39 comments on “If Men Are Such A Threat To Women, Then Why Don’t Women Avoid Men?

  1. Thanks for bringing this to the attention of everyone. I left a post. In case she moderates it out of existence, I’m pasting it below.

    I can’t remember ever reading a more unrealistic, fantasy-like tale of what male sexuality might be like. I’ve honestly never heard of anyone with less understanding of male sexuality than in this post. I assume the ridiculously high-handed attitude evidenced here meant less for your son and more for your liberal friends to clap you on the back. Or to win some kind of feminist award. But since you did post it, here is a dose of reality.

    First, the vast majority of men do not rape. So the premise of this post is disturbing, statistics-wise. You should sooner worry about your son committing suicide. Look at the stats: you’re more likely to have a teenager who blows his brains out than rapes. Or one that gets messed up on drugs. Suicide is a male problem. That’s why it gets no media attention. Here is one of many links you may find useful in the future:

    http://www.newstatesman.com/2013/05/uncomfortable-truth-why-do-more-men-women-commit-suicide

    You also assume a bunch of things. Like this: “If he is heterosexual, he will want to be physically close to these (drunk) girls. He might kiss them. He might even do more than that.”

    Or he might not. In fact, he probably won’t. As a former teenage boy, I can tell you I and many of my friends were turned off and a bit frightened of drunk girls. We avoided them, sensing out-of-control trouble. Most of us were college bound and tried to avoid prison cells. Most boys don’t study for years only to throw it away. In fact, the instances in college I saw when a guy did kiss a clearly drunk girl, he was razzed FOR doing it and/or told to “move along” by a bigger dude. Yes, the opposite happens, but men are naturally chivalrous and they jump in to save the drunk girl more. You just don’t hear those stories on the news.

    “If and when he engages in sexual acts at parties, my son will almost certainly be egged on, or at least encouraged, by his peers.”

    Wrong again. Teenage boys trash talk a lot, but only its rare they “egg on” someone to have sex in the context of a drunken party. Boys tend to avoid sex talk with each other due to the homoerotic undercurrent.

    I’m not sure where you’re getting your version of reality from, but it’s not the same one I live in, and I’d venture to say it’s not the same one most men or boys live in. Get our of your NPR bubble for a bit. Read some real statistics on sites like Glenn Sacks.com. Please do a little research on what teenage boys are like before your child grows up.

    Reading a post about a mother worrying her 2-year-old will rape is like reading a post a dad is worried his 2-year-old daughter will be “a slut.” It’s creepy. And presumptuous. And will probably be a huge source of shame for your son, should he know his mother views him not as a human but as a “potential rapist.” Nice work, mom.

    Your comment is awaiting moderation.

  2. this is exactly what I wondered whenever I heard the “1 in 4 women will be raped in college” myth. if women are being raped at that high of a rate, then why would any woman ever go to college? do women really think that a degree in fucking pottery is more important than their lives? or perhaps… rape isn’t that big of a deal.

  3. Yes, going ghost is the only option for the undesireable man. The only thing that really angers me is the fact that men like us have to pay taxes to these feminist cunts. We are feeding the hand that bites us.. Since women/society have pushed us out, it is only fair that our taxes are pushed out as well.. aka. us ghosts should not have to pay them.

  4. “…Then Why Don’t Women Avoid Men?”

    Like we men are increasingly doing, by Going Our Own Way?

    MGTOW has happened because we bicycles have not only realized that that we don’t need fish, either; we have also realized the fish have become toxic.

    Avoid the toxic fish of today’s society — MGTOW or ‘going ghost’ is the only way we can avoid them.

  5. “As a former teenage boy, I can tell you I and many of my friends were turned off and a bit frightened of drunk girls. We avoided them, sensing out-of-control trouble.”

    Yup, I avoid drunk women, they are trouble…

    • Modern feminasty womyn have made themselves toxic, and nothing but trouble, drunk or sober.
      Who needs a false accusation? A man is much better off to avoid them, and interact with them ONLY when positively, absolutely necessary. Anything else is foolish.

  6. There ARE plenty of women who avoid men and don’t want to be around men. There’s a good portion of feminist rhetoric that deals with women just separating themselves from all men because of the perceived danger men pose and the degree to which men (as a group) are found undesirable. So there is such a thing as “women going their own way”; I think that the reason people who write and comment on blogs like this one may not encounter such women very often is that they simply do a great job separating themselves from men, so most of us never see them. So how do we know they exist? Most college campus, larger urban areas, etc have women’s organizations that say “off the radar” and are by women, for women, and of women who really don’t want to be around men at all. Men might learn of the existence of such groups by seeing flyers posted on campus, etc. There’s also the phenomenon of “women’s only” gyms, health clubs, etc. which also speak to a desire to get away from men at least in some contexts.

    I think it’s sad that it’s come to this. Men and women can get along. There are still decent, nice people, out there of both genders. And – I realize *this* part will sound crazy to some – there are even women out there who act civilized, decent, and sociable to men they’re not attracted to romantically and from whom they’re not trying to get something. It’s called being human. (Wow?!?! RIght?!?! Imagine that!)

    • There ARE plenty of women who avoid men and don’t want to be around men.

      You missed the point of this article. The question is “If all women are always in serious threat from all men at all times, then why don’t most women avoid men”?

      The very fact that such a tiny percentage of women avoids men is proof that women are not threatened by men. And things like women-only gyms are popular due to not wanting to be seen at your worst by men. It’s not that this woman fears a man will rape her on the pec deck machine. It’s for fear a cute guy might witness her in bad shape, while sweaty and without make up.

      Men going herbivore is such a huge trend several countries are doing major-scale statistical analysis on it… women separating and avoiding men is tiny.

    • Perhaps men/women going their own way was designed by the universe to cull overpopulation to preserve water, food, resources, infrastructure, etc…

        • I’m simply saying maybe another good result of MTGOW for men is a reduction in the population & hence a reduction of the government-protected underclass of uneducated minorities/women sucking dry the social services that should be going towards down-trodden, benevolent men like myself that have an unfortunate neurological condition(Aspergers) through no fault or intention of our own.

          As far as gays/lesbians, if they can do their part to encourage enough of the extroverted, neurotypical, welfare-class “alpha” feeders & breeders to convert to gayism so they can effectively eliminate their neaderthalist silly selves from the gene pool so that I can get more social services($$$$$), if needed, for my chronic Aspergers condition, then great, I’m all for it….

        • White pill it’s interesting that you use the term Neanderthal to describe your “neurotypicals”. Interesting because within the bizzaro world of the manosphere the pop-psych idea of the day is that so-called “Neanderthal DNA (or thal as they call it) ” is the source of introversion and perhaps ASDs in general.

          Pretty hilarious don’t you think?

        • Doomfinger, while I’m not privy to the manosphere’s opinions, that manner of lies, transference & scapegoating by them is of no surprise to me in light of Adam Lanza being chosen as my representative by the lamestream media immediately after Sandy Hook when they were suddenly saying & printing garbage like Aspies “lack empathy”, & of course it becomes fact automatically, like anything the media says.

          If Obama removed the dole from able-bodied alpha thug breeders(never happen) & reserved it for the much-smaller percentage of non-breeding autistic American adults like myself, they could obliterate their “fiscal cliff” overnight while doubling my assistance(hell, even tripling it probably)….hell, us non-breeding Aspies will extinct ourselves completely in about 50 or so years & then they can just eliminate welfare & social security disability altogether.

    • There’s plenty of rhetoric about it. The point of this post was that the rhetoric about how dangerous men are and need to be avoided does not match with how women would and should act if that were true.

      As for women only gyms, its not like gyms are a hotbed of rape and violence against women. If women only gyms were a way for men to avoid women then they wouldn’t do things like the ADVERTISE ON TELEVISION alerting the evil men to their presence. It’s the same with college campus womens groups. I remember from my own college days how they were constantly causing trouble. That’s not how they would act if they’re trying to avoid men.

      And like Alek said, governments are starting to worry about men going ghost/herbivore men. There is no equivalent worry on their part about women.

      • “And like Alek said, governments are starting to worry about men going ghost/herbivore men. There is no equivalent worry on their part about women.”

        yup…

        people have compared MGTOW to radical lesbian separatists…there are two huge differences, MGTOW/Grasseater is occurring in more “atomized” times, that is it is easier to go your own way-most MGTOW’s aren’t interested in community and the separatist’s were into their girls groups. Another aspect is most MGTOW’s are very heterosexual, they’ve just done the cost/benefit analysis and decided the risks aren’t worth it…

        since most of us are all “don’t let the door hit your ass on the way out” with feminist separatist’s it’s funny how Manboobs, Scumbag Schwyzer and all the other femanazi’s hate MGTOW far more than PUA’s or even MRA’s and almost proof positive that they are relying on the blood, sweat and tears of low status men to maintain an unjust system….

        • I recall laughing at a reddit thread where “FeMRA” heavyweights Typhon Blue and GWW perplexedly tried to wrap their brains around the MGTOW concept.

          They eventually concluded that, surprise, surprise… grass-eaters are really the male equivalent of radical separatist muff-eaters. LOL!

          Even ostensibly sympathetic women just don’t– and probably can’t– get it. The life experiences we take for granted, that you and blackpill allude to, are too alien for them to understand.

          The great irony here is that men have, collectively, spent lifetimes creating and sustaining massively complex systems like agriculture, transportation, warfare, science and engineering, law and participatory government to the– disproportionate– benefit of helpless women and children. Almost all of us have contributed in some way, through the workforce, various civic duties, sitting on juries, and so on.

          GYOW is a male phenomenon, for men are more capable of decoupling from the cocoon of civilization. Doubtful? In the extreme case, just look at the sex ratio of any anarchic frontier society.

  7. BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! Oh my god. I am so glad you avoid women, I think if I was approached by this un-researched, unfounded, unsupported total self fulfilling type of bullshit on the street I would piss myself laughing, and would then have to go home and change. You have your head so far up your ass it’s completely unbelievable. If men are so afraid of women, how come I spend a large part of my time explaining to strangers who approach me on the street, at my job, in the bar ‘I’m not interested, and please stop pushing me to give you my number” How come a guy who was grabbing himself got right up in my face and told me I wanted it, even though I was holding a staple gun, and telling him to back the fuck off, if men are so afraid of women how come one time while I was having a private conversation with one of my friends about a book I was reading on feminism…a guy decided it was his place and business to tell me it was bullshit, and started yelling at us for being stupid lesbians (it should be noted…I’m not…I have a boyfriend. he’s amazing) If women are such a threat to men how come my friend was raped last month walking home with one other friend by a single guy who wasn’t intoxicated. Maybe you should do your homework before you make bold unfounded claims that make you out to be this pitiful fucking victim even though it stems from your own personal issues with women…you idiot

    • I’d estimate

      99.99% of men have never approached a woman on the street, not a single time in their entire life… ever. never.

      90% of men have never approached a stranger period (with the 10% only having ever done it at parties/clubs when drunk, and most have barely gathered the courage to make a passing remark, very very very very few men ever have the courage to approach strangers in bars, they’re a rare breed).

      how come I spend a large part of my time explaining to strangers who approach me on the street, at my job, in the bar ‘I’m not interested, and please stop pushing me to give you my number”

      I’m not going to say you’re exaggerating when you say “spend large part of my time”, I’ll just ask for specifics. How many men did you have to do this to since last monday? Give me a specific number.

      There have been 10,000 minutes since last monday, to say you spend a large amount of time on rejecting pushy men on the street, that would mean at least 5% of your time goes to that. This would be 500 minutes spent fending off men begging you for your number. Let’s say 10 minutes per man, that’s 50 men.

      Have you had 50 men begging you for your number as you (poor dearie) had to explain you’re too good for them? What was the actual number? Be specific

      How come a guy who was grabbing himself got right up in my face and told me I wanted it

      I guess you suck at statistics.

      On the average day you’re passed by at least 200 men. If you had the above-painted scenario happen to you every single day, it would make it a 1in200 men thing. If it happens to you once a month, it would be a 1-in-6000 men scenario. Once a year? It means only 1 in 73,000 men is like the one you described…

      Now tell me honestly, how many times has this happened in your life? Give me a specific number?

    • This is the perfect example of what I was talking about. If 10% of what you said was really happening to you, you would be taking more radical steps to deal with it. This would likely include avoiding men as much as possible. Since you aren’t doing that, you’re full of shit.

  8. If there was ever an argument for seizing a child its this. Unortunately canadian social services would only encourge her to get a grant and turn it into a study.

    Bettter that child had never lived than to be condemned to a life of suffering and self hate. Hopefully someone will help him before he commits suicide

    • You got it. When your own mother reviles you as much as this one obviously, and very publicly, does, a lifetime of emotional suffering is a fait accompli.

      Sometimes this type of sustained insult can be a crucible for transcendent art and other works of genius, but is much more likely, as you said, to end abruptly, spattered on a wall or drugged into oblivion.

      While it’s highly unlikely they’d actually do anything to help the boy, perhaps someone should notify the relevant child protective authority. Consider it your good deed for the day.

      Also, sweetheart, if you’re reading this, please seek therapy for your son’s sake.

  9. Not only do most women not avoid men, but most women choose to show interest in the most aggressive, insensitive, dangerous men.

  10. oh, yeah, I don’t know if you guys are music fans but I’d like to put this song up as a big eff you to bigots like Forney (and all his WN but buddies) and the Manboobz hatecrew…

  11. I posted this in Dalrock:

    ———————-

    The Manosphere was created when the PUAs and the White Nationalists co-opted the Men’s Rights Movement.

    Let me be very honest.

    The MRM started in the mid-70s, and entered the internet as a usenet group. Then blogs, and then Youtube channels.

    In 2009, Welmer got together a few bloggers sympathetic to the MRM and formed a collective blog called the Spearhead. The group started small (Opus,y Novaseeker) but accumulated more bloggers, including Dalrock, Ferdinand Bardamu and Roissy. Roissy is the undisputed founder of the Manosphere.

    Roissy was a PUA first and foremost, but occasionally commented on the state of society and offered “deep” insights into women. (To this day, the majority of commenters are PUAs and cads.) This style would be picked up by Roosh and used in his successful business venture ROK. Roissy added nothing new: he made case study after study of pickups and made bizarre conclusions, and posted flawed interpretations of research. Ross Jeffries, David DeAngelo and Mystery laid the groundwork for him and he built an entire website on that. Roissy coinedy “Rationalization Hamster” though, and his Sixteen is the basis of LTR game.

    I remember in 2011, the Spearhead was obscure and unheard of, and trolls were invaders from radical feminist websites. The truth is that the MRM, not the Manosphere, went mainstream in 2012. Within the year, the word misandry became mainstream, and criticism and rejection of feminism became socially acceptable and popular. Today, a blue pill article is followed by red pill coments on CNN, Salon and elsewhere.

    Athol Kay is an opportunistic money-grubber who repackaged Roissy’s compilations of PUA ideas and invented Married Game. He used it to sell two books to middle-aged suburbanites who would otherwise feel squeamish about reading Roissy. He is a e-sergeant who tells married man to man up, YES MAN UP, and GAME THOSE FRIGID EX-SLUTS. Women are by nature flaky and contemptful of men, and you need Game to crack her open.

    Rollo Tomassi is a charlatan who hides his “scientific” analysis behind stretched out syntax, which is in reality: colloquial language rearranged into six to eight phrases per sentence and infused with Latin and Greek words USED TO EXPLAIN THE SCIENCE OF RELATIONSHIPS between men and women. His personality is a mixture of that of an Arab sheikh and a French philosopher, and oozes out on his blog. His writing style lacks clarity, forethought and organization. He is such a bad writer that only Manospherians can understand what he’s trying to say half of the time.

    The Manosphere was created when dregs like Roissy, Ferdinand and Koanic Soul; opportunists like Athol Kay and Rollo; and kooks like Hawaiian Libertarian bought into the MRM. Let us not forget the unsung heroes:

    Bernard Chapin
    Barbarrossaaaa
    ManWomanMyth
    ThugticianWisdom
    Zed the Zen Priest

    and many others unmentioned.

    • That’s ROFL funny what you say about Rollo. I’ve seen him post short cogent things in the m-sphere comboxes, usually with a link to his blog. So I’ve been suckered over maybe 3-4 times out of curiosity, and have encountered the erudite sounding verbal muck just as you describe. It’s all the more ironic because he bills himself as being “the rational male”. Not.

      If you want that, try reading eg. Satoshi Kanazawa’s book — he’s someone who comes to mind as a writer who doesn’t mess around in the least going straight from A to B.

      Jesus was wrong when he predicted the meek would inherit the earth. It was the bogus instead.

      As an historical point of fact, inbetween usenet news groups and blogs there were individual websites. Zed had one, as did Rich Zubaty and Rod van Mechelen (backlash.com), and a guy who wrote Per’s MANifesto (a monthly newsletter w/commentary). Blogs came quite a bit later, like almost a decade after the WWW/Netscape/AOL first burst on the scene.

  12. I posted this in Dalrock:

    ———————-

    The Manosphere was created when the PUAs and the White Nationalists co-opted the Men’s Rights Movement.

    Let me be very honest.

    The MRM started in the mid-70s, and entered the internet as a usenet group. Then blogs, and then Youtube channels.

    In 2009, Welmer got together a few bloggers sympathetic to the MRM and formed a collective blog called the Spearhead. The group started small (Opus,y Novaseeker) but accumulated more bloggers, including Dalrock, Ferdinand Bardamu and Roissy. Roissy is the undisputed founder of the Manosphere.

    Roissy was a PUA first and foremost, but occasionally commented on the state of society and offered “deep” insights into women. (To this day, the majority of commenters are PUAs and cads.) This style would be picked up by Roosh and used in his successful business venture ROK. Roissy added nothing new: he made case study after study of pickups and made bizarre conclusions, and posted flawed interpretations of research. Ross Jeffries, David DeAngelo and Mystery laid the groundwork for him and he built an entire website on that. Roissy coinedy “Rationalization Hamster” though, and his Sixteen is the basis of LTR game.

    I remember in 2011, the Spearhead was obscure and unheard of, and trolls were invaders from radical feminist websites. The truth is that the MRM, not the Manosphere, went mainstream in 2012. Within the year, the word misandry became mainstream, and criticism and rejection of feminism became socially acceptable and popular. Today, a blue pill article is followed by red pill coments on CNN, Salon and elsewhere.

    Athol Kay is an opportunistic money-grubber who repackaged Roissy’s compilations of PUA ideas and invented Married Game. He used it to sell two books to middle-aged suburbanites who would otherwise feel squeamish about reading Roissy. He is a e-sergeant who tells married man to man up, YES MAN UP, and GAME THOSE FRIGID EX-SLUTS. Women are by nature flaky and contemptful of men, and you need Game to crack her open.

    Rollo Tomassi is a charlatan who hides his “scientific” analysis behind stretched out syntax, which is in reality: colloquial language rearranged into six to eight phrases per sentence and infused with Latin and Greek words USED TO EXPLAIN THE SCIENCE OF RELATIONSHIPS between men and women. His personality is a mixture of that of an Arab sheikh and a French philosopher, and oozes out on his blog. His writing style lacks clarity, forethought and organization. He is such a bad writer that only Manospherians can understand what he’s trying to say half of the time.

    The Manosphere was created when dregs like Roissy, Ferdinand and Koanic Soul; opportunists like Athol Kay and Rollo; and kooks like Hawaiian Libertarian bought into the MRM. Let us not forget the unsung heroes:

    Bernard Chapin
    Barbarrossaaaa
    ManWomanMyth
    ThugticianWisdom
    Zed the Zen Priest
    Anonymous Age 71

    and many others unmentioned.

    • “the MRM, not the Manosphere, went mainstream in 2012. Within the year, the word misandry became mainstream, and criticism and rejection of feminism became socially acceptable and popular”

      A little over a year ago I found the “About” section of this very blog, omegavirginrevolt, by using Google search terms including the word “misandry” along with “anti male”, “anti virgin” & so forth, recognizing(and getting fed up with) the long-running cultural/media assaults on men, especially sexually-inexperienced(read: civil/educated) adult men like myself, both online & in America, where I’m from. I first posted here as “End Sexual Supremacy” in about late-April to early-May of last year(2012), which was 2 months prior to me being diagnosed with Aspergers Syndrome(a life-shifting experience to say the least, but that’s neither here nor there). I then didn’t post here again until this January, when I rediscovered this site & posted as “autistic, ‘omega’ by default”, then “autistic & proud” & finally my current “autisticwhitemale”(also neither here nor there, except for ID history purposes). Long story short, if MRM(hence this blog) & words like “misandry”(which Google Spellcheck still won’t recognize as a word) became mainstream “within 2012” like you said, then that can only mean that I, autisticwhitemale, helped make “MRM” & “misandry” become mainstream. I put those pro-MRM words such as “misandry” into the Google search engine(that made the whole world sing) and thus I, yours truly, must have helped spike the visitor numbers of MRM sites like this one, perhaps single-handedly making MRM mainstream within 2012, as you say. So, to sum up, you’re welcome everyone(I don’t know what else to say, quite honestly).

    • Thanks for your input. If you are who I think you are, thank you for stopping in to give us the definitive information.

  13. Hey blackpill, you might find this hilarious.

    The other day, Roissy did a post on game: http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/confident-a-hole-game/

    Sounds like a typical Roissy post, but get this. The picture being used is of some normalfag’s face photo-shopped onto what was a male underwear model’s face. The picture is therefore totally fake, but Roissy is using it as an example of confident a-hole game. LOL What a retard! The photos were sent to Roissy as a prank and he’s making a fool of himself on his own worthless blog. He’s already been told the pictures are fake, but won’t publish any of it for fear of damaging his “credibility.” The comments alone are priceless. Roissy is also trying to cover up his gaffe by writing more and more lame posts to bury it.

    This just goes to show that PUA is a fraud and anyone who believes that game works is mentally retarded. More info here: http://puahate.com/showthread.php?t=71395

    • It figures. Whether it’s Paul Elam getting tricked about that Georgetown chick, or this, the so called manosphere easily falls victim to pranks and scams. The so called manosphere should be called the gullibleosphere.

  14. The comments on Roissy’s blog about the guy being hot and good-looking are hilarious as fuck. In real life, the guy in question is a dateless/sexless wonder who couldn’t score a date if his life depended on it. That’s what blows Roissy’s BS out of the water. The people who post on his blog are severely delusional and stupid.

  15. Pingback: The So Called Manosphere Should Be Called The Gullibleosphere | The Black Pill

  16. To the question “why don’t women simply avoid men then?” I would answer: many women do exactly that actually. See Lesbian Separatism.

    While I have nothing but respect and admiration for women separatist, I personally think the problem of male dominance, patriarchy, society wide rape culture etc should be fixed ‘with’ men not without them. Change will have to be made, profound and extreme change at the fundamental level of society but I believe it’s possible.

    That being said I think Separatists can work with more mainstream feminists to accomplish that goal.

    • Lesbian separatism is pretty much dead at this point, but it’s not woman separatism. You proved my point. Only a tiny fraction of a tiny fraction of women feel the need to avoid men, and the women who do aren’t avoiding men because they’re female. MGTOW draws from a broad cross section of men unlike lesbian separatism so you proved my point.

  17. Reblogged this on The Wise Woman Speaks and commented:
    This is an interesting commentary in response to an article written by the mother of a two-year old boy who is worried about the impact of rape culture might have on her son by the time he is a teenager and is engaging in teen “rites of passage,” as she puts it.

    As I said in a previous blogpost about women disappearing from the internet or from public life, you don’t notice that they’re gone; they’re just gone.

    There is no organized movement or self-help group for this, it is simply a matter of self-preservation. Women have to act to preserve their own lives and, in many cases, the safety of their children.

    So, online they simply disappear and when they reappear, they reappear as “Earnest” or “Frank” or “Jim” and no one knows that they are women. They check the “male” gender box whenever possible and try to go on with their business.

    This is women’s individual response to the tidal wave of hatred and threats – the kind of things where men come from out of state to hunt you down where you live – which have been occurring all over online in the past several years.

    In real life, they don’t leave the house. I’ve discussed this at my new blog and I plan to discuss it more – how to arrange your life so that you do not run the risk of violence from men. And, the only way to eliminate this possibility completely is not avoid men. 99% of the time this is possible – if, of course, you never leave your house.

    Yes, expecting women to *have* to do this is a kind of victim-blaming. In the big picture, it is denying women their basic human and civil rights. It is denying women the right to fully participate in every aspect of life. And, it is not a choice that is being freely made by women. It is a last resort. It is understanding just how dangerous men are to my very existence. It is realizing that I’ve been through much so random violence from strange men that I’m now on my 8th life and I don’t know if I can possibly survive another attack. That is hardly a free choice, but it is the only option left to many women. And, you don’t hear about these people, as a rule – and if you do, as you’re hearing from me now, it is done very carefully, very anonymously.

    Victims should not be life-long prisoners. They should not have to live in fear the rest of their lives. But, we have to deal with the world the way it is and not the way we would like it to be, if we want to go on surviving.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s