67 comments on “Conspiracy Theorists Want To Put You In A Concentration Camp

  1. “Psychological research has shown that conspiracy theorists believe in conspiracy theories because they want to do what the conspiracy theories say. ”

    I know otherwise intelligent people who hold conspiracy theories about the Federal Reserve System. They even say completely nonsensical thinks about it, like no one knows what goes on in the Fed because no one has the authority to audit it, even though you can find Fed audits online as public documents.

    I’ve wondered about the mentality of some of these people. Perhaps they want to discredit the Fed because they view it as a plum crony capitalist deal that went to a rival gang of cronies, and they want their gang of cronies to run it instead.

    • I’ve wondered about the mentality of some of these people. Perhaps they want to discredit the Fed because they view it as a plum crony capitalist deal that went to a rival gang of cronies, and they want their gang of cronies to run it instead.

      That is pretty much it. The Federal Reserve is an odd public-private hybrid that works. A fully public or fully private equivalent has lots of problems as has been seen plenty of times in history. The Federal Reserve is a compromise so that neither the public side nor the private side can do too much to wreck it. This left a lot of groups who want to remake society, conspiracy theorists among them, out in the cold since they can’t use the Federal Reserve for their agenda. Conspiracy theorists don’t understand the compromise nature of the Federal Reserve so they think of it as a rival gang of crony captialists when that isn’t the case.

      • I wonder what the Fed-hating cranks will say if Rand Paul gets his gratuitous audit of the Fed, and it doesn’t turn up anything to support their mythology about the Fed as a SPECTRE-like organization that secretly runs the world.

  2. I laugh at the kooks who obsess over the population figure on the Georgia Guidestones, as if these rocks have voodoo powers or something.

    If you don’t like the Georgia Guidestones’ population number, set up your own rock with a different number carved into it you find acceptable.

    • The Georgia Guidestones conspiracy theories are such a joke. Despite what conspiracy theorists think, it is not that expensive to build an equivalent. I have thought about creating my own Georgia Guidestones with some gibberish on them somewhere just to troll conspiracy theorists. I would make mine twice as big as the Georgia Guidestones so that conspiracy theorists would think that they are twice as powerful.

  3. Robert Heinlein’s West Point speech, “The Pragmatics of Patriotism,” basically endorses expending men to save women. Heinlein conveniently never had to make this sacrifice, and he died in his bed from the diseases of old age.

    http://westernrifleshooters.blogspot.com/2008/03/pragmatics-of-patriotism.html

    I would have less of a problem with that if women showed these men beforehand that they valued the men in their given state by putting out for them; at least the men could die with the memory of having a few nights of sexual experience.

    But in practice women sandbag and stall a lot of these men before they go in harm’s way with nonsense about how they have to “prove” themselves first through their valor in battle.

    • You are a disgusting person. You would be okay with making men disposable, if only women would put out in return.

      Where is your self respect? You are obsessed with winning women over.

    • I can’t find a reason to argue with his logic:

      “Men who go down to the sea in ships have long had another way of expressing the same moral behavior tagged by the abstract expression “patriotism.” Spelled out in simple Anglo-Saxon words “Patriotism” reads “Women and children first!”

      And that is the moral result of realizing a self-evident biological fact: Men are expendable; women and children are not. A tribe or a nation can lose a high percentage of its men and still pick up the pieces and go on. . .as long as the women and children are saved. But if you fail to save the women and children, you’ve had it, you’re done, you’re THROUGH! You join tyrannosaurus rex, one more breed that bilged its final test.”

      • If women are biologically necessary and children are important because they are “the future” then wouldn’t logic rule that women become as useless as men once they hit say 35? (I was going to say menopausal but women’s fertility declines.)

        • It’s actually sooner than that. Women are useless as soon as they are done breastfeeding their last child. And that assumes they have children. Increasing numbers of women aren’t having children so they are as “useless” as any man.

      • If you save a bunch of women from a sinking ship on foreign waters, they’ll be conquered and subsequently defeated forever by whoever finds them. If you save a bunch of men, they may conquer and eventually triumph over potential adversaries, and perhaps reproduce aplenty via the women they capture. Not to mention the fact that men are stronger and more strategic, thus apt to survive harsher conditions than women. Thus, men’s life is more important than women’s life, objectively. This may be counter-intuitive for some, but then intuitions are often very wrong.

      • “Society still protects older women. Something else is going on rather than Roberto’s claim-“It’s all about the species, mahn.””

        Stoner, I’ve noticed this as well. You can throw in society’s pandering to fat women and proven female criminals as well.

        If the justification for defending women is due to society needing their reproductive potential its extremely counter-intuitive.

        I’ve been reading Rookh Kshatriya’s ‘anglobitch’ website and he goes over how western society’s misandry is so ingrained due to factors like puritanism and Christianity.

        This is another reason why the tradcon’s desire to go back to the ‘good old days’ is a huge mistake. Women will be placed on a pedestal regardless of the laws because that treatment of men is deeply ingrained in anglo society itself.

        Robert – that’s a good point I never thought of before. Compounded with the fact that women are pretty opportunistic in regards to mates; as the aftermath of countless wars have proven women are all too happy to spread their legs for men that come in, conquer their countries and kill their fathers, brothers and sons let alone their husbands.

        So the logic that women are a reproductive bottleneck and hence need to be sacrificed for (even if I subscribed to that belief) doesn’t wash with me.

        • not a fan of ole Rookh,

          He actually has a pole up with Roissy in DC as a vote for “top MRA.” I don’t trust the guy or like him one bit. That was the lesson from the Inmalafide days, the enemy of my enemy is not my friend…

        • One can still gleam useful information from even their most hated enemy.

          I really think his views go a long way to explaining the deep rooted problems in western culture and why (besides biological reasons) we are so predisposed to put women on a pedestal.

          I don’t care for Roissy either, but I largely agree with Rookh Kshatriya’s articles otherwise. I’ve been to your blog as well and of course read your posts. I don’t see why you would be so opposed to his views.

        • “I don’t care for Roissy either, but I largely agree with Rookh Kshatriya’s articles otherwise. I’ve been to your blog as well and of course read your posts. I don’t see why you would be so opposed to his views.”

          well, to say this guy is elitist is putting it mildly…

          I believe he’s an Indian guy educated in England. Caste system in India, Class system in England.

          He’d step on a low status man with just as much glee as the feminist’s he claims to hate…

          I remember this guy who loved Rookh always used to comment on my blog, but he seemed to have the traditionalist mindset-be a provider. He got all in a tizzy when I was critical of Bernie Chapin. Those guy’s answers seem to be “vote Republican and it’ll be all right”-dude, no it won’t…

        • Men have become so desperate to gain the attentions of women they would actually resort to reducing their lifespan to prevent hair loss. They’re reacting like many women do when they realize their looks are fading.

          I’m in full agreement with Rookh’s article. Its something I’ve also noticed with my own anecdotes. Many manuresphere articles like to say that women can no longer draw men after 30 or so and honestly I’d love that to be true but I’ve seen seen too many cases of women that have been married twice and again by that age (and more). Its not like these women are drawing the new suckers in by their personality.

          Hell my own mother is another example. She had two kids from two different men, and despite that she was heavily lusted after past her 40s, and probably still is now.

          The desperation many men have for a woman that’s relatively decent looking and not fat is insane. And many men will not even set their standards that high. I used to consider the fat white female some sort of loser black fetish, but the reality is you see fat chicks of every race with any male these days.

          I recall reading the ‘Rational Male’ website by Rollo. He mentioned how his middle age sister-in-law left her husband and got taken in by a wealthy man. The man even paid for the two children’s expenses, which included college tuition. Other examples are the creator of Dilbert, and even Bill Gates. We have exceedingly wealthy individuals that are not only foolish enough to marry, but marry aging women with children.

          When you look around and see all these aging single mothers/divorced women are easily able to get financially accomplished men (and multiple times at that) both of those articles start to make a lot of sense.

        • This all reminds me of something in the Bible. So many women are attracted to men that conquer other men, whether it was for a good cause or a evil gain. So many manosphere men get angry like Saul does.

          1 Samuel 18:5-10:
          “So David went out wherever Saul sent him, and behaved wisely. And Saul set him over the men of war, and he was accepted in the sight of all the people and also in the sight of Saul’s servants. Now it had happened as they were coming home, when David was returning from the slaughter of the Philistine, that the women had come out of all the cities of Israel, singing and dancing, to meet King Saul, with tambourines, with joy, and with musical instruments. 7 So the women sang as they danced, and said:

          “Saul has slain his thousands,
          And David his ten thousands.”

          Then Saul was very angry, and the saying displeased him; and he said, “They have ascribed to David ten thousands, and to me they have ascribed only thousands. Now what more can he have but the kingdom?” So Saul eyed David from that day forward.

          And it happened on the next day that the distressing spirit from God came upon Saul, and he prophesied inside the house. So David played music with his hand, as at other times; but there was a spear in Saul’s hand. And Saul cast the spear, for he said, “I will pin David to the wall!” But David escaped his presence twice.”

      • “well, to say this guy is elitist is putting it mildly…

        I believe he’s an Indian guy educated in England. Caste system in India, Class system in England.

        He’d step on a low status man with just as much glee as the feminist’s he claims to hate…

        I remember this guy who loved Rookh always used to comment on my blog, but he seemed to have the traditionalist mindset-be a provider. He got all in a tizzy when I was critical of Bernie Chapin. Those guy’s answers seem to be “vote Republican and it’ll be all right”-dude, no it won’t…”

        Do you have any proof for these assertions? I’ve gone through just about all of his posted articles and I have not seen the elitism you speak of. Several white night nationalists and racists have posted to his blog and they were all responded to vehemently.

        His views are quite the opposite of what you claim from what I’ve seen. Any links that depict these accusations you’re making would be welcome.

        Your post seems filled with assumptions, rather than actually having read the guy’s pieces.

      • Did you read the article? He’s clearly describing people that buy into media propaganda that says regardless of looks, regardless of income level, regardless of social status they can achieve anything and get any kind of woman they want.

        That’s not shitting on low status men, that’s shitting on delusional men who haven’t woken up to western society’s lies.

        I’m a fat, ugly black guy. I attend college but I’m currently working a minimum wage job to get by. I don’t even have a car; I walk to work. Me expecting some hot runway model to be interested in me is just unrealistic.

        That’d be like you or I being rich and/or attractive and some ugly fat chick expecting us to be interested (indeed, many women are entitled like that).

        • Ergeniz,

          I did read the article…

          Here’s where I and likely others here think he is going wrong….

          He goes onto the concept of red pill/blue pill that is a religious concept throughout the manosphere. I think the concept is flawed first of all. It’s like a feminist attempting to describe the world through “patriarchy.” He ads the modification that this is better seen as sexual false conciousness…

          However, just look at “game”–this sells men the lie that they can learn a few tips and tricks and then bang supermodels. Just the fact that guys like Social Kenny and Mitchel (who are interested in actively pursuing women) are just as critical of the “game” sold by roosh/fartiste as anyone here is a good indicator that this is a scam. If anything “game” is selling a sexual false conciousness.

          If anything it is low status men who are most aware of their situation… You are, I am. In fact I realized at one point if I “won the lottery”/”became a rock star” that the women “showing interest” would essentially be entering into a prostitute/client relationship with me as they wouldn’t be interested before my change in wealth/status.

          Something interesting here. He mentions poor whites voting Republican even though this goes against their self interest. There was a racist, er, “race realist” blogger named GL Piggy who was poor (worked as a waiter and had a huge student loan debt.) He was a huge advocate for the alt reich. The simple answer was that he had a “false conciousness” and was willing to vote for the republicans because he thought that they would see he was a broke white guy and they would help him out as they got wealthier. But there is another (counter intuitive) explanation–he hates blacks and other’s (NAM’s he called them) –so much that he would do something AGAINST his own self interest to hurt them rather than doing something that might advance his own self interest if it helped them….

          Actually, if you are bullied by another low status man who you know isn’t getting laid and he tries to demean you with nasty insults about your lack of success with women, do you think this helps him “score”? This isn’t about “false conciousness”-this is about one group hating another group. Why have Roosh and Fartiste become obsessed with “culture war” over preying on drunk broads in dimly lit bars?

          Rookh is selling you something, and it probably isn’t good for your health…

        • edit to ad…

          some poor southern white men likely vote Republican not because it is a good deal for them but that they know so-called “liberals” like Barry O’Bombya, Billary Clinton and
          Joe “Bite Me” Bidden do hate them…

        • Stoner, here’s some of what he’s written on game. From what he’s written, he echoes the same opinions we do. That women treat most men like shit, especially “low status males” like you and I.

          http://kshatriya-anglobitch.blogspot.com/2009/08/rookh-kshatriyas-true-art-of-game.html

          http://kshatriya-anglobitch.blogspot.com/2009/08/david-koresh-lord-of-true-game.html

          He doesn’t seem to support ‘game’, but makes the observation that women are drawn to psychopaths, drama, thug, criminals and degenerates which everyone here has noted at some time or another.

          Also read the comments section of each article where he expands on his opinions.

          I’m simply not seeing the evidence of him shitting on guys like us like you are.

          “He goes onto the concept of red pill/blue pill that is a religious concept throughout the manosphere. I think the concept is flawed first of all. It’s like a feminist attempting to describe the world through “patriarchy.” He ads the modification that this is better seen as sexual false conciousness…”

          I agree that the pill concept is nonsense, much like the Alpha/beta/gamma classifications that these people seem to love putting themselves or others in.

          However, when he refers to ‘sexual false conciousness’ he’s describing how society conditions men to think that by working and mindlessly sacrificing themselves to the system they will be rewarded. We all know that to be a lie. He’s essentially saying to not buy into being a useful idiot for the system.

          He also argues other points like women not really looking at sex so much as an act of enjoyment or even relief but rather merely a tool used to manipulate men. A hypothesis I’m really starting to agree with.

          His ‘anglobitch’ thesis is very similar to the anti-feminist’s (basically women trying to control the price of sex, among other things) but he goes into other factors such as the anglo/western culture and how demonizing men seems to be the very root of the culture. Its actually deeply ingrained.

          That is what I see him to be ‘selling’.

        • okay Ergeniz,

          I read those posts you linked too…

          Funnier than hell. If that is a comedy blog (or maybe just his humor) it’s fucking great. Also saw the Aurini nutcase in one comment.

          Anglofag-pretty funny….

          there are studies saying that those with dark triad traits have more sex partners…

          …and it is said that sociopathy is more common in CEO/politicians than the normal population…

          …now if you read his stuff for laughs, it seems better than allot of M(h)RA/man-0-sphere stuff….

          …however as life advice????

          ….I don’t even think he is actually advising you start a cult….

          “He also argues other points like women not really looking at sex so much as an act of enjoyment or even relief but rather merely a tool used to manipulate men. A hypothesis I’m really starting to agree with. ”

          well, that’s why I said A.) prostitution should be legal because it isn’t the gov’t business to tell people what to do…

          B.) Prostitution is women exploiting men’s loneliness and horniness….

          …of course I get called a mysognyist worse than Hugo Schwyzer and Warmachine who have actually harmed living. breathing women….

          funny how that works…

          (also explains why women slut shame other women, “sluts” cross the union line…)

        • “there are studies saying that those with dark triad traits have more sex partners…

          …and it is said that sociopathy is more common in CEO/politicians than the normal population…

          …now if you read his stuff for laughs, it seems better than allot of M(h)RA/man-0-sphere stuff….

          …however as life advice????

          ….I don’t even think he is actually advising you start a cult…”

          Yes, I’m pretty sure he’s being tongue in cheek.

          I agree about prostitution on both points. Feminists lobbying for it to be illegal, along with sexbots and recently even stuff like that new Dead or Alive Beach volleyball game is about them trying to control men and the price of sex. theanitfeminist’s website goes into this a lot.

          That said, I would never use a prostitute. And I’ve no problem remaining a virgin.

  4. Wow, “hypocrite” doesn’t even begin to suffice for people like Alex Jones. That’s a fascinating study. No matter how much stupidity i see, I’m still surprised that these conspiracy loons want to be the ones runnung the camps.

  5. Order out of chaos.
    It’s on your money!
    Cause the problem (immigration)
    Solution (Police State)
    Win-win for expanding govt=cuckservatives rule.
    Or dems rule,same animal.
    As for Alex, Agent provocateur.

    Not even the churches are preaching love anymore.
    So go to hell all of you.

  6. Of course you put mosques under surveillance, that’s where the terrorists come from. What Alex Jones is right to object to* is surveillance on people who pose no possible threat, surveillance for the purposes of totalitarian control.

    *Because even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

    • “Having heard the entire context of his answer, I believe he and the reporter were talking about something different. It sounded as though Trump wanted to track immigrants entering the country, whereas it was reported that he wanted to put all muslims on some kind of list. Typical media frenzy over nothing.

      Frankly, some mosques should be shut down, but I’m not a big fan of big brother. When the government says it is here to help, it usually makes things worse. Keep in mind that many groups list all WNs as potential terrorists before you advocate restrictions and databases on potential terrorists. ”

      https://archive.is/xaTQd

      disturbing when even the WN’s realize that to demonize one group is to demonize all…

      in fact, it looks like Tashfeen Malik was the one driving the bus so to speak, yet many of the politicians want to let in women, not just families but exclude single men. hahaha, nice job with profiling there…

      (and it appears Tashfeen was on some kind of list…)

    • Since women pose a threat to myself and many men as well as the US economy and government, when will Alex Jones start advocating government surveillance of women? Alex Jones has to or he will be a hypocrite based on your reasoning. We know he won’t do that because he’s a massive mangina.

  7. Of course its not surprising that these weirdos and keyboard storm troopers have no problem with concentration camps and genocide. After all Hitler is idolized by good deal of these pathetic shut ins. Even as they engage in Holocaust Denial, they wink and nudge that it was a good thing. At the same time, they never STFU about the Holodomor. Sure the genocides perpetrated by the Soviets were under reported mostly because the media and Hollywood tend to whitewash communist barbarities. But clearly they are ok with one type of genocide but not with another.

    Slightly OT: Im afraid these types may soon get their heart broken by Putin as he is getting increasingly comfortable with Israel!

    • While Communist genocides are underreported, conspiracy theorists are guilty of the same thing. They don’t shut up about the Holodomor, but they hardly ever talk about Mao’s atrocities or Pol Pot or North Korea. I have even seen conspiracy theorists say that the Western media is lying about the situation in North Korea. White people weren’t the victims so they don’t care.

      • You are correct about them ignoring any genocides which doesnt have white victims and hence the blackout of N Korea ,Mao and Pol Pot. But it gets murkier.
        They jump up and down about the Holodomor mostly because the Bolshevik had a disproportionate number of Jewish members. That is true of course but what is also true is that Caucasian groups such as Georgians and other minorities were even more over represented. Certainly it was a revolt against the old order which was Russian Orthodox but the dissidents werent Jews alone.

        Furthermore by Jewish law, they arent very good Jews as they are atheists. It is not a mere technicality. Even in Israel you have Haredis and Neturei Karta , ultra orthodox groups who see the founding of Israel itself as a crime against the Torah , to the extant of allying themselves with the PLO to undermine Israel! Funny the WVW(white vagina worshippers) never talk about that.

        Also another thing they fail to mention that Hitler had absolute contempt for Russians be they Jew or Christian. At best he saw them as Asiatic barbarians and a slave class to serve their new German overlords when they conquered the region similar to how British ruled India. The Nazis were also responsible for millions of Russian deaths. But you dont see the WVWs weeping about THAT!

  8. Alex Jones claims the elites have superweapons which could destroy the whole solar system. I guess these elites have sent us messages about this coming war in SyFy miniseries, “The Expanse.”

  9. Misandry is one of the main reasons why people hate Muslim men and want Muslim men put into concentration camps. Feminists and manginas see Muslim men as a threat to global (white) female supremacy.

    Now, I personally do not believe that Islam poses such a threat or that any of its branches could be a healthy alternative for men, but what I believe doesn’t matter – what matters is that feminists and manginas clearly see Muslim men as a potential threat to global (white) female supremacy and that they want this threat to be gone.

    The only difference between the “right” and the “left” is, that they can’t quite agree on which methods to use (More propaganda less weapons? More weapons less propaganda?). But the number one reason feminists and manginas hate Muslim men and want Muslim men bombed, killed, or in camps or whatever is: “They are a threat to (white) female supremacy, they refuse to accept (white) female supremacy.”

    So anyone who is opposed to Islam (because he is a devout Christian, for example) or who argues for stricter border controls, less immigration, tougher anti-terror laws or whatever, should be careful here and not groom a monster that also wants to devour us…

  10. I just watched “The Big Bang Theory” episode where Sheldon fucks a woman for the first time, well into his 30’s.

    NOT FUNNY, and certainly not an accurate depiction of most male virgins’ situations at that age, because Amy wanted sex with Sheldon all along. By contrast, male virgins usually wind up that way through sexual eviction by all the women they’ve known.

    The episode also assumes that Sheldon could get an erection and perform sexually at that age on his first try, without any preparation. I found out otherwise through my own experience in my 30’s.

  11. The ideology of this “Black Pill” has a lot of parallels to Nazism. Like Nazism, it is based on scapegoating an entire group of people, all women, for the actions of a small minority of feminists and other trouble causers. Like nazism, it selectively blames a group with only minority control of something negative of “running” it, for example Nazis will say that if 3 out of 10 leaders of something are Jewish it is “Jewish run.” Black Pill ignores the significant evidence of male control over the government and corporations of the West and calls the West a “matriarchy.” Like the Nazis, he is willing to blame members of his group for being “traitors,”(“manginas”) but that does not stop him from ascribing evils solely to the out-group, as Black Pill makes a big deal about holding Women, and only Women, responsible for feminism. Individuals who betray the group are considered to have only acted wrongly due to “manipulation” or direct bribery by the out group, rather than due to tensions and conflicts of interest within the in group, Nazis ignored the class tensions that drove gentile support for Communism, just as Black Pill ignores class, sexual, religious, and racial tensions which lead men to support feminism.

    • Ken is just another mentally ill conspiracy theorist rambling inane shit.

      You are just a loser, that is cancer to any movement or group of people striving for positive change in the world, fuck off.

      • Not sure what “conspiracy theory” Ken presented, but he is right in his criticism of your ideology. Yours is the closest thing to “feminism for men,” a reason-free, anti-social, hatred based ideology. It is very notable that you refuse to disclose your ethnicity, a tactic communists have long employed.

        • Communists refuse to disclose their ethnicity? Bullshit. They love identity politics, and so do all you white vagina worshipping nationalists. I do not believe in identity politics because I am more than a group. I am an individual.

        • I’m generally pretty good at spotting Jews and I don’t think BP is one. There are very few Jewish incels, Jews can always fall back on their race’s social networks. Also MGTOW is an ideology threatening to Jewish interests.

      • ” I do not believe in identity politics because I am more than a group. I am an individual”.

        The hivemind despises that manner of thinking.

        You must conform. OR ELSE.

  12. I don’t get why people who hold the Federal Reserve System in such suspicion, turn around and think that Bitcoin and other digital currency schemes invented by unaccountable software people will save the day. I’d like to know when and where the Bitcoin founders had their Jekyll Island-like secret meeting to come up with this scheme, and who attended this gathering. Bitcoin to me sounds like another affinity scam to take advantage of geeks’ social inadequacies in recognizing con men.

    • Do a Google search on bitcoin conspiracy or bitcoin NSA, and you will find plenty of distrust of bitcoin. Plenty of conspiracy theorists think the NSA or a conspiracy is behind bitcoin.

      As for geeks, remember that bitcoin is open source. With open source there is nothing to “trust” as anyone call inspect the source code. The source code can and has been used to create additional cryptocurrencies so if you don’t trust bitcoin, you can roll your own.

  13. “@RealAlexJones shut them all down islam is not a religion it’s a political ideology therefore has no rights under the religious freedom act”

    So freedom of association is not a thing then?

    Alex Jones fans are pure scum.

  14. Pingback: Alex Jones Proved Conspiracy Theory Is BS And A Scam | Freedom From The Gynocracy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s