64 comments on “How Many Conspiracy Theories Come From Feminists?

  1. Conspiracy theories come from feminists so that they can get other peoples’ money doled out to them by government held hostage at the ballot box.
    And then claim even more money when their yarns start to rip society apart, since they need it to “fix” the problem.
    The reality for most women is that they would prefer if most men dropped dead or handed over their money without complaint.
    After all, “eye-rape” is now the newest scourge against women.
    I’ve always wondered one thing though:

    If men and women are equal,

    how come women say that men can’t be raped?

    After all, rape is sex or a sexual act done to someone, against their consent.

    So does this mean women are ignoring rape of men? How can they be the kinder, gentler sex, and how can they be oppressed then? If they can be cruel … they can’t be oppressed.

    Eye-rape story: http://www.stickmanbangkok.com/ReadersSubmissions2011/reader6932.htm

  2. I often wonder if David Icke is just a very clever guy who found a way to make stacks of cash by tuning into people’s need to believe in conspiracy. Wasn’t L Ron Hubbard also quoted as saying the way to become a millionaire was to start your own religion?

    Icke started out life in the England as a football (soccer) player but had to retire early through injury. He then became the BBC sports anchor man. Then he started on the mad stuff…

    • I often wonder if David Icke is just a very clever guy who found a way to make stacks of cash by tuning into people’s need to believe in conspiracy.

      I’m starting to wonder the same about InMalaFide. He shows moments of clarity that make me think he’s got to be too smart to fully buy into this crap. It makes me think he may have been more of a true believer before and isn’t so much anymore but is too heavily invested to turn back now so he just goes along for the ride to cash in.

      • Yeah, I have had these moments of doubt about roosh, inamalafide, and others. It is always tempting to think these people cannot possibly be so deluded, and must be cashing in, but its so hard to say. Yes, these people have moments of lucidity, but the human mind is complex and can handle incredible amounts of cognitive dissonance. None of us are all of a piece, and even the craziest of us have moments of startling lucidity and sanity. So mere moments of sanity do not suggest to me that these people secretly know the truth necessarily, but simply that like all of us, they have discordant elements in their thinking.

        I used to think roosh was just scamming his audience and did not believe his own idiocy, but I am not even so sure anymore. I often think that the belief systems of these people is just as important for their own psychologies (as overcompensations for inferiority complexes, etc) as their desire to make money – maybe even more important.

        • Roosh is probably the only honest person in the Roissyite-Paleo-Game Cult. His MO is one that truly does work; he approaches dozens of women, usually intoxicated, near closing time at a nightclub, with no regard for their appearance.
          I’m not knocking the guy. He is simply doing things the old fashioned way, endless approaches. He even admits in his writings that he starts with the best looking girls, then works his way down the ladder.
          This completely ignores the fact that even the most honest PUA in the sphere had to expat to have any success with women.

          Really, if these idiots were more like Roosh and less like Roissy, they would probably be a lot happier. Pick up is a numbers game. “inner game” is cultish weirdness trying to mimic self-help.

        • I think inner game is actually a great concept in theory. Way more important than obsessing over how to bang skanks. It’s just that I think none of these guys have even a hint of enough self-awareness to be qualified to teach anyone about doing any sort of inner work.

        • ybm, Roosh is involuntarily honest. He does not set out to be honest – in fact he explicitly claims that game is real and is a major part of his success – but if you have any brain and read between the lines he pretty much admits straight out that game does not work and it is all about numbers. He admits this again and again and again, but his readers dont seem to draw the obvious conclusions. Its surreal.

          Either roosh is incredibly clever at marketing or a complete idiot who stumbled onto an important fact about his audience – when he makes these *candid* posts about how game does not work, he is trying to boost his credibility and make himself *relate* to the struggles and failures of his readership. Thing is, anyone with a brain soon realizes that roosh is providing strong and repeated evidence that game does not work, and anyone who has the kind of personality to religiously believe in game, actually does relate to roosh and completely fails to connect the dots and see that roosh is practically screaming at him – again and again – that game does not work. Now, the critical thinking guys who would draw the obvious conclusions from rooshs posts would have left game sooner or later anyways, and the religious types are completely irrational anyways, so they completely ignore what roosh is actually saying and just *relate* to his failures on an emotional level. It is either a brilliant strategy or a completely accidental *tactic* that is a good example of an idiot succeeding despite his incredible idiocy, heck, because of his idiocy 😉

          Interestingly, I used to follow roosh, and rooshs repeated self-admitted failures with game and women was ONE important factor in getting me to question game 😉 Roosh wrote this book about his travels in S America – which I read – in which he repeatedly details his failures with women, is quite clear that he had practically NO success with game in S America, and gives this lovingly described example of this Italian guy who he says did everything absolutely contrary to game and yet was HUGELY successful with the women, to the point where some women were throwing themselves at him. Roosh then says that this guy was just a bizarre outlier but game still works!?!?! Again, either he is an irrational wacko, or he has a fiendish grasp of the irrationality of his audience and their appetite for cognitive dissonance 😉

      • Over time Baradmu has gotten more and more insane, but it all could be an act. He always was into monetizing his blog as much as possible. (Every so often someone advances the idea that Bardamu is Advocatus Diaboli which would make sense if he’s doing it just for the money.) As far as I’m concerned, I have the same problem that I have with David Icke. He’s impedeing the progress of anti-feminism with his conspiracy crap.

        • Roosh like Mystery and Neil Strauss and most PUA were late bloomers. They lost their virginity in their 20s. Most PUA are beginners that teach people how to be good with women. It’s like being a born again Christian or some other religion, now you have found the light and you want to teach it to someone else. Roosh is honest and believes what he preaches. Many PUAs are just scam artists and know their routines don’t work. Most of these guys actually hurt their chances with girls with the stupid things they do. There are right things to do with women and wrong things, but unfortunately the guys that are teaching are the blind leading the blind. It’s just like guys who write about getting rich in Real Estate or the stock market are the beginners not the smart wealthy ones. Guys that are good don’t have time to waste writing books for pennies when they could make dollars for doing!

    • I often wonder if David Icke is just a very clever guy who found a way to make stacks of cash by tuning into people’s need to believe in conspiracy. Wasn’t L Ron Hubbard also quoted as saying the way to become a millionaire was to start your own religion?

      It’s definitely possible, although some of stuff he did at the beginning of his conspiracy theorist career like declaring himself to be the “son of the godhead” in a TV interview could have easily got him put in an insane asylum. In other words, I can’t be sure, but it doesn’t matter except as a method to discredit Icke. Icke is opposed to anti-feminism and has used conspiracy theory to defend feminism. For instance, Icke lies by saying that all family court problems are due to pedophiles who worship the devil trying to steal kids from parents when the reality is that family courts are feminist institutions working for women to steal children and assets from fathers. This means we have to fight Icke since his conspiracy theories impede the progress of anti-feminism.

  3. Feminists have to resort to bizarre conspiracies; reality does not match what they believe.

    “Why are some women so mean to other women? Maybe some women are just jerks. No, that can’t be it, women are pure and innocent, it must be a male plot to turn women against each other.”

    “Why aren’t there more women in science, math, or computer programming? It can’t be that women think those things are nerdy–there must be a male plot to keep women out.”

    etc.

    • FB – isn’t that guy a catholic? Mystic beardy sky man created the whole universe and everything in it, and is terribly upset that people occasionally slip a franger over their hello sailor. I tend to think He (God) should stop peeking into people’s bedrooms if what goes on in there upsets Him so much.

      I think I’ll wander over there and troll that post a little.

  4. “So why does anyone believe conspiracy theories when they come out a feminists mouth?”

    Paranoid people believe any conspiracy theory, regardless of where it came from. Anyone who hasn’t already done so should read “The Paranoid Style in American Politics”, by Hofstadter. Google also the phrase “Crank Magnetism” – people who believe one nutty thing tend to believe dozens.

  5. I was right when I vowed to leave behind the MRA community. I said I would block every site except Fidelbogen, BP, Forweg and AVfM…

    But I was too busy to manually put all sites in one by one, so today I somehow stumbled onto marky mark’s site and saw this:

    http://markymarksthoughts.blogspot.com/2012/02/catastrophe-in-sex-relations.html

    The battle has been lost. The MRA has been taken over.

    You know I used to say that it takes gamers 3-5 years to awaken, but I was going off of the general community where guys are encouraged to leave the house an practice this stuff.

    The MRA is the only place in the world where you have people who openly proclaim never having tried game, never tried applying it, or studying it… Yet they defend it and make the same batshit insane statements like “game will part the seas and make pussy rain from the sky and the world will
    Magically become a paradise thanks to the god of game which hall ensure nothing is ever bad and all is amazing…”

    I mean you have guys who openly admit not having interacted with females for 20-30 years, have no formal theoretical knowledge either (social psychology, Evo psych training)… But they praise how “spot on” the god of game is…

    This is worrying… In the general community guys who actually applied this shit took 3-5 years to awaken. How long does it take married gamers? What about “haven’t talked to a woman in 30 years but I support game and believe anyone criticizing it is crazy” type of guys?

    • I was right when I vowed to leave behind the MRA community.

      Yes, you were. I have been playing around with the idea of calling myself a Rational Anti-Feminist Activist (RAFA) or Rational Anti-Misandrist Activist (RAMA) because the whole MRM has been taken over.

      I know you disagree, but even AVfM is in the same boat. I have been doing more reading of AVfM posts, and I’m finding a lot more conspiracy theory. For example, I found this post where JtO is making false accusations that Leo Strauss, a professor of philosophy and politics, created neo-conservativism to engineer a facist takeover. This is another example of a conspiracy theory that comes from people sympathetic to feminism although it isn’t about feminist issues.

      It reminds me of when the Dominique Strauss-Kahn false rape fiasco was going on. Despite knowing that this was a false rape case, many MRAs were still ready to hang him because of his religion/race (Jewish), his job (then head of the IMF) or his politics (leftist/socialist). If I’m the victim of a false rape charge will the MRM support me? I can’t be sure. My politics are to the left of the Ron Paul fringe, I have distant Jewish ancestry, and I have lots of money. This means the MRM could hang me out to dry.

      I don’t know where Paul Elam is on all of this. Either he agrees with the conspiracy theory and the rest of the crap in which case he’s part of the problem, or he doesn’t in which case he is simply not competent enough to be a an anti-feminist leader. If it’s the latter, Elam is not competent enough to lead because he can’t deal with everyone from the gamers to the conspiracy theorists to the white supremacists who are trying to take over the MRM or rather have taken over the MRM. Even in cases like game where Elam took a stand against game, he botched the whole thing up by giving the gamers another platform to take over (the Elam-Frost debate).

      This reminds me that I need to purge some links:
      MarkyMark – Because of the reasons that you said
      AVfM – Because it’s run by conspiracy theorists
      Dr. Helen – Because she got sucked into game via Vox Day

      This is worrying… In the general community guys who actually applied this shit took 3-5 years to awaken. How long does it take married gamers? What about “haven’t talked to a woman in 30 years but I support game and believe anyone criticizing it is crazy” type of guys?

      I suspect the answer is never. Even married gamers who get divorced don’t give on game even though it failed them (see that mormon men blogger for the ultimate example).

      I have an idea for dealing with this which I can’t reveal publically because it won’t work if it is known. Even that idea won’t deprogram the gamers and the conspiracy theorists. It will just drive a wedge between them and anti-feminism so we can get rid of them.

      The future of anti-feminism is angry young men. Young men have lived their entire lives under the feminist jackboot. Most of them have never heard of the manosphere, but they know the evil women have done to them, their fathers, their uncles, and their brothers. These angry young men will get older and still be angry. Many boys will grow up to become angry young men. Eventually this will reach critical mass. This is the future I’m working towards now.

      • Anger is a legitimate reaction to injustice, and anger has granted many successes to feminism; I see no reason why it should be moderated to the point where it cannot drive men to fight injustice wrought by feminism and misandry.

    • I hope neither of you (or the other frequent visitors here) quit the MRA movement. If you want to step away for a while, then come back and see what you think of it after a break to recharge your batteries, that would be a good idea. But I for one would sure miss the discussions and sharing of infor that take place at sites like this.

      • I didn’t leave the MRM. The MRM left me.

        If you what you meant is that you’re worried that I’m going to stop blogging, I’m not going to do that. Someone has to carry the torch of rational anti-misandry.

      • I’m not going to stop fighting and talking about misandry. In fact I’ll take it one step further and start doing videos soon.

        I’m just not going to be “an MRA”, nor define mysel through it. I’ll just be a phislopher or a skeptic who happens to be anti-misandry (among other things).

    • Hilariously that blog was the one that finally grossed me out enough about the game-sphere to stop reading blogs except Alek, BP, and Dalrock. That guy is the logical end of burying yourself in the gamesphere long enough that it turns you into a freak. I hope it is a troll blog because otherwise I get a vague feeling of menace from reading that blog. Like a man on the verge of frenzy.

      • I don’t really view it a gamer blog but more of a mgtow blog or that man’s version of it.

        The internet dating series is interesting, but form me it isn’t the main attraction.

        My first impression of the blog was not favorable, but when I looked past the language I found the man is worth reading. I am still not sure how I feel about all the bits and views of this man though. I personally have never had any problems with women like FRA etc. So I won’t be able to fully understand a guy like him and other guys who’ve experienced misandry directly.

        What I find most interesting about the blog are the posts on the future and how one must be prepared. Some sort of major change (resource war, change in governance, economic collapse etc.) is coming soon. The exact timing and nature of this change is unpredictable. Feminst governance will be replaced by something else. What will this something else be? How do we position ourselves to not get fucked. Do we need to arm ourselves? Do we need to think about how to avoid being drafted into a war? Etc. etc.

        • Well, the chance of a Toba-Catastophe event occuring in our lifetimes is incredibly small. Rome was not built in a day, and it certainly didn’t fall in a day. The East lasted another 1,000 years after the west had abandoned the cities. Unemployment and debt levels are bad, worse than any time in living memory for millenials. But the problems of today are miniscule compared to the problems of almost all of the centuries before the 21st. I’m not living in a city under seige by Mongols or infected with Bubonic Plague, our modern societies problems are small.

          Things like feminism are a side-effect of extreme consumption and free-time. Those two things are definitely coming to an end for the west, I agree with doomers when they say this. Men and women of the west are going to have to work a lot harder for a lot less and spend a lot less in the coming century. But that doesn’t mean we will be squatting in a ditch poking berries up our noses. Women, always selfish and always acting in their own interest, will simply fall back into waif mode as feminism suddenly loses its life-line of a fat government cheque. This is the reason I think all the MRA stuff is a fools game. At the end of the day, the male human is a slave to the female human, he has been bred this way. Whether being a workhorse to carry the load of wife and child and die for king and country, or tax-slave put to the sword on the divorce court and die in a desert for the oil that powers the gears of consumption (by females). Man means slave, now, and forever.

          Unfortunately our relative decline in lifestyle will be a catastophe for the poor of the world.

        • At the end of the day, the male human is a slave to the female human, he has been bred this way. Whether being a workhorse to carry the load of wife and child and die for king and country, or tax-slave put to the sword on the divorce court and die in a desert for the oil that powers the gears of consumption (by females). Man means slave, now, and forever.

          ybm, that sounds like a step too far to me. In many primitive societies, women do more work than men, and in many traditional societies women do a tremendous amount of back breaking labor, easily equal to men. In primitive times, the female task of gathering was more laborious – although less dangerous – than the male task of hunting. Historically in the West women did as much if not more work than men, especially in the lower classes. It was only in the delicate upper classes that women were seen as fragile hothouse flowers, a relic of knightly attitudes towards women, itself a product of the Christian suppression of carnal love which had then to find a non-carnal expression (as the idealization of love between the sexes and the idealization of women) – but then, men did little work in this class either, aside from pleasurable work like governing or fighting, and only if so inclined – there were scores of completely idle male aristocrats. The upper middle class attempt to ape the manners of the aristocracy in the 19th century led to a bizarre situation where the men worked to make money and women had essentially very little to do. But this has always been an historical anomaly.

        • Historically, it was women were slaves to men, in terms of work and obedience.

          But it really does not matter what is *bred* in us historically. I dont believe in instincts, I believe in survival strategies. Our *instincts* are merely capacities that we can bring into play if the situation calls for it. For instance, I do not think there is an *instinct* for violence, there is a capacity for it, a capacity which we will bring into play if we find ourselves in a situation where violence is our best option. In my own life, I have lived in safe countries where I have been docile and non-violent, and you would have said I simply lacked the *instinct* for violence. Other times I have lived in countries where violence and aggression were essential to my survival, and I adapted accordingly, and you would have said I was a violent hot head. But it was simply a question of strategy, there was no *instinct* involved.

          Its the same with male-female roles and relationships – they will optimize themselves in response to environmental incentives. They are not held hostage to our *instincts*.

        • Great post, Kevin. I could not agree more about capacities vs. instincts.

          An instinct is “someone threatened me, so I attack them every time.” If you are threatened and you might attack, or you might run away, or you might laugh in their face, or you might talk them out of it, or you might go and call the cops, you aren’t acting upon instinct.

        • lol, thats a good point and an excellent way of putting it, real peterman – if you have a bunch of different options, then you are not exactly acting on *blind* instinct, are you? instinct implies at least some level of compulsion.

        • Sorry guy, I was writing on some game blogs at the same time as I was posting on here. Posting on those things really winds me up because you literally arent allowed to disagree with them.

    • Yeah I think too many guys will dismiss the author because of the language. But read a few entries and you realize the man writing the blog is no dummy. One must also understand the man’s FRA experience and other life experience to fully appreciate his perspective. I am still digesting it.

      • Can’t speak for anyone on here but the wimminz blog certainly doesn’t strike me as a game blog. It seems to tie in with anti-game more than anything.

        I felt very angry on this guy’s behalf when reading the FRA stuff. I can’t blame the author for wanting to let off steam.

        • The average male is less “alpha” than the average female.

          Try not to choke on that.

          The desperation on this board is palpable.

          If you hate women/feminism, check out “female sperm”, “ova-fusion”. You’ll shit a brick!
          😄

        • I feel bad for you Anglo guys, your women really dohate you don’t they? Every corner of the Internet some Anglo chick will drop in to show everyone just how much anglo women hate their fathers, brothers, sons, friends, their own people.

          No wonder all you Anglo guys are going to Europe and Asia to find women. I wouldn’t marry any of them either!

        • YBM, it isn’t just anglo women who hate men. Women are the same everywhere. The only difference is how much of the male population they want dead. Lesbian separatists want 100% of men dead whereas purely hetero women at the other end only want 80% of men dead.

        • Ok, I should have been more specific, attribute that to the half bottle of wine I drank earlier in the night.

          Indeed all women don’t really like or want men.

          Anglo women seem to be the only ones that delight in destroying them though.

        • Anglo women seem to be the only ones that delight in destroying them though.

          Couldn’t this just be a factor of Anglo women being more honest? Or perhaps feminism being more advanced in Anglo countries than some other places?

        • I can only speculate.

          In the area of the delight in the male suffering I think it a small number of very visible celebrities (Sharon Osbourne for example, the radfem lesbians Rosie O’Donnell and Ellen Degeneres) who legitimately hate men, it just happens that media leads the culture. It is no grand conspiracy. They have the platform, they set the tone. It only makes it worse that anglo-culture seems to think men are either abusive cads, wimpy morons, rapists, pedophiles, or criminals. A culture of suspicion hangs over the heads of every man in Canada.

          To me it seems like consumer media likes to puff women up for marketing purposes too. “Buy our detergent because your dumb slob of a husband has been rolling around in the dirt like the family dog”.

          I can very easily tell when a commercial has been produced in the US or adapted from a European one. Proctor and Gamble is especially guilty of the ‘woman good man bad’ advertising campaigns, not surprisingly P&G is a major producer of household supplies.

          Dalrock (the other blog I comment at) writes pretty extensively about how protestant christianity and its ‘moral superiority of the female’ is pretty culturally pervasive in the anglosphere, even among secular women (see chivalry).

  6. A CT told me to do my research…by watching Alex Jones. He tried to draw communism and feminism together, and to be honest…that is a long shot. Plus, the CT also thought feminism started 50 years ago.

    I…I have lost faith in the human race.

    • Any two ideologies can be “tied together” (that is, be seen to overlap, venn diagram style) under a bigger umbrella term . Except for possibly Objectivism.

      Objectivism operates as a monad at this point. The mother of all ideologies. More discovery on that to closely follow, of course.

      Anyway, this sure got off topic. I thought we wuz talking feminism! X)

  7. Pingback: Where Is The Real World Action? | The Black Pill

  8. Good video, insane comments, especially from newworldodour.

    Ex: I’ll say the same thing to you as Niki Rockefeller said to Aaron Russo “you’re an idiot” Because you have a problem with people that are geopolitically aware and do not deal with theories but facts you don’t believe conspiracies exist?! Do you know how to use google? There is so much evidence of conspiracy facts it’s not even debatable. Tell me USS liberty attack theory or fact? Also watch?v=lhJCTFZf03A Nothing to do with feminism? Did I say idiot? I meant MORON!!!

    Riiiiiiiiiight.

  9. Pingback: Conspiracy Theory At AVfM | The Black Pill

  10. As for “conspiracy theories”, yeah, I suppose there is no proof, there’s no proof Nazi Germany or USSR ever existed, there is no proof the trans-Atlantic slave trade ever took place, or the witch trials, or the crusades. None of this ever happened because that would be “conspiracy theories.”

    Now, lets get a little more serious here. Yeah, most “conspiracy theorists” are manginas, white knights, however, this does not mean I will throw the baby out with the bath water. I am not naive enough to believe we are some magical exception to the laws of history or human nature. I don’t think I am any more cosmically special than Pablo in Cuba, or Chang in China. If it can happen there, it can happen here.

    Now, as to WHY most “conspiracy theorists” are manginas, well, if you can’t handle basic math, your a fool to try to tackle advanced trigonometry. But here you go, the “elite” KNOW roughly 20% of the population will not buy the official story, so, they give them puppet leaders to follow, who mix truth with lies or disinfo, to send people further down the rabbit hole. To borrow a quote from Joseph Stalin (who doesn’t exist, because his existance is apparently a conspiracy theory) “The best way to control your opposition is to lead it.”

    Now, WHY do they want to put men down? Because men are statistically more likely to be resistant. So they give them all these fake leaders to follow, David Icke, Michael Tsarion, etc etc (there are hundreds of them), and all these fuckards play on this myth of male power, this myth of the big bad evil patriarchy oppressing women.

    Now, onto the MRM, any anti-feminist who buys into PUA shows you how much of a mangina they really are. PUA serves the feminist agenda, by placing all responsibility onto men, by taking women off of one pedistal and putting them onto another. Read this link here:

    http://lifestylejourney.blogspot.com/2010/02/pua-scam.html

    This link shows perfectly the parallels between the “truth movement” and the PUA. There is nothing so super shadowy or mythical about it, it is all just a business. Hollywood has you all trained to think of some shadowy druids or some shit on some sci-fi bullshit, WRONG, instead of looking at things in a mythological lense, I’d recommend looking at the world for what it is, a business. It is all a business. And “we the people” are the peons churning the cogs to keep the machine moving. This isn’t some David Icke “lizard men did it” shit. In fact, mainstream media, and the elites themselves, are openly bragging about what they are doing right to our faces. If you haven’t learned from history yet, that your not special for being born into a certain country or culture, then there is no help for you. You are merely too stupid and dogmatic to see what is right in your face. Hell your surrounded with proof, they even admit to it.

    Lets see, parallels between us and Nazi Germany 1) smoking bans, 2) false flag attack, 3) illegal wars over seas, 4) heightening of security, 5) patriot act, 6) gun bans (so the people will be defenseless), 7) eugenics-based society addicted to this myth of genetic superiority (this is WHY they labeled you all and myself, “omega males” because they are practing eugenics, what they are basically telling you is “your not human, your genetically weak and inferior,”).

    Of coarse there’s little point in me trying to give proof because I already know, no matter how much proof I stack up, it’ll never be enough to people who refuse to allow there to be enough proof.

    • I suppose there is no proof, there’s no proof Nazi Germany or USSR ever existed, there is no proof the trans-Atlantic slave trade ever took place, or the witch trials, or the crusades. None of this ever happened because that would be “conspiracy theories.”

      This is your argument? Seriously? There is such a thing as objective evidence, and you have no understanding of how it works.

      the “elite” KNOW roughly 20% of the population will not buy the official story, so, they give them puppet leaders to follow, who mix truth with lies or disinfo, to send people further down the rabbit hole. To borrow a quote from Joseph Stalin (who doesn’t exist, because his existance is apparently a conspiracy theory) “The best way to control your opposition is to lead it.”

      So conspiracy theorists are easily manipulated. I have been saying that for a while since they keep falling victim to scams.

      Because men are statistically more likely to be resistant.

      Conspiracy theorists aren’t resistant to anything since, as you pointed out, they’re incredibly easy to manipulate.

      Lets see, parallels between us and Nazi Germany 1) smoking bans, 2) false flag attack, 3) illegal wars over seas, 4) heightening of security, 5) patriot act, 6) gun bans (so the people will be defenseless),

      When is Amtrak going to start running on time?

      eugenics-based society addicted to this myth of genetic superiority (this is WHY they labeled you all and myself, “omega males” because they are practing eugenics, what they are basically telling you is “your not human, your genetically weak and inferior,”).

      Are you saying the world is run by Roissyite gamers? Because those are the only guys who have called me an omega. I find this less believeable than Icke’s lizard men from another planet.

      Of coarse there’s little point in me trying to give proof

      You have certainly proven that conspiracy theorists are easily to manipulate and scam.

  11. I mean is there any doubt we’ve been made into the ass of a eugenics system? Do “the beautiful people” honestly not think they are better than us guys? Look at movies like “40 yr old virgin.” Look how they call us “losers.” this is because they DON’T think theyr better than us, and because theyr NOT playing eugenics, right? LOL… Most people (blue pillers living TFL are still blue pillers) are merely too damn weak to take the red pill.

  12. But you know, I’m sure you’ll wanna tell me how “wrong” I am, w/o having done a fucking bit of research. I’ve read all the books written by the elite, for the elite, books that were still available to “we the people” but were collecing dust on library shelves as long as the circus was in town (entertainment to keep the masses distracted). I’ve read tons of books where they make absolutely no bones about their agendas or what they intend to do, I’ve spent half my life researching all this shit and I have a mountain of irrefutable evidence. But, someone whose obviously done nothing was sit around eating cheetos watching oprah is somehow gonna tell me how damn wrong I am, right? LOL.

    You know what the saddest part is, is because “truth seekers” often to to be matriarchal manginas, you automatically throw away everything you hear them say, even the true parts. Merely because *some* of what they say is brainwash, and because mangina selective truth seekers have went against you. So now, you wanna throw the baby out with the bath water, because your too emotionally weak to separate their matriarchal bullshit from the rest of the information.

    • But you know, I’m sure you’ll wanna tell me how “wrong” I am, w/o having done a fucking bit of research. I’ve read all the books written by the elite, for the elite, books that were still available to “we the people” but were collecing dust on library shelves as long as the circus was in town (entertainment to keep the masses distracted). I’ve read tons of books where they make absolutely no bones about their agendas or what they intend to do, I’ve spent half my life researching all this shit and I have a mountain of irrefutable evidence.

      By your own admission you are easily manipulated so everything you say here is guaranteed to be wrong.

      You know what the saddest part is, is because “truth seekers” often to to be matriarchal manginas, you automatically throw away everything you hear them say, even the true parts. Merely because *some* of what they say is brainwash,

      I deal in fact not truth.

      If they can’t figure out that they’re being brainwashed, then why should I do it for them? You’re telling me that I should search for a needle in a haystack hidden in a field of haystacks when that field is submerged in an ocean of shit. I have heard this argument from conspiracy theorists a million times before. (You guys need new material.) Why is it my job to separate the supposed tiny bit of fact in conspiracy theory (which really doesn’t even exist)? Why don’t you conspiracy theorists do it?

      and because mangina selective truth seekers have went against you.

      Conspiracy theorists have attacked me. The supposed enemies of conspiracy theorists seem happy to leave me alone. That’s all I need to know.

  13. yes, because conspiracy manginas attacked you, your too emotionally weak to separate the information. Exactly what I said the 1st time. That’s like, if I were a Jew, and Hitler said 2+2=4, and I snap back “2+2 can’t =4 because Hitler said it, and he attacked me.”

    Let me share a quote with you from Ted Turner:

    “There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it….”

    Lets see how many politicians openly use the term “NWO”

    Bush Sr.

    Bush Jr.

    Bill Clinton

    Obama

    Tony Blair

    Henry Kissinger

    ADOLF HITLER himself stated ““National Socialism will use its own revolution for establishing of a new world order.”?

    But we’re special right? Bad things can’t happen to Americans because your here, and the world stops turning for you. Your so much more important to the universe than those creepy foreigners in other lands, and other times, right? I mean, your beyond the laws of history, hell, history has no effect on you at all because your sooooo much more evolved than those savage heathen foreigners, right?

  14. Explain this to me, back in the 90’s, if you even mentioned THE EXISTENCE of such shadowy organizations as Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Trilateral Commission, or The Builderburgs, you’d be laughed out of a room as a crazy conspiracy whacko.. Now, however, all you have to do is turn on CNN and you see representatives of these organizations on public access television.

    • I read about the CFR and Trilateral Commission in regular news during the 90s. The only difference is back then we didn’t have blogs for mentally ill conspiracy theorists to invade.

  15. And don’t say they are random coincidences, theyr not. They are relevant “coincidences.”

    Abraham Lincoln 1861-1865
    JFK 1961-1963

    Abraham Lincoln was elected to congress in 1846
    JFK was elected to congress in 1946

    Abraham was elected to President in 1860
    Kennedy was elected to President in 1960

    Both names Lincoln and Kennedy each contain 7 letters
    Both were particularly concerned with civil rights
    Both wives lost children while living in the White House

    Both presidents were shot on a Friday
    Both presidents were shot in the head.

    Lincoln’s secretary was named Kennedy
    Kennedy’s secretary was named Lincoln

    Both were assassinated by southerners
    Both were succeeded by southerners

    Both successors were named Johnson

    Andrew Johnson was born in 1808
    Lyndon Johnson was born in 1908

    Assassin John Wilkes Booth was born in 1839
    Assassin Lee Harvey Oswald was born in 1939

    Both assassins were known by their 3 names
    Both names are composed of 15 letters

    Lincoln was shot at the theater named “Ford.” (Ford is the F in JFK)
    Lennedy was shot in a car called “Lincoln.”

    Booth ran from a theater and was caught in a warehouse
    Oswald ran from a warehouse and was caught in a theater.

    Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials.

    And here’s the kicker….

    Lincoln issued and Kennedy (it is claimed) was about to issue “Greenbacks,” or gov’t. debt-free money….

    The odds of all that being one giant string of coincidences is astronomically small. Occam’s razor (isn’t that what coincidence theorists love to use) points to the simplest explanation being a conspiracy. Here’s a shocker for you, step outside your gated community… The world isn’t sunshine and lollipops, sunshine;)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s