67 comments on “Women And Manginas Will Resurrect Hitler Rather Than Accept Men Have Rights

  1. “I am certain that in a few decades that you will see women and manginas joining forces with Neo-Nazis (who by definition want to serve women, at least white women) in a desperate bid to prevent men from getting human rights.”

    http://dearwhitefeminists.wordpress.com/update/

    when I would get in arguments with WN alter-righties, I’d drop the above link and say, hey, your ideology is far closer to her’s than mine and I’m glad to disagree….

    and thanks for the shoutout…

      • I “get” WN in that I understand they are pissed off about demographic trends and the obvious fact that white women, as the major demographic group marketed to, are pretty much giving a 24/7 two handed middle-finger to white men.

        But I also “get” that all of those things have already and are continuing to happen among other races as well. Black Women, Asian Women, Muslim Women, Indian Women, Native Women, all of them are getting a heavy dose of misandry. Its just that white women are the most visible group as their voices get heard before pretty much everyone else on the planet.

        The white woman is the leisure class of our current history and unfortunately for both WN and MRMs, they don’t give a shit about men, white or not.

        • I “get” WN in that I understand they are pissed off about demographic trends and the obvious fact that white women, as the major demographic group marketed to, are pretty much giving a 24/7 two handed middle-finger to white men.

          Yes, but what I don’t get about them is that they’re responding to being shitted on by white by pedestalizing white women more. Because when you focus on hating other races, hating miscegenation, extolling the purity and virtues of the white race, the implication is that white women are the ultimate prize that must be won back or protected.

          It’s like they have Stockholm Syndrome.

  2. This reminds of when the angryharry.com website was blocked on library public access computers in Hampshire (UK). It took them a year or more (I can’t recall how long) before they decided to ‘unblock’ it from their list. IIRC they banned it under the catch-all label of ‘Sexual Materials’.

    The White-Nationalist White-Knighters (WNWKs) do seem to predominate at stormfront, it’s just because they’re old school WNs, more like Trad-Cons who see the ‘little lady’ as a poor ickle victim who gets poached on by whoever. And they’ll be averse to criticising women because they think that that’s what the Jews/Liberals want you to do, so criticising women would be like aiding the enemy. But those are the views of the old school and Beta/emasculated side of the WN. Because of the growth in awareness of PUA/Game (regardless of what you think of it) the younger WNs (like Firepower, http://eradica.wordpress.com) aren’t kow-towing the ‘women as victim’ line anymore. They seem to be willing to scrutinize women and not put them on the pedestal. So it might be that Neo-Nazis end up ‘resurrecting Hitler’, but it will be the old school Trad-Con element, not the younger generation.

      • Dream on. I get more hits than you, even without branding YOU with inflammatory names (like troll) coyly designed to bias and censor.

        Just as the censorship you allege to hate so much, with your Daily Outrage UK banlist above, you paint yourself as inferior to the one you label.

        It’s the same old impotent MRA bs, compiling “enemies lists” while you all sit around as Lady Judges legislate your rights away.

      • I’m not going to speak on his behalf, or claim to know his mind, but from the tone of the site and the following quote it seems that he doesn’t worship women or think of them as something that shouldn’t be scrutinized:

        ‘WNs (White Nationalists) are wise to almost the entire list [of the Liberal fist], but ignore #3 and often lean in favor of #4 when it comes to “white knighting” to preserve the sanctity of their race via White females.’
        (http://eradica.wordpress.com/2012/06/01/five-fingered-fist-of-liberalism/)

        If he associates White Knighting with Liberals, and he sees Liberals as bad, then that means he associates White Knighting (i.e. pedestalizing/worshipping women) as a bad thing.

        Though if you want more proof than that, then I can’t think of any. It’s always hard to prove a negative (prove that he ‘doesnt’ worship women), because that would mean making several posts explicitly saying ‘I don’t worship women’: something that you’ll rarely find anywhere, even if the person doesn’t worship women.

        • The problem is, Fap-power is a troll, meaning he just wants to be contrarian. You can’t use him as an example of some new breed of White Nationalist anymore than you can use him as example of some new breed of MRA or PUA. His shtick is to take a bunch of groups that he feels some marginal kinship to, then point out over and over what he believes to be their flaws and attack them for sitting on the computer all day and not engaging in real-world activism to create change. Even though he himself sits on his computer all day trolling people and never talks about what real world change he himself is doing. The quote you put up is him bashing White Nationalists for putting women on pedestals, so I don’t see how he becomes proof that there is a new breed of WNs who don’t pedestalize women. Fap-power doesn’t pedestalize women because he bashes EVERYONE.

          And why would you keep linking to a known troll? You linked to him twice so far. All that does is give him attention, notify him that he’s being discussed, and cause him to come over here to troll, which he’s already started doing after you linked to him the first time. Are you one of his devoted readers or something?

        • Grizzly, I’m using him as an example of what younger WNs seem to be because that’s what I’ve seen of them. I linked to him firstly so you knew who I was referring to because I didn’t know that he commented regularly here. On the second occasion as a link to the quote that I made, that’s all; it’s something I do whenever I quote someone, link to the place I got the quote from.

          ‘The quote you put up is him bashing White Nationalists for putting women on pedestals, so I don’t see how he becomes proof that there is a new breed of WNs who don’t pedestalize women.’

          It seems to me that the two are mutually exclusive (either/or): you either pedestalise women, or do not pedestalise women. And seeing as he bashes WNs who pedestalise women, that means that he doesn’t pedestalise them. That’s the logic I’m using. But if you want a quote of him saying something like “feminists are lying pieces of filth” then I probably couldn’t give it.

          He is only one example of the younger WN attitude. I could point to a post by a woman on the topic of masturbation/pornography and how it was damaging to the white race. But did the younger guys buy into her line, her spiel, her BS? No they didn’t. They vocalised how pissed off they were at women in general, and women’s attitude towards men (e.g. how the nice guy always gets left behind, how women insult men for using porn but not women etc). That to me shows that younger WN’s aren’t following the beliefs of the older WNs who think that men should die to preserve the beauty of the white woman.

          And this probably isn’t just a WN thing. This could, could, apply to the younger generation of other nationalist movements, be they black, Japanese, Arab or whatever, and men in general.

        • It seems to me that the two are mutually exclusive (either/or): you either pedestalise women, or do not pedestalise women. And seeing as he bashes WNs who pedestalise women, that means that he doesn’t pedestalise them. That’s the logic I’m using. But if you want a quote of him saying something like “feminists are lying pieces of filth” then I probably couldn’t give it.

          My point is, I don’t think he’s a good example because I don’t think he considers himself a White Nationalist. He is unable to affiliate or work with ANYONE, and attacks EVERYONE, in an effort to make himself feel good. Everyone else sucks and is on the right path, he has all the right answers, he’s a lone wolf with righteous rage, the only person who sees the truth, etc. That’s his narrative. I’ve never seen him play nicely or work together with any group of people. All he does is troll and antagonize, even people whose views he’s sympathetic too.

          You may be right or you may be wrong about a new breed of WNs no longer pedestalizing white women. I realize that. But my point is, I wouldn’t use Fap-power as an example of a typical member of any group, except trolls.

        • ‘I’ve never seen him play nicely or work together with any group of people. All he does is troll and antagonize, even people whose views he’s sympathetic too.’

          I’m going to throw my hands up in the air and say ‘I don’t know’, simply because I’ve not seen him commenting on any other blog. I don’t know; I’ll keep my eyes open and see what turns up.

          ‘a new breed of WNs no longer pedestalizing white women’

          That’s the way it seems to me. The old WN view you can see in all it’s ‘glory’ on Stormfront, where they say things like ‘not even a single white woman should be enslaved’ (be a sex slave to the Moors in 8th century Spain) even if it means that the entire white race would stay alive because of her. That kind of view is not only misandric, it’s illogical. How can any race survive without its men? (And that applies to the human race too.) Those kinds of WNs (or indeed nationalists of any colour) will die out because they’re views are incompatible with reality (they think women are moral and worthy creatures). They’re like mangina’s with an aggressive bully streak.

        • Here’s the problem. You tell us about this supposed new breed of white supremacists that don’t pedestalize women. Your only evidence of this is Firepower, a known troll, who takes the opposite position of whoever he is dealing with at that second just to get a rise out of them. (That’s what trolls do.) Since trolls like Firepower don’t have any consistent beliefs, there is no way he can be used as evidence of anything except trolling. Thus, there is no evidence of this supposed “new breed of white supremacists”.

        • Black Pill, I didn’t say they were part of a ‘new breed’ (implying they are a distinct group from the old WNs) I said they were from the younger generation.

          As you comment on CH/Roissy’s blog quite often, you must at least read some of the comments there. And if you read the comments, then you will see that many of the commentors are both racially aware (of the differences between the races) and sexually aware (of the differences between the sexes, or read his post on White Women (http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2012/09/20/white-woman/), which he says:

          ‘I think white nationalists, though I sympathize with the lie-smashing spirit enlivening their mission, will have to come to terms with something unsavory: their “natural allies” answer to no master save one.’

          Here’s another example of young WN’s not pedestalising women. This time from Hipster Racist over at Mindweaponsinragnarok
          ‘We have NOTHING to say or do with you bitches. You’re White – GREAT. Good luck with that.’
          (http://mindweaponsinragnarok.com/2013/03/18/commenting-etiquette-take-note-hipster-and-liberators/#comment-22339)

          Or you can read comments like these on an article about ‘the effects of pornography on the brain’:
          Uh:
          The “blame”, or rather the weight of pathology, falls entirely on men’s shoulders — as usual. At no time in his admittedly short talk does he spare even a single breath for a quick mention of the extremely flagrant behaviors of modern white women and the totally sexualized landscape their presence engenders.
          (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/09/pornographys-effect-on-the-brain-part-2/#comment-91956)

          Luke:
          This ‘seeking Superman’ syndrome, I believe, is directly tied to the jewish media’s glorification of White female beauty, which serves to drive up the level of conceit and narcissism and gives White females enormously inflated egos
          (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/09/pornographys-effect-on-the-brain-part-1/#comment-92015)

          Those are the only instances that I can remember (and find links for) at the moment, and if you recall my exact words ‘They seem to be willing to scrutinize women and not put them on the pedestal.’ . Now that doesn’t mean the younger WNs are slagging women off, insulting them etc (which you might have been expecting), it means that they are WILLING to scrutinize them and judge them honestly. Which means calling them out on BS, lies, and duplicity. That’s what I’ve seen. A willingness not to take females at face value and believe everything they say, and assume they are always the victims. That’s what the younger generation of WN’s SEEMS like it believes to me.

        • and if you recall my exact words ‘They seem to be willing to scrutinize women and not put them on the pedestal.’

          One of your examples involves blaming the “Jewish media” for what women do. That is failing to scrutinize women and putting women on a pedestal (of hypo-agency). If you asked each one of your examples who was really at fault for (white) female behavior, and if they answered honestly they would say, “The Jews” (or some derivative thereof). That’s the same old thing we’ve seen from white supremacists forever.

          Now that doesn’t mean the younger WNs are slagging women off, insulting them etc (which you might have been expecting)

          If white supremacists realized the actual nature of (white) women, this is what they would do. The problem is that will never happen without a white supremacist male leaving white supremacism because without half of the white race, white supremacism implodes on itself.

        • 1) The Jewish media comment said that the media:
          ‘drive up the level of conceit and narcissism’
          Now that indicates that he admits that women are ‘already’ conceited and narcicistic (which most people probably feel is a bad rather than good behaviour). And as he admits that white women ‘are already’ conceited and narcissitic, that is evidence that he is appraising women honestly and not pedstalizing them as you claim All WN’s do.

          2) As for your comment that WNs ‘should be’ slagging off women, well that contradicts your own view on women:
          “the only women who can actually be supportive partners are female MRAs.”
          (https://omegavirginrevolt.wordpress.com/2012/09/25/less-than-10-women-in-the-entire-world-think-this/)

          What, so you’re going to start slagging off female MRAs now? Women whom you consider ‘supportive partners’? If your not going to slag off all women, then why would you expect Nationalists (of any colour) to slag off their ‘supportive partners’ (ie women who agree and participate in advancing your political views)?

          3) And finally:
          ‘That’s the same old thing we’ve seen from white supremacists forever.’

          They’re Nationalists not Supremacists, there’s a distinct diffrence. Please get your terminology right and stop accepting the mainstream view that nationalism=supremacism. Even David Duke (a former KKK member) says: “all people have a basic human right to preserve their own heritage.”
          (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Duke)
          That means he is a Nationalist and not a Supremacist. There’s a distinct difference. It’s one that many people accept from the mainstream view without even thinking about it. You should no better than to accept MSM views so easily and unquestionningly.

        • 1) The Jewish media comment said that the media: BLAH BLAH BLAH

          You can either hold women accountable or (wrongly) blame the Jews. You can’t have it both ways.

          As for your comment that WNs ‘should be’ slagging off women, well that contradicts your own view on women:

          I said that white supremacists should be slagging off women if they realized the nature of white women (and were trying to be consistent with their own supposed ideology). Since they’re really just a woman worshipping cult, they don’t do that.

          They’re Nationalists not Supremacists, there’s a distinct diffrence. Please get your terminology right and stop accepting the mainstream view that nationalism=supremacism. Even David Duke (a former KKK member) says

          I don’t give a shit what they want to call themselves or what David Duke says. “Preserving heritage” is a form of collectivism and slavery (for men) just like Naziism, Fascism, Socialism/Social Democracy, and Communism is.

          Why are you running to the defense of these people? Are you trying to disrupt actual anti-feminism?

        • 1) You completely ignored my point that he (a WN) acknowledges that women are ALREADY conceited and narcisstic, before the media exert any influence on them.

          2) Not all WNs slag off women, only some from the younger generation do. I’ve already told you that’s what I believe. I totally agree that the older generation of WN are more in line with Trad-Cons and pedestalize women. The women who are WN and are supportive do not deserve to be slagged off by WNs, which is exactly the same as your position: ‘Don’t slag off women MRAs’

          3) Clearly you do give a shit, otherwise you would call them Nationalists and not Supremacists. And yes it does matter. There is no disdain in Nationalism, there is disdain in Supremacism. Men respect each other in Nationalism not in Supremacism. Any kind of Nationalism that tends towards Supremacy is no longer Nationalism, exactly because it doesn’t treat men as equal (parity equal).

          Your heritage is something that you inherit, it’s not slavery. What, so you stand against freedom of speech, a right that is part of your Heritage. You stand against freedom of movement, a right that is part of your Heritage. If you want to start attacking the idea that inheritance is bad then go and burn down the local library. All of that and more is part of your inheritance.

          4) ‘Why are you running to the defense of these people? Are you trying to disrupt actual anti-feminism?’
          Your original claim that Neo-Nazis will support the next Hitler and usher in a regime of total misandry is what is wrong; it is what I am telling you. If Right Wingers do support the next Hitler/Mao/Stalin, then it will be from the older generation, those who pedestalize women; the Trad-Cons. If you could lose the image of all WNs as misandric/pro-gynarchy, and see the true picture then you would benefit by it. You’d see potential allies rather than potential enemies. That’s what I’m saying.

        • You completely ignored

          Anyone who blames the Jews for anything when it comes to female behavior can not be trusted to hold women accountable.

          I’ve already told you that’s what I believe.

          Here we deal in what is not what you want to be.

          Clearly you do give a shit, otherwise you would call them Nationalists and not Supremacists.

          Let’s call them by a more accurate name, white cunt worshipers.

          The women who are WN and are supportive do not deserve to be slagged off by WNs, which is exactly the same as your position: ‘Don’t slag off women MRAs’

          Yes they do because I have seen white cunt worshiping women be a constant source of misandry against white cunt worshiping men. If the goal of these people is the advancement of the white race then the white cunt worshiping women in their movement are an impediment to their goals. This is completely different than female MRAs.

          Men respect each other in Nationalism

          Bullshit. If we’re talking about actual “nationalism” then men are expected to be slaves and/or die for whatever “nation” we’re talking about. That isn’t respecting men.

          What, so you stand against freedom of speech, a right that is part of your Heritage. You stand against freedom of movement, a right that is part of your Heritage.

          Since my rights can be taken away whenever a woman feels like it, my only heritage is misandry. I want no part of my heritage.

          If you could lose the image of all WNs as misandric/pro-gynarchy, and see the true picture then you would benefit by it. You’d see potential allies rather than potential enemies. That’s what I’m saying.

          I have heard this argument verbatim when it comes to both (Roissyite) gamers and conspiracy theorists. Both of those groups (which overlap heavily with the white cunt worshipers) turned out to be nothing more than plague on the MRM and viewed the MRM are a fertile field for their scams. These groups like the white cunt worshipers have been trying to take over the MRM for some time. They have failed which is why they spend more time attacking the MRM than anything else including attacking feminism. I don’t see the white cunt worshipers as potential enemies. I see them as ACTUAL enemies because they proven themselves to be dishonest (like the Roissyite gamers and the conspiracy theorists) and to be nothing but a disruption to the MRM.

        • ‘Anyone who blames the Jews for anything when it comes to female behavior can not be trusted to hold women accountable.’

          Again, you ignored the fact that I said that Luke ALREADY acknowledged that women are narcissistic and conceneited, BEFORE the media (white, jewish, black or asian) exerted any influence on them. Ergo the media is not to blame for creating the problem as you said.

          ‘Here we deal in what is not what you want to be.’

          Totally irrelevant. And actually ignored that I said I agree with you that some WN DO pedestalize women.

          ‘Let’s call them by a more accurate name, white cunt worshipers.’

          You mean like this man http://www.heretical.com (a WN) who says women = evil, and shouldn’t be allowed in the WN movement? Clearly you haven’t done your research thoroughly enough.

          ‘Yes they do because I have seen white cunt worshiping women be a constant source of misandry against white cunt worshiping men’

          Evidence?

          ‘I want no part of my heritage.’

          Right… Your American heritage that gave votes to men, but no votes to women, and you reject that? That gave fathers the rights over their children instead of mothers. Despite your views, you reject that part of your heritage is to deny the vote to women and to give fathers preferential treatment over mothers?

          In summary: You mis-portray both WN and your own heritage as totally misandric (when the former is at least partly true, and the latter was only lesserly true). You fail to provide any evidence to support your claims that: the younger generation of WN is misandric or WN as a whole is misandric. You claim that I am trying to ‘disrupt anti feminism’, when this is the ONLY article on your site that I have have any minor quibble with.

          You make lots of claims but don’t provide any evidence (whereas I have), please change this, otherwise it seems like your just posting personal opinions.

        • Again, you ignored the fact that I said that Luke ALREADY acknowledged that women are narcissistic and conceneited, BEFORE the media (white, jewish, black or asian) exerted any influence on them. Ergo the media is not to blame for creating the problem as you said.

          It always comes back to the Jews with the white cunt worshipers. I have had white cunt worshipers try to recruit me with this exact tactic starting out by pretending to agree with me and then slowly try to make it all about the Jews hoping I won’t notice. It didn’t work on me then, and it doesn’t work now.

          Evidence?

          There’s this white cunt worshiping woman attacking men with, “you can’t get laid bullshit”. This one says that (white cunt worshiping) women are fine, but (white cunt worshiping) men need to man up. I can keep listing examples, but I won’t bother. Instead all I have to look at is the “14 words” that white nationalists cunt worshipers recite.

          Because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from the earth.

          That says it all.

          You mean like this man http://www.heretical.com (a WN) who says women = evil

          It seems like all of his problems go back what he believes is white women being attracted to non-white men. That doesn’t help with the real problems women cause. This also doesn’t read as hating women, but needing to save women from themselves which is something I also see from (misandrist) Roissyite gamers.

          Regardless of that, let’s assume you’re right. Then what? There’s only 1 or 3 or 5 of these people who aren’t white cunt worshipers. There’s no point in taking these guys on as allies since for all 5 of them, I can get 500,000 MRAs from sources other than the white cunt worshipers. Plus, they don’t bring all of the white cunt worshiper baggage of anti-semitism, conspiracy theory, obsessing over multiculturalism, etc. It’s simply a bad strategy from a practical perspective.

          Right… Your American heritage that gave votes to men, but no votes to women, and you reject that?

          When given the chance American men couldn’t hand over the vote to American women fast enough. Clearly most men shouldn’t have the vote either since they are just under the thumb of women. I want no part of that heritage.

          You fail to provide any evidence to support your claims that: the younger generation of WN is misandric or WN as a whole is misandric.

          The 14 words that white cunt worshipers use, “Because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from the earth.” says it all. They keep repeating this sentence of misandry.

          You claim that I am trying to ‘disrupt anti feminism’, when this is the ONLY article on your site that I have have any minor quibble with.

          I have had people from various marginal movements from conspiracy theorists to traditionalist conservatives to white cunt worshipers, many of them female, come here to try and recruit me to their movements. In every single case, they very quickly turned out to be frauds attempting to be parasites on the MRM. Right now, you’re using all the same arguments they did.

        • ‘There’s this white cunt worshiping woman attacking men with, “you can’t get laid bullshit”. This one says that (white cunt worshiping) women are fine, but (white cunt worshiping) men need to man up.’

          Oh I completely agree with you that the older generation of WNs is full of misandry. I said that several comments back. Those people are basically the extremist end of the Trad-Cons. As I keep saying, the younger generation SEEMs (and that was my exact word in the first comment that kicked this all off) like casting aside the notion that women should be pedestalized. That’s been my argument all the time. I’m not arguing that All WNs are keyed up on women (or hate them as you think they should do, even though you don’t hate all women in the MRA movement).

          ‘It seems like all of his problems go back what he believes is white women being attracted to non-white men.’

          Right, so you dismiss the rest of the site, all of the pages, and the fact that he’s written two books on gender because of one page? That’s not a fair appraisal. If you looked at any of the other pages (which you may or may not have) then you would see that he goes into detail about women from other ages (Suffragettes) and women from other cultures (small tribes). His focus is on women and not just white women. You’re obsession seems to be white women, not his. I’ve not seen you criticise the black women that mutilate childrens genitals, or the Japanese women that commit incest with their sons, or any other race at all, you just pick on white women; it strikes me that you are the one with the racial issues here, not him.

          ‘Regardless of that, let’s assume you’re right. Then what? There’s only 1 or 3 or 5 of these people who aren’t white cunt worshipers.’

          That’s it! That’s all I’m arguing for: A part of the WN movement (though probably more than 5) is clued up on women and doesn’t worship them; only a part, and they ‘Seem’ like they are from the younger generation. That’s all I’ve been saying. A part or a minority certainly isn’t the majority.

          ‘Plus, they don’t bring all of the white cunt worshiper baggage of anti-semitism, conspiracy theory, obsessing over multiculturalism, etc. It’s simply a bad strategy from a practical perspective.’

          That’s the same in any movement, political, religious, philosophical, MRA or whatever; it’s what happens when two or more people get together: minor disagreements happen. You can only work with what you’ve got; and as you’ve said yourself, you have disagreements with other people who call themselves MRAs, that’s just part of the human question. If someone’s amenable to your views, then work with them, if not then don’t. Take this guy (who I stumbled across by happenstance yesterday) he calls white women ‘bitches’ and thinks that– ‘We must not look down on a single man as a man who “Can’t get a girl.” A man does not need a woman to have inherent personal value. This horrid lie is what drives up women’s value to the undeserved level it currently holds and correspondingly drives up women’s power over our society. (http://racistthinktank.wordpress.com/2011/12/13/women-in-the-21st-century/). (Again, this is only one man.)

          ‘When given the chance American men couldn’t hand over the vote to American women fast enough. Clearly most men shouldn’t have the vote either since they are just under the thumb of women. I want no part of that heritage.’

          Forgive me if I’m wrong, but I thought that the early voting rights of Americans were only given to a small portion of men? Who were predominantly landholders IIRC, which fits right in with what you want (though you’d prefer voting qualifications of a different standard other than property).

          ‘The 14 words that white cunt worshipers use, “Because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from the earth.” says it all. They keep repeating this sentence of misandry.’

          You’re misquoting (unintentionally or not I don’t know) the phrase: that is one of two ’14 words’ phrases the other being the better known: “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White Children”. Yes the 14 words that you quoted are misandric, and any sane man from ‘any’ movement would reject them.

          ‘I have had people from various marginal movements from conspiracy theorists to traditionalist conservatives to white cunt worshipers, many of them female, come here to try and recruit me to their movements. In every single case, they very quickly turned out to be frauds attempting to be parasites on the MRM. Right now, you’re using all the same arguments they did.’

          I have no interest in recruiting you into any movement, Trad-Cons or whatever. I’ve only had one minor disagreement with what I’ve seen of your site, that’s all. Please keep on doing what you are doing.

        • As I keep saying, the younger generation SEEMs (and that was my exact word in the first comment that kicked this all off) like casting aside the notion that women should be pedestalized.

          This blog has been invaded by a bunch of young white vagina worshipers, and they have proven you wrong.

          (or hate them as you think they should do, even though you don’t hate all women in the MRA movement)

          You obviously don’t understand the MRM since you’re trying to apply white vagina worshiping standards to it. There’s a difference between a woman who actively chooses to become a MRA and a woman who was just born white.

          His focus is on women and not just white women. You’re obsession seems to be white women, not his. I’ve not seen you criticise the black women that mutilate childrens genitals, or the Japanese women that commit incest with their sons, or any other race at all, you just pick on white women; it strikes me that you are the one with the racial issues here, not him.

          His focus seems to be on non-white women, which is of no help to me. White vagina worshipers like him try to rebrand female pathologies as non-white pathologies. Not only is this wrong and completely unhelpful for the MRM, it’s also unhelpful for anyone who cares about the white race. White women are doing the same thing to whites that non-white women have done their communities, just more slowly. The white vagina worshipers can’t recognize that.

          That’s it! That’s all I’m arguing for: A part of the WN movement (though probably more than 5) is clued up on women and doesn’t worship them; only a part, and they ‘Seem’ like they are from the younger generation. That’s all I’ve been saying. A part or a minority certainly isn’t the majority.

          Why are you arguing for this? Even if you were right (and the last few days have proven that you aren’t), you think that I and other MRAs should cater to some tiny group of 5 people. That’s a waste of time.

          If someone’s amenable to your views, then work with them, if not then don’t.

          The white vagina worshipers aren’t. The only reason that this is an issue is because white vagina worshipers are constantly invading MRM spaces. Notice that it’s never the other way around. That’s because the MRM has considerably more numbers and traffic than the white vagina worshipers.

          I’ve only had one minor disagreement with what I’ve seen of your site, that’s all.

          I have a problem believing that since you identify with the manosphere/androsphere, and I’m opposed to everything the so called manosphere (or androsphere) stands for.

        • ‘This blog has been invaded by a bunch of young white vagina worshipers, and they have proven you wrong.’

          As I haven’t gone through the comments section of all your posts over the last year then I can’t comment one way or the other.

          ‘There’s a difference between a woman who actively chooses to become a MRA and a woman who was just born white.’

          As is there a difference between a WN woman and a regular white woman. You can tell that because most women vote for political parties that aren’t WN, just as most women vote for political parties that aren’t pro-men.

          ‘I and other MRAs…’

          You keep saying you’re an MRA, but I’ve never seen any signs of Rights Activism on this site. You do a good job of highlighting cultural misandry (which is a definitely a good thing), but there are no petitions, letters or anything else that I can sign up to or copy and paste and send off to a governor, senator, member of parliament or whatever.

          ‘White vagina worshipers like him try to rebrand female pathologies as non-white pathologies.’

          That’s simply untrue. Just look at his site and you’ll see that he criticises women throughout time and space, regardless of race or anything else. He is the only person I’ve seen who points out that Suffragettes were terrorists who resorted to pyromania and bombing shops, you’ve never said anything about that. From what I can see he’s done more to inform men of what women are really like, and that modern day (post 1950s feminism) is really just a drop in the ocean, a domino on the end of a chain. You’re being disingenuous if you fail to point this fact out.

          ‘white vagina worshipers are constantly invading MRM spaces. Notice that it’s never the other way around.’

          I can’t say that I’ve seen many (or any come to think of it) invasions, just men commenting on sites that interest them. The only invasive type of action that I’ve seen was a post (by Giovanni Dannato on female attire) on the In Mala Fide site, which was spammed/trolled/flamed by dozens of enraged women/manginas. Are you sure you’re not seeing something that isn’t really there? It seems like your belief that the entire WN community is out to get you (https://omegavirginrevolt.wordpress.com/2011/12/06/another-conspiracy-theory-about-me-this-time-on-stormfront/) when it’s only one solitary post on an open forum. You can’t link to one post and claim it to represent the view of ALL WNs, and then reject my link to one post and claim that it only represents ONE WNs view, that’s just hypocrisy. You can have it one way or the other, not both.

          ‘I’m opposed to everything the so called manosphere (or androsphere) stands for.’

          I doubt that (if there is even a divide between the different sub-groups at all).

        • I doubt that (if there is even a divide between the different sub-groups at all).

          I had been wondering if you’re a troll, but this confirms it. There’s been so much animosity between the various parts of the manosphere that the MRAs have completely (or almost completely) disassociated themselves from the so called manosphere. There’s no way you could have missed that.

          Goodbye troll.

      • “Firepower is a self-loathing (and rightly so) troll. Even the manosphere doesn’t respect him….I don’t think he’s a good example because I don’t think he considers himself a White Nationalist. He is unable to affiliate or work with ANYONE, and attacks EVERYONE, in an effort to make himself feel good”

        Like anyone here should give a crap if he’s “respected” by the “manosphere” or “works well” with Hitler-loving WNs who sit around & quote Nietzsche(Hitler’s idol & another nutcase) & talk about killing minorities & Jews & talk down about “ethnic whites”(ie-those not 100% from Northwest Europe) and thus are the reason that I get this kind of garbage from “Ybm” for defending some conservative principles(& I stress SOME):

        “your ERA was defeated by your right wing, among them known John Birch Society member Phyllis Shafley.
        In fact I would argue that the majority of the misandric laws in your country are at their root, a product of the misplaced anglo-saxon chivalry promoted by your conservative right-wing. Alimony, Rape-Hysteria, VAWA, IMBRA, just a small sample of legislation designed to protect the “wimminfolk” from the big bad men.”[https://omegavirginrevolt.wordpress.com/2013/02/27/even-spambots-have-figured-out-the-so-called-manosphere/#comments]

        He flew off the handle & made all kinds of baseless assumptions about me, assuming I was an old, backward, hillbilly ultra-christian WN nut & equally false & baseless(and offensive to me) a white-nighter on top of it, which is ridiculous in the face of me being an autistic person who’s been treated like shit by pretty much everyone, including & maybe even especially women, but then I get told by you to let “Ybm” explain himself:

        “Badmouthing the anglosphere is not the same as bashing “whitey.” I say we let ybm explain himself before assuming he’s on some anti-white kick.”

        I wouldn’t have said shit if had he refrained from lumping me in with white feminists like anyone with a brain who can see I’m an autistic and thus ALL women hate me WOULD do.

        The only “conservative” values anyone should assume I’m talking about have 100% to do with HELPING men’s rights(ex-legal reform) & nothing at all to do with some kind of Christian pedestalizing of women used by liberals like “Ybm” to knock down MRA conservatives(even one’s with Aspergers) by shifting all the blame to “The Right”, like they do for everything else that’s wrong with the world.

        I’ll take a troll who “hates everyone”(I can relate), ESPECIALLY if he hates those WN hippy faggots….

  3. Call me a skeptic. I’d like to see a list of all sites that are banned, not just the ones on the list provided on the link.

    Perhaps they just looked at the SPLC list, and decided to add the domains it listed.

    YOU are not on that list. DEANSDALE is not on the list. ANGLOBITCH (Dr. Rookh Kshatriya) is not on the list…

    Maybe they just haven’t gotten around to censoring everybody yet?

    Also, many of those sites – are well – just crap – like AVFM.

    However; MarkyMark and ManWomanMyth – why those two are on there is confusing.

      • Yeah, but, how come yours is not on it? AngloBitch?

        What criteria are they using (if any) – I see some very low traffic blogs on there, and I see high traffic blogs on there.

        Traffic cannot be a factor. And; I really would like to see a complete list, not just the ones listed there…

        • I don’t know why some blogs are on it and not others, but there should be at least one manosphere blog on there. Whatever method they used shouldn’t eliminate all manosphere blogs from this list unless they only think men standing up for their rights is a threat and not a bunch of keyboard jockeys who fail to get laid.

        • “And; I really would like to see a complete list, not just the ones listed there…”

          So would I. Apparently, Judgy Bitch has been banned by UK mobile phone companies as “pornography.” It’s possible that Roissy, Roosh, Anglobitch, et al. have as well.

  4. feminism is tyranny.

    so if someone quibbles about godwin’s law, that’s usually my fallback position. “ok, feminists aren’t nazis, they’re just tyrants.”

  5. Simply put – I don’t care.
    This reaction is in the lines of the “lalalala I can’t hear you” response put forward by children. It simply speaks of a refusal to face the truth.
    When feminism goes down in flames, dragging the UK and that odious Harriet Harman with it, I won’t be on hand to say “I told you so!”.

  6. From the research I’ve done, feminists (whom are mostly white females) are breeding themselves out of existence. US demographics point to a white minority in a couple of generations. It appears that those from Hispanic and Muslim heritage will be taking the place of the falling white majority. These are both highly male dominated and highly conservative groups. This trend seems to be true in both America and Britain. Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong, but if this is true, wont future historians be laughing loudly at feminist culture? This is irony, right? White and black women destroying white and black men all the while eliminating themselves and their ideals. Am I missing the bigger picture, or is this true?

  7. AAB says:
    April 2, 2013 at 8:39 am
    “You keep saying you’re an MRA, but I’ve never seen any signs of Rights Activism on this site. You do a good job of highlighting cultural misandry (which is a definitely a good thing), but there are no petitions, letters or anything else that I can sign up to or copy and paste and send off to a governor, senator, member of parliament or whatever.”

    Damn good point. I too wish all these “Serioussss Bizznizz” MRA keyboard lawyers would get to chop-chopping on all their “Menz Activism” they brag so much about/bullshit & promise about before my Aspergers ass gets shipped off to Guantanamo when Hitlery Rod-up-her-ass KKKlinton gets elected by the voting machines(er, I mean “voters”) in ’16.

    • I knew it was only a matter of time until your dumbass started attacking Blackpill too, since you seem obsessed with attacking me. All the while wallowing in your little pity party about being autistic, boo fucking hoo. I don’t give a shit about your crutch.

      How many organizations have you donated money to? I’ve donated to two fathers rights organizations and one judicial reform group.

      How much has your stupid-ass donated this year?

      • How many organizations have you donated money to? I’ve donated to two fathers rights organizations and one judicial reform group.

        How much has your stupid-ass donated this year?

        Don’t bother trying to justify yourselves to them. We’re all doing things in the real world that don’t fit into internet arguments (or that we don’t want connected to our user names here). The most serious mens rights/fathers rights activists in the world like Glenn Sacks and Stephen Baskerville don’t count as activists by their definition.

        I have probably donated more money to various mens rights and related causes than they have ever seen in their lives.

    • Damn good point. I too wish all these “Serioussss Bizznizz” MRA keyboard lawyers would get to chop-chopping on all their “Menz Activism” they brag so much about/bullshit & promise

      Do you mean like this? Or this? Or this?

      Beyond that real life activism doesn’t fit into internet arguments.

      • autistic, non-linking white-knight jingoist rightwing paleo-dieting MRM conspiracy-theorist extroirdinaire on said:

        “Do you mean like this? Or this? Or this?”

        I’ll give you the second link, though it’s from last August & long-forgotten in the archives(only 753 signatures? That’s horseshit). Anyone that wasn’t here then(myself included) never saw it. The other 2 examples are a couple of meat-head alpha jocks that “pumpeD”, “dumpeD”(while a white male “Aspie” did all their homework no doubt) & got burned…….can’t relate, no simpathy, don’t give a fuck. I’m just a lousy MRA I guess; hate me. Oh well, life goes on….

        • though it’s from last August & long-forgotten in the archives

          So it only counts if you bothered to notice it? You like everyone else that complains about a lack of activism is conveniently never around when it happens.

          The other 2 examples are a couple of meat-head alpha jocks that “pumpeD”, “dumpeD”(while a white male “Aspie” did all their homework no doubt) & got burned…….can’t relate, no simpathy, don’t give a fuck. I’m just a lousy MRA I guess;

          Yes, you are a lousy MRA. The false rape industry is a real mens rights issue. And you obviously didn’t even read the third link because it had nothing to do with sex. It’s about a man who was in the process of losing his job because a woman harassed him at his workplace (which happened to be a bus because he was a bus driver).

        • Wait, the third link was a bus driver, not an athlete, my bad. I just caught the bottom of the link saying he was black, saw the name “Artis” & thought he was playing for the Utah Jazz or something, lol. I guess I just don’t have time to read a bunch of blogs from last fall. That’s a raw deal he got, though; poor guy.

      • “So it only counts if you bothered to notice it? You like everyone else that complains about a lack of activism is conveniently never around when it happens.”

        When it’s buried pages and pages deep and from August of last year, back when I was in the middle of booking therapy sessions while transferring my medical records from therapy clinic-to-therapy clinic-to-therapy clinic(while sick on misprescribed anxiety meds) on the advise of the psychologist that diagnosed my autism after I just got done spending an entire week taking personality tests in a mental health facility(while on said misprescribed meds courtesy of a senile, creepy Russian shrink who probably worked on Eugenics for Joseph Stalin) just for telling my stupid police dispatch that my stupid noisy neighbors & the stupid local donut-eating police’s total lack of action on said stupid neighbors over the last 10 years made me feel like killing myself…….then yeah, kinda hard to notice a blog post on an obscure website linking to some other obscure blog post with 750 signatures that I didn’t have time to look for considering my very real-life trying circumstances at that time. Would you care at all(or care if I “missed it when it counted”) if that bus driver or that athlete were white? Were you thinking of anything more then your precious, already-culturally-protected black man when you read the Obamacare article?

        “Yes, you are a lousy MRA.”

        A couple weeks ago I might have cared. Such is life….

      • BTW BP I don’t know if you are still keeping up with Brian but he signed with the Falcons earlier in the week.

  8. “How many organizations have you donated money to? I’ve donated to two fathers rights organizations and one judicial reform group.
    How much has your stupid-ass donated this year?”

    Omg really……poor-shaming me? How 1999. You waste your money on some fat cat’s “charity”(tax writeoff)…..congratulations, idiot.

    “I knew it was only a matter of time until your dumbass started attacking Blackpill too, since you seem obsessed with attacking me….”

    Only because you were obsessed with shaming me 6 ways to Sunday, calling me a white-knight, a fanatic, a jingoist & probably 5 other things here: https://omegavirginrevolt.wordpress.com/2013/02/24/the-90s-called-they-want-their-conspiracy-theory-back/#comment-9003

    You’re a reactionary nut, just like all neurotypical ultra-liberal closeted manginas. Calling me dumbass only further illustrates you severely over-estimate your own “intelligence”.

    “wallowing in your little pity party about being autistic, boo fucking hoo.”

    LOL, you wish.

    “I don’t give a shit about your crutch.”

    Like I care. Go back to your anti-white-scapegoating-diguised-as-anti-feminism Anglobitch written by your beloved, seasoned 150-year-old MRA guru who “knows more than anyone”. I read his thesis; I could have wrote that crap myself 20 years ago in college.

    • The elite’s strategy(and that of their idiot foot soldiers) is to link any anti-feminist(really anti-misandrist) sentiment with racism, nationalism and other boogeymen for the pussy-whipped(liberal-whipped, for now) American majority. I don’t claim to know what’s happening elsewhere, but it doesn’t look good in Norway either. I have to believe sooner or later enough people will say “enough is enough”.

      • The elite’s strategy(and that of their idiot foot soldiers) is to link any anti-feminist(really anti-misandrist) sentiment with racism, nationalism and other boogeymen

        So you’re saying that the so called manosphere works for the elite?

        • “So you’re saying that the so called manosphere works for the elite?”

          No, you & your pal YBM, who refused to apologize for calling me a white knight, religious fanatic, jingoist & 10 other things for no good reason for simply mentioning “conservative”, then most recently despicably marginalizing my autism when I wasn’t even addressing him.

          Any unashamed self interest on the part of white male victims of modern misandry like myself typically yields accusations/assumptions by you/your followers of “white nationalist”. The problem being of course that white males, by far the biggest victims of modern misandry(and racism), aren’t granted victim points by people like you, much like government & our sick culture who, typically, only grant sympathy to leftist(feminist)-approved “alpha” minority victims, even though in misandry’s case the majority of victims are clearly white(thus “non-alpha”) males, thus no one actually cares, nor will anything ever get done(for me). You want your “John McCain”, politically-correct “MRA” movement, and white male “aspies” like me just mess that all up. I get it.

        • So oogenhand, are you suggesting that the omega aspergers virgin white males like me who are no doubt the most primary targets and victims of all the modern American sexual sphere that’s controlled and upheld by the feminist and for the feminist, are you suggesting the we should simply sit back and wait for some sort of infighting within the current sexual hierarchy(women, then alphas(mostly of minority persuasion in America)) to break down along race/cultural/class issues due to white women(or educated women period) getting tired of the crude “patriarchy” of Jamal/Juan & finally putting the black/Mexican/etc “alpha” inner-city hoods in the “target” category so finally we, the aspie unwanted(by women) suburban/rural white males can finally get some sort of political/cultural advantage in the feminized “Anglo sphere” via some sort of “enemy of my enemy is my friend” alignment with hopefully enough future outcasted(by feminists) alpha males? While I’m not automatically assuming that you’re saying that would be ideal, I can see how that would “look good on paper” at least for men in general, sort of.

          The thing is, will the omega aspergers virgin white male like myself have to wait 1000 years for the current American sexual hierarchy of women, then alphas(neurotypical, extroverted minorities or white trash), then betas(white, Jew or other middle/upper-class male human banks for the current feminized women) and at the bottom omegas(me) to somehow “break down” in some way that would primarily benefit me and me first? Because frankly I’m, admittedly, a bit of a jaded, selfish, stone-cold SOB that doesn’t really give a fuck about the beta & alpha men above me, considering the way that BOTH have gleefully held me down for their own selfish benefits in the current American sexual sphere.

          Am I making sense to anyone else now? Can Blackpill(or anyone else) actually see where I’m coming from now? All I can honestly do in the current American situation is 3 things: either (1)start a business somehow and become self-employed & independently wealthy at home and/or (2)leave America(or head for the mountains) and live in some sort of “Buddhist”-like spiritual isolation or (3)kill myself. The third seems(and has seemed) an option for me many times, personally, and I still keep it in the back of my mind. I have a full bottle(unused) of Seroquels(sleeping pills) from my stay at the clinic where I got the “Aspergers” diagnosis last summer, and I can down that bad boy with enough convincing at any time(I’m learning self-hypnosis, and I can use it for that specific purpose if there’s no other option). I’m not “crying for help”, or “pity-partying” like one suggested. This is my reality, and I refuse to be misunderstood; it’s that simple.

  9. Pingback: Prevent suicide of autists!!! | oogenhand

  10. Pingback: Why MRM Will Fail | Eradica

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s