Fact VS. Truth

I was thinking more about how the so called manosphere evaluates something based on its verisimilitude, or to what degree does it appear to be true.  Whether something appears to be true is completely in the eye of the person evaluating it.  It is completely determined by their feelings, and not rational, scientific analysis (which the so called manosphere is completely against).

However, the problem with verisimilitude goes beyond whether something appears to be true to the entire concept of truth itself.  Often times manospherians will refer to themselves as “truth seekers” so this is relevant.  We tend to think of the words, “truth” and “fact” as interchangeable.  However, there is a difference between those two words.  The difference is best explained by a quote from the movie, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade where Indiana Jones says, “Archeology is the search for fact– not truth. If it’s truth you’re looking for, Dr. Tyree’s philosophy class is right down the hall.”  In other words, “truth” is based on your beliefs, whereas “fact” has to do with objective reality.

This is the difference between the red pill and the black pill.  The red pill manospherians have created a philosophy that they know to be “true” so they don’t bother checking if their philosophy actually matches up with what happens in the real world.  (If they did, the manospherians would realize they are completely wrong.)  On the other hand, the idea behind the black pill is all about facts which by definition means that a black pill is always dealing with the objective reality of the real world.  The so called manosphere determines “truth” based on only their own feelings whereas we objectively analyze the real world for facts.  This is the difference between the so called manosphere and us.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Fact VS. Truth

  1. Unfortunately for your case, what you have written here, is nothing more than assertions, based…. on your feelings of what is true. Pot meet kettle.
    Of course you may cite the various points you raise in your previous articles. However if you will honestly appraise your efforts in this regard, they amount to little more than cherry picking facts, fishing for conflict, and attempts to create guilt by association. Nothing of any substance.

    I do not disagree entirely with your thesis. Much, or even most, of the ‘manosphere’ is odious, ignorant, juvenile and contemptible. We unfortunately live in an odious, ignorant, juvenile and contemptible age… and it’s coming from all sides. However, other than your condemnation of these facets, you seem at a loss to offer even constructive criticism, much less a higher vision.

    Perhaps you should adjorn your arse from purposeless criticism and see if there is anything anywhere in the effort that you find positive, and write of that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s