72 comments on “Massive Rationalizations

  1. On one level, it’s a bit sad when someone can’t break through their own mental prisons. It’s a form of compassion, however, to keep telling them the truth because some, however few in number they may be, do end up waking up.

    Recently, I’ve been increasingly aware of how writers like Rollo Tomassi are leading men astray with false Alpha / Beta and Feminine Imperative narratives because these false ideas also feed the sense of inadequacy felt by men who are wrapped up in begging for scraps from women.

  2. I know I left allot of links on your last post like a cuck’d spamgina…

    however, resubmitting as they may be relevant….

    https://archive.is/l2Doo

    http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=74976

    remember to “men” like Clarence in Baltimore and Cuck cRudd, Sailerfraud is some kind of God. He makes their waccizm seem scientific ™

    Now, why is this relevant????

    The nutters like Andre Anglin and Jack Off Don-0-van are quite easy to dismiss but the “moderate” nutterz are good wordsmiths and try to pass off their ideas where they won’t be scrutinized.

    Why is this of relevance?

    We have already seen this with feminism.

    It is quite easy to dismiss the Kill All Men feminists but when you fight the “moderate” feminist’s like Hugo Schwyzer and Amanda Marcotte, you will be called a “bigot” at cesspits like The Good Chump Project. The “moderate” feminists hide behind things like “rape culture” and show skeevy Roosh V as an example of how bad things are.

    • I used to enjoy reading Sailer despite his seemingly benign watered down avuncular racism. He was quite interesting and perceptive on his own blog but since he migrated to unz.com he gave up any pretense of objectivity and went full on white supremacist. And after he jumped on the Trump bandwagon, he has become quite intolerable. Most of the good commenters have either fled or been blacklisted by Sailer because they routinely exposed WNs as fools and frauds.

  3. off topic, but finally a liberal who doesn’t have his head completely up his ass:

    “Finally, do not discount the electorate’s ability to be mischievous or underestimate how any millions fancy themselves as closet anarchists once they draw the curtain and are all alone in the voting booth. It’s one of the few places left in society where there are no security cameras, no listening devices, no spouses, no kids, no boss, no cops, there’s not even a friggin’ time limit. You can take as long as you need in there and no one can make you do anything. You can push the button and vote a straight party line, or you can write in Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck. There are no rules. And because of that, and the anger that so many have toward a broken political system, millions are going to vote for Trump not because they agree with him, not because they like his bigotry or ego, but just because they can. Just because it will upset the apple cart and make mommy and daddy mad. And in the same way like when you’re standing on the edge of Niagara Falls and your mind wonders for a moment what would that feel like to go over that thing, a lot of people are going to love being in the position of puppetmaster and plunking down for Trump just to see what that might look like. Remember back in the ‘90s when the people of Minnesota elected a professional wrestler as their governor? They didn’t do this because they’re stupid or thought that Jesse Ventura was some sort of statesman or political intellectual. They did so just because they could. Minnesota is one of the smartest states in the country. It is also filled with people who have a dark sense of humor — and voting for Ventura was their version of a good practical joke on a sick political system. This is going to happen again with Trump.”

    http://michaelmoore.com/trumpwillwin/

    • I agree. A rare moment of perception and common sense from the otherwise ignorant and loathsome Moore

        • If Trump gets elected that’s guaranteed to happen. Does anyone think Trump gives a shit about the alt-right, if he’s even heard of it? The bigger problem is that Trump gets elected and then shits on everyone. (Or appears to do so because he’s in over his head or otherwise can’t deliver.) That is the worst of all possibilities situation because whoever is next will be much more hardcore than Trump.

      • A lot of people say so, and I find all those people can never provide examples.

        “The great question that has never been answered, and which I have not yet been able to answer, despite my thirty years of research into the feminine soul, is ‘What does a woman want?'”

        • What does a woman want? More.

          The complete and utter lack of profundity in the feminine mind – the mind of emotion, elation and happiness as opposed to the masculine mind of form, line and logic – seems difficult to notice because people don’t want to think that the finer qualities they project onto women are not merited.

          As for Freud:

          Was Sigmund Freud a quack?

          http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2468/was-sigmund-freud-a-quack

          The answer is that what he did was not science but he presented it as science and not as philosophy.

        • TheGreatSheBang:

          I read the article, which didn’t really contain a specific critique of Freud. Freud was writing, mind you, in the 19th Century, when all “science” was tied up with philosophy — and as we know it, science had yet to really be born (the first guy to note this was probably Heidegger in ‘The End of Philosophy and The Task of Thinking’ written in mid 20th century).

          Boxer

        • Boxer:

          Freud had a successful career promoting his ideas which were results of investigations that were not uncommon – hundreds of doctors and “scientists” were studying the “unconscious” at the time. Bringing his ideas “forward” into modern science has its difficulties.

          I looked for a free summary article, that’s why it is a bit thin. I have a book critique of Freud from my undergrad days around here somewhere.

          Here’s another free one:

          Why Freud Was Not a Scientist
          Real Clear Science

          http://www.realclearscience.com/blog/2015/04/freud_was_mostly_a_fraud.html

          Whereas a full article on Freud is usually behind a paywall.

          The Verdict on Freud
          Psychology Science Journal

          http://pss.sagepub.com/content/7/2/63.abstract

        • I actually met Fredrick Crews (the author of the paper at your second link). Again, these are interesting essays, but they don’t support the notion that Freud was a fraud. To do that, they’d at least have to quote something specific Freud wrote, and give evidence that he wrote it in bad faith. There isn’t any specific exegesis of Freudian theory here.

          I respect people who don’t like the man (most of the people who really hate Freud are feminists, which probably biases me in the opposite direction). Unlike many of these people, I have actually read his work. It’s easy to say he was objectively wrong about many things (the entire text of Moses and Monotheism has been historically disproven, for instance) but it’s another thing entirely to say he was “a fraud”. There’s a much higher threshold for that accusation.

          Best,

          Boxer

        • “A lot of people say so, and I find all those people can never provide examples.”

          Lots of example to provide,

          Also a lot of what Sigmund says is unfalsifiable bullshit.

        • Lots of example to provide

          Yet, you guys aren’t providing any. You’re just repeating the same claims over and over. 🙂

          Also a lot of what Sigmund says is unfalsifiable bullshit.

          From our perspective, that’s certainly true. The same can be said for Newton, Darwin, Einstein and anyone else who wrote 100+ years ago.

        • Boxer to compare Sigmund to Newton, Darwin, and Einstein is laughable. Newton was quickly put to the test through observation, Darwin was proven right through the discovery of DNA, and Einstein was quickly tested soon after his theories came out. as time goes along Freud gets even more ad more debunked. His theories have been floating about for 100 years now.

          Freud is about a valid as Game PUA it is up to followers of Freud to prove their assertions.

          The false memory syndrome thing came from believers in Freud.

        • Dear tamerlame:

          Please see inside text…

          Boxer to compare Sigmund to Newton, Darwin, and Einstein is laughable. Newton was quickly put to the test through observation, Darwin was proven right through the discovery of DNA, and Einstein was quickly tested soon after his theories came out.

          You’ve never really read any of these thinkers, have you?

          Darwin, Newton and Einstein all stumbled along, making objective mistakes as they went (human speciation, spatial absolutism, unified field theory) that ideologues castigate them for — despite important work in the process. That’s really the story of scientific and philosophical progress.

          as time goes along Freud gets even more ad more debunked. His theories have been floating about for 100 years now.

          Well, we’ll have to agree to disagree on this. Good talking to you!

        • “You’ve never really read any of these thinkers, have you?
          Darwin, Newton and Einstein all stumbled along, making objective mistakes as they went”

          They made mistakes, and offered stuff that could be tested.

          Freud just pulled shit out of his ass.

          Using your logic we should accept PUA because they make mistakes? Wot?

          Can you point to me to something valid Freud did?

        • “You’ve never really read any of these thinkers, have you?2

          I have read Darwin, I have read the life history of Newton and Einstein. I am not one of those idiots who can be derailed by bringing up irreverent points. Do I have to of read Principia Mathematica. to call bullshit on your semantic games and deflections?

        • Your claim that there are “never” or “never any” or can “never provide” examples falls quiet flat.

          I am not calling Freud a “fraud” although some of the links I posited asked that question because that is what is readily available to link to but that is not necessarily the claim nor the conclusion. And a lot of academics are not calling Freud a “fraud.” They point that his work has turned out to be a kind of dead-end and are moving on from it and not looking back to it. And that’s it and the sensible view, in my opinion.

          I admit that some academics are trying to make career and sell books by calling Freud a fraud. But they’re wasting their time because it is clearly their intent to do so.

          Do you think his work has validity at present? And if so, it is up to you and the Freudians to continue support his claims.

        • thegreatshebang:

          I want to be clear here that I’m not trying to be rude. I don’t care what you think of Freud, but I think if you want to make an argument, you should make it logically.

          Let me make this simple: To indulge in this sort of argument, you need to provide a quote from one of Freud’s published works, then point out the contextualized fallacies inherent within. You haven’t done this, nor has any of the authors of the third-party essays.

          It’s fine to not like Freud’s work or its implications, but when you make the sorts of allegations you’ve made here (fraud, dead-end, etc.) you should be specific.

          Best,

          Boxer

        • Do you think his work has validity at present? And if so, it is up to you and the Freudians to continue support his claims.

          There’s a really old concept that I once saw on a stele from Classical Rome. It said something on the order of the burden of proof is upon he who asserts. It’s the same concept we learn as kids in our society: innocent ’til proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, etc.

          The fact that you don’t seem to understand this concept is disturbing to me. You will be a much better writer if you internalize it.

          If you claim that something is fraudulent, it isn’t for your intellectual opponent to simply take you at your word and defend whatever position you’ve declared a fraud. It’s your job to back up your contentions with your own evidence. This means providing examples from original source material, then illustrating where the sources contain fallacies, providing counterexamples, etc..

          A good example of well-constructed arguments exists in the articles here, on Omega Virgin Revolt. I don’t agree with all of them, but they’re all well-written and well-presented, linear and structurally coherent. You could do worse than studying some of them to get a feel for what I’m talking about.

          Best,

          Boxer

        • And I still claim I never said Freud was a fraud. I claim I never said it and I claim I am not saying it now.

          Here below is yet another article WITH quotes from FREUD.

          Critique of Psychoanalysis.
          John F. Khilstrom
          Berkeley University

          http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~kihlstrm/PersonalityWeb/Ch8CritiquePsychoanalysis.htm

          You have no idea what I have or have not internalized about logical arguments and should not, by your own admission, discuss things you do not know.

          What I do know is that a good number of people in the academic community are not interested in looking at Freud as science TODAY and his theories are rapidly, if not already, being placed in the realm of psuedo-science.

          Here is a review with research links in the bibliography. See step 5 for the current view on Freud.

          Stanford University Encyclopedia of Philosophy
          Science and Pseudo-science

          http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pseudo-science/

          As far as an Internet discussion goes on a comments section, I’m only going to take a few minutes and then move to other matters and I certainly allow the right for you to do so yourself.

          Therefore, I concede that most people you will encounter on this, or any other matter, won’t provide quotes, source material, arguments, proofs, or evidence and will only provide spurious claims. But whether anyone investigates them further is another matter.

          I for one, don’t care if you provide links to recent articles that will rehabilitate Freud. But I for one don’t think that these prestigious academics would all but place Freud as a “dead-end” if they had accepted some claims and rejected others.

        • “Again, these are interesting essays, but they don’t support the notion that Freud was a fraud. To do that, they’d at least have to quote something specific Freud wrote, and give evidence that he wrote it in bad faith.”

          No we do not have to prove that, we are talking about his ideas, you are moving the goalposts, I don’t want to be rude, but on this issue you are full of shit, and acting like the typical Freudian cultist.

          We do not have to disprove a negative, you have to prove that Freud is relevant, or Freud can be dismissed out of hand.

          Freudian theories belong in the dust bin of history.

    • Dear Tamerlame:

      No we do not have to prove that, we are talking about his ideas, you are moving the goalposts, I don’t want to be rude, but on this issue you are full of shit, and acting like the typical Freudian cultist.

      We do not have to disprove a negative, you have to prove that Freud is relevant, or Freud can be dismissed out of hand.

      You’ve repeated these sentiments multiple times, over the course of a month. I already understand your contentions.

      Freudian theories belong in the dust bin of history.

      You’ve never read any of his work, so you really wouldn’t know.

      I don’t waste time debating ideologues who don’t know what they’re talking about, so again (and again, and again) it was a good discussion, but we’re going to have to agree to disagree.

      Take Care,

      Boxer

  4. The people who used the word cuck are overwhelmingly Trump supporters so we have to assess why that is , in order to get to the root of the problem -jobs and women ie those resources which men covet the most.

    Keep in mind most of this lot are addicting to Doomsday porn. Their cultural guru is Pat Buchanan and the economic shepherd is the comical Tyler Durden from Zerohedge.com who has been predicting a great depression every 3 months since 2009.

    While the economy is far from ideal and yes a lot of jobs are lot in outsourcing, in reality Americans have a net job growth due insourcing from Germany and Japan. And before the oil prices took a hit- very high paying jobs were to be had in North Dakota and Texas.

    It is just that the manufacturing jobs have shifted to states that are free from union interference and so the south and south west is today what Michigan and Ohio were till the early 1970s.

    So much for jobs but what of these black and Arab studs stealing those hot white women who rightfully belong to Trump boot lickers Matt Forney , Roosh and the like? (please reserve your laughter till end of this post)

    Well according to the Pew Research Poll, white women marry out approximately the same rate as white men approx- 7%. While Asian women marry out at an astonishing 35% vs 17% for Asian men. And it seems most of these Asian women are marrying white men.

    http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/06/12/interracial-marriage-who-is-marrying-out/

    So what exactly are these self described cuck busters complaining about?

    I see them roughly of these economic strata- The middle class and the working class.
    A guy earning 40,000$ doesnt really envy a guy earning 4 billion $ but the guy earning 400,000 $ as he likely more to rub shoulders with this sort. Also billionaires ideologies being endlessly malleable(Donald Trump was a Democrat and Bloomberg was once a Republican) , it is hard to pin them down and hence one tends to projects ones images (good or bad) on to them. This is less the case with the guy owning $400,000. A lot of white guys who went to good colleges and took the right courses are unable to get out of the <100,000$ bracket and feel that others such as Jews, Indians, Asians and Arabs who tend to have higher median income than whites have got way because they rigged the system. I put Steve Sailer (MBA from UCLA) and that deranged Jewish paleocon Lion of the Blogosphere(JD from University of Arizona) in this category. Despite their shrieks against elitism, they practically worship anyone who graduated from an Ivy League school and are obsessed with elitist past times and hobbies such as private jets and golf resorts.
    Their envy and resentment is so intense its almost tangible.

    As for the working classes, to be fair to them, for this post I am considering mostly union members who hate the free market, merit based promotions, competition and wages based on performance than seniority.
    Pretty much all paleocon cuckbusters have a hard on for unions because it protected dim witted whites from the big bad world of consumer choice. Be American , buy American sounds downright comical in a global economy. Some people simply dont understand opportunity costs and comparative advantages. Econ 101!

    I saw Mike Rowe talking about how there is a shortage of carpeters, electiricans ,plumbers with salaries ranging from $80,000 to $200.000 depending on work experience. It is then I realized that a good chunk of white America had become quite classist. What else posseses them to go into debt to take Art History courses and work at Starbucks as opposed to making a good living at pest control- the former option involves penury but status and latter is lucrative but low class.

    A lot of these kids are off spring of the working class who think their destiny lies elswhere. For them Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump economic nationalism in inherently inter changeable.

    So all in all, the whites are not really suffering that much at all . Its all a matter of perspective and their aspirations. For those who feel that 7% of women marrying out is intolerable but A OK for 35% of Asian American women to marry whties(look at the self serving and hypocritical rationalizations of the poster aptly named Trump Fan) are ironically the ones who feel whites are being cucked. And why is that -well they are most likely getting no or mediocre white women and non white men of similar social strata(non ghetto black men, Arab American and Indian American men) clean up with white women. I have seen this myself. A guy who feels cucked doesnt wish to declare himself so , so he castigates an entire sub community of his race and states that they are cucked. After all misery loves company!

    • “well they are most likely getting no or mediocre white women and non white men of similar social strata(non ghetto black men, Arab American and Indian American men) clean up with white women”.

      As you reported with your 7% marriage stat above, by and large marrying out is very rare; white women tend to stick to their own. Again, the highest out rate is white male/Asian female. I should note don’t have a stake in this fight on personal level (I’m a virgin and plan to remain as such; don’t date being one reason) but I notice the hypocrisy of those that speak against interracial; using such derogatory terms such as ‘mudsharking’, etc but nothing is said as such when Asian women happily leave their men in the cold to do the same. Inverted, women of other races are considered ’empowered’ to do similar but the men are shamed as betrayers to their race.

      That said, I do admit these types do bring valid points such as the massive crime rate with blacks and other problems. Many blacks refuse to acknowledge these issues and instead fall back on the scapegoat of ‘white oppression’. These excuses allow them to have excellent projection to permit them to continue their bad behavior while still complaining about their lack of equality. This is unacceptable and state of predominately black cities such as Detroit is irrefutable evidence of this.

      I also replied to you before that all this ‘cleaning up’ black/arabs/asian men do with other races seems to be restricted to obese/older/fat white women. What I find so strange about this shaming concerning interracial is that white women are extremely xenophobic in regards to dating; this concern seems unwarranted. Not counting the fat and/or unattractive ones, but being supremacists they should not be concerned about these types being ‘taken’ regardless.

      • “That said, I do admit these types do bring valid points such as the massive crime rate with blacks and other problems. Many blacks refuse to acknowledge these issues and instead fall back on the scapegoat of ‘white oppression’. These excuses allow them to have excellent projection to permit them to continue their bad behavior while still complaining about their lack of equality. This is unacceptable and state of predominately black cities such as Detroit is irrefutable evidence of this.”

        The black crime rate is mostly due to cultural and economic aspects rather than racism(by whites) or innate racial characteristics(so called african propensity to violence). Blacks were on the way to becoming a steady, mildly prosperous middle class folk similar to West African black immigrants tend to be in U.S. However their tragedy is that civil rights liberated them at the same time that Great Society and drugs made headway. All this made a potent acid in which their traditional values were dissolved. And of course crank racism from their own lot hasnt helped either. Though I believe as leaders like Sharpton, Jackson etc die off, there are hardly any of their stature who can fan the flames of hatred and seperatism further. So there is hope..

        “I also replied to you before that all this ‘cleaning up’ black/arabs/asian men do with other races seems to be restricted to obese/older/fat white women. What I find so strange about this shaming concerning interracial is that white women are extremely xenophobic in regards to dating; this concern seems unwarranted. Not counting the fat and/or unattractive ones, but being supremacists they should not be concerned about these types being ‘taken’ regardless.”

        I am Indian and have dated attractive white women. But i realize most Indians/Indian Americans do not , thats mostly because they have poor taste in women and their inferiority complexes make them very grateful for any attention from a white chick
        “oh my god dude, that white girl is totally checking me out.”
        “But Vijay that bitch be fat yo! Never mind that – she is white!” .
        Sadly this is the situation with many non white men (even if they are handsome so fat white women often reel in a good catch). I have seen Indian men ditch their attractive Indian girlfriends(heck one of them was a Miss India contestant) to pursue some rogue looking white chick. Similar is the case with Arabs etc.

        But those Arabs, Indians, blacks who are not ghetto /third world and look acceptable and can relate to white subcultures can actually get attractive women. I personally detest most popular culture but have an eclectic sense of humor (I like the old Red Eyes with Gutfeld before he went all corporate) and European and Japanese cinema. This brands me as a sophisticate yet earthy of sorts which I am told is relateable and interesting personality( if I say so myself!). Anyway enough of my self promotion! My point is those minority men who do well with attractive white women need to possess these basic characteristics. I think Assanova, a black guy who used to run a pseudo game blog but hated PUAs, said pretty much the same. His advice to black men looking to bang white women was to take it easy on the cultural blackness and stop hanging out too much with other blacks LOL. I believe him as his blog was mostly common sense (dress well, work out , speak well, smell nice, have money) rather than DHV, sarge, neg and all that crap.

        White supremacists at once wail about minorities taking white women and at the same time mocking those men at bagging only fat women. This tells you all you need to know.

        As BP pointed out Matt Fattyony’s skewering of fat women ties in to the same issues.

  5. Another somewhat OT: It seems that now that Fox News is in full imposion(probably karma due fellating Trump) , Megyn Kelly is likely heading for greener pastures and is eyeing CNN. It then occured to me that Jedidiah Bila, a Fox News “contributor”(what exactly did she contribute beside shapely legs on the leg chair on Red Eye) who would spout generic conservative talking points(oh that “contribution”) has migrated to The Cycle(heh) and then The View and she has adopted her unimaginative conservative talking points to unimaginative conservative lite talking points soon to be right leaning liberal to moderate to….yeah. Similar career arc for another Fox News bimbo SE Cupp. What are the odds that Megyn Kelly will hold on to whatever little “conservative” positions she has on CNN? Not likely. It is only male anchors and talking heads whose ideologies tend to be consistent(whatever they are) but females being herd animals immediately adapt to their sorroundings to play along. Just as females will adapt to to Muslim hordes by serving in their harems instead of saying setting themselves on fire like Hindu women did rather than submit to Muslim lust(this noble act later got perverted into Sati). As ancients recognized that a daughter who married or abducted (often the distinction was a fine one) to another tribe was good as theirs so they tended to honor women who killed themselves rather than live and become part of the enemy in comfort as saints and goddesses. That is because they recognized female nature is to submit to the enemy . So the exceptional cases were given due respect.

    I dont see these conservative women having any principles at all whether paleo or neo. The best example is so called conservative Ann Coulter who shoves RINOs such as Romney, Christie and now Trump down conservative throats. All of these efforts tie into her book sales!

    Either way these women were the polestars of tradcon feminism- the worst and most insidious type of feminism there is. Good riddance to them and that channel

    • Going a bit further off topic, may I ask your opinion on the Europe situation?

      Its obvious the government is purposefully allowing these hordes in to suit their own ends. Why exactly is up to debate; one view by TFM is due to economics – he argues that the migrants are being ushered into the country to cushion the low birthrate problem as well as more potential citizens to contribute taxes (I suppose think of Mexicans in regard to America). However, he doesn’t seem to realize almost all of these types are entirely dependent upon welfare and of course their behavior is degenerate, to say the least. He believes the government’s reasoning is totally based on economics; I just don’t agree.

      That said, the rape reports and statistics are clearly bunk; blown out of proportion in much the same manner as many other reports feminists tend to peddle (think nonsense such as the pay gap and college rape). It also is suspicious that statistics on these supposed assaults and rapes were reported almost immediately following the migrants arrival. I recall seeing absurd nonsense such as Sweden being the rape capital of the world with 1000% increase in rape and similar numbers.

      My personal theory is that the migrants are being allowed in precisely because of their degenerate behavior; they give the government a convenient scapegoat/boogeyman upon which to spew propaganda and redirect the public’s attention from their own corruption. Theantifeminist.com also suggest that the feminists are being outed for their lies on ‘rape culture’ and the supposed degeneracy of their native males so they support the arrival of these migrants so they will provide them with a real rape culture upon which to further their victim mentality.

      Of course, there’s also the theory that women are just shitty and they have sick rape/domination fantasies that European/Western men will not cater to and so gladly welcome third world immigrants to facilitate them. Society and national identity being destroyed in the process being of absolutely no concern to them.

      • I dont think there is really anything too sinister about the European governments with respect to refugees. I think stupidity, general liberal feels than reelz, as well European guilt about colonialsm, Holocaust etc. etc. You mean may where is the logic of allowing millions of anti Semitic Syrians in your country if you feel bad about the Holocaust- well that is where stupidity comes in.

        But in fairness, it was a very unique situation. I think one historian mention that there hasnt this much Middle Eastern infusion of peoples into Europe since the Neolithic age! We all knew Europeans and their governments were an emasculated and feckless people since WWII. What exactly could one expect of them? Round them Semitic peoples ,put them on trains and make them hang around in camps….oh wait….. The few countries which did resist the onslaught of immigrants(Poland, Slovakia and Hungary) by stating bluntly they only wanted Christians themselves have no history of colonialism in the third world therefore feel no guilt whatsoever about standing up for their values.

        As for women, I agree that European women are often quite contemptuous of their men. Heck I had many such women flirt with me directly in front of their husbands or boyfriends while he sits there and shrugs either out of apathy or the tolerance and feminism he prides himself on. I actually think women do this to knock some sense into their men into becoming more possessive and dominant. Failing that , they wouldnt mind having a go at more assertive men. But I dont think the refugees will clean up with native European women due to low economic prospects. Oh sure , quite a few may bang some bored married women “cucking” the husband. But by and large, the intermarriage rate would probably remain the same.

        In France, despite its colonialism, there is very little guilt and self flagellation about their idenity. French christian men marry more Maghrebin Arab women than vice versa and these women usually abandon Islam.

        Similarly in Russia , there is a shortage of men from WWII era and a great influx of central Asian Muslim men but still the out marrying rate is really not that great.

        In West Europe, migrant men are restricted by economic prospects. In Russia due to strong cultural identity.In France due to both.

        • “You mean may where is the logic of allowing millions of anti Semitic Syrians in ”

          Sorry about the stupid typo- it should be

          “you may ask where is the logic of allowing..”

        • ” Holocaust etc. etc. You mean may where is the logic of allowing millions of anti Semitic Syrians in your country if you feel bad about the Holocaust- well that is where stupidity comes in.”

          Perhaps to drain the Syrian army of manpower?

  6. I am likely stating the obvious here, but remember how those guys who were obsessed with HBD were also obsessed with “game” as it was preached by Roosh V/Roissy. Now, it gets clearer, the “game” cucks wanna see other men murdered in war so they can get some. The HBD cucks want to dehumanize other men-remember it is always other men, they would make all kinds of excuses for a white guy with “yellow fever” and they’ll even make rationalizations for a white guy with a “Hailey Berry” type black woman, ie she isn’t ghetto, she hangs out w/ whites, schooled, etc,etc…

    Just like feminist’s they expect one rule set for them and one rule set for everyone not them…

    • A bit off topic.

      Stoner, if this is offensive just disregard…

      I have to ask, you said you were of mixed parentage. Your mother was abusive and you noted she was white, while your father black – was your mother overweight/obese?

      This is something I have heard more and more in this trend lately. It can’t be a coincidence.

      • I’ve never precisely revaeled my mix, not that I would get doxxed or anything, but…

        both my parents hit me, just had to get taken to the hospital a few times after mommy went “mad.” Don’t remember much pain, just blood. I don’t think my mother would count as obese and in fact, considered the area where I grew up, she was “average” but not fit.

        • both my parents hit me, just had to get taken to the hospital a few times after mommy went “mad.” Don’t remember much pain, just blood. I don’t think my mother would count as obese and in fact, considered the area where I grew up, she was “average” but not fit.

          I knew mothers who were much like yours in my youth. The daughters of such women tend to repeat the cycle. The sons of the same women have two basic outcomes. They either retreat into a shell (video games, music, intellectualism, weightlifting/sports) which becomes a substitution for healthy parental involvement, or they become hypersocial, successful, worldly playas. (The second camp can be argued to be a subset of the first, but they’re more holistic in their obsessions, despite not really being any happier, I suspect).

          What’s interesting about your own situation is that your dad stuck around. Most of the kids I am referring to had mothers who drove away their husbands, and the kids suffered as a result from having no permanent father figure at all.

        • my parents were divorced, would see my father some weekends. My sister got her Warmachine BF and wound up in the hospital, pretty brutal, like a bad car wreck. I was option 1, video games, music.

        • I am sorry to hear that. Your mother was quite a piece of work. Mine was too though my abuse was mostly psychological , not so much physical(atleast no more so than the average Indian parents-slaps,whipping with belts etc, that was just meh to me even as a kid) . My initial response was to seek her approval even more as well as my neglectful fathers(who only cared for my sisters). But around age 17 I just stopped caring and started to avoid them as much as could and its then my life took a turn for the better albeit gradually.

          I liked video games and comics like any other kid but my parents never bought me any so I never got into the habit. I was always interested in reading(come to think of it they never bought me books either and they would give away my toys a couple of months after they bought them) .
          So I would borrow books from my friends(oh I would catch hell for that too) and read in secret. Even now as an adult I tend to read under the covers.

          I have a couple of consoles which I bought a couple of years plus a ton of games from youth(Prince of Persia etc) for nostalgia sake. They are still gathering dust. I guess i dont have the patience to see them through.

          Coming back to you, if you were bleeding due to your mother’s tender touch, didnt the hospital inform the authorities. They could probably figure that it was due to abuse. If they had locked her up, would your life had been better.

        • I think it was before mandatory reporting, a few years later my younger cousin got taken to the hospital for a dislocated shoulder and there were allot of questions.

        • “Coming back to you, if you were bleeding due to your mother’s tender touch, didnt the hospital inform the authorities”.

          Men and children are second class citizens in western countries. Women are in such a state of divinity that they can murder men and children and get off scott-free. In the rare cases they get convicted and actually serve time their sentences are laughably brief; a mere slap on the wrist.

          My own mother was more responsible than most and was quite adept at managing money and most affairs. However, our personal relationship was always strained. Being a single parent household my affections to her were magnified and for most of my childhood I grew up as a ‘mama’s boy’. As was par the course for black households, I was witness to a revolving door of boyfriends/lovers and my mother never hesitated to use my father as an example of shaming me whenever my behavior was not to her liking.

          I slowly begin to grow away from her and beginning in high school I became very angry and disobedient as I realized she simply was physically incapable of controlling me any longer (this did not stop her from attempting to use other males to discipline or put me in line by way of proxy). Our problems came to a breaking point when I finally struck her out of anger and she sent me to live with my father and grandfather to teach me a lesson. While I discovered the grass was not greener on the other side (my father being a decidedly despicable character) I did learn from him and my father masculine values and perceptions that my mother was unable to bestow on me. It was as if something clicked in me that summer and I changed rapidly.

          My mother was pleased by my change in behavior and ordered my return to her household which I no longer wished by this point. I continued my years in High School with her, tolerating her new religious zeal; naturally this resulted in her forcefully trying to push it upon me despite my protests.

          Fast forward years later and I have gained my independence. I no longer communicate with my mother and she is effectively cut off from me.

          It is one of the best decisions I have ever made.

        • a few years later my younger cousin got taken to the hospital for a dislocated shoulder and there were allot of questions.

          While outliers exist, the majority of women are essentially unable to raise children past a certain stage of development (age 4-5). The rise of single-mother households correlates so strongly with such a wide range of social pathologies that the daily excuses and coverups (most of which are truly laughable to anyone with a brain) is a testament to human gullibility.

          In the end, you guys are making the best of the usual shit situation. Finding something you enjoy and indulging in it is the best revenge.

          Fast forward years later and I have gained my independence. I no longer communicate with my mother and she is effectively cut off from me.

          It is one of the best decisions I have ever made.

          I haven’t spoken to my own mother since my 18th birthday, except to thank her for her interest and repeatedly ask her not to contact me in the future. I have a sister who follows the same protocol. (Occasionally, she has attempted to send cards and letters, though I think she’s finally getting the message.) Funny to note that she has constructed an elaborate fantasy which she spreads among her neighbors, that I love her dearly but am too busy to ever visit. Whatever works, I suppose. I’m just glad to be rid of her and her looney drama.

          The best revenge is living well.

    • Oh you dont know how hypocritical and self serving white supremacists can get about banging non white women. Of course it all ties in notion of supremacism itself.
      Even as they try to whitewash slavery by making bizarre claims that it wasnt as bad as in Africa and the Arab world (this is false, amongst Arabs a slave couldnt escape slavery by converting to Islam and in Africa ,descendents of slaves didnt remain in servitude , neither was there “Scientific” racism in those countries ), they gingerly ignore the fact the fact that many white men would have sex with slave women.

      But they go into hysterics when say Will Smith or Wesley Snipes have a love scene with a white woman on screen claiming that Hollywood is cucking them or some such rubbish.

      Then again I am reminded of Fred Reeds trip to the white supremacist American Renaissance conference where he pooh poohed the notion that they were racist- why look this attendee has a HIspanic wife, that guy has Korean girlfriend etc. etc.

      I couldnt decide whether to laugh or weep at such stupidity and intellectual dishonesty. But I will say this much- you know they already lost the war when they dont even wish to be called racists or anti Semites( “I dont mind Jews, its just that too many Jews are evil” )So they are reduced to dog whistles such as (((this crap)))

  7. The writer of this blog is a retarded jewish super-virgin incel with tiny cock who’s too stupid to understand the cuckold meme.

    Cuckold = male bitch who takes it up the ass and rationalizes that he loves it. White male democrat voters. Non-jewish Israel-supporters. Europeans who support mass immigration of violent criminal primitive aggresive low-iq muslims. Etc. etc..

    Cuck is an insult to a man’s masculine core.

    Seems like the writer was humilitated by the so called “manosphere” “mra movement” or whatever. And now he seeks revenge by writing some shitty tiny unimportant blog like a butthurt kike-pig.

    • We know what you limp wristed internet storm troopers mean by that lame insult. We just think it reflects more on you than on us. If you werent so retarded , then you wouldve figured it out.

      As for Mossad and 9/11 LOL- I am scared to ask but why would Israel attack a city and building filled with Jews? And no, they werent absent from work that day. That rubbish started because Rosh Hoshannah – a Jewish festival was around the same time though a few days later during which yes a good number of Jews would take the day off. And idiot nazi dick suckers like yourself ran with that stupid narrative.

      Anyway there is no arguing with conspiracy theorist Pat Buchanan ,Donald Trump and Ron Paul taint smoochers. My argument above is strictly for those with an iota on common sense and those who are on the fence with the conspiracy theory nonsense.

    • violent criminal primitive aggresive low-iq muslims. ”

      “violent”,”aggressive” this is exactly what I am talking about. These WNs and their 50 shades of G(r)ay porno fetishes. It was hidden in the remaining words “Criminal”,”primitive” and “low iq” .Im afraid these apply to you. Most neo Nazis out of there are unemployed wannabes and geeks. Even those violent types are no match for Hispanic street gangs and even Jewish Defense League militias who routinely pummel Nazis with baseball bats.

      In Toronto SL Tamils in the early to mid 1990s gave neo Nazis such a thrashing that they kept a low profile ever since.

      You are probably jacking off while reading this…. As your current messiah Trump would say- SAD!

    • This is the post that gives on giving. These WNS are like garbage compactors, they an amazing ability to pack so much rubbish and falsehoods in so few words that it may take an entire book to demolish their nonsense. Alas that is the burden of speaking the truth.

      “Seems like the writer was humilitated by the so called “manosphere” “mra movement” or whatever. And now he seeks revenge by writing some shitty tiny unimportant blog like a butthurt kike-pig.”

      Seems to be your heroes are the Middle Eastern ape man Roosh and the obese and soon to be Rascal commuter -Matt Forney! (paging stonerwithaboner- do what you do best). Im afraid Mansophere isnt capable of humiliating anyone but themselves. And he isnt Jewish but a white gentile who is gainfully (self) employed unlike you Im sure , and being butt hurt applies mostly to semi literate and whiny Trump supporters.

  8. The writer of this blog is a retarded jewish super-virgin incel with tiny cock who’s too stupid to understand the cuckold meme.

    Agreed that Black Pill doesn’t fully understand the meme, but this doesn’t imply stupidity.

    The cuckold meme originated with men who were almost certainly closet homosexuals. Normal men don’t sit around trying to think about how to get next to male genitals and semen while maintaining plausible deniability… I mean really, no straight man wants to kiss a woman after she just sucked another man off, or eat the same pussy that just hosted someone else’s cock… but this is exactly what cuckold fetishists do.

    The people who obsess about cuckoldry ought to just come out the closet already. Quit lying to yourselves.

        • I did.

          I asked because what you said doesn’t seem to disagree with how BP defined the terms.

          Also, how a term originated and how it is used currently are two different things. Related, ‘gay’ did not used to be associated with homosexuaity. And how fat women have subverted the terms “voluptuous” and “shapely” to suit their own ends.

    • heh! As if on cue , your paleo Trump cock sucking girlfriend has a post out about “muscular Muslims” overcoming an “emasculated West”! On the paleo Nazi loving unz.com

      http://www.unz.com/imercer/emasculated-west-primed-for-a-muscular-muslim-takeover/

      Some excerpts for your onanist hobbies which comprise you Roissyite sex lives

      “Islamic State projects strength. Strength is an aphrodisiac. Women are biologically programmed to be attracted to powerful men.

      “Sheikh Muhammad Ayed has no such problem. Speaking in a deep, sonorous voice; …”

      “On its side, Islam has ascetic evangelists such as Ayed, who bow to no one.

      On our side we have Father Michael Pfleger! He’s the too-hideous-to-behold, standard issue, Western preacher-cum-Obama idolater.

      Pray tell: Who looks and sounds more impressive to the young and the impressionable? The impassioned, unapologetic, manly imam in flowing, Lawrence-of-Arabia robes, who channels the Word of his Prophet? Or, Father Pfleger, the soft face of the West’s ultra-liberal faith; a tool of liberal public administration; a man more eager to prostrate himself to Caesar than to serve a higher authority?”

      At this point Ms. Mercer walked away from the keyboard to change her panties….

      Mind you this Mercer is a greater fan of Trump than Ann Coulter(who pledged to be his mistress). She earlier penned a column extolling Trumps huuuuge manhood and tough guy persona.

      And your women themselves are rubbing one out for the incoming Muslim horde. As if that weren’t enough, look at the comments and their sniveling worship of the Chechens (are they cheating on Putin now?).

      As someone who lived and worked in Muslim countries and is actually familiar with the culture , let me tell you- Muslims in generals and Arabs in particular make a great show of masculinity but actually put up a rather poor fight. This is true when in road rage incidents which I have been a part of in UAE, Iraq and Jordan or in the battlefield where they are routinely trounced by non Muslims.

      I remember the paleos got all wet for Arabs in the 1990s with the rise of Al Qaeda and when these were exposed as paper tigers in the aftermath of 2001, they shifted affections to the Palestinians and the Chechens and when these were crushed by Israel in the 2nd Intifada and Putin both in 2005, they toyed around with Ahmadinajad and his gangsters causing havoc in Iraq. After the Boston bombing, Sailer practically seemed to beg for Chechen bukkake the way he slobbered over them. And now with the rise of ethnocentric Sunni Arab supremacist ISIS, Ms Mercer and her paleo “male” minions like yourself are practically offering their posterior for the taking.

      All this cuck stuff is simply projection bro. As BP said , wake up and smell the mangina amongst you. And no, the whiny crybaby Trump who measures his self worth by which pussy he banged isn’t going to help you.

      • ” After the Boston bombing, Sailer practically seemed to beg for Chechen bukkake the way he slobbered over them. ”

        I read Sailer and as I remember it his point was that they ought to be kept out of the country. You are the one “projecting” your xenophilia onto others.

        • Of course they claim they don’t want Muslims in their countries just like ms. Mercer. But their admiration of their machismo not to mention anti semitism tells a different story.

  9. It’s meaning comes from two things:

    1. As a simple insult that cuckservatives aren’t masculine, they are weak in the way they submit themselves to Jews and non-Whites. Use of “cuckold” to denote lack of masculinity is very old, Shaksphere used it in his plays.

    2. As a collective insult referring to White nations which embrace feminism and mass immigration. Just as the cuckold raises another man’s child in his own house, the German man pays taxes to support a fecund population of Muslims who, due to his own women’s low fertility rate, will replace his own race in his own country.

    • We know what it is supposed to mean dipshit. The rest of us are playing 3 dimensional chess while you are stuck with tic tac toe! Once again the type of white supremacists online who accuse other races of low IQ are simply projecting(as with “cuck”) if this moron is any indication.

  10. It seems no way to comment on the new page: Evidence that Virigns are not Murderers

    Of course can’t comment on the post but at least the comment option didn’t load on for me on the page.

  11. A bit-off topic, but I feel I should bring this up. Have you seen this article on GotQuestions written by these “Christians”? The title of it is called “Why did God allow polygamy in the Bible?”

    http://www.gotquestions.org/polygamy.html

    Basically, the author(s) say that women were forced into polygamy by men. They say because of patriarchal societes, women were forced to be unable to provide for themselves; they were uneducated and untrained. They claim unmarried women were foreced to prostiution and slavery. They claim that 50.5 of the world population are female. Therefore, they say that there would be tens of thousands more women than men, at least in ancient times, and more so when men died off in wars. They say polygamy was allowed by God for women who could not find a husband to protect and provide for her.
    If they are inferring that there are tens of thousands more women than men today, either that is BS or that only makes me even more tired of the dating/marriage market today.
    They also claim polygamy was allowed by God to expand humanity much faster. They then bring up Genesis 9:7 where God commanded to be fruitful and multiply.
    Ummm. Wasn’t that commandment given to Noah and those who just survived the floood. How many people were aboard the ark? That commmandment was given to them so they would not die out. How many generations has it been between Noah and King David?
    They claim it has changed today. They say women are able to provide for and protect themselves in most cultures. They also claim most nations outlaw polygamy.

    Yet, polygamy feels more alive than ever. Way too many women today are giving themselves to a minority of the men for free. Only when they are ready to settle down do they desire a wedding. I guess too many women and the church view the wedding ceremony as what makes two officially married, not the sex.
    Sex is a blood convenant, a vow. Too bad most preachers will never preach that.

    Also, in Dr. Helen Smith’s book, Men on Strike, a lawyer woman says, “I am a masculine woman, but I need an even more masculine man.” I guess having many women on your arm makes a man more masculine in her eyes. The women who are able to provide and protect themselves begin to view more and more men as weaklings.

    http://www.gotquestions.org/polygamy.html

  12. Pingback: Freud on The Fear of Loneliness | v5k2c2

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s