26 comments on “Less Than 10 Women In The Entire World Think This

  1. Excellent post.
    What happens when secular law becomes anti-family?
    What happens when Christians ignore/deny their Patriarchal God?
    The Muslims take over.
    Today’s elusive wapiti illustrates this nicely.
    His only flaw is to see it as wrong,and appeals back to “consent by the governed.”
    When he should have said “Christians should be setting up their own court systems too!”

    Making the claim that men do not have the right to their own flesh and blood families does not make it so!

    This will change,either by the barbarians or by assertion of the Christian ethic.(again)

    To link that in with your OT-what’s the real point in getting laid if you can’t keep the fruits of your semen?

    • Islam cannot and will not take over the western world because an absurd amount of money has been flowed into the middle east (especially the Magreb) to bring “womens rights” to the Islamic world. The Islamic world in its pride and hubris, is in the process of falling to the same issues the west did. While Salafis fight from the outside, their women are rotting the core out from under them.

      The so-called “Arab Spring” has shown that along with the Anglo-Consumer Capitalism that comes with “democracy” so do womens rights.

      Courtesy of your pal Hillary Clinton.

      Note I am a leftist so I am not saying this from a position of American conservatism.

  2. I noticed that a lot men will make fun of lower status men as a pathetic attempt to impress women.

    You can easily become a social loser for openly agreeing with valid observations put forth by whiners.

    The low status men are supposed to blame themselves for not magically willing themselves into being more attractive.

    and everyone else is supposed to either make fun of low status men or ignore them.

    Women don’t risk the same social ostracism as men for defending whiners.

    -Simpsonsdidit

      • I am extremely overprotective of guys who get bullied, both online and IRL. I fought guys who picked on my younger brothers for liking comic books and video game in the 90s. I didn’t get into them until my mid 20s.

        A couple students were playing MTG in the cafeteria last week and another prof (female of course) said something. I told her off. Its funny what having an accent will let you get away with when it comes to bitchy anglo women.

        I went and watched them play MTG right after that. Good bunch, they invited me to watch the Avengers, apparently we have an on-campus club for nerdy stuff like comic books and MTG/D&D, and they asked me to join it! I know a few decent looking, lonely women that are into comic books that I’m going to bring too.

  3. I’d say there is more than just sex involved. Female approval is also important – requiring no sex at all.

    Hmmm. How can I put this – it seems like some people value what women say over what any man says.

    Hence, if a woman says something that many men have been saying for years – in their minds, it suddenly becomes more “valid”.

    Another aspect of all this that has nothing to do with sex.

    Just my two cents.

    The world does not revolve entirely around sex. Neither does the hatred of men.

  4. Feminism is not about: “All grrrls are great cos we have vaginas! That makes us superior, so teh menz should do everything for us, because we are so entitled to everything! Give us your moneyz and spermz, so we can enslave you!”

    Uh, no. Feminism promotes a fucking DIVERSE perspective on women (and men, BTW), not painting them as superior or inherently good or some weird ass shit like that. Women can be kind-hearted, but they can also be violent serial killers (and violent towards men, raping them… something that you MRAs accuse us of being in denial). Pretty much like men. Feminist fact. We don’t try to oppress men, we don’t hate on them. We are not entitled to anything other than basic human rights and being treated as frickin’ INDIVIDUALS, not some crappy idea of how “all women are and should be”. The same applies to men, because your blog seems to be about the frustration of how men are expected to behave in limited ways and are often disregarded if they don’t – an understandable frustration. Well, and feminist-bashing.

    I’m a feminist and I can give you a couple of examples of why I disagree with PUA and similar dating advice:

    – PUA teaches you to do everything for women, to put on an act. Well, they tell you that you’re the leading “alpha”, but still all you do comes down to doing anything to attract a woman. Very empowering to men. NOT. Expressing yourself in limited ways (aka “building attraction) =/= being a leader. They’re mutually exclusive, because you’re becoming the one lead by (supposed) desires of women.

    – They teach you to base your identity on the success with women. If you don’t have game, you’re practically a “loser”. As if there’s nothing else positive in a man than his success with women. As if you need gratification of your existence by and through women. Because fucking and relationships are not meant to be just for fun (and not obligatory), but some sort of competition in Social Darwinian fashion which you have to win in order to prove your life worthy of existence (“Fuck or Die”). I believe it’s toxic to men, because they teach you that if you fail in the eyes of women, you’re some sort of inferior chump who deserves to feel bad.

    – The whole idea of “alpha” vs. “beta” is a big joke. Not to speak of the fact that the “alpha wolf” is a myth (only occurring in wolves which are in captivity, because in nature, their hierarchy is based on family structure, i.e. there’s actually a pair of male and female “alpha wolves”). Why would one change himself to become more “alpha”? What for? To fuck some girls? That’s so stupid. Instead of embracing your personality and thus gaining self-confidence (which, in fact, makes you more attractive), they tell you to change yourself to become some imposter. And they make a shitload of money with that crap. Like, even if you’re not successful with most women (or not having sex), does that make your life somehow unlivable? A person’s value and worth is not measured by what their decide to do with his/her body, it’s none of anyone’s business (as long as nobody is harmed)

    Note: No, feminists do not want to control men. Actually, we believe that if the myth about “real men” ceased to exist, “effeminate” or “low-status” men wouldn’t be looked down on by many women (and men). You know, many women support equal rights and such, but they don’t take time to reflect upon gender and what is called toxic hegemonic masculinity (the current ideal of masculinity – “alpha” and such). And believe that those men are the only desirable. Now I don’t want to say that the “manly men” should disappear, I’m just saying that society should become more open and welcoming to different expressions of femininity and masculinity in total.

    P.S.: I don’t understand your hatred of feminism.

    • Talk to your own sisters then dearie:

      http://agentorangefiles.com/

      We aren’t PUAs or gamers around here, neither are we bottom status men (Blackpill is quite wealthy in fact). What we are, is intellectually honest, and in order to be so, some hard truths as demonstrated in the above link, have to be recognized.

      Clean your own house before you tell us to mop our floor.

      • I should specify (This is what I get for posting on heated topics before I’ve eaten lunch):

        I agree with 9/10 of what you wrote, it is only your snarky first paragraph, and your little jab at the end I take issue with. For some reason feminists always seem to coat every post they make on the internet with either condescension, snark, or sarcasm. I blame facebook and Twitter myself.

        The reason I take issue with those points, other than your bad attitude and stupid intentional misspellings, is that unfortunately, *your* (and in a way, my) brand of feminism lost the war. You can see this by the majority of women being outright disdainful or hostile to being labeled ‘feminist’ especially young women.

        Equality doesn’t mean anything in the age of affirmative action for privileged white upper middle class women, economic decline for everyone else. Fortunately upper middle class white women are simply an endangered species because of birthrates.

        • > You can see this by the majority of women being outright disdainful
          > or hostile to being labeled ‘feminist’ especially young women.

          This is because they intuitively sense that feminism is as much a war of lies and coercion waged by older/unattractive women against the interests of young women as it is one against men.

          Think of Tonya Harding trying to have Nancy Kerrigan knee-capped and removed from the competition, and you get the basic idea.

    • Feminism is not about: “All grrrls are great cos we have vaginas! That makes us superior, so teh menz should do everything for us, because we are so entitled to everything! Give us your moneyz and spermz, so we can enslave you!”

      I’m supposed to take your word for this? My eyes and ears disagree.

      Feminism promotes a fucking DIVERSE perspective on women

      This phrase makes absolutely no sense. A single perspective can’t be “diverse”.

      We are not entitled to anything other than basic human rights and being treated as frickin’ INDIVIDUALS, not some crappy idea of how “all women are and should be”.

      Then why can’t you feminists get your hands out of my wallet? Why can’t you feminists stop trying to destroy my job and my reputation?

      I’m a feminist and I can give you a couple of examples of why I disagree with PUA and similar dating advice:

      We are not PUAs here.

      they teach you that if you fail in the eyes of women, you’re some sort of inferior chump who deserves to feel bad.

      Feminists do the same. I have directly experienced this.

      No, feminists do not want to control men.

      Then why are you feminists working so hard to enslave men?

      Actually, we believe that if the myth about “real men” ceased to exist, “effeminate” or “low-status” men wouldn’t be looked down on by many women (and men).

      I am neither effeminate nor low status.

      I’m just saying that society should become more open and welcoming to different expressions of femininity and masculinity in total.

      I don’t need society to be more “welcoming” to different expressions of masculinity. What I need is for feminists to stop trying to destroy my job, freedom, and my life.

  5. I haven’t downloaded the file you posted, but the title seems to suggest that it’s about radfem – a branch of feminism I and other feminists I know distance ourselves from for several reasons, e.g. its essentialism, transphobia (especially transmisogyny) and dismissal of other issues of social injustice.
    That’s why, for the bigger picture, I prefer a more differentiated view and the term kyriarchy. It is better suited for explaining more complex power relations within a society due to the consideration of different intersections with privileges (or lack thereof). Which puts middle class cis able-bodied straight white women pretty much on the upper scale of society, while I disagree that women are a privileged class as a whole. And because of the intersection, it allows some men to be more oppressed than some women et cetera.
    However, I don’t see why feminism should be a total failure. I guess it depends on who is given credit for feminism and who is not. It’s not a completely homogenous movement, after all.

    • Good. Mra seems to have a natural ally in your brand of feminism, you can help by getting more of you gals on board and join us in reforming the unequal legal system!

      You can also help by expressing to your fellow feminists to abandon gendered terms like creepy, and foster a feeling with men that they are not looked upon as potential child predators to rapists merely for being present!

      If you are into all those ideas, point me toward a blog or similar place and I would be happy to help winning hearts and minds among feminists especially!

    • but the title seems to suggest that it’s about radfem – a branch of feminism I and other feminists I know distance ourselves from for several reasons

      This line of reasoning has been used to defend some of the most vile evils in history like Naziism, Communism, and Islamo-facism.

      That’s why, for the bigger picture, I prefer a more differentiated view and the term kyriarchy. It is better suited for explaining more complex power relations within a society due to the consideration of different intersections with privileges (or lack thereof). Which puts middle class cis able-bodied straight white women pretty much on the upper scale of society, while I disagree that women are a privileged class as a whole.

      All women in the US are more privileged than I am. Government policy guarantees that.

      • From the archives (circa 1998-2000)….

        The New Aristocrats, by Rich Zubaty

        What do we think of when we think of aristocrats? Wealthy estate owners robed in fine clothes? Social lions, blessed by birth, with immunity from performing heavy labor, and freedom from the tedious business of fighting wars? Pampered scions with privileged access to the ear of the King? Emotionally reserved cultural nobles comporting themselves with an air of moral superiority? The trend-setters of pomp and spectacle? The social Petri dish of rumor and gossip?

        Forbes magazine says women own 65% of America’s wealth and spend 80% of consumer dollars. Warren Farrell says six times more retail space is allotted to women’s personal items than to men’s.

        Less than 1% of bricklayers, asphalt pourers, and heavy laborers are women. Women do not fix their own cars or repair their own toilets.

        Women are not required to register for the Selective Service. Women may aspire to becoming senators or judges or corporate tycoons, but they are not obligated to fight the wars that preserve our government and economic system.

        Women have organized powerful lobbying entities which put pressure on Washington to address women’s issues and ignore men’s issues. Women are the inheritors of government policies which afford them special privilege in the arenas of divorce, custody, reproductive rights; crime and sentencing; health care and longevity; and military service.

        Aristocrats dominate culture through sheer pomposity, exude airs of moral and cultural superiority, and disdain those “beneath” them. Women spend more money on “culture” than men. They consume more books, films, live performances and domestic items. In doing so they warp popular culture to appeal to their biases.

        Women’s presumptions and prejudices rule popular media, education, and advertising. Things of interest to women are widely regarded as being culturally superior to things of interest to men. Designer fashion shows get news coverage. Salmon fishing and hot rods do not. Women do not hesitate to belittle and shame men for their “cruder” tastes.

        Aristocrats and feminist enforcers aggressively censor people or ideas with which they disagree. They will bully, sabotage, and openly molest adversaries. They do not die in foreign wars protecting freedom of speech, and have thereby perversely concluded that freedom of speech means freedom of speech for them, and not for anyone else.

        As knights are considered morally superior to common soldiers, so women are considered morally superior to men. Women are believed when they lie, forgiven when they cheat, and sentenced to 50% less jail time when convicted of the same crimes as men. When a man hits a woman we despise him as a brute. When a woman hits a man we ask what HE did to provoke her. Why the duplicity? Like all aristocrats, women are assumed to adhere to a higher moral standard than common men.

        Aristocrats wear make-up, restrain their emotions in public, and project a regal image. Women are experts at controlling and manipulating emotions since these are their main weapons in the war between the sexes. Men are spontaneous, direct creatures. Women are florid and catty – their glowing blandishments and glittering solicitude most often mask a covert agenda.

        Strike up the band and bring on the chorus. Aristocrats and women adore pomp and spectacle. Both are breeding ponds for rumor and gossip and other social viruses.

        If America created a special class of men who could hold high office without fighting war, control vast wealth by means of special government connections, and evade hard labor by claiming cultural and moral superiority, we would consider them parasites, a throwback to monarchy — bloody aristocrats!

        And we wouldn’t kiss the seats of their bluejeans. We’d mount a media campaign to take them down a notch. Or we’d put them on a boat back to Europe to exert their rivalries in a society resigned to social class divisions.

  6. Jeezuz, that last post by Martian Bachelor about the New Aristocrats was spot on! I am a 46 yo mother of 5 sons in their 20s. I adore my sons absolutely. They struggle and have to work at such physically difficult jobs because they are men, and it’s ‘expected’ of them. I ask them ” have you met any nice girls lately” and the answer is always the same: ‘there are no nice girls mom, only sluts’ That is sad.

    Femcunt has to realize that a new class of people has been given special privileges such as outlined in this description of the New Aristocrats, and it is patently unfair and I don’t blame men like Black Pill for raging against this. I have no idea where my sons are going to find good women, feminine women to settle down with and make families. Not in this country (Canada) that’s for sure. They certainly realize the dangers of spreading their seed in the wrong place…and how they will lose everything if they piss off the wrong female.

    Black Pill, I do agree with your position and I’m glad you’re trying to raise awareness. It’s a friggen uphill battle.

    • Here is what I suggest:

      1.) Do not prod, shame, or pressure your sons to ‘marry and settle down’ or ‘meet a nice girl’ in Canada. I live here, and I am a few years older than your sons, it does not get better for them.
      2.) Encourage them to be happy in their personal pursuits.
      3.) Do not pressure them to work harder than they need to, in order to be personally independent. I am an educator at a local community college, and the majority of these young men are only here because that is what is ‘expected of them’.
      4.) If you desire grandchildren, you will have to encourage your sons to learn other languages and to associate with immigrants and ‘non-white’ women. Unfortunately this means that your culture and your beliefs, and your ethnicity itself, may be a casualty of your sons happiness. Take solace in the fact that foreign women married to Canadian men have an absurdly low illegitimacy and divorce rate (somewhere around 18% compared to 47% for Canadian whites).
      5.) Encourage your sons to move to other countries to find women, admit that this may mean you do not get to see them as much as you like. But take comfort in that your sons will be happier elsewhere.

      I am an Italian living in Canada, and unfortunately there is no happiness for Canadian men in this country. One day I hope to return home but I will not assist in the destruction of my country through Austerity. When my people learn that austerity is a cancer, I will return to rebuild. I have no desire to marry a Canadian woman.

        • Conspiracy Theorists are the craziest people on the internet 100%. Anything you say is confirmation of their Theory, either through ‘that’s what THEY want you to think’ or ‘you can’t trust anything THEY say because THEY control the message’.

          Magical Thinking ties in very closely with Conspiracy Theory, and wouldn’t you know it, GAME is magical Thinking.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s