100 comments on “Why White Vagina Worshiping Nationalists Keep Showing Up Here

  1. They are keyboard jockeys incapable of any action. So they keep looking for new places, blogs and forums, since the old places get tired of them.

    It reminds me of a joke. A man gets into the self-serve change business and buys a machine that exchanges a dollar for 4 quarters. “How are you going to make any money”, a friend asks them man. He replies, “With volume!”

  2. the alt-riech is gonna start eating their own pretty soon, and I gotta say it’s gonna be fun to watch…

    https://archive.is/vVIkh

    apparently Angelo John Gay was run off Youtube, hardcore nazi’s are saying he is a government plant…

    Peeps speculate that Andrew Anglin/Daily Stormer is financed by rich jewish bankers. One interesting observation is that hacker Weev caused a bunch of printers at major universities to print swastika’s. The irony is that someone with his skills could do some serious damage yet he is doing high school pranks. There’s also a video that I think is parody by Murdock. Murdock. It shows these WN’s trying to get into a white paradise. One guy isn’t let in because he is part Irish. They allude to the pseudo science of HBD when Romanian’s get “kicked out of the white race” because their IQ scores drop. It’s pretty funny actually. As I mentioned in another comment where I grew up, people of Irish descent were called Mic’s, Italian’s Daygo’s and Whop’s, etc.etc….

    It also gets more convoluted because Cuck Rudd and all his GL Piggies were quite happy to call George Zimmerman a white guy with a tan even though he had dark Mexican features and possibly/probably had black blood as well as Amerindian/white blood.

  3. anyways, this is why I have mostly moved to making meme’s–no one cares about well thought out logical arguments, they just want to fling poo. It’s as has been said with arguing with feminist’s. You won’t win over any feminists by arguing, the only value is getting the ideas out there so so-called “fence sitters” can make a decision for themselves….

  4. on another topic….

    http://www.news.com.au/finance/business/other-industries/former-prostitute-takes-aim-at-her-clients-in-scathing-letter/news-story/6f28870d436544514a909d581467d06f

    I find this letter to be 100% believable as we know womyn think men are absolute garbage. So politically speaking I think prostitution should be legal, but also visiting a prostitute is degrading because she thinks you are a piece of shit and she is laughing at you after you give her money and wishes you would die in a fire…

    • Lol I wudnt be surprised if mgtow leaning Australian men stop patronising prostitutes after reading this bitch and hence these hooked are now ready to lynch her. And perhaps pressure parliament to pass a law for alimony of sorts for prostitutes who are dumped by their loyal clientele. I wish I was joking…nothing shocks me these days….

      • Unfortunately, if they are like the “libertarian” “tough guys” at Shedding of the Ego, they will probably say that they go and teh’ wimminz beg them for bareback but they are a little afraid of spermjacking. Sorry to say, allot of “MGTOW” these daze sound like alter riechies with a dash of PUAtard…

        • I often wondered why these guys call the selves libertarians when try hardly espouse any free market views. Indeed they are actually quite statist if not monarchist politically and fellate unions and tariff schemes. No wonder these fools love donald trump who seems to have tapped in the alt right reserves with a great deal of help from anti semitic crackpot (m)ann coulter. Donald trump so called misogyny is really meaningless as he measured his self worth by how many women he banged. For all practical purposes he is a gynocentrist. But don’t tell to his cult groupies ro(BO)sh and matt fattorny

        • hehe SWB , seems like you and I are drinking from the same water dish. Wonder what happened to Ann Coulter. Very few conservatives are as fierce and articulate defenders of the Civil Rights Act. Around that time the founder of the National Review(who evicted Coulter in 2001) William Buckleys criticism of the segregationists was lukewarm at best. At the same time though he did weed out all the other crackpot anti semites, John Birchers, flouride in the water conspiracy theorists from the Republican party. Now with the help of Ann “Cruz is natural born citizen…oh wait he isnt” Coulter and Donald Trump they have squirmed their way into relevance after the rock that was the mansophere was turned over.

          Now the media will is itching to tag all MRAs as crackpots thanks to these losers. Thats just fucking swell.

        • Forget to mention , Ann Coulter was the only prominent female conservative, heck only conservative who thought it was a tragedy that women got to vote as it adversely affected liberty. You can certainly chalk up her saying that to her being an attention whore (now a spiritual whore having given up her principles for Donald Trump who she fantasizes of fulfilling her pet project of undoing the “mistake” of 1965). However atleast she put the idea out there.

        • I often only if Ann Coulter was happily married with critters to some hunky dude, she would stop attempting foist George W Bush, Chris Christie, Mitt Romney and now Donald Trump and god knows how many other thoroughly unsuitable individuals for the presidency only because other suitable candidates such as the capable (but admittedly unattractive) Ted Cruz dont pass her arbitrary hunk test. Keep in mind she thought Dick Cneney was incredibly sexy ??!!

        • What the fuck are you on about stoner?

          Stop being a passive aggressive twerp. Name some names, don’t just make vague accusations.

          You are starting to lose your mind.

          Any slight disagreement and you start flinging shit at people.

        • passive aggressive? name names???

          okay, Judgy Bitch….

          https://stonerwithaboner.wordpress.com/2014/11/16/traditionalist-women-have-no-part-in-any-self-respecting-mens-movement/

          and, ironically there is a nice tie in as the youtube vid has William Buckley…

          I didn’t name names as awhile back Mr. Black Pill asked that I use archive.is when linking to questionable sources. And I most certainly consider Judgy Bitch a questionable source.

          And, no, it isn’t a slight disagreement, it is close to 180 degrees. I’ve said many times that I actively hope AVfM fails as it is doing more harm than good. Is that passive aggressive enough for ya???

    • It is so easy to see right through this “former” prostitute. She never mentioned a pimp, so she could have just been a waitress. She would have had the same crappy attitude towards her customers.

      “I faked a smile during table service, even though I hated the work, just to get good tips.”

      She would have called men misogynists for tipping more just because she had a pretty face.

      Loser.

      • but donchya know “sex work” is spechul and restaurants are capializm. Men go to restaurants because they are “privileged” and hate the people who work there. In fact the men will pick restaurants run by groups of people they hate specifically so they can patronize them and oppress them further. But when womyn go, it is because they want to redistrubute their wealth that they managed to snag from the evillle patriarchy to those less privileged. Except those sexist patriarchs sweating in the back kitchen. The sexist patriarchs are always put in the back kitchen to shelter pooor womyn from their evillle privilege and entitlement…

    • “http://www.news.com.au/finance/business/other-industries/former-prostitute-takes-aim-at-her-clients-in-scathing-letter/news-story/6f28870d436544514a909d581467d06f”

      Nice to see the commentators on that article aren’t buying into her bullshit.

      I agree about prostitution though. It should be legal. Its a service where someone sells themselves to another person for payment – no different than any other profession. What makes sex so special?

      Like you, I wouldn’t use a prostitute though.

  5. Most of these WN types have as little to do with an “alpha Patriarch” who has a naked, pregnant woman waiting for him in the kitchen as they have with 1920’s German National Socialists marching through Munich’s historical beer halls.

    It’s all just LARPING. The majority of them has the same problems with women other men have. They are just too afraid to admit it and now want to shoot the messenger.

  6. “I guarantee you that Marcuse’s suggestion here will be used as a basis for a conspiracy theory that MGTOW is a Cultural Marxist plot.”

    Talk about unwarranted self-importance. Jesus.

    • Oh come on, if you’re a Ben Garrison Fan then you’re familiar with 4chan, 8chan and related websites. And hence must be familiar with the phenomenon of anti-feminist threads being derailed with antisemitic memes that say something like “Yes goy, your women are the problem, not the Jews! You should hate your women, goy!”

      This conspiracy theory about MRA and MGTOW being a Jewish/cultural marxist plot to drive a wedge between white men and women already exists.

      And it actually got worse over the last few years because the manosphere was basically swallowed up by the alt-right and now the alt-right gets swallowed up by the far-right.

  7. A female white nationalist blaming feminism, seemingly trying to lure men back in the plantation. There’s a handful of idiotic white males taking the bait.

    • Dear Mono:

      Thanks for posting this.

      I actually know “Wife With A Purpose” (we Mormons are fairly inbred).

      “Why would they do that? You can’t justify it logically” she says at about 5 minutes in… This is actually something Marcuse talked about directly. She’s falling back on the enlightenment idea that these self-contradictory collective behaviors are the fault of incorrect thought processes (bad formal logic, in other words). This reveals that she’s caught in the technical paradigm (as we all are), and with that, she’s failed before she begins her speech. She thinks she can just correct people’s thought processes, without correcting the material conditions in which people operate, and somehow come to a solution. She can’t of course.

      Yes, we should blame migrants when they behave badly; but, one can’t help but notice, that all the women who whine about being molested by migrants are almost always out and about, searching for strange dick, free drinks and attention — in the middle of the night — when these attacks occur. I have yet to hear about any chaste German housewife having her home broken into and gang raped by migrants. That doesn’t seem to be happening.

      If a woman wants a German man’s protection against migrants, then she should do what is reasonable to secure that. That means getting married, shutting her mouth, cooking and cleaning for her man. Problem solved. Only pure white North European cock in her and she’ll be treated well. As wimminz noted a few months ago, all these women passed on those services long ago, so they share a measure of responsibility too. If women are going out whoring, they can complain about being manhandled, but that is very different from a good wife being assaulted. It’s a stark difference of both kind and essence.

      Again, if “Wife With A Purpose” wants to run her mouth about white people being victims, it’s fine with me. If she wants to actually solve the problem, she’d start to address all the culprits in these ongoing little escapades. North African and Levantine men come from a society where women actually have responsibilities, and if there are women out late, drunk, unescorted, flashing tits and ass, I can understand why they’d think they were dealing with street prostitutes.

      Regards,

      Boxer

      • “If a woman wants a German man’s protection against migrants, then she should do what is reasonable to secure that. That means getting married, shutting her mouth, cooking and cleaning for her man. Problem solved. Only pure white North European cock in her and she’ll be treated well.”

        That sounds to me like a disgusting, and, to be frank, Semitic, mentality. Throughout European history, for those places inside the Hajnal line, there have always been some women, typically between 5 and 15% in any generation, who never marry. There’s a big difference between opposing promiscuity and miscegenation, as any healthy society will do, and demanding every woman gets married. What about the lesbians? What about the woman who men do not want to marry? What about the crazy ones, the ones you know would make poor wives and mothers?

        “If people can vent their anger at being ripped off (which is really happening on a huge scale) toward some illusory and ill-defined bogeyman (Jews, Freemasons, etc.) then the status quo doesn’t have to worry so much about people coming after the real culprits.”

        I oppose the over-the-top antisemitism of stormfags like Anglin, but the Jews are hardly an “illusionary and ill-defined bogeyman.” If they are a “bogeyman” then tell me who are the “real culprits?”

        • That sounds to me like a disgusting, and, to be frank, Semitic, mentality.

          If that is a “Semitic” mentality, then we should be thanking the Jews for waking us up.

          If they are a “bogeyman” then tell me who are the “real culprits?”

          Women and manginas.

        • Dear Sentient:

          Last night I wrote:

          “If a woman wants a German man’s protection against migrants, then she should do what is reasonable to secure that. That means getting married, shutting her mouth, cooking and cleaning for her man. Problem solved. Only pure white North European cock in her and she’ll be treated well.”

          Then you replied:

          That sounds to me like a disgusting, and, to be frank, Semitic, mentality.

          If you’re accusing me of being Jewish, you’re mistaken. If you meant something else, feel free to elaborate. I’m unclear on exactly what makes a mentality “semitic”.

          Throughout European history, for those places inside the Hajnal line, there have always been some women, typically between 5 and 15% in any generation, who never marry.

          You can’t really equate those women to the skank-ho princess of today, unless you can show that there were tons of unmarried, unchaperoned women in European history who expected to wander around drunk and half naked, without being groped and fondled.

          There’s a big difference between opposing promiscuity and miscegenation, as any healthy society will do, and demanding every woman gets married. What about the lesbians? What about the woman who men do not want to marry? What about the crazy ones, the ones you know would make poor wives and mothers?

          Both in Europe and in North Africa, those women traditionally went to convents, where they lived a chaste life and worked to uplift society. I’m not religious, but I think the convent served a worthy social function.

          I wrote:

          “If people can vent their anger at being ripped off (which is really happening on a huge scale) toward some illusory and ill-defined bogeyman (Jews, Freemasons, etc.) then the status quo doesn’t have to worry so much about people coming after the real culprits.”

          Then you replied:

          I oppose the over-the-top antisemitism of stormfags like Anglin, but the Jews are hardly an “illusionary and ill-defined bogeyman.” If they are a “bogeyman” then tell me who are the “real culprits?”

          Your first job in backing up your implied premise is to well-define “Jews”. Explain what is a Jew and what isn’t. Your second duty will be to show that all members of this defined set are 1. somehow controlling shit behind the scenes and 2. exempt from the laws that apply to the rest of us.

          You can’t do this, of course, because your premise is nonsense. For every wealthy, powerful Jew you trot out, I can trot out two people. The first will be an equally wealthy, equally powerful Christian/Atheist/Muslim, and the second will be a bona fide Jew who is a total nobody, who doesn’t control anything, and who just got his ass beat in divorce court.

          I realize it’s more convenient to imagine that some nefarious group of conspirators is responsible for all the world’s problems, but life is often more complicated than we’d prefer.

          Regards,

          Boxer

        • “Your first job in backing up your implied premise is to well-define “Jews”. Explain what is a Jew and what isn’t.”

          I identify as a Jew anyone who has Jewish ancestry and either:

          1. Identifies as a Jew.
          2. Or, if they publicly disavow Jewish identity, behaves in a way that leads me to believe that this disavowal is not sincere.

          The stormfags have a much more broad definition, I know, but I think it’s incorrect to lump all the michlings into the catagory of “Jews” even though many of them are excluded from the race by the Jews themselves.

          ‘Your second duty will be to show that all members of this defined set are 1. somehow controlling shit behind the scenes and 2. exempt from the laws that apply to the rest of us.”

          Does every single Chinese person in China “control” things? Is every single person persecuted by the Chinese government non-Chinese? No and no. Yet you would still agree that China is run by ethnic Chinese.(more specifically Han, which is what we mean when we say “Chinese”)

          “I realize it’s more convenient to imagine that some nefarious group of conspirators is responsible for all the world’s problems, but life is often more complicated than we’d prefer.”

          And I said I rejected the over the top anti-semitism of the stormfags. My position is simple:

          1. The Jews are the creators of the ideologies of modern feminism, antiracism, and neoconservatism.
          2. They believe in and promote these ideologies for reasons of ethnic interests, which can be seen whenever the pro-immigration advocate takes the opposite position about a certain middle Eastern nation. This is quite different from the attitude of the White feminist, liberal, or neocon, who promotes his ideology because he personally benefits or because he honestly believes it.

      • “If a woman wants a German man’s protection against migrants, then she should do what is reasonable to secure that. That means getting married, shutting her mouth, cooking and cleaning for her man.”

        Boxer are you really willing to be a slave and bodyguard to a woman, if she lives with you rent free and gives you sex? Cooking and cleaning is a tradcon euphemism for leeching off a man.

        If a woman wants protect for me, she better live in a society where women protect men in return. Women have social power, they are not helpless, they could use that social power to help me.

        I grew up in children’s homes, I was abused by my mother, that child abuse was enabled and supported by female social workers. Since women have never protected me, I will never protect a woman, even if she opens her legs for me.

        In fact you are unwittingly encouraging male slavery, this whole keeping women at home and putting them in their place is male ego bullshit, and a sham. All it takes is one call to the police and her fake submission sham is over.

        Cooking and cleaning? I want a society where women pull their weight, and woman can be made to pull their weight that is the annoying thing. Women are more naturally risk adverse than men, so that means social pressure and punishment could work, it is just manginas refuse to punish men, and pass the social costs of women’s behavior onto society and other men.

        • Well said. What has also been mentioned before is that these so-called advantages to having a female live with you (cooking, cleaning) are actually cheaper to simply pay a professional to do (or as I do, perform them yourself). There is also absolutely no way a woman is guaranteed to perform those duties, and indeed most anglo women do not or only do them as long as they need to until they get their foot in the door. A marriage contract also places the man on the hook as a slave for a woman but she is required to do nothing.

          What women and most men want is for women to remain a protected and privileged class while men continue on as lower class citizens that accept the blame for women’s destruction of society. This intense vagina worship and egotism of ‘masculinity’ is why we have the US and UK continually make ever increasing gynocentric laws and absolutely no-one speaks up about it.

          We have laws that compel police to arrest men on the say so of any woman’s whim, even those that have absolutely no evidence to support their claims or those that have been previously proven to be liars to the authorities. This presumes the male is always guilty from the outset and he must prove his innocence – going against everything the US law system stands for. But this outright subversion is tolerated because a vagina said so.

          No women are taking any actions to abolish or protest any of these laws or societies treatment of men so in effect all women are enemies to a male’s wellbeing. Saying a woman deserves protection or a man’s resources in exchange for some sex or a meal is insulting.

        • Dear tamerlame:

          Please see below…

          Boxer are you really willing to be a slave and bodyguard to a woman, if she lives with you rent free and gives you sex? Cooking and cleaning is a tradcon euphemism for leeching off a man.

          I’m more down toward the MGTOW or perhaps PUA end of the scale, than the tradcon one, so, no. My life and lifestyle illustrates the fact that I’m not willing to chain myself to some dopey woman and serve her for the rest of my days.

          HOWEVER

          Most men are not like us (celibate or just playing the field unattached) and never will be. Most men are romantics who will quite willingly go into that slavery and be happy in their misery, provided a few minimal concessions are made on the part of the female party (cooking, cleaning, fidelity — or the plausible illusion of it, etc.)

          As I pointed out, the women in question who complain about being groped in the street have a very simple solution to their problem. They should do what old school women did, and find one of these simps, and be his wife. Problem solved. Unfortunately for them, they don’t even have it in them to do these minimal things. They want to have it both ways, as they usually do. I have little sympathy for them as a result.

          If a woman wants protect for me, she better live in a society where women protect men in return. Women have social power, they are not helpless, they could use that social power to help me.

          On this we’ll never agree. I find women to be utterly worthless re: protection of any sort. Not only do I not want them protecting me, I don’t want them deluding themselves with the idea that they can or should. They’d just get in my way. Women have their charms, and one of the most pronounced is invisibility unless I want them for my own purposes.

          Best,

          Boxer

        • One more thing. If you was falsely accused of rape, you wouldn’t want a big group of women speaking out for you?

          (I know this is theoretical, and women will never do that.)

          Do you deny that women have lots of social power?

        • “I grew up in children’s homes, I was abused by my mother, that child abuse was enabled and supported by female social workers. Since women have never protected me, I will never protect a woman, even if she opens her legs for me.”

          Shhhh!! Don’t try to blog that on the Dalrock blog. You’ll just get attacked with false accusations of thinking that you’re a special snowflake, accused of not knowing that everyone has battle scars, and you need it man up. You’ll get accused of not even trying to get a woman.
          Just like I was on that blog. Someone who goes by the name of Dave on the Dalrock blog did that to me. Instead of asking questions, when I orginally didn’t insult anyone, he goes on a rampage attacking me. I hope that guy reads this and gets his ego hurt since all that guy can do is beat his chest.

          P.S. Boxer has seen me on the Dalrock blog, but I went by a different name. If he asks me who I was, I might reveal my name on the Dalrock blog.

        • Have you compiled all this into your manifesto yet? This is why, while I agree with a lot of what the MGTOWs say, I won’t identify with the movement because it is filled with clowns like this guy.

          “If a woman wants protect for me, she better live in a society where women protect men in return. Women have social power, they are not helpless, they could use that social power to help me.”

          “Social power” what does that even mean? It sounds to me like as meaningless a concept as a “the patriarchy” or “White privilege.” And what kind of “help” are you demanding? Did they refuse to invite you to parties in high school?

          “I grew up in children’s homes, I was abused by my mother, that child abuse was enabled and supported by female social workers. Since women have never protected me, I will never protect a woman, even if she opens her legs for me. ”

          A Black man robbed me! I’m going to make all the members of the Black race pay, even if they are nice to me!

          Even Sigmud (((Freud))) was right twice a day.

          I oppose feminism because it takes away our rights, not because I want to “make the bitches pay.” I’ve always been, on cultural issues, a libertarian. About whether women should be doing more real work, or doing more child-rearing, my philosophy is let people decide on their own, they know how best to run their personal lives, not some resentful guy a thousand miles away. And everyone deserves protection from crime, not just people who behave according to the old testament God’s law in the way I approve.

  8. Dear Black Pill:

    Thanks for bringing this up. I don’t agree with Uncle Herb on everything, but on this I think he was right.

    Stoner With a Boner writes:

    Peeps speculate that Andrew Anglin/Daily Stormer is financed by rich jewish bankers. One interesting observation is that hacker Weev caused a bunch of printers at major universities to print swastika’s. The irony is that someone with his skills could do some serious damage yet he is doing high school pranks. There’s also a video that I think is parody by Murdock. Murdock. It shows these WN’s trying to get into a white paradise. One guy isn’t let in because he is part Irish. They allude to the pseudo science of HBD when Romanian’s get “kicked out of the white race” because their IQ scores drop. It’s pretty funny actually. As I mentioned in another comment where I grew up, people of Irish descent were called Mic’s, Italian’s Daygo’s and Whop’s, etc.etc….

    Marcuse would remind us that even if people like Anglin et. al. are not being directly paid off, they’re being indirectly co-opted. In the old days, a guy like Anglin would have been thrown in jail or exiled. Today, he’s allowed to keep ranting. The system gives him a measure of notoriety, which feeds his ego. He gets dumb aspiring nazi followers who give him money, and in return, the system gets an escape valve which negates the possibility of truly effective action. If people can vent their anger at being ripped off (which is really happening on a huge scale) toward some illusory and ill-defined bogeyman (Jews, Freemasons, etc.) then the status quo doesn’t have to worry so much about people coming after the real culprits. This is what Marcuse referred to when he used the term “one-dimensional”. Most of society’s taboos are simply illusions, and there isn’t really any direct protest any longer that isn’t siphoned off and redirected.

    The system is going to collapse under the weight of its own contradictions anyway. We don’t much need to help it in that regard. If we want to be effective, we should continue to spread the memes that Black Pill is advocating (and Dalrock too). Find something that gives you happiness, and go get it. Try not to give the establishment any money, time or attention (don’t go fight in its stupid wars, either). Concentrate on your own life and you’ll build a microcosm of a healthier replacement that can take over when the structure collapses.

    Regards,

    Boxer

    • The system is going to collapse under the weight of its own contradictions anyway. We don’t much need to help it in that regard. If we want to be effective, we should continue to spread the memes that Black Pill is advocating (and Dalrock too). Find something that gives you happiness, and go get it. Try not to give the establishment any money, time or attention (don’t go fight in its stupid wars, either). Concentrate on your own life and you’ll build a microcosm of a healthier replacement that can take over when the structure collapses.

      Can we really get a healthier replacement? Most people simply aren’t capable of that. Most men would be better off living my life. They would have far fewer problems than they currently do, but they would find my life to be horrific because it lacks women in spite of the freedom and wealth they would have.

      As for Dalrock, he’s just another tradcon.

      • I agree with these two paragraphs in response. Furthermore, the “system” is not necesarily “going to collapse”. The “system” has been in flux for several thousand years and will continue to keep changing.

      • Dear Black Pill:

        Can we really get a healthier replacement?

        I think it’d be hard to envision a moderately stable social structure that was less healthy than the status quo, actually. In any case, Marcuse was a student of Heidegger but he was also a Marxist. They had a lot of funny post-Hegelian ideas about geist and history. Today’s structure will collapse to bring about something more lofty. Whether that’s a true account of historical progression, I don’t know.

        Most people simply aren’t capable of that. Most men would be better off living my life. They would have far fewer problems than they currently do, but they would find my life to be horrific because it lacks women in spite of the freedom and wealth they would have.

        I apologize for taking things in a personal direction, but I’d like to understand what your life consists of. In any event, if you’re talking about lifelong celibacy, then I agree, most men would not have the discipline for it. Next to the biological drives for moment-to-moment survival and drinking water, the drive to have sex is probably the most pronounced.

        I’ll confess to being skeptical that too many men are in that position, though. It’s almost impossible to steer entirely clear of women. Even when I was young, with no car, no job, no money and no prospects, I had women endlessly trying to glom on to me. About once a month I’m offered up no strings sex by someone (usually married) out of the blue. I’m tall, but otherwise no great shakes in the looks department. If women are doing this to me, then hawt dudes get ten times the attention. If I have any devotion to MGTOW, it’s due to introspection about such experiences and the trouble they’ve tended to be, after the initial sex was over. I don’t pretend to resist all of them, though.

        If you’re talking about simply not getting married and not spending any money on women, that’s an increasing trend among men now. Twenty years ago I would have been married, myself. As it is today, I can’t see it.

        As for Dalrock, he’s just another tradcon.

        And his blog is as subversive as yours. Granted, the comments section attracts a lot of dullards, but I don’t think the content of his articles are too far away from those I read here.

        Best,

        Boxer

        • I think it’d be hard to envision a moderately stable social structure that was less healthy than the status quo, actually.

          If we use the past as an example, and we agree that had a “moderately stable” social structure, then it’s all the same. My dad was a mangina, and so were my grandfathers. My grandfathers lived enough of their lives pre-feminism so the problem was around before feminism. You can even see it in movies. I remember watching Rebel Without A Cause, and James Dean’s father was completely under the thumb of James Dean’s mother. Most people think that men were in charge pre-feminism. Rebel Without A Cause predates feminism so it proves that is not the case. One female master was in charge before feminism, a different female master was in charge after feminism started. As far as I can tell, there is no difference so another social structure will just be another female master in charge of everything. I want freedom, but very few men actually want freedom.

          I apologize for taking things in a personal direction, but I’d like to understand what your life consists of.

          No need for an apology. I have never had any women interested in me despite my wealth (and I’m neither short nor ugly either) so if that changes I know such a woman would be scamming me for my money not because she is interested in me. Otherwise, I have no options for sex outside of hookers (assuming my hand doesn’t count). In fact, outside of my family and positions where women are forced to be nice to me, women have been universally hostile to me. I haven’t talked about how I was falsely accused of sexual harassment in the past in a while, but that happened. I don’t feel like rehashing the details, but I never had any interaction with the women who accused me of sexual harassment, so my presence was enough to make them want to lie to force me out of my job. I got lucky and won because like the women in the Jian Gomeshi case, the women were stupid and made a lot of mistakes in their false accusations. (For example, they said I did things on certain days when I wasn’t in the office.) While I did win, even my mom thought that I did something that caused a misunderstanding. Even my own mother wouldn’t fully support me because even she couldn’t stop being all about team woman for a second.

          Overall, my life has been one battle with women after another. I have taken steps to minimize what women can do to me like going from being a regular employee to being self employed consultant running my own business. Sure, I make more money than I ever dreamed possible, but I constantly have to worry that I don’t get entrapped by a woman’s scheme to destroy my life. You could say not all women, which would be valid, if women didn’t immediately support team woman at the drop of a hat.

          Imagine as a teenager or a college student, you were given a choice of two possible lives. In the first option, your life is going to suck. You will be living paycheck to paycheck and so forth. In the second option, you are rich and have a great life with few problems, except that women hate you. You have constantly take steps to protect yourself against women. Despite this, you are better off with the second option than the first. Most men will choose the first option. That is what I meant.

          I don’t know how old you are, but I suspect you are older than me. (I could be wrong). You may not have witnessed how brazen women are getting with their acts of cruelty and evil.

        • ” I’m tall, but otherwise no great shakes in the looks department. ”

          I think tallness is one of the most important factors when it comes to getting sex.

          Seen to many 5.1 women demand 6 foot plus men online.

        • The studies I’ve seen point to muscularity and male body type (waist to chest and shoulder ratio) as the biggest factor to male attractiveness to women. Face comes in highly as well. Height is far down the list. Of course, if women “want it all” in a list of features in men, they will want height as well.

          http://evp.sagepub.com/content/13/3/1474704915604563.full

          http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=psyc_pubs

          http://evp.sagepub.com/content/13/3/1474704915604563.full

        • I’ve seen many cases where an attractive woman is with a lanky or skinny guy of average height and looks combined with low income or job prospects and I do wonder what is going on there.

        • Ergeniz said: “I’ve seen many cases where an attractive woman is with a lanky or skinny guy of average height and looks combined with low income or job prospects and I do wonder what is going on there.”

          Can be lots of things. They’re not really dating but she strings him along. He’s a place-holder orbiter and she doesn’t like to be alone. The child tagging along is actually fathered from another man and you can’t tell just by seeing them in public not knowing the whole story. She’s got several guys on the side. There are not enough attractive men to go around. It takes time to get to meet new people, even for attractive women. He might be low-income but inherit a house free-and-clear. Etc. etc.

      • “They would have far fewer problems than they currently do, but they would find my life to be horrific because it lacks women in spite of the freedom and wealth they would have”.

        This is the crux of the issue. Most men will easily forgive and forget in regards to women after the collapse and as seen now the majority of males prefer to give up their freedom in exchange for having a woman near them. It seems most males lack the motivation or drive to achieve anything besides the minimum (if that) without a female to function as a carrot and stick.

        Accepting this is why I am pessimistic about the future. When you look at why men date and marry single mothers or older/fat women all this makes sense. I get the feeling most men would become suicidal if they were prevented from ever being with a woman. Its pathetic, but its how it is.

        Dalrock being married himself told me all I needed to know about him.

        • Most men will easily forgive and forget in regards to women after the collapse and as seen now the majority of males prefer to give up their freedom in exchange for having a woman near them. It seems most males lack the motivation or drive to achieve anything besides the minimum (if that) without a female to function as a carrot and stick.

          And they are giving up wealth too. If you free yourself from women you can pretty quickly become a millionaire.

          Accepting this is why I am pessimistic about the future. When you look at why men date and marry single mothers or older/fat women all this makes sense.

          If the tiny fraction of men who get it can escape then there is hope. This would mean colonizing another planet. Women and manginas are already scared that this will happen because they’re worried about things like #GamerGate organizing colonization missions to Mars (with the help of Elon Musk).

          I get the feeling most men would become suicidal if they were prevented from ever being with a woman. Its pathetic, but its how it is.

          This is why the Pak colonization mission that created the Ringworld in Larry Niven’s Known Space Universe always ends up being such a great metaphor. The Pak on that colonization mission forced themselves to go without contact with breeders (women), but half of the Pak couldn’t do it. Some tried to break into the sealed part of the ship where the breeders were and got executed for violating their colonization compact. The rest of them stopped moving without breeder contact which is how Pak commit suicide. The Pak that survived the trip no longer had any need for breeder (female) contact so they were better off.

  9. Sorry if this is a little off-topic, but every time I see the term “white vagnia worshipping nationalists”, I’m a little confused: are these people nationalists who worship white vagina, white nationalists who worship vagina, or nationalists who are white and worship vagina?

    • I’m not black pill but I think it’s a funny and basically accurate view of the more lockstep WN. If you talk to them for any length of time, you’ll get the sense that “the white race” is a procedural analogy for “white cunt”. They admit as much in their campy slogans, to wit:

      That the beauty of the white Aryan woman shall not perish from the earth

      We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children

      These are direct and indirect references to women which they chant as mantras, whenever they’re questioned.

      Even a casual viewer will note that there’s nothing especially spectacular about white chicks. They cause just as much trouble as black and Asian chicks, they’re just as expensive, their antics are just as time-consuming.

      I have no problem with white nationalists (or black nationalists, or Asian nationalists) but if they want to glorify their people, they’ll put women on the back burner, and start accomplishing meaningful things in the real world. Having a bunch of kids with some mediocre woman isn’t some great achievement. It’s the easiest thing in the world. Animals reproduce all the time. Ironically, if these WN types would quit worrying about filling an already overpopulated world up with more hungry children, they’d free themselves up to accomplish something useful and actually be a credit to their people.

      Boxer

      • I guess I’ve never really noticed much of a white nationalist presence in the “manosphere” or “incelosphere”. I have noticed a lot of black-centric commentary in these areas, usually around the central theme of black women and their problems, but as you said, no race of women has a monopoly on the shortcomings of 21st century women generally, nor is any race immune from it. American blacks generally tend to be somewhat black-centric, seeing most everything in life through the lens of race, the reasons of which are another discussion. I will say though that black men seem to make up the majority of the best commentators on these subjects.

        As for white nationalists, they’re all talk because they can’t preserve the white race no matter what they say. White people all over the world, in Europe and in the Americas, are actually dying out. Their birth rate is far below the 2.1 replacement level just about everywhere. The only reason that the overall population continues to increase is because of Latinos, and especially Muslims, who tend to breed like rabbits. In order to preserve the white race, white nationalists would have to be able to keep their women as caged-up baby mills like they do in Islamic cultures, but they can’t beat back or even slow down the anti-fertility epidemic of feminism in white culture, so everything they talk about it fantasy and is a waste of time to even acknowledge.

    • “White vagina worshiping nationalist” is a term I came up with for white nationalists. As Boxer pointed out, “white vagina worshiping nationalist” is a procedural analogy for white cunt. It is a reminder that white nationalism is all about white cunt. White men do not benefit from white nationalism.

  10. Stoner you say.

    “Unfortunately, if they are like the “libertarian” “tough guys” at Shedding of the Ego, they will probably say that they go and teh’ wimminz beg them for bareback but they are a little afraid of spermjacking. Sorry to say, allot of “MGTOW” these daze sound like alter riechies with a dash of PUAtard…”

    then you post.

    “passive aggressive? name names???

    okay, Judgy Bitch….

    https://stonerwithaboner.wordpress.com/2014/11/16/traditionalist-women-have-no-part-in-any-self-respecting-mens-movement/

    and, ironically there is a nice tie in as the youtube vid has William Buckley…

    I didn’t name names as awhile back Mr. Black Pill asked that I use archive.is when linking to questionable sources. And I most certainly consider Judgy Bitch a questionable source.

    And, no, it isn’t a slight disagreement, it is close to 180 degrees. I’ve said many times that I actively hope AVfM fails as it is doing more harm than good. Is that passive aggressive enough for ya???”

    So you name drop shedding of the ego, and then you ramble on about AVFM? Talk about non sequitur.

    • Hey Penis Breath,

      the formatting showed you were attacking my comment about AVfM, (and I stand by what I’ve said.)

      If you want me to name names….

      Cake Griffin is a total Pussy Addict.

      Tim is a closet white nationalist

      Andy is the communist conspiracy theory guy.

      And don’t get me started on your boy who says that 18 yr old men shouldn’t vote.

      But now I gave you EXACTLY what you want. You can post this comment on sheddingoftheego and say SWAB is a back biting bitch, look how he slanders men behind their back where they are unable to reply. You are using the exact same tactics as slimebag Clarence in Baltimore….

  11. This comment is insane.

    “boydoesntmeetgirl says:
    April 17, 2016 at 11:23 pm
    Good article, but the problem is that it comes mostly from known leftist sources that have turned spin into an art form. I don’t buy it. My comments stand.”

    He doesn’t just post waffle about Muslim women being baby factories in Muslim societies, he contradicts himself in the same post.

    He says the article is great, and then claims it is invalid because it is leftist, so his comments still stand. Boydoesntmeetgirl is a WN mental defect.

    Women have babies when they can be used as hostages and it is to their benifit to enslave men. Women in Afghanistan send their 8 year old sons to work in mines in Iran and send the money back to them. Yet all that this WN can do is waffle on about female oppression in the middle east, and remove agency from women.

    Look at Turkey with their lower birth rates than Sweden. Birth rates by all women in first world countries drop, this applies to all religions full stop. This is a fact, waffling on about leftist media will not change this fact of reality.

    • You’re calling me a white nationalist? I’m not sure where you’re getting that, but the way you are overreacting about my comments on Islamic cultures is the kind of reaction you usually only see from Muslims.

      Are you a Muslim?

      • Are you mentally ill and paranoid?

        I am asking that, because you have to be to assume someone has to be a Muslim to challenge your blatant bullshit.

        Muslim women are not forced to be anything, stop chatting shit, and using feminist narratives against other groups of men you do not like.

        • I’m not asking that to challenge what you are saying – are you calling me a white nationalist to challenge what I’m saying? I’m just asking because it’s usually Muslims who tend to fly off the handle in defense of Islam, in denial of some very obvious aspects of hardcore Islamic culture.

          So, are you a Muslim? Don’t worry – answering won’t change the facts. I just want to hear a yes or no, because I’m curious.

        • I am not defending Islam mental defect.

          I am not in denial mental defect. You are spreading the same brainless lies about the middle east everyone else spreads. You should know better.

          Mentally ill WN’s compartmentalize facts they do not agree with as defending Islam.

          I am not flying off the handle, i am calling you a mental defect because you clearly are one.

        • Well, you actually are defending Islam. When I criticize something, and then you argue against my criticisms and post cherry-picked contradictory factoids, that’s defending. That alone doesn’t make you Muslim, but you are definitely defending Islam.

          By the way, you haven’t given me an answer as to whether you yourself are Muslim or not.

          It also seems that you hypocritically “compartmentalize” facts you do not agree with as white nationalism, something you keep trying to project onto me for some reason. Unlike you with the question of Islam, I can and do tell you unequivocally that I am not a white nationalist.

        • Of course you’ll be able to point to examples of feminsim in the Mideast, and feminists talking about the Mideast, but that doesn’t give us the big picture. It’s quite obvious to everyone that the more of an Islamic stranglehold on a given place, the more women are caged up and treated like livestock.

          On the whole, western feminists only talk about the problems in the Mideast as a passing concern, but focus on hen-pecking and micromanaging men in their own countries. All you have to do is look at videos of Lauren Southern and Milo Yiannopolous holding up signs at slutwalks, charging that Islamic cultures are true rape cultures, and see the reactions they get. The women at those slutwalks can’t handle the truth about how they blatantly turn a blind eye to what happens in Islamic theocracies.

          You would have to be living in a blind rage dream world, or be an angry and defensive Muslim yourself, to deny that females are treated as captives, property and livestock in strict Islamic theocracies. That’s not feminist propaganda – that’s obvious to everyone outside the grip of ISIS, the Muslim Brotherhood, the Taliban, et al.

        • “Of course you’ll be able to point to examples of feminsim in the Mideast, and feminists talking about the Mideast, but that doesn’t give us the big picture. It’s quite obvious to everyone that the more of an Islamic stranglehold on a given place, the more women are caged up and treated like livestock. ”

          Okay you are a feminist troll.

          “You would have to be living in a blind rage dream world, or be an angry and defensive Muslim yourself, to deny that females are treated as captives, property and livestock in strict Islamic theocracies. That’s not feminist propaganda – that’s obvious to everyone outside the grip of ISIS, the Muslim Brotherhood, the Taliban, et al.”

          MUH WOMYN ARE VICTIMS!

          you retard, men are tapped by the gender roles they have to perform for women in the middle east, you are such a woman worshipper, that you do not see the far greater male suffering.

          Women are not fucking caged like animals in the middle east, you have to be mentally ill to use that hysterical language.

          Women are more risk avoidant than men, and in poor economic conditions they like rigid gender roles that protect them.

          In richer Islamic countries women are not really restricted at all. Look at Iran for an example a country where 5000 men are in prison due to not paying their mehrieh debts that all married men are placed under. You should do some research.

          You have no excuse for repeating feminist lies about Islamic cultures.

          Mental defect I hate Islamic culture as it is a highly misandric religion.

          The way you are banging on about my anger, I think you must be projecting or something.

        • You know it really amazes me how people can become so committed to a personality cult or doxy that they lose all ability to have independent thought. I’m glad I never got to the point in my incel/MGTOW/anti-feminism career that I couldn’t even recognize the conditions women live in under strict Islamic societies as bad.

          Hey, there was a guy named Ted Bundy who raped and murdered several women back in the ’70s. I think that he was wrong for doing this. Does that make me a feminist troll?

          In strict Sharia-imposed places — places like Afghanistan, ISIS-controlled territory and post-Arab Spring Egypt — life probably sucks for everyone, male and female, in many ways. This doesn’t mean that women aren’t effectively caged up and treated as baby mills. This is not so much the case in more developed places like Iran and Turkey, but to point to places like that doesn’t contradict anything I said because my original example was about “Islamic cultures”, meaning strictly Islamic and Sharia rather than somewhat secular albeit officially Islamic with a Muslim majority.

          I don’t think anyone believes that you aren’t angry.

      • BTW I have been around muslim women, only a retard would consider Muslim women caged.

        you make the classic mistake of assuming that the cultural practices women demand and women collectively enforce on other women who do not comply as something men do to women.

        • Why don’t you tell us about your experience with Islam? Since you can’t seem to give a yes or no answer to your own Islamic affiliation or not, why not tell us where you met these Muslim women? Tell us how you know that all of the news and government reports, actual footage and testimony from escaped women are all lies and conspiracy. Don’t say “research” either, because you claim to have been around Muslim women.

  12. On this we’ll never agree. I find women to be utterly worthless re: protection of any sort. Not only do I not want them protecting me, I don’t want them deluding themselves with the idea that they can or should. They’d just get in my way. Women have their charms, and one of the most pronounced is invisibility unless I want them for my own purposes.

    Dear Boxer

    Women are useless? How did they manage to nag the state into giving them so much? Women have social power, they are just too selfish to use it for the collective good. Under estimating women and expecting nothing from them is the problem.

    Women are more risk adverse, so the very men who refuse to see women nothing more than children are contributing to the problem. Women can be made to behave, they can be made to act for the greater good, if only men where willing to put pressure on them to do so.

    Your support of the old roles are a dead end. If some woman attaches herself to a brainless traditional white knight, she is still a menace and a pest to me and other men.

    Men can get sex without protecting and providing for them, this has nothing to do celibacy.

    I do believe women should be kept out of the way as well. They should be barred from certain fields, but they should still be expect to pull their weight in other ways. If not women should be left to die in the gutter, sex is not a good enough reason to keep them around. Cooking and cleaning? Nope, not enough to live off a man rent free. Also the woman cooking and cleaning can use the state to kick the man out after she is bored pretending to be submissive.

    Women should do the work they are able to do. Women should be expected to protect kids, and do stuff to help vulnerable men. If women can’t be made to contribute more to society, they should be replaced by artificial wombs completely. If men are not able to learn about female nature, and keep on simping for them, I will just walk away and let men suffer the fate they deserve.

    I do not think women are completely useless, they act useless because men are willing to bear the social costs of their bad behavior.

  13. Why do WN’s troll your blog? Maybe it’s because you go far beyond the legitimate grievances men have against feminism and promote hatred against women. This attracts the most bigoted of commenters, who then wonder why if it’s okay to hate women because of feminism it’s not okay to hate Blacks because of crime or Jews because of alleged “subversion.”

    The neocons have a similar response, horrified whenever a commenter talks about Mexicans or Jews the way that neocons talk about Muslims.

    • “Maybe it’s because you go far beyond the legitimate grievances men have against feminism and promote hatred against women”.

      Its considered ‘going beyond legitimate grievances’ when men exhibit hatred against women…despite the fact it was women that promoted hatred against men in the first place. Women doing so is simply ‘misguided’ or the result of subversion but men doing it is ‘going overboard’ and clearly an outrage.

      Women and feminism go hand in hand. They actively go out of their way to harm men, create laws that oppress men and on top of that, demand men feel guilty for (largely imagined) past injustices while insisting we continue to forcefully hand over our wealth and place ourselves in mortal danger. All the while continuing to shit on us. Funny, I haven’t seen men do any of these things against women.

      You are a massive hypocrite.

  14. Racial supremacists are really some of the biggest gynocentric faggots.

    WP Fag: “That’s what you get for raping white women.”

    Me: “Most rape accusations are false these days, especially if they’re by a white female.”

    WP Fag: “No they’re not. It’s no secret. It’s written in the black males DNA to rape white women. That’s why the kkk was started. To combat the black male on white female rape epidemic.”

    • Do you have any evidence that white women are more likely to lie about rape?

      A lot of “anti-racists” are staunchly opposed to unsupported generalizations about an entire race, unless the race you’re talking about is whites. I’m not a white nationalist(I’m 3/4 white and 1/4 Asian) but I think a lot of white nationalism is a reaction against these kind of blatant double standards.

  15. Looks like white nationalist Trumpsters are mostly in denial about their messiah being bankrolled by that very Zionist demon himself Sheldon Adelson! Different WNs are reacting to it differently. A few of the columnists in Occidental Observer have saw the writing on the wall and admitted they worshipped a false God. But some like Unz.com writers such as Steve Sailer and other anti semitic crackpots have simply implemented a blackout on this issue. I did quite a few searches on this story on their sites but couldnt find anything. A bit odd seeing how they were reporting with breathless reverence every fart and belch emanating from Trump during the primary season.
    Looks like a good number of these clowns are secretly weeping in their pillows that Trump is a “Zionist stooge” like all others in the end. Trump has been scamming and conning people through out his entire life,why should this lot be treated differently. WN and conspiracy theorists as BP pointed out, despite their bizarre claims that they are enlightenend(Im sorry- Dark Enlightened) and sophisticated ,are incredibly naive and foolish.
    They got rolled and how! Oh , Trump was and remains a tool but I do appreciate him trolling those who believed his shtick. He and his idiot followers(WN or otherwise) deserve each other.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s