1.5 years ago, the PUA scene was pro-feminist in the following ways that commenters like you and a half dozen others, including the editor of Inmalafide, helped to change:
1) Blame the Male – It used to be that if a man reported a game failure on the PUA scene, he was slammed as not having been worthy of the woman. Now it’s universally understood that he hadn’t gotten around a dumb hamster.
This is still true. Gamers blame men now more than ever. Gamers have said that if you don’t have game you deserve to be put in jail because of false rape accusations, you deserve to lose your job because of false sexual harassment allegations, you deserve to be divorced because game failed in your marriage, etc. Nothing has changed here.
2) PUAs Should Retire at 35 and Marry + Age difference dating is bad – About 1.5 years ago being a PUA was thought of like being a pro athlete. You were supposed to enter Marriage 2.0 with a hottie that you’d gamed before you turned 40 or else you’d be thought of as an old loser. You were not supposed to seriously consider dating someone more than 10-15 years younger.
This PUA attitude was not much of a threat to older women. PUA commenters were mostly young. Feminists really had no problem with the young PUA scene (or shouldn’t have).
That’s mostly changed now barring inconsistencies among various Chateau guest posters (if there’s only one blogger, he’s got a split personality).
Given the amount of “marriage game” bloggers this may have changed but if it did it was from one form of feminism to another. Now we have gamers saying that you deserve to get divorced if you don’t have game in your marriage. That’s no improvement here and gamers are still feminist.
3) No man with a harem would pay for a lap dance for extra action on the side.
This attitude didn’t make sense except it sure made feminists and social cons happy.
France and Israel are now moving to follow Sweden by criminalizing men for paying for sexual activity (because the fems and social cons say this “exploits women”) so it’s only been in the nick of time that guys on the PUA scene are aware that it’s not cool to let those who themselves don’t want sex with young women take men’s options away.
Formerly, PUAs were ready to sacrifice their rights in order to look “cool” or “alpha”.
I’m not even sure what this has to do with feminism. If you have an actual harem then you won’t have time to pay for lap dances and it would be a waste of money if you have that many willing women.
Gamers are still more than willing to sacrifice their rights to look “cool” and/or “alpha” so nothing has changed there. They’re still feminist.
4) Foreign women are inferior to American women if for no other reason than they are less of a challenge.
This one may be true but it’s so minor that it hasn’t had an effect of making game anti-feminist.
At least we have a gamer admitting that game used to be feminist as late as a year and a half ago. However he is just using that admission to cover up the fact that game is still feminist.