In the past I have written about how moral arguments against game are useless because they don’t attack the core of game and are really a debate about premarital sex. Moral arguments against game are extremely limited in criticizing game and really about separate ideological issues. Anyone who makes a moral argument against game just wants a Christianized form of game where game becomes a vehicle for promoting Christianity typically of the traditionalist variety. (Although in many cases it’s about promoting red pill Christianity which is a contradiction in terms and is a heresy as far orthodox Christianity goes.)
Feminists also only allow a limited form of criticism of game. With feminists it’s not about premarital sex, but “misogyny”. They are against any criticism of game that actually attacks the core of game instead of being about the supposed misogyny of its practitioners and have plenty of history of attacking anti-gamers. A good example of this can be found at this page on the blue pill reddit. (The blue pill reddit is supposed to be a parody of the red pill reddit.) The page on the blue pill reddit was supposed to be about how the Great DC Gamer Meetup of 2012 was an total disaster. The comments ended up being about my supposed misogyny, baseless attacks on Aaron Sleazy, baseless attacks on the MRM, and a defense of non-Roissyite gamers as practicing “natural pickup” (whatever that is). IOW, the comments were about anything but how game failed. The reason for that is because showing that game doesn’t work in no way helps their cause which is obsessing over supposed misogyny of (Roissyite) gamers. They aren’t against game at all. What they want is form of feminist game where game is used to force men to become feminists. A more succinct way of saying that is that they want gamers to all become like Dr.
Neither the Christians nor the feminists are actually interested in the facts on how game is a scam. They aren’t interested how game was created by a member of an online marketing scam group known as The Syndicate. These facts are dangerous to them because they show that various aspects of feminism and modern (traditionalist) Christianity are lies. Both ideologies say that women are perfect so pointing out that game (and dating advice in general) is a scam shatters the illusion of women being perfect.
Also, neither the Christians nor the feminists are actually interested in helping men get together with women (just as the so called manosphere has no use for a man actually trying to get with women). This is the reason for the attacks on Aaron Sleazy. Dating advice that works would by definition be free of all ideological bullshit. It couldn’t be used to promote (traditionalist or heretical red pill) Christianity or feminism. What the Christians and the feminists want to do is yell forever about the evils of premarital sex and “misogyny” respectively. Dating advice that works would deny them a vehicle for doing that.
If a person or a group is unwilling to call out game as a scam like how Christians and feminists, then they really aren’t against game. Only allowing a limited criticism of game is part of the Misandrist Dating Advice Distraction (MDAD) because groups that only allow a limited criticism of game are trying to distract you from the fraudulent nature of game and the rest of the dating advice industry.