The Just World Fallacy & The Incel Virgin Domestic Terrorist Organization Conspiracy Theory

There’s a myth going around that the recent Oregon shooter was an incel (involuntary celibate) virgin.  The justification for this is based on posts he allegedly made on the r9k board on 4chan.  That’s very weak evidence, and it turns out that r9k was trying to frame one of its own users, Eggman, as the shooter.  Even if other evidence supposedly surfaces that the shooter was an incel virgin, it should be treated with skepticism.  The media said that he is a white supremacist, even though he is actually mixed race, so the media can not be trusted to report accurate details about the shooter.

The real reason so many people want to label the Oregon shooter an incel virgin isn’t about the whatever was written on 4chan.  It’s because they believe in the just world fallacy in dating and sex (which is the basis of the feminist time machine).  They think, correctly, that murdering lots of people makes a man evil, but then they assume that evil men can’t get laid or get into relationships with women.  Thus, in the minds of most people being evil and being an incel virgin is one in the same.  They also believe that if one is true than the other is true as well.  In other words, this isn’t a case of evil men are incel virgins, but only some incel virgins are evil.  What they believe is that being an incel virgin alone is evidence that a man is evil and will go around raping women and murdering people.

Believing that being evil and being incel virgin man is the same is very dangerous for incel virgin men.  For example, DailyKos is now promoting a conspiracy theory that r9k is an “online domestic terrorist organization”Some DailyKos users are suggesting that a list get created to track men, who I guess they would suspect of being incel virgins later, starting in third grade. (By their own admission such a list would be illegal and unconstitutional, but that doesn’t seem to bother them.)  Other DailyKos users want the NSA to track incel virgin men.  (I’m certain that everyone on DailyKos who wants the NSA to spy on incel virgin men was previously against NSA spying).  There are even some other DailyKos users who think that the government is intentionally turning a blind eye to the so called “incel virgin terrorism”, possibly as a method to keep the public in a state of panic.

Such reactions aren’t limited to DailyKos.  Jezebel declared that “sexually frustrated men” are “the real terrorists.  (Notice how “sexually frustrated men” is a much larger category than incel virgin men.)  Jezebel also demanded that “sexually frustrated men” be castrated (obviously such as castration would not be voluntary).

Other reactions appear to be less extreme at first glance, but on further analysis are not.  Someone at Reddit is suggesting that camps be created for incel virgin men. That person had to put that they didn’t mean concentration camps in the title (which in itself is very revealing).  If you read the link, it doesn’t sound sinister until that person says “lets round them up”.  Even in a conversation about incel virgin men that looks innocuous on the surface still treats incel virgin men as terrorists who are going to snap at any second.

There are many more examples I could document, but this where the just world fallacy in dating and sex leads.  If a man has any trouble getting getting laid or getting into a relationship, then lots of people, especially women, believe him to be evil, on the verge of a murderous rampage, and part of a incel virgin domestic terrorist organization (that is nothing but a conspiracy theory) that requires NSA spying to stop (NSA spying they were formerly against).

You are not safe if you aren’t an incel virgin.  Jezebel included all “sexually frustrated men” as terrorists.  DailyKos included #GamerGate as part of the incel virgin domestic terrorist organization conspiracy theory, as well as the MRM & MGTOW.  If they don’t like something about you, then you will be accused of being an incel virgin, so that people can treat you as if you were synonymous with evil and part of a domestic terrorist organization.

Advertisements

47 thoughts on “The Just World Fallacy & The Incel Virgin Domestic Terrorist Organization Conspiracy Theory

  1. No ex-girlfriends have identified themselves as such for Mercer – and if he had any, I can see why they would want to keep a low profile. So his incel status sounds plausible so far.

    As I posted on your previous entry, I get the impression that it freaks out many feminist women when you bring up the idea of restoring patriarchy so that women couldn’t get sexual experience until they married. This prospect might unsettle them because women find most men sexually repulsive to begin with, though prostitutes demonstrate that women can function sexually with a variety of men without any of this “chemistry” nonsense.

    But I also suspect that we see a guilt reaction here: Women feel on some level that they have collectively done something wrong by embracing feminism, sexual freedom and hypergamy, and they don’t want to face accountability for their transgressions.

    By contrast, the men who want to see patriarchy restored seem to do so with a clear conscience because they see a great injustice that needs redressing. I certainly feel that way about it.

    So in a way it makes sense for women to want to round up and do away with incels: Criminals want to eliminate the victims and witnesses to their crimes so that they can’t testify.

    • No ex-girlfriends have identified themselves as such for Mercer – and if he had any, I can see why they would want to keep a low profile. So his incel status sounds plausible so far.

      Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Like you said any girlfriend or ex-girlfriend the shooter may have or had would want to keep a low profile. I see no reason to play up the idea that the shooter was an incel virgin. We should not make it easy for DailyKos and others like them to engage in their incel virgin domestic terrorist organization conspiracy theory.

      I get the impression that it freaks out many feminist women when you bring up the idea of restoring patriarchy

      I have never talked about “restoring patriarchy” because I have absolutely no interest in doing that. To me that would be equivalent to John Galt choosing to work for the government at the end of Atlas Shrugged or a Human or Ringworld Hominid Protector going back to run the Pak homeworld. In the best case scenario it would be a waste of time, and I have no interest in bailing out women.

    • dude, why the fuck do you want to “return to patriarchy”?

      if you are so unhappy with incel, just go hire a prostitute, no one here would laugh at you. It looks like you have money because you were able to raise cash for some broad. In fact, if you went to prostitutes about a dozen times, then you’d likely have more real life sexual experience with womyn than most guys like Roosh and Aaron Clarey….

      watch this..

    • “I get the impression that it freaks out many feminist women when you bring up the idea of restoring patriarchy so that women couldn’t get sexual experience until they married. ”

      It would freak me as a man out too. I have no interest in spending the rest of my life with someone I have not sussed out as sexually compatible.

      “This prospect might unsettle them because women find most men sexually repulsive to begin with”

      If as you say they find most men sexually repulsive then I’d assume they’d be ok with not having sex with most men but having a decent shot at an actual relationship with the hot ones.

      Look, a return to pre-marital sex taboos only means what it meant back when they were en vogue – that the incel “losers” would not have a chance at marriage and would remain “bachelors” their whole lives.

    • So you are willing to be a slave to women, just as long as your master cant discard you easily?

      Women will not provide for you, so only a person lacking self respect will provide for a woman.

  2. haha…

    the reason you don’t hear about more white supremacist shoot-ups is that when Chuck Rudd and Jack Don-0-van have their manuresphere hot tub meet-up of doom, well when they pull out the rifles and start shooting…

    they can’t “shoot str8.”

    okay, not politically correct, but I thought it was funny…

    It’s just a matter of time before an HBD blogger declares white shooters have the highest notch count, er, kill count and the femmies devour them…

  3. womyn love, love, love violent men…

    Elliot Rodgers would be getting love letters if he wasn’t dead…

    I bet that nutcase Breivik gets tons of love letters….

    Of course feminist’s and the M(h)RM will never acknowledge that empirical truth…

      • > The Aurora, CO movie theater shooter is now getting lots of love letters.

        I live in Colorado so I’ve been treated to the entire 3+ year saga… it didn’t get much nat’l coverage but near the end of the proceedings one of his nutjob female admirers showed up in court and made a huge disturbance, screaming and railing at the judge incoherently for what he was doing (locking up the perfect object of her desire), and earning not the death penalty (ha!) but 30 days in the slammer for contempt of court.

        When women want to fuck murders, marry Charles Manson et al, and breed all the killer police state thuglettes they can, Houston, we have a problem.

        When a society will not or cannot control its women, it goes into a rapid death spiral trying futilely to control its men instead. Male behavior is the result of a breeding experiment run by women. It’s bad science to blame the lab rats when they’re put in an impossible situation.

    • Women want attention from Famous men, if they are somewhat good-looking, then even better. Violence is not sufficient, if they are not famous nor decent looking. Violence just adds a little drama. Women don’t “love” these men. They “love” that these men would die to protect them. They still see them as disposable, and you don’t “love as a human being” something you see as disposable.

      Violence gets you a girlfriend, sometimes, but not always, and it still doesn’t get you “love.”

        • “your brain releases chemicals, same as drug use…

          I think violence is a bigger piece of the puzzle than anyone has explored so far.”

          Brain releases chemicals during violence as well.

          Love is a vague term but certainly empathy exists. And brain releases chemicals then too.

        • yes…

          one of the first times I ever did anything sexual with a woman, I was unprepared with the rush of endorphins into my brain. I stared into her eyes and thought this is what love must feel like. I realized intellectually I didn’t love her as I hardly even knew her name. Since I had a fair amount of experience with using psychadelics, I realized my brain was releasing chemicals to make me feel a certain way. If I hadn’t used hallucinogens, likely I would have actually thought I was in love.

    • Female killers also get more than their fair share of love letters, white knights and marriage proposals from fan-boys. And they don’t even have to be half way cute like Casey or Jodie, as Charles Manson’s right hand woman proved. IIRC, one of her lawyers even married her!

      • Do you think the same dynamic is in play? IE do you think the men want to “rescue” the women such as Arias?

        Personally, I am hypervigilante-if I see a women who berates people and has a temper but lots of people apologizing for why she is always “stressed” I stay far away…

        • ” do you think the men want to “rescue” the women such as Arias?”

          The women who showed up at court for Ted Bundy all thought he was an innocent man falsely accused.

          I don’t know what the hell “dynamic” is at play when people romantically pursue cold blooded killers. If I had to guess – some sort of sociopatholgy.

        • yes, but specifically, do you think it is a different dynamic when a man is interested in a violent woman than when a woman is interested in a violent man? IE the woman thinks the violent man will “protect her” whereas the man thinks he can “fix” the violent woman? Or do you think people are drawn to violent people…

          (also okay if you don’t have an answer….)

        • “do you think it is a different dynamic when a man is interested in a violent woman than when a woman is interested in a violent man? IE the woman thinks the violent man will “protect her””

          No. In Bundy’s case as he specifically targetted young women there was no reason for the young women who wrote him letters and showed up in court to think he would not be a danger to them as well, forget about “protecting” them – that’s out of the question . Obviously they thought he was innocent and wrongly accused. They felt sorry for him and were also attracted to his above average looks.

          “whereas the man thinks he can “fix” the violent woman?”

          Those men also think the women are innocent and wrongly accused.

          “Or do you think people are drawn to violent people…”

          No. Sure, *some* people are drawn to violent people. Hopefully a very small minority. I personally don’t know anyone drawn to violent people. I would assume people drawn to violent people because of their violence are either violent themselves or are somehow otherwise not right in the head.

  4. I am assuming that the term “incel virgin men” as you are using it, as contrasted with “incel men who are not virgins” and “virgin men who are MGTOW”, is that subset of men that base all of their identity around getting bonding with a woman and can’t seem to get it and can’t seem to break out of wanting it, no matter what they see or how women treat them. From what I can tell from direct writings about “incel virgin men” is that they have an intense emotional reaction to women (which I completely understand) but can’t ever seem to take in new information and see things from a different angle.

    It seems to me this is a narrow group of men is targeted by the Just World Fallacy with also quite a bit of The Sky is Falling Fallacy, intended to smear and witch hunt as wide a group of men as possible.

    • yes, it is a wide group–that’s why AVfM is insanely stupid to attack MGTOW and call them Pigtow +. Of course it has to do with them shitting on these men to appear “above” them, however, the “strategy” will backfire…

    • It seems to me this is a narrow group of men is targeted by the Just World Fallacy with also quite a bit of The Sky is Falling Fallacy, intended to smear and witch hunt as wide a group of men as possible.

      Yes, this is it. I could define “incel virgin men” but it doesn’t matter since as we can see from DailyKos and Jezebel, they are trying to smear any man who has trouble with sex and relationships, #GamerGate, the MRM, MGTOW, and several other groups I’m probably forgetting into “incel virgin men” to declare them all part of a secret incel virgin terrorist organization.

  5. 1. Incels are not psychos

    2. There is no such thing as “sexual frustration” as long as masturbation is a thing

    3. All male fraternities like Buddhist and other monastic orders exist and provide many single men with a sense of purpose and happiness

  6. I followed a link to AVfM on this blog and Usher from Mens’ News Daily wrote;

    David R. Usher • a year ago

    MGTOW is also code language for men who for lack of anything else to do with themselves are likely to take up the gay lifestyle

  7. if women were committing mass murders, the government would step in to find a way to blame someone other than the women.

    then again, that’s kind of what we have with abortion. the baby itself gets blamed for inconveniencing the woman.

    • Please, anything but sweeping, substantive No Incel Left Behind legislation which addresses the issues and provides a redress of grievances!!

      The jewmoney judases, stupid useless bimbos, lying thieving whores, and their “government” of armed pimps will never roll back femtopia.

      History’s ruthless agents of power are necessary to move their age’s cycle forward. All forms resist change and their power must by wrested from them so they can be possessed by new forms.

      Society evolved to serve the needs of its individual human members, not the other way around. When society ceases to serve the needs of its human members, it becomes a cancer which consumes life in order to survive.

      You cannot spoil a corrupt system. This modern world deserves a modern attitude: you gotta stick it to them before they stick it to you.

      • “The jewmoney judases, stupid useless bimbos, lying thieving whores, and their “government” of armed pimps will never roll back femtopia.”

        I smell an Alt-Reicher, and no sir-ee bob, I don’t like your kind one fucking bit….

        “Society evolved to serve the needs of its individual human members, not the other way around. When society ceases to serve the needs of its human members, it becomes a cancer which consumes life in order to survive.”

        that sounds like something an anarchist would say. Don’t say it too loud otherwise you won’t be able to hug Judgy Bitch and Aaron Clarey at the AVfM campfire….

  8. Pingback: Libertarianism Is Becoming Another Form Of Gynosocialism | The Black Pill

  9. Pingback: LIHOP And MIHOP Incel Virgin Domestic Terrorist Organization Conspiracy Theories | The Black Pill

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s