There’s one thing I hate about the holidays: family and others that you don’t see that often asking some variant of, “do I have a girlfriend?” Everything I have done doesn’t matter. Only this matters to them. Usually if they aren’t total assholes about it I will be polite but what’s the point?
They should either put up or shut up about it. If they think it’s such a problem, then why don’t they put up by doing something to help? Otherwise why don’t they shut up. It’s nothing more than a club used to attack me. And then there’s the people who are like, “I just want to know you’re happy”. So I can’t be happy alone? If you think I’m so miserable why don’t they do something to help? I think what they really want is me to lie to them to give them the best of both worlds of they can pretend that I have a girlfriend without an actual woman having to do the job.
I suspect what this is really all about is that they can’t stand that such a source of money, me, isn’t under the thumb of a woman. And it’s not like being with a woman makes men happy either. I have seen lots of men in LTRs and marriages. They are miserable. At least I can get away from women occasionally. They can’t without a divorce and their wives stealing half their assets. I’m at least partially free since no one has been able to devise a way to put me under the thumb of a woman without an actual woman holding her nose and getting close to me. There’s something to be said for women hating you.
Game doesn’t exist. It’s a made up thing to attack men for not getting laid.
I knew it would take time but eventually I would be proven right. Little by little it’s happening. In Mala Fide has admitted that a lot of the big names of game/PUA are full of shit a lot of the time. This huge departure from the standard game line that game is perfect and you must be at fault if you can’t get laid. It’s not that far of a stretch to realize that game doesn’t exist.
I don’t expect the truth about game to be generally accepted anytime soon. What will happen is that the truth about game will be exposed layer by layer. It’s like layers of an onion and the In Mala Fide post pulled back one layer.
Outside of obvious exceptions like my mom I avoid women within reason. Many of you may think that what I do is nuts but its for good reasons such as avoiding prison and keeping gainful employment. Anything having to do with women will only get more legally precarious in the future. Here are two examples why.
Jessica Valenti wants to change rape laws from as they are written now to something like Swedish rape laws. What this cunt is really complaining about is that in the US (at least in theory if not in practice) a man is innocent until proven guilty. This isn’t good enough for her. She wants it so that men can’t challenge false rape charges. She wants men to be imprisoned on a woman’s say so. Any sex with a woman will be legally dangerous since she will be able to have you thrown in prison on a whim. It’s not just sex wither. Any interaction with a woman will be dangerous since a woman can (and will) claim anything.
Anna Ardin one of the cunts who is accusing Julian Assange of rape has a long history of making false (if not crazy) charges against men. Here is an interesting story about it.
A Swedish forum reports that she is an expert on sexual harassment and the male “master suppression techniques”. Once, as she was lecturing, a male student in the audience looked at his notes instead of staring at her. Anna Ardin reported him for sexual harassment because he discriminated against her for being a woman and because she claimed he made use of the male “master suppression technique” in trying to make her feel invisible. As soon as the student learned about her complaint, he contacted her to apologize and explain himself. Anna Ardin’s response was to once again report him for sexual harassment, again because he was using the “master suppression technique”, this time to belittle her feelings.
Look at a woman, get accused of sexual harassment. Don’t look at a woman, get accused of sexual harassment. If you’re within 5 miles of a woman, despite having no contact with her, she will be able to successfully have your charged with sexual harassment because being within 5 miles of her means you’re using the “master supression technique”.
Women are bad enough now but they are only going to get worse in the future. While I believe MRAs will be sucessfully eventually, women are not going to improve even then.
I recently got another comment about a discussion that happened a while ago with Susan Walsh. Since I have gotten that comment and gotten a couple of emails wondering what the deal was I thought it might be good to explain why and the larger issue involved.
The original post I wrote asked the question of “Why Don’t the [Supposed] Good Women Differentiate Themselves?” What Susan Walsh did was something she does a lot which is saying “But women have it bad too”. That had nothing to do with the subject matter and is a tactic that she a lot uses when the problems of men come up. I had enough of it. Look at a good example.
I have noticed a great reluctance among some men to share the misery. It is very important for them to believe that only beta males suffer in the SMP. It is a very dissonant and unwelcome notion that women, who are to blame for the entire mess, may also be suffering. Many men have said that women being deprived of relationships is nothing compared with men being deprived of sex.
Of course we’re reluctant to “share the misery”. It doesn’t describe the reality that many men are going through. There are no women going through an equivalent to what a lot of men such as myself are going through. To “share the misery” would require men like myself to not speak out about what is happening to a lot of men. Even trying to compare “deprived of relationships” (what women are supposedly going through) with “deprived of sex” (what men are supposedly going through is an attempt to hide what many men are going through. The obvious problem is that a man deprived of sex is also most likely deprived of relationships too (and this was pointed out on Susan Walsh’s blog) so the men are getting a double whammy that no woman is getting.
Or answer this question. Where is the female equivalent to me? Good luck at finding a 32 year old involuntary virgin woman who has been forcibly purged from anything socially that involves the opposite sex with only same sex friends in the exact same situation as her and has had multiple sexual harassment complaints against her (or whatever the equivalent would be) in an attempt to purge her from the workplace. Just try finding a 32 year old involuntary virgin female. You will not be able to. I can find plenty of men in both categories. Another thing Susan Walsh has done is bring up female virgins in college when the issue of older male virgins comes up. It is very absurd to compare an 18 year old virgin with a 32 year old virgin like myself. These are two very different things. It is telling that Susan Walsh has to go back to college to find a female virgin to make that comparison. On a personal level it’s insulting because effectively Susan Walsh is saying my problems are meaningless and trivializing my experiences. One of the reasons why I am unable to get together with women now is this difference because all the available women my age have sex partner counts in the high double digits or triple digits.
Beyond Susan Walsh this has been a big problem. When I tried going to psychologists to solve the problem of being an older virgin, I got accused of lying a lot (when I wasn’t being accused of having Aspergers syndrome) because speaking out about these uniquely male problems didn’t go over well with feminized psychologists. It’s the same problem of being told to shut up about what is happening in your life as a man.
Men have also been told to effectively shut up when speaking out about issues not involing virginity/dating/sex too. Try pointing out that upwards of 80% of the jobs lost in the current recession have been lost by men (an objective verifiable fact) and you will be accused of being worse than Hitler. Try speaking out about how men are having their jobs destroyed, being thrown out of their families by the courts, etc. and you will be accused of misogyny and get lectured about “male privledge” (effectively telling him to shut up).
Speaking out about any of these issues affecting men will get you the shut up response. It may be the harsher “you’re a misogynist” or the softer “women have it bad too” but it is all the same. The current recession is a good metaphor for what is happening between men and women in a more global sense. Men are more and more losing their jobs and having to go live in a van by the river getting lectures about being misogynists or being insulted by being told “women have problems too” while women are in cushy government jobs making more money than men getting several new government agencies dedicated to women because of Obamacare (while men get nothing) being told their most minor problems are a state of emergency that everyone must deal with immediately.
None of this is a reason for men to stop speaking out. Yes women will think you’re a misogynist or you will offend her delusion that men and women have equivalent problems. This is the reason why men must continue to speak out and why I will continue to do so.
We MRAs and MGTOW and anyone else interested in mens rights gets the “You hate women” canard thrown at us a lot. This is a code red anti-male shaming tactic so that alone should prove its bullshit. It’s no different than “You have a small penis”. But like with all anti-male shaming tactics it keeps getting used.
Unless you have been underground the last few weeks you have heard about Wikileaks and Julian Assange. The Spearhead reported on the crazy rape charges against him. The woman, Anna Ardin, accusing Julian Assange is a radical feminist bent on a massive campaign of terror and just plain evil against men. (As an aside this is why we all need to support Julian Assange now regardless of anyone’s opinion of what he has done.)
What does this have to do with code red anti-male shaming tactics? None of us supposed “woman haters” have done anything like what Ardin has done or what thousands of feminists have done in calling for the genocide of some, most, or all men. Women and manginas who say “You hate women” never criticize women much less one like Ardin.
Or take this cunt who posted (a quickly downvoted) comment which basically says all men are rapists. The “You hate women” women and manginas are nowhere to be found to criticize her either.
Anyone who uses the “You hate women” anti-male shaming tactic is nothing but a hypocrite. Period.
I get attacked a lot for doing nothing about my “problems” except whining. This is obviously bullshit. The reason why I get attacked for doing “nothing” is that what I have done does not involve getting laid. It “doesn’t count” to any man who pedestalizes women and that includes some supposed MRAs.
Some of you asked about how I deal with being involuntarily celibate. It’s by realizing that things other than getting laid matter. Even if you obsess over game you still spend most of your life doing something other than getting laid. Really getting laid doesn’t matter at all. It’s not like you need to get laid to live. Don’t you want to improve the rest of your life at all?
That’s what I did by becoming self employed. I have freed myself from so much of the feminized bullshit that plagues the modern workplace and that’s in addition to the sexual harassment crap I have freed myself from. I have only been doing this for a few months but I’m already making a lot more money than I was before and that takes into account added expenses since I don’t get anymore corporate benefits. It’s clear that I’m not going to lack for work either for a very long time (especially since managers are looking for ways to bypass HR). I recommend becoming self employed to any man who wants to get some feminized BS out of his life. You spend at least 40 hours a week at work. Why subject yourself to feminized crap for that much of your life? Game or getting laid isn’t going to improve your job (unless you make porn for a living and probably not even then). Game isn’t going to get you out of the “diversity” BS you get at work. It isn’t going to save you from sexual harassment charges, etc. Getting out of the corporate box will.
When you stop obsessing about getting laid, you become that much more free. Why have I freed myself from the feminized corporate workplace and the gamers are still working as desk jockeys in feminized corporations? Because they’re obsessing about getting laid and I’m not. I made real progress in improving my life using the ideas of MGTOW and applying them to work. This is an accomplishment with real UNQUESTIONABLE positive results. For all of their blather the gamers can’t show that they have really improved their lives with game. The married gamers espeically. Just wait until the divorces happen.
I am a lot more free than the gamers. The gamers are dependent on women because they pedestalize them. I am not. They are stuck in feminized corporate hell. I am not. The married gamers are stuck in horrid marriages that are ticking time bombs for divorce. I am not. (The married gamers mostly could not free themselves from their feminized corporate hell because their wives would object.)
Do you want to be free or dependent on women? If you choose freedom you choose everything that is good about life. That is what I have done.