39 comments on “The Age Of The Secular Cult

  1. Whenever someone mentions “secular cults”, organizations like Scientology or the Church Of Satan come to my mind. I don’t know if both are really secular because the former has this weird alien stuff going while the latter relies on occult symbolism or pagan rituals to a certain degree, despite claiming to be atheist.

    There’s no question that Russia is a fucked up place. How powerful are those secular cults really? It seems like Putin managed quite well to handle several movements with his political theatre wether on the left or on the right and by that kept the pile of shit from catching fire.

    • I would say that the Church of Satan is not a secular cult. OTOH, Scientology is a secular cult despite the weird alien crap. For example, in Scientology, Xenu, who is Scientology’s devil, isn’t spiritual. He’s supposed to be a flesh and blood alien imprisoned somewhere on Earth. In other words, it’s possible to find Xenu (according to Scientology). Even Scientology’s thetans aren’t spiritual concepts either. They exist in the physical universe. Thus, Scientology is a secular cult. And Scientology with its army of lawyers causes a lot of trouble such as harassment of its critics. Scientology is also a threat to the first amendment. Scientology managed to get the movie, The Profit, banned for several years. That movie was the only movie banned in the US in modern times (outside of child porn and things that violated federal election laws). Scientology also has its own Navy so we can see how much trouble a secular cult can cause.

      Most of the Russian secular cults don’t have much power right now. However, that could change. In the case of domestic secular cults in the US, Russia has been promoting them. And they get promoted when someone needs a boogeyman. Hillary Clinton talking about the alt-right is the prime example of this. All she did was give the alt-right, a bunch of nobodies no one ever heard of, a platform. I can see the same thing happening in Russia where the CIA funds secular cults in Russia to destabilize that nation. Then, Putin ends up propping them up by making them his boogeyman just like Hillary did. While Putin has held things together so far, he can’t do that forever. The reason why Putin controls Russia now is because Yeltsin and his family were so corrupt, and Putin was the only man who could keep Yeltsin & his family out of prison. Putin is also similarly corrupt, but there is no man in Russia who can take over for him and keep Putin out of prison like Putin has done for Yeltsin. Thus, at some point Putin’s power will fall apart creating a vacuum for the secular cults to take over.

      On top of that there is one secular cult that is already embedded in part of the Kremlin and the Russian military, Eurasianism. Eurasianism is a death worshiping cult that wants to start a world war with the US and the West to lead to the end of the world. (Those are the terms they use.) They believe such a world war is the only way to save the world. It was started by a man who the communists in charge of the Soviet Union considered a dangerous nutjob. Yes, there is at least one secular cult that has power in Russia just as social justice warriors/intersectional feminists have power in the US.

      • The Church of Satanists are mostly epicurean deviants. It is harmless nonsense. Scientologists have considerable legal powers at their disposal which they dont hesitate to use as well at their celebrity muscle such as Tom Cruise etc but these days they are hoemoraging supporters and memebers. And they find themselves deeply unpopular despite the resources at their disposal.

      • With all due respect, Mr. Black Pill, you got it all backwards. If anything, Laveyan Satanism better fits the definition of secular cults than Scientology. Just because thetans could be located in the physical universe, per Scientology, does not mean they are not spiritual concepts. As I understand it, thetans are “alien ghosts” hence spirit-beings. [You might bring up the fact that e-meters imply that thetans are a “scientific concept.” The problem is that, while in the Semitic monotheistic religions there is a clear divide between the physical and the supernatural, this was not always the case in other religious traditions. I am not sure if, e.g., Hinduism recognizes such a clear demarcation between the physical and the supernatural. I understand that Dr. Van Nostrand is a Hindu. Perhaps he could better explain? As a more contemporary example, the spiritualism of the 19th century was premised on a “science of the occult.” This idea finds its way in such literary tropes as “Magic A Is Magic A” and “Magitek” (refer to TV Tropes). Such tropes could be found in Ghostbusters, or in works of “Urban Fantasy” combining wizardry ala Harry Potter with cyberpunk tropes. So just because per Scientology’s own metaphysics thetans could be detected via a *machine* does not negate their supernatural nature.] On the contrary, modern “Satanism” was founded by a secular Jew, Anton LaVey, who based his entire philosophy on the “Objectivism” of Ayn Rand, in that both celebrate greed and narcissism while denouncing altruism, generosity, humility, and self-sacrifice. Laveyan Satanists do not literally worship a literal Satan, a red-skinned horned humanoid with bat wings and a goatee, or even an evil supernatural entity. For Laveyan Satanists, their concept of Satan is metaphorical or symbolic, as Laveyan Satanism is simply the inverse of Christianity. What would be among seven deadly sins for Christians – greed, lust, pride… would be virtues for Laveyan Satanism. Furthermore, I am pretty sure that the Church of Satan does not even take themselves that seriously. Laveyan Satanists are really just edgy clowns. Scientology, on the other hand, is indeed a dangerous cult that brainwashes its members of all ages and has an army of lawyers at its disposal. So while I think you are fairly intelligent and occasionally an interesting writer, if anything the Church of Satan is a secular cult and the Church of Scientology is a religious cult. You have it all backward! And that calls into question anything you have to say on this. You simply can not say that secular cults are worse than religious cults and vice versa.

        Likewise, DVN seems to be under the impression that communism (or secular ideology in general) is potentially more dangerous than Islamism because the latter is supposedly limited by whatever is written in the Koran or by the will of Allah, but those are moot points because leaders of politicized Islam will get their way by insisting that they alone know what the Koran really means (it’s all about interpretation! Which is an inherent problem with scripture-based religions. So it’s less a problem of “religious cults” versus “secular cults” as it is between hierarchical and traditionalist religions on one hand (e.g. the Roman Catholic and Orthodox Churches) and more egalitarian scriptural religions (Sunni Islam, Protestantism).), or they alone have a channel to God and know His will. Also, DVN thinks that Islamism is seen as more “primitive” even in the Moslem world and that “secular cults” would be intrinsically more appealing to the intelligentsia. But wouldn’t that be a moderating force, if theocratic movements attract stupid, superstitious, violent savage thugs but “secular cults” would attract intellectuals? I admit I might not know the answer yet.

        Regarding the situation in Russia, I wonder how that country is so screwed up that so-called secular cults, many of them batshit crazy such as Eurasianism or the Phantom Time Hypothesis, would have any appeal to either the masses or the intelligentsia, or the economic and political elites. I suppose we can look to Russian history, going back to the beginning of the Rus. Perhaps the nihilism of the post-Soviet Russian people is the reason?

  2. From the description, it seems that your friend means the adepts of Fomenko’s New Chronology. Garry Kasparov is one of them, maybe. These people are like the UGO-logists, fanatical in the intellectual sense but otherwise harmless. Plus, I have an impression that their influence (such as it was) has been declining in the last 10 years.

    • ” The problem is that, while in the Semitic monotheistic religions there is a clear divide between the physical and the supernatural, this was not always the case in other religious traditions. I am not sure if, e.g., Hinduism recognizes such a clear demarcation between the physical and the supernatural. I understand that Dr. Van Nostrand is a Hindu. Perhaps he could better explain?”

      Hinduism being a “pagan” religion accepts that humans can have many divine attributes, indeed be elevated to a divine being altogether. Rama and Krishna were warrior kings who performed spectacular feats who were later deified. If you read the original core of the Ramayana and the Mahabharata where Rama and Krishna are the main characters respectively, you will note that their supernatural powers are not considerable at all. Indeed they are often confused, dejected and demoralized many times mostly being subject to the laws of nature. As such they have more similarity to Greek heroes such as Ulysses. Where Hinduism diverts from Greek religion is

      1) Though it Greeks and Vedics have cognate dietes such Zeus/Indra , Saturn/Shani, Appolo/Surya etc, Vedic people went beyond these sense based dieties and developed more abstract concepts as represented by Shiva. This is where Hinduism as we know today came into being. Though back then it was a very different beast what with all the beef eating and glorification of war and conquest. It is another matter that Hindus despite their physical courage had a relatively bad military record with regard to Macedonian ,Scythian and Hun invasions due to a lack of centralization ,lack of good horses and substandard material culture. It is not until the early medieval era where they were able to hold back Muslim invaders for a good 500 years till the dam broke in 1200 AD that they got their act together militarily.

      2) Hindu gods werent cruel, vain,lustful and capricioius like those of Greeks. Though Indra did engage in a lot of Zeus style tomfoolery including banging a sages wife and the irate sage cursed Indra that he would be covered with a thousand penises LOL. In another version, it was a 1000 vaginas haha. So you see here too, humans have some power over gods especially when their overstep their bounds and engage in less than holy behavior.

      Semitic religions OTOH are rather stringent about human beings having any type of power. Moses is basically a mouthpiece for god and his staff a conduit for Gods miracles. Indeed Moses was punished by God not to set foot in Israel because apparently all this miracle stuff went to his head and he took credit for the waters of Maribah when he struck a rock to gush forth fresh water for the thirsty Hebrews. Though Jewish mysticism such as Kabbalah is more generous is ascribing super human abilities to figures such as Moses and Solomon.

      The Jesus phenomenon seems to be a compromise of Semitic monotheistic type “only god can do miracles” and an almost Egyptian and Hindu “a man can be god”

      Islam lies somewhere in the middle. There is a great deal of folklore in the Quran. Islam is basically desert folklore with a monotheistic overlay. Every few hundred years or so Muslim revert to their pagan roots only to be confronted by their versions of Martin Luther. The latest being Abdul Wahhab who was aghast that Bedouin women often walked around topless worshipping trees in the 1800s. Trying doing that in Saudi today LOL

    • “Also, DVN thinks that Islamism is seen as more “primitive” even in the Moslem world and that “secular cults” would be intrinsically more appealing to the intelligentsia. But wouldn’t that be a moderating force, if theocratic movements attract stupid, superstitious, violent savage thugs but “secular cults” would attract intellectuals? I admit I might not know the answer yet.”

      Islamism has the demographic advantage -after there are more violent superstitious men out there than “rational” and skeptical men. However what matters is not so much numbers but ideological zealotry. Granted Islam is not lacking in these. But the problem with having only such type of men in your ranks is that they are unable to put a sustained fight due to their fatalism. And contrary to what people believe , Islam is a rather brittle religion which is why it is estimated that the majority of the young in the “Islamic republic” of Iran are either outright atheists or convert to other religions altogether.

      “Regarding the situation in Russia, I wonder how that country is so screwed up that so-called secular cults, many of them batshit crazy such as Eurasianism or the Phantom Time Hypothesis, would have any appeal to either the masses or the intelligentsia, or the economic and political elites. I suppose we can look to Russian history, going back to the beginning of the Rus. Perhaps the nihilism of the post-Soviet Russian people is the reason?”

      Russia is screwed because of many reasons

      1) They are not quite sure whether they are Asian or European. I think their hearts are Asian what with their penchant for corny Bollywood movies.

      2) They never went through a proper enlightenment since the fall of Byzantine cut off their access to the neo Hellenism which in turn did benefit Europe.

      3)Russian Orthodox did not care one way or the another for the nature of the rulers where they were Mongols, Tartars, cruel Czars, Stalin or Putin. They played footsie with them as they believed its not their place but Gods to affect political change.

      4) Rulers like Peter the Great are revered despite his utter callousness for Russian lives( the building of St Petersburg on a very unsuitable swamp land claimed the lives of untold dozens). That tradition of disregard for human life has carred on ever since.

      5) We forget that they were mostly serfs a mere 100 years ago while most Europeans were literate and urban dwellers by the early 1900s.

      6) Do I need add nearly 8 decades of varying degrees of communist authoritarianism.

      7) Yelstin and the World Bank hardly helped

      8) Men died in wwII in so many numbers that there is still a considerable male deficit. This allowed females to do stupid shit. But dont tell Roosh, Roissy, Matt Forney et al as they believe Russian women are just awesome LOL

      9) Vodka. So much so that most people dont realize it is now considered rather boorish for Russians to drink vodka. Especially women. This came as a shock to me when I went there (Moscow and St Petersburg). You go to a house bringing a bottle of vodka , you will be met with rude stares. Red wine or cognac (neither of these should be Russian please) is the ticket.

  3. I used to believe that Islamism was a great threat to world civilization until I heard a debate between Robert Spencer and David P Goldman who made the case for Islamists and Soviets being the most dangerous groups respectively. It seems that David Goldman made the better argument. As dangerous as the islamists are they are not only encumbered by their ideology which more often than not turns as many Muslisms against them as non Muslims(witness the loathing against Al Qaeda in Jordan, Lebanon in late 2000s and now ISIS in Iraq and Syria) but the Soviets had answer to no one as their constituents were quite abstract(The New Man) and had a sort of secular eschatology.

    Furthermore the Soviets had the best minds working for them. While Islamic fundamentalists often drive away even vaccinators accusing them of witchcraft or spies.

    These days the best minds are often agnostic or atheist. It is not inconceivable they will gravitate to such movements that flatter their egos and belief systems as opposed to talking to evangelicals who they view as casting pearls in front of swine.

    I find the alt rights worship of Putin understable on a superficial level. After all everyone respects a strongman and a patriot.But ultimately they highlight their fanboyism, latent homosexuality and utter ignorance. Putin is not some brilliant strategist some assume him to be. He is just taking advantage of the fecklessness of the last two Presidents who werent quite prepared for him. Bush antagonized him for no reason as he was living in a Cold war paradigm. And Obama just let him loose on the Middle East and couldnt control him no more and hence the sorry situation he finds his party in today.

    Putin appointed a crony in Chechnya who applies Shariah law. Thats right Putin has the honor of the first Russian president to have shariah law inhis dominion! Even he does not seem to understand that to destroy Islamism it is not enough or even required to have brutal military victories as Putin did in Chechnya but to crush the very ideology that inspires such views and actions.

    I dont think secular cults will be as powerful in Russia as the Russian people had their fill of secularism. Even Putin managed to hang on to power by pretending tobe a Russian Orthodox practitioner.
    Even as Russian people are not actively religious , they respect their faith and traditions a great deal and have no desire for a God shaped void as it were.

    • “I find the alt rights worship of Putin understable on a superficial level. After all everyone respects a strongman and a patriot.But ultimately they highlight their fanboyism, latent homosexuality and utter ignorance.”

      Pretty much, although I don’t even think “latent homosexuality” is as prominent a factor in the Putin “worship” of the alt-right, though I do not deny that it IS a factor of course, so much as their craving for a male role model or an abstract father figure. For the alt-right wiggers, all or most come either from broken homes and single mothers, or from families that look like functional models, but in which the man of the house is reduced to an emasculated beta male henpecked by his nagging wife from the moment he comes home from work. (Granted, that is not limited to the alt-right wiggers. This seems to be a society-wide phenomenon in the United States and other countries, though alt-right wiggers seem to be affected a bit more than most. These alt-right “shitlords” are the same wiggers who would have been devoted Eminem fans or Juggalos back in the late 90s.) These fatherless alt-right cunts simply need a leader who is intelligent, charismatic, ruggedly handsome (i.e. NOT some metrosexual prettyboy), masculine, and a badass. Putin is all these things, or at least he cultivates that image via successful use of propaganda. You can almost excuse the alt-right wiggers for falling for Putin, particularly the /pol/fags.

      And for all the lofty intellectuals with their interesting ideas leading the alt-right (even if the alt-right does not actually have a single, coherent unifying ideology. The label of “alt-right” is simply slapped onto an interconnected web of “politically incorrect” or “unorthodox” or “not kosher” right-wing ideologies springing from the overlap of the manosphere and the HBD community amongst autistic Internet nerds.), the fact is /pol/fags are the bread-and-butter of the alt-right. Further irony, being nihilistic, edgy shitlords, the /pol/fags love to engage in Nazi live action role play, yet every last one of them is a fucking untermensch. Should their fantasies come true and Adolf Hitler rise from the dead to build a New Reich all the /pol/fags and other untermenschen from 4chan and its poison fruits would be the first to go to the Zyklon B showers. Sweet irony! [Fuck, I HATE 4chan!]

      Where I disagree with you and Black Pill is your assessment of the role of the “Alt-Right” (and their equivalent(s) on the left…). I can guarantee that neither the alt-right (and the manuresphere, and HBD, and NRx, and even white nationalism…) nor SJW and intersectional feminism would serve as the “secular cults” he keeps alluding to above. Whereas movements, be they Christianity and Islam, or Marxism-Leninism exist on their own, the alt-right and SJW left are merely useful tools, means to an end, but both two sides of the same coin. The alt-right served a useful role. They got a bunch of fucking White Nationalists to vote for “honorary Jew” Donald Trump, a virtual Likudnik whose daughter converted to Judaism and married a wealthy Jew, whose grandkids are halachic Jews. LOL! The “alt-right” served a useful role as Trump’s Sturmabteilung and now it is in a state of implosion.

      Did you read about how a notorious alt-right “leader” Michael Enoch of TRS (who stoked the flames of the more rabid “14-88 race war now, gas the kikes” wing of the alt-right) turned out to be a full-blooded Jew named Michael Peinovich? How he has a pro-LGBT wife, also Jewish and once a chapter president of a B’nei Brith youth group?
      http://www.salon.com/2017/01/16/cat-fight-on-the-alt-right-neo-nazi-podcaster-mike-enoch-quits-after-doxxers-reveal-his-wife-is-jewish/

      The alt-right is imploding, partly by the “doxing” of (((Michael “Enoch” Peinovich))) [who helped popularize the (((Jew quote))) meme], partly by the fact that with “muh God-Emperor” in office, the alt-right are useful idiots who have outlived their usefulness. My only question is who will be “doxed” next within the larger alt-right. Such figures as Rick Spencer, Greg Johnson, and Milo the Gay Jew are not anonymous enough to effectively “dox.” My money is on some alt-right YouTuber such as Rocking MrE or “le based tranny” Blaire White. Could it be that Rocking MrE and his wife are Jewish, that Rocking MrE is gay (transparent closet case), that all his kids are the product of literal cuckoldry, and that he is Milo’s personal fucktoy? Would not surprise me in the least if that turns out the case! Or else, maybe Ms. Blaire White, the “Cunt with a Cock” will turn out just to be a cunt (no cock). [I suspect that she is “cis” but just pretending to be trans for the attention.] Would that interfere with Milo the Jew’s plans to sell her to Steve Bannon or Rupert Murdoch as the new Ann Coulter?

    • “Where I disagree with you and Black Pill is your assessment of the role of the “Alt-Right” (and their equivalent(s) on the left…). I can guarantee that neither the alt-right (and the manuresphere, and HBD, and NRx, and even white nationalism…) nor SJW and intersectional feminism would serve as the “secular cults” he keeps alluding to above. Whereas movements, be they Christianity and Islam, or Marxism-Leninism exist on their own, the alt-right and SJW left are merely useful tools, means to an end, but both two sides of the same coin. The alt-right served a useful role. They got a bunch of fucking White Nationalists to vote for “honorary Jew” Donald Trump, a virtual Likudnik whose daughter converted to Judaism and married a wealthy Jew, whose grandkids are halachic Jews. LOL! The “alt-right” served a useful role as Trump’s Sturmabteilung and now it is in a state of implosion.”

      Alt right is admittedly a wide umbrella of individuals of different views ranging from anarchic libertarianism to pro monarchy and can encompass even blacks ,gays and Jews.

      What we mean here by the alt right is mostly the folks on the HBD white nationalist blogs and website such as Unz.com and Takimag.com who have appropriated the label for themselves and projected all their hopes on Donald Trump. I am not a fan of Trump or Clinton though in retrospect I am glad he won instead of her. Despite my low assessment of Trump I never claimed he was an anti Semite as so many silly neo cons and liberals believed. Yes his familial connections say it all.

      But if you read some of the responses by WNs when I pointed it out they come up with all sorts of odd justifications such as the Spanish royalty circa 1492 also intermarried with Jews and this is my favorite “there are Jews and there are kikes”

      These guys will believe what they want to and when some policy of the other of Trumps goes against their agenda such his support for moving the U.S embassy to Jerusalem, they will grant him near supernatural powers of intuition what with all the 4D chess stuff. As if geopolitics were so simple. The world is is complicated and unpredictable ,and difficult to manage even for a hyperpower such as U.S. Even the best plans can falter and collapse without a leader who can think on his feet. And even then his success ratio maybe relatively modest. Reagan had a plan to smash the Soviet Union, defeat Arab and Iranian terrorism and reduce the size of the federal government. We all saw where he saw the most success and even then it was a tough call with Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Poland, Czech republics, CIS and Baltic states,U.K playing their parts only because it was in their interests to do so.

      Same will go for Trump in the best case scenario. But conspiracy prone theorists who believe in a hyper competent technocracy behind the scenes * will not understand this.

      * LOL this despite the revelations of Wikileaks, Snowden ,Panama Papers , Clinton Foundations scams etc etc.

      • I thought of something creepy yet funny. Dick Spence is likely a closet (hehe, not quite where you think it’s going but close) feminist. Since hateful feminist’s love, love, love S&M, maybe this is part of his twisted fantasy of public humiliation and physical violence. Who are we to judge consenting adults…

        • Laugh at the attack on Spencer all you want, but know that they’d just as soon attack you. Antifeminism is as bad as racism, in their eyes. While most liberals are wimps, I hear (((they))) are recruiting former criminals to commit these types of attacks.

        • hahahahahaha…

          I am of the status of men who carries a receipt when I walk out of the store. Somehow I doubt that being hassled by the bacon with the implication that I didn’t pay for my shit is a privilege that Jagoff Donovan, Dick Spence and Milo Y don’t have. I know you would laugh your clitoris off if you saw video of me being assaulted. And those “black block” criminals you talk of, mostly white dudes because they know they will get the kiddie gloves when put infront of a judge…

      • hahahahaha….

        this gets funnier and funnier….

        (if true)

        Dick Spence got beaten by a poo eating cuck, what’s that make him, a double cuck? Surely not master of the white race ™

      • I have heard of a shit eating grin but this is ridiculous!

        Thank you . I will be hear all night. Dont forget to tip your server!

        • I should mention that even though I obviously loathe people like Richard Spencer and while he does espouse a hate filled ideology, I cant really support this action. Firstly he was sucker punched. And Spencer never called for violence and engaged in this behavior himself. It gives him victimhood status which is ambrosia for any movement these days.

  4. “The very first time I experienced my version of perfection was when I met a gorgeous man in Monaco last year. He’s young, a multimillionaire (I mean, you have to be to live in Monte-Carlo), and during our date at the Hermitage Hotel terrace he made a comment during our conversation that he thinks biologically, deep down, all women want to be dominated. I raised my eyebrow at him and quickly disagreed. There is nothing about me, or my life that wants to be controlled by a man, outside of the bedroom. I left that last part out in my objection because quite frankly, I didn’t want to give him a bone in this debate that would only encourage his views on women being in a position of servitude. Little did he know, I was soaked all the way through my panties.”
    https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/im-a-feminist-who-loves-rough-sex

    • I stopped bothering asking if she reconciles her feminism with her domination fantasies.

      With all these triggering over hate speech etc I wonder is the the U turn theory of feminism where these strong empowered women meet the Victorian era fainting ladies at the other end.

    • Made women “feel” . Thats always the operative word isnt it. Its almost as if objective reality is patriarchal conspiracy to demean women!

  5. OT: I notice many MRAs admire and quote on Bill Burr for his stance on feminism and female psychology in general. But really what does he DO as opposed to what he SAYS? He uses terms like Islamophobia, homophobia, supportted Bernie Sanders, a socialist mangina who has been assigned the role of wymenz hater just because he ran against Hillary. Burr married an obnoxious and unattractive black *woman who seems to take her talking points from NOW and The View.

    The guy is playing a role at best and a liar, fraud and Trojan horse at worst. His crediblity should be in the toilet in this point but strangely many MRAs and MGTOWs are dazzled by the flash ,perhaps because they are just grateful someone famous is saying something vaguely sympathetic and see him a fellow traveller for their cause.

    * her being black is significant because black feminists are far more strident ,entitled and money grubbing than white feminists. This is why we are seeing a growing proportion of MGTOWs from the black community.

    • Comedians are the court jesters of this day and age, the “licensed fools”, as they were called. Those who are permitted to mix some half truths with many lies to allow people to vent and then fall back into line. Lies mixed some truth are much more dangerous than pure lies because it’s much easier to see through pure lies.

      Patrice O’Neal also said a great many things about women that were spot-on and hilariously funny. Or Bill Maher. And probably many more I’m just not aware of because I’m not that much into comedy. When something or someone is called “politically incorrect”, that’s usually a red flag.

      These days, being “politically incorrect” just means that you’re allowed to vent a little and then have to fall back into line – or that we need to use even more force, violence and hard power against groups and countries that are perceived to be not feminist enough (Muslims, the whole African continent except SA, etc.).

      • In the past an unPC comedian would be reigned by corporate sponsors who would hand them TV shows and movie contracts. But nowadays with Patreon and gofundme etc, there is really no need for comedians to ever tone it down.

        Bill Maher was tolerated by the media because “yes he is an SOB but he is our SOB”. Even as he recognizing that people voted for Trump because they were tired of this SJW crap, he still supported Hilary Clinton. I make the distinction between supporting Clinton and voting Clinton because quite a few conservative and Democrats voted for Clinton for other reasons than the fact that she is a great candidate.

        On my blog I mentioned how admiration for the British “civilizing mission” in particular the British Raj’s ban on sati in India has been used by American neo cons and other to spread Western values. They often even quote the self described criminal Charles Napier who banned Sati and conquered Sindh province thus solidifying British India’s western border.
        Just FYI Sati or burning of the widow of her husband funeral pyre was restricted to some districts in Bengal and it was usually voluntary. I am not a fan of the custom , but it was obvious that it was not mandatory , hence women who perished this way were honored as minor goddesses.

        Similarly while I dont care for how women are treated in Saudi Arabia et al, that is no bodys business but their own. Either way these severe restrictions on women did not exist a 100 years ago. It is purely due to the unholy alliance of Wahhabis and Sauds which have created such a dysfunctional society which ends exporting its misfits and ideology abroad . We all know what happened next…

        This has the obvious perverted effect of war less of a swift retributive action and more of a therapy session of the conquered peoples with specific political and social goals as has been the case since Vietnam. The sad results are there for all to see.

        James Mattis seems to recognize this on some level that the purpose of a military is to break things, not build. them.

  6. @Ergeniz

    empiresoflight.blogspot.com

    Here we go. Though i must tell you much of the content doesnt match with what I write here. It deals mostly with Indian culture and history. I tend to avoid politics though occasionally you will find posts about American culture , women etc.

    Much of the blog actually deals with Indian crackpot conspiracy theorists , one guy in particular simply recycles stuff from stormfront and packages it for Indian consumption.

  7. Pingback: Saturday Good Stuff – v5k2c2

  8. “I noticed how similar these groups were to everything from the alt-right, neoreaction, the manuresphere, white vagina worshipers, to social justice warriors/intersectional feminists and other feminists”

    Or the blog author and his circle-jerk or mentally ill loser rejects LARPing like a bunch of super-virgin here.

    Seriously, have you for one second in your life asked yourself “am I actually wrong?”. Most idiots and psychopaths are so convinced in their own self-righteousness that they could never even imagine the concept of critical self reflection.

    Take it from someone who lives in real life – you are just a sad loser autist crapping out really idiotic, mastubatory idiotic texts to feel better about your failed life. But it’s not white people’s or Christians’ fault that your life is a sad failure, you only have yourself to blame.

  9. “But it’s not white people’s or Christians’ fault that your life is a sad failure, you only have yourself to blame.”

    Your incoherent ramblings aside, I found this statement interesting. Since I assume you are white nationalist, you seem to be one who sees Christianity as integral to Western civilization and certainly I agree with you. However “white peoples or Christians fault” puzzles me. Is it your position that Nigerians who have more Anglicans than England itself and indeed more religious than the English are a part of Western civilization or do you consider them equal or superior to white secularists.

    Sorry to dissapoint that OVR is not a Jew like you lunatics assume every one against you is. He is very much a white, his previous avatar was “white and nerdy”. He is a lapsed Christian.

    • Sorry to dissapoint that OVR is not a Jew like you lunatics assume every one against you is. He is very much a white, his previous avatar was “white and nerdy”. He is a lapsed Christian.

      This is a phenomena I have noticed from white vagina worshiping nationalists to intersectional feminists. It’s not enough for them to simply call me a loser. They have to accuse me of being one of their (imaginary) overlords too. Call it the Loser Overlord canard. It’s associated with the Gay Virgin Player Rapist canard.

  10. Pingback: The Gay Virgin Player Rapist Loser Overlord | Freedom From The Gynocracy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s