In a comment Tamerlane linked to this video from CS MGTOW on Libertarianism. Before I start talking about the video, it’s important to understand why MRAs and MGTOW are attracted to Libertarianism. Regardless of whatever the pluses or minuses of Libertarianism may be, the fact is most of government exists to benefit women. Take any government social program and the beneficiaries are either mostly or all women. The USDA even has a program called WIC which stands for women, infants, and children which obviously means that this program only benefits women. The only example I could find of a government program that benefits men would be veterans’ benefits, but that’s a stretch to call it a social program. Also, since women can serve in the military, they can access it too. Plus, many men have died serving in the military so they could never see their veterans’ benefits by definition. What is happened that any degree of socialism is really gynosocialism where women get all the benefits but men do nothing but pay taxes. Looking at this, it becomes logical for men to support Libertarianism since government doesn’t do a single thing for men.
In fairness, there are socialists who see a problem with this, but they are marginalized by their fellow leftists as “brosocialists” or “brocialists”. Also, there is no reason to have a lot of sympathy for the “brosocialists” since rather than realizing that gynosocialism is a cancer of the left, they will blame this on a right wing conspiracy to discredit socialism. Regardless of that all socialism is gynosocialism now.
So doesn’t that mean we should all support Libertarianism if it’s far from perfect? Not so fast. The first problem is that many so called Libertarians are Libertarian in name only. This is common in the manuresphere. Many manurespherians say that they’re Libertarian yet they have never advocated for a distinctly Libertarian position and have been hostile to the Libertarian Party. Manurespherians are also consider themselves “Libertarian” in bizarre ways. CS MGTOW brought up an example from Hawaiian Fat Blob where he is against domestic violence shelters for men under any circumstances. CS MGTOW brought up the point that this was a case of Libertarianism being used to hurt men, but it’s actually worse than that. It’s one thing to say that domestic violence shelters for men shouldn’t be funded by the government. It’s another to say that they should never exist, and that is not Libertarian. While Libertarians would be against government funded domestic violence shelters for men, they would have no problem with a privately funded domestic violence shelter for men. Hawaiian Fat Blob was advocating an anti-Libertarian position while lying about it being a Libertarian position. None of this should be surprising since the manuresphere is constantly lying.
However, that’s a sideshow to the real problem that CS MGTOW spends most of the video talking about which is that Libertarianism is being taken over by women. Watch the video for some good examples that show how Libertarians are accusing men of being statists while excusing female support for big government as women desperate for protection against evil men. The so called Libertarians can provide no evidence for their accusations against men so these Libertarians are guilty of false accusations against men.
With Libertarians making excuses for female support for big government, Libertarianism is becoming another form of gynosocialism. Where Libertarian Gynosocialism is unique compared to other forms of gynosocialism is that it has the potential to be the most dangerous form of gynosocialism. Due to historical reasons other forms of gynosocialism have to at least pretend to support non-gynosocialist government programs such as veterans’ benefits, fighting terrorism, etc. Libertarian Gynosocialism has no such problem. They can have a justification to squeeze out all other government spending in favor of government spending on women. Libertarian Gynosocialism has the potential to be the purest form of gynosocialism there is. Some will make the argument that at least under Libertarian Gynosocialism we will get rid of things like NSA spying. This will not happen because women want to use NSA spying to track incel virgin and other unattractive men who they incorrectly believe are all about to become mass shooters. The Libertarian Gynosocialists will give in to this demand so they won’t get rid of NSA spying.
There is no such thing as a political system that can prevent gynosocialism. Women and manginas will just wear it down until even political positions like Libertarianism become the opposite of what they are supposed to be. The problem here isn’t the what but the who. What needs to be done is keep both women and manginas out of government. Thus something like taking away the vote from women is not enough. Anyone who wants to take away the vote from women has a scheme they want to use such as only married men get to vote. This is guaranteeing that only manginas will be in government with women controlling the government by proxy.
Social change could solve the problem, but it won’t happen. The problem is too connected to biological impulses for large scale social change. It’s the same problem the Pak Protectors have. Only a small percentage of them were able to rise above their biology, and many of them who recognized their biology as a problem failed in their attempt to rise above it. Thus the only solution is what the Pak Protectors who could rise above their biology tried which is setting up colonies in space far away from their homeworld. We need to do the same and leave the women and manginas behind.