpha pump and dumps, and most will snatch a foolish beta male provider before they hit the wall.

        Your window of opportunity to get a virgin has probably past, and marriage is a bad deal anyways.

        foreveralone.jpg

        • Haha, yup. At least being alone beats being lonely in a relationship plus as a guy it’s a lot cheaper too, and you don’t have to worry about STDs, get jealous (at least because you have so much to choose from as potentials — get to the question of them choosing you later…) or suffer from emotional see-saws or be subjected to crying jags.
          Nothing stopping someone from being more forward within the bounds of decency as long as he follows the measures to avoid false rape accusations. So the chances just got better, the longer you stay away from the crazies 🙂

    • Re: “Wait.. you guys are involuntarily virgins. I think this site is a product of sexual frustration that needs to be released. I’m sure someone would have sex with you really like no matter how vile you maybe. There are loads and loads of desperate and horny people in the world.”

      Yes, and most of them are men.

      Care to guess why?

      Because human females are the limiting sex in every dimension of mate choice.

      This fact follows from well established evolutionary principles, and has been borne out in every sound experiment designed to test them.

      “Especially with the internet, I’m sure if you don’t give off the creep vibes that you give off on this blog in real life, someone would have sex with you. It might not be a Victoria’s Secret model, and she may in fact have daddy issues… but someone would have sex with you no matter what you happen to look like.”

      It is a popular strawman that male incels are the result of niche expectations in female attractiveness – even a trivial online experiment will confirm the truth, that except for a very small subset of males, the odds of a male attracting his ‘statistical’ equivalent, is astronomically rare(ie. because the vast majority of women are preferrentially – and often ‘disassortatively’ – selecting from that very small subset of ‘choice’ males.

  9. Re: “We need a male birth control pill. Badly. Alpha males can be counted on to use it.”

    Non-sequitur.

    First of, the whole ‘Alpha male’ meme is a spurious concept when applied to human mating practices(in contemporary human societies), where mate access is no longer a function of subordinate status concessions.

    Next, the males who are popularly deemed as ‘Alpha’s’ by agreeable females, prohibitively tend towards antisocial delinquency(for adaptive reasons I have explained elsewhere in this blog) – making them, on the contrary, the *least* likely males to use any form of contraceptive(hence the adaptive basis – in terms of reproductive fitness – of their rogue tendencies).

  10. the problem is not that women are destroying civilization, the problem is that too many men pander to women on the off chance they might get some ass. Men need to learn to be men, that is to say, men need to learn to live without women and no, I don’t mean turning gay. We aren’t born needing sex and there is already too much indiscriminate breeding on this planet, just look at the problems that causes us. I agree that women need to learn to fend for themselves without all that men have worked so hard to create but nothing short of tearing it all down will work. We are all too divided on too many issues and the best thing that can happen to this planet now is an ELE, or extinction level event. I know that is difficult to grasp as a good thing, but you need to remove the self to see the logic of that. “survival of the fittest” is just that, it does not mean survival of whomever has the most toys, or the biggest muscles or brain, the longest dick or the biggest tits, all the pathertic meaningles things we think have value on the “modern world”, no survival of the fittest is exactly that; the fittest is whomever SURVIVES. For myself, I won;t be acting chivalrous when the shit hits it, trying to save any women on the off chance I might get some ass, they are on their own, just like me> end rant

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s