85 comments on “Conspiracy Theorists Are Not “Starting A Conversation”

  1. Rather irksome to me are the disingenous conspiracists who say, “I can’t see any flaws in my reasoning. Can someone point out what I’m not seeing here?”

    And when someone invariably, for the nth time, points out critical reasoning errors, they say, “I can’t see any flaws in my reasoning. Can someone point out what I’m not seeing here?”

    This is doubly bad. One is that they are incapable and unable to reason properly. The second is that they troll people to respond to them without any intention of changing from their conspiracy dumb-think.

    Often, this is how they reveal themselves to be authoritarian and reveal that they want to be in charge but ultimately have nothing substantial to offer as a good reason to be in charge.

  2. Arguably more serious than his nonsensical shit-talk about Satanic sex cults run out of pizza shops (where the general public is in and out, at all hours of the day and night, without ever seeming to see anything out of the ordinary) is what Alex Jones is *not* saying.

    As our brother Leeduva pointed out, in an earlier comment, Alex Jones has recently had his children kidnapped away from him, at his expense, by the Texas divorce courts. It’s interesting that Jones hasn’t made a peep about this on his youtube channels or his web page. I thought he was some sort of counterculture dissident, fighting the power? Why is he not leading protests against the family law racket?

    If anyone takes Jones seriously at this point, he’s either self-deluded or he’s incredibly stupid.

      • Boxer is also talking trash about black pill on his blog.

        I told people never to trust people who believe in Sigmund Freud like a religion, Freudism is psdueo science junk

        One or two interesting insights, mixed in with bizarre junk. Freud belongs in the dustbin of history

        • “One of the guys who is giving you trouble: “Stoner With A Boner” is a content thief, who indulges in copypasta from better thinkers to fill his blog. I believe you were around when I pointed that out, last summer, also.

          Personally, I like Black Pill’s blog and don’t care that he surrounds himself with sycophants. He makes pretty good points and isn’t afraid to criticize the people who consider themselves “thought leaders” (Spencer, Forney, etc.). Your mileage may vary, and it should. Every man has his own standards.

          Peace! Boxer”

          You accused Black Pill of surrounding himself with sychophants.

          BTW after your spazz out, Black pill stopped speaking to me, so that disproves your sychopahnt accusations lol

          Freud Equals pseudo science. It would behoove you not to call others kooks.

  3. …the ongoing conversation has been…

    …should we move forward with an imperfect MGTOW/Men’s Rights…

    …or should we tear down the imperfect MGTOW/Men’s Rights…

    Here is something problematic I’ve seen at sheddingoftheego…

    I called out Barbar and Max Hydrogen for being intellectually dishonest…

    (I used teh Bastard formerly known as SWAB as my handle.)

    One article title was that the government was stopping men from visiting sex doll prostitutes…

    However, it was easily verifiable that it was social media creating a backlash that shut down the original location of the brothel…

    Max Hydrogen responded by saying “I didn’t pick the title” and BarBar responded by banning me.

    They didn’t even correct the information when they had been proven wrong…

    This seems like David Futrelle behavior…

    The problem with associating with someone like Alex Jones is that he is all about smoke and mirrors and lies…

    Who wants to be associated with his “boner pills” that most likely don’t work when someone can point out real problems low status men are facing without conspiracy theory…

    It’s like telling a fat guy all he has to do is stop drinking soda and get more excersize. He ignores this simple advice, buys a purple space suit since Alex Jones told him he is fat because cosmic rays lower his testosterone. And just to spite you, he buys more mountain dew. His problems get worse because he didn’t face them head on. And that’s why these conspiracy theory fuckers are so bad. When men are trying to find solutions, it is shooting yourself in the foot to listen to false prophets…

    • It’s like telling a fat guy all he has to do is stop drinking soda and get more excersize. He ignores this simple advice, buys a purple space suit since Alex Jones told him he is fat because cosmic rays lower his testosterone. And just to spite you, he buys more mountain dew.

      Ironically, this is an accurate description of everyone in the manuresphere who is on the paleo diet.

    • I called out Barbar and Max Hydrogen for being intellectually dishonest…

      You aren’t intelligent enough to critique anyone, SWAB. That’s not me being rude, it’s just the brute fact of the matter.

      Max Hydrogen responded by saying “I didn’t pick the title” and BarBar responded by banning me.

      They didn’t even correct the information when they had been proven wrong…

      This seems like David Futrelle behavior…

      It’s much more likely that he banned you because you’re a useless dork.

      As we both know, you’re prone to spam people’s blogs with indecent nonsense and unfunny memes. I’d assume you were a feminist, sent in to make us all look stupid, but I don’t think your schtick is an act, as much as it is a symptom of genuine personal problems.

      There’s really no reason to argue with someone who is as thoroughly dense as you are. Those of us who keep you around do so because we’re prone to enjoy cheap entertainment in our off-hours.

      Regards,

      Boxer

        • Dear SWAB:

          it is EASILY provable the title is incorrect and I PROVED that…

          This reply is a great example of your inability to understand nuance. I don’t care about your last pissing match, and I don’t care about this one; and I won’t care about the next dozen people who laugh at/ban/ignore you. You’re a friendless masturbator, and your greatest original contribution is a collection of photos of Jack Donovan.

          Your the one like the feminists/alt-reich with all the false accusations.

          It’s ‘you’re’; and, speaking of false accusations, I wonder where that pathetic little cockroach “Tamerlame” scuttled off to. I thought he was going to post some more of his fun lies last night.

          Regards,

          Boxer

        • hahahaha, I just PROVED my point and you tried to change goalposts.

          Good job fuckface!

          OK SWAB. Whatever you say, dear.

      • “You tried, in the most womanly possible way, to play a game of “lets you and him fight” with Black Pill and me.

        Only a woman would do this. Come clean, sister. You’re a feminist who is fucking with people here, am I right?”

        No I just realized you was batshit insane, and not worth interacting with.

        I was trying to network and build something pro male. (Something I am still doing.)

        You posted some good comments against idiots who believe in cultural Marxism. I considered you useful, but then realized you was too mentally gone in the head to be of any use. You are just as toxic and useless as any conspiracy theory retard.

        • No I just realized you was batshit insane, and not worth interacting with.

          Yet, you just had to intone my name, over and over, like one of my spurned bitches, over the course of a year. Now you’re interacting with me, and whining about it.

          You bitches are all the same. lol

        • Your hero Alex Jones for starters. And by association-you. A guy who excuses and justifies conspiracy theorists is no better than one himself

        • Ah, Dr Van Nostrand, I presume…

          How is it that Alex Jones is my hero? When have I ever said as much? And since when could one be called a conspiracy theorist “by association”, even if one hasn’t actually theorized about any conspiracies? Can you name any of my alleged conspiracy theories? Which conspiracy theories from Alex Jones or anyone else – validated, falsified or pending – have I justified? How closely associated am I to Alex Jones, anyhow? Does he know me?

          LOL You guys are uptight.

        • You said a month ago…

          That said, I will always have a soft spot in my heart for Alex. He first came on my radar nearly 20 years ago, back when he was *nobody*. In those days, there didn’t seem to be a prayer in hell that sheeple would ever wake up to some of the shit going on in this world behind the scenes, or that someone like Alex Jones would become a household name, let alone someone getting elected to the presidency who has Alex Jones in his hear. Alex has been going out on a limb for years, taking quite a few personal risks, and overall, I’d say he’s done a lot more good than harm.

          Alex Jones may not be your “hero”, but as you said, you like the guy. (And that’s knowing that Alex Jones doesn’t think men are fully human.) Additionally, you have theorized about conspiracies.

          For example, a big glut of conspiracy stuff I’ve seen actually came out of a museum in London, but after being exposed, it has since been purged from that museum.

          Beyond that you are using conspiracy theorist tactics verbatim. The only people who ask “what a conspiracy theorist is” are conspiracy theorists. (Everyone else who is an English speaker can figure it out.) Then that leads to attacking the English language and accusing the CIA of inventing the term, “conspiracy theory”. We have seen these tricks a thousand times before so we can identify them as soon as they start. You aren’t fooling anyone.

        • “Alex Jones may not be your “hero”, but as you said, you like the guy. (And that’s knowing that Alex Jones doesn’t think men are fully human.)”
          Thank you for clearing up that he’s not my hero…and thanks for posting that link, but it’s actually the first time I’ve ever heard it, even though you just accused me of already knowing he said that. I guess I missed it, along with 98% of everything he has said over the past 20 years or more.

          Sounds like he was making a point about biology vs. feminism and whatever else, and in so doing, he pulled out some pretty cringeworthy pedestalizing poetry that can only bloat the already gargantuan female ego even further, which I would rebuke him for. But then, and I said in the first paragraph of what I wrote about a month ago (which you are conveniently not acknowledging) much of what Alex Jones says is easily rebuked and dismissed…but yes, I still do like him and I think he does a worthwhile thing overall. See I am not all-or-nothing with people like that. I do what’s called eating the meat and spitting out the bones – you should try it sometime.

          “Additionally, you have theorized about conspiracies.”
          The thing about the museum purge isn’t my conspiracy theory. It’s somebody’s but not mine. I’m not seeing where you are pointing to any theories on conspiracies that I have come up with. A conspiracy theorist is the person with whom the theory originates, not just someone who repeats them, believes them or speculates about them.

          “The only people who ask “what a conspiracy theorist is” are conspiracy theorists.”
          According to whom, outside of this tribal blog of anonymous keyboard warriors?

          “Then that leads to attacking the English language and accusing the CIA of inventing the term, “conspiracy theory”.”
          Now THAT is one helluva conspiracy theory! Never have heard it before. Who came up with that one?

          “We have seen these tricks a thousand times before so we can identify them as soon as they start. You aren’t fooling anyone.”
          LOL Oh fuck dude, no one on here is worth trying to fool. Who are you including in “we”, other than yourself and a couple of other hangers-on who do little but rant about white supremacists, and now conspiracy theorists, and whatever is going to be the next boogeyman that you can hopefully link to the gynocracy?

          As I have said before, there are probably a lot of conspiracy theories out there that are valid and you would agree with, but now you are turning the whole concept of conspiracy theory – which can range anywhere from cracked-out entertainment peddlers like David Icke down to a basic police investigation into two or more people conspiring to commit a crime – into something illegitimate. Why does it have to be that way? If you don’t like Alex Jones, and you think he’s full of shit, then fine; but does that mean that everyone who is a conspiracy theorist, or a conspiracy theory consumer, is part of a monolithic force of men’s enemies (or maybe just your own enemies) operating under the auspices of the gynocracy, right alongside “white vagina worshiping nationalists”? I mean it just looks silly to anyone outside of this particular echo chamber, if that matters.

          Just look at some of your own statements, if you want to have a conversation about logic or lack thereof… “Alex Jones has falsely accused a lot of men of raping and sexually abusing children. (This is something we see every conspiracy theorist do.)” Really?! I’m guessing you’re not familiar with very many conspiracy theorists then. When you say shit like that, it just makes you look like an idiot. Ah, but anyone who thinks that must be a conspiracy theorist, and/or a white nationalist…right, “Black Pill”?

  4. > Alex Jones has falsely accused a lot of men of raping and sexually abusing children.

    Didn’t know he had a bee in his bonnet about this specifically.

    Here’s the thing: without fail, almost without exception, EVERY moral crusader with a thing about some specific moral failing does that very thing themselves. It’s pathological. Show me a conservative congressman who rails against the gays; and I’ll show you a closet homo. Show me a preacher that regularly and repeatedly condemns bestiality in the strongest terms; and I’ll show you a pig-fucker.

    This, this always happens. Like clockwork. Like some hidden law of the universe.

    If Alex Jones has a jones (ha!) for condemning pedophillia and seeing it in every corner, it’s realy only a matter of time before he is caught doing it.

  5. Pingback: Alex Jones and Pizzagate – v5k2c2

  6. A bit off-topic, but your article reminds me of a preacher named Cliff Knectle. He is one of those guys that bang their chest about giving straight answers. However, I have seen some of his video talks, and there is something very disturbing about him. He says things like, “I haven’t raped, but I have lusted.” “I may not have raped little boys or girls like some of the Catholic priests and others, but I have lusted.” Lusting referring to women of course. I read one of his books. While I think half of its ok, some of his thoughts really weird me out, particularly within the sex department.

    In the section titled, “Question 31: What’s wrong with homosexuality?” He doesn’t answer the question. He opens up with an apology to how homosexuals have been treated like garbage, everyone has sinned, and then he changes the subject to hetereosexuality lusting. He says how both are equally just as guilty. He brings up the overused example of let him who has no sin cast the first stone of the adulteress woman from the Bible. Cliff claims that Jesus said, “If any of you men have never lusted, go ahead and stone her.” Cliff also spends half of the section going on and on, to fill his answer more, how Jesus died for your sins.
    Cliff also said in that same section that “Any dog can have sex with many different dogs. It takes a man to be committed to one woman…” Did Cliff implicity call all men dogs? Regardless, I don’t know what planet Cliff is living on, but more and more dogs, err I mean men, are being denied sex with so much as one woman.

    It seems to me Cliff is more ashamed of male hetereosexual lusting than actual, physical homosexual practicing.

    I found a medical article about the negative health effects of phyically practicing homosexuality. For exmaple, According to a report in The Health Implications of Homosexuality by the Medical Institute for Sexual Health, some pathogens associated with enteritis and proctocolitis “appear only to be sexually transmitted among men who have sex with men.

    Link to article: http://www.battlefortruth.org/articlesdetail.asp?id=235

    (No offense to any homosexuals reading this. Feel free to tell me that medical article is not accurate. My point is that the church today is more afraid and ashamed of male hetereosexualty than physical homosexuality.)

    The link below to the section of the book with “What’s wrong with homosexuality” is shown below.

    https://books.google.com/books?id=gCq6eFcN7FQC&pg=PA126&lpg=PA126&dq=cliffe+knechtle+what%27s+wrong+with+homosexuality&source=bl&ots=8F3McrBZ-6&sig=CkesAVmftqk68ie5u1AJFuE8sUg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwicrZ7d6NTTAhWpg1QKHZtZCQYQ6AEINzAE#v=onepage&q=cliffe%20knechtle%20what's%20wrong%20with%20homosexuality&f=false

    • Most of it is ground covered by MGTOW already and the final part about male feminists being so as a reproductive strategy has been discussed even by antifeminists.

    • Remember that J. Peterson ultimately believes that you can only be psychologically healthy if you have a long-term live-in relationship (for both men and women), which is illogical. So everything he argues will come back to that point.

      • Remember that J. Peterson ultimately believes that you can only be psychologically healthy if you have a long-term live-in relationship (for both men and women)

        I’m familiar with his work. I haven’t ever seen him generalize to this extent. Do you have a source?

        • You have to piece it together, from various lectures. You can do your own searches on his observations as others have uploaded clips from his longer speeches and will come to your own conclusions.
          In this one he says if you don’t have a healthy marriage you’ll be “a mess at 50”.
          http://bit.ly/2rc6EZO
          Another one, conflict in marriage “straightens you out”: http://bit.ly/2qO8JLN
          Here’s the view that what matters is the right “match” that will “balance you out.” http://bit.ly/2rnmiys
          If you seek perfection in relationships that means you are impossible to live with but maybe you can “work towards it” within the confines of a relationship: https://podverse.fm/clips/SJPRVDQqg
          Here’s a direct quote: “A huge part of the utility in having a partner is companionship, but, and also the maintenance of sanity. You need someone around… so that every time you manifest one of your uncontrollable weaknesses, they slap you on the side of the head and tell you to behave !” AND “the most important thing in life is your family, children and relationship” AND “if you don’t have children by 40 (for women) you will be a lost soul.”
          http://bit.ly/2rcz5qm
          You may come to a different conclusions that Peterson thinks only exceptional (not near the norm) can choose to not be part of an intimate relationship. He does say that you can get some fulfillment in life outside of marriage. But you’ll have to decide for yourself after doing a search where he stands.

  7. The Great Shebang:

    Thanks! This is is really interesting. The ambiguity in his message is a definite problem, but I never caught him being so overt about his thesis.

    I really ought to write something about it, and when I do, I’ll give you credit.

    Best,

    Boxer

    • but, but but he like Jung better than Freud…

      are you triggered???

      [url=https://imgflip.com/i/1p5vvt][img]https://i.imgflip.com/1p5vvt.jpg[/img][/url][url=https://imgflip.com/memegenerator]via Imgflip Meme Generator[/url]

      • Posting under a variety of aliases, “stonerwithaboner”, recently spammed my blog (just as he is doing here, unfortunately) solely to indulge in overt homosexualism. He recently waited until I was on holiday, so that he could spam xxx .gif images of homosexual men fucking and sucking each other. He also posted quotes about how he is happy and proud to be a homosexual.

        Needless to say he was permabanned the second I returned to my blog.

        Since then, he has attempted to register dozens of accounts to get back into the site, most recently this past weekend. He has failed every single time.

        So to everyone at Black Pill, please be aware that you’re dealing with a mystery meat fag with an unhealthy obsession with Matt Forney and Jack Donovan.

        Regards, Boxer

        • “Posting under a variety of aliases, “stonerwithaboner”, recently spammed my blog (just as he is doing here, unfortunately) solely to indulge in overt homosexualism. ”

          Oh no! the humanity! lololol

          Anything but homosexuality! its the end of the world.

          “So to everyone at Black Pill, please be aware that you’re dealing with a mystery meat fag with an unhealthy obsession with Matt Forney and Jack Donovan.”

          you don’t like gays?

        • You’re falling into your historical trap of conflating online nonsense with real-world relationships. To clarify, I think that the homosexual “stonerwithaboner” is a boring loser, who doesn’t troll effectively, and whose contributions, here and elsewhere, are nil. I’d have to actually know him to “not like him”.

          Hope this helps,

          Boxer

    • “Dear SWAB:

      it is EASILY provable the title is incorrect and I PROVED that…
      This reply is a great example of your inability to understand nuance. I don’t care about your last pissing match, and I don’t care about this one; and I won’t care about the next dozen people who laugh at/ban/ignore you. and your greatest original contribution is a collection of photos of Jack Donovan.

      Your the one like the feminists/alt-reich with all the false accusations.
      It’s ‘you’re’; and, speaking of false accusations, I wonder where that pathetic little cockroach “Tamerlame” scuttled off to. I thought he was going to post some more of his fun lies last night.

      Regards,

      Boxer”

      You are seriously mentally ill.

      Looks your ego got wounded when I called you out for your batshit insane ideas.

      BTW friends are over rated, i doubt you have many of them yourself anyway lolol.

      • Dear Drama Queen Tamerlame:

        You are seriously mentally ill.

        Looks your ego got wounded when I called you out for your batshit insane ideas.

        Wounded egos, mental illness… Sounds positively “freudian”

        BTW friends are over rated, i doubt you have many of them yourself anyway lolol.

        Your constant presence on the internet, coupled with the endless series of meaningless conflicts you create, is a fair sign of personal problems. Again, Freud called this displacement. It’s too bad you’ve never read the works that you laughably pretend to criticize here. You’d surely get a lot out of them.

        Regards,

        Boxer

        • I create conflicts?

          maybe you are right, but you are just as bad as me, if not even worse.

          I never called you a coackroach and dehumanized you.

          you are seriously sick.

        • You tried, in the most womanly possible way, to play a game of “lets you and him fight” with Black Pill and me.

          Only a woman would do this. Come clean, sister. You’re a feminist who is fucking with people here, am I right?

        • “Your constant presence on the internet”

          your on the internet as well. Can you measure my presence on the internet?

          Just another shaming attempt.

          “Your constant presence on the internet, coupled with the endless series of meaningless conflicts you create, is a fair sign of personal problems. Again, Freud called this displacement.”

          Ever heard of the concept called projection? You are involved in a meaningless conflict right now.

          You had an embarrassing mental melt down in front of everyone.

          Why you took passive aggressive jabs at Black Pill is beyond me, but you are seriously mentally ill.

        • You had an embarrassing mental melt down in front of everyone.

          I suppose I ought to be embarrassed, of wasting time with the likes of you, but I never claimed to have highbrow hobbies.

          Why you took passive aggressive jabs at Black Pill is beyond me, but you are seriously mentally ill.

          For better and for worse, you are part of Black Pill’s brand. Maybe he doesn’t care, but if you two women were stinking up my blog, I’d have a huge problem with the association.

          That isn’t passive-aggressive. It’s just an honest observation from my perspective. He can make of it whatever he likes.

  8. Dear Drama Queen Tamerlame:

    You accused Black Pill of surrounding himself with sychophants.

    He doesn’t seem very interested in his audience, it’s true. Anyway, if that’s the best example you can come up with as far as “trash talk,” then I guess you were lying, huh?

    It wouldn’t be the first time, would it?

    BTW after your spazz out, Black pill stopped speaking to me, so that disproves your sychopahnt accusations lol

    I suppose I’ll have to apologize and retract my earlier statement then. That’s easy enough, and bonus points for him in being more judicious with his time and attention.

    Freud Equals pseudo science. It would behoove you not to call others kooks.

    I call you a kook not to insult you, but because it’s true. You pretend to lecture on works that you know nothing about, you wander around online, venting the pathetic, impotent rage you neither have the courage to express in real life, nor the fortitude to resolve constructively.

    It’s all quite sad, actually.

    Regards,

    Boxer

    • “He doesn’t seem very interested in his audience, it’s true. Anyway, if that’s the best example you can come up with as far as “trash talk,” then I guess you were lying, huh?”

      That was an passive aggressive attack on his character and you know it.

      I wasn’t lying, so you are now resorting to gaslighting now are you?

      “You pretend to lecture on works that you know nothing about”

      Empty appeal to ridicule, I hate to be pedantic, but how does on pretend to lecture? on either lecture or doesn’t .

      ” impotent rage you neither have the courage to express in real life, nor the fortitude to resolve constructively.”

      I have beaten up women in real life, I have shouted abuse at judges in court. Telling them to jail me. You do not know me, perhaps you are a coward and you are projecting. At the end of the day all men are cowards under this system because we accept it and live under it.

      The only valid point you bring up is me about resolving things constructively, that is a weakness I admit to.

      BTW you could learn to resolve things constructively, instead of flipping out and spewing bile.

      • White Knight Male Feminist detected…

        for all you know he handed out a beating to protect a small child or innocent puppy dog from a mad woman.

        Neither of you two faggots have ever faced any conflict in real life. Your pent up aggression, which makes fools of you, daily on the internet, is proof enough of that.

        Do keep poasting. It’s a laugh riot.

        Regards,

        Boxer

        • hahahaha….

          for the record I’m not gay, just ask your mom and sister….

          low status men seems to be their fetish. In fact they bought me lunch afterowrds and slipped $200 in my front pocket.

        • for the record I’m not gay, just ask your mom and sister….

          Years of obsessive posts featuring half-naked photos of Jack Donovan prove your point, no doubt.

        • Apparently I have caused offence to him and other prominent members of the alt-wrong such as Aaron Clarey and Richard Spencer. Only reason that “triggers” you is because you support work which hates low status men.

        • Apparently I have caused offence to him and other prominent members of the alt-wrong such as Aaron Clarey and Richard Spencer. Only reason that “triggers” you is because you support work which hates low status men.

          This sort of wordsalad doesn’t effectively convey any information, except in the metadata, where the reader rapidly becomes convinced that you’re an unstable idiot.

          It is, of course, very heterosexual to spend years posting gay pr0n online, and to obsessively talk about homos.

        • hahaha, your the one with Jack Donovan and Heartiste linked on your blog, not me buddy. I don’t engage in psychobabble much but methinks you are guilty of “projection.”

        • You are anti male, using the term faggot as a anti male slur, attacking other men for their low status.

          Why are you even here?

        • You are anti male, using the term faggot as a anti male slur, attacking other men for their low status.

          You aren’t men. Men don’t beg, for weeks, for someone to come and interact with them, then whine when he finally gets time to show up.

          You’re women. Only women behave like you two.

          Why are you even here?

          Because you both consistently begged for my attention.

      • Yeah? What are you going to do about it, honey?

        You fems don’t get it. Your shaming language doesn’t work on men any longer.

  9. Dear SWAB:

    hahaha, your the one with Jack Donovan and Heartiste linked on your blog, not me buddy. I don’t engage in psychobabble much but methinks you are guilty of “projection.”

    I’ve got a link to this blog on mine, as well. I read a wide variety of sources, and I recognize quality argumentation and salient points even when I don’t agree with all of it.

    That is the basic difference between an individuated man (like me) and a couple of losers like you and Tamerlame, who is amazed that I don’t hate my own commenters even when I debate them. More generally, that is one of the reasons that my life is enjoyable, and your lives are miserable.

    Regards,

    Boxer

    • You talk about good argumentation, then you do pointless ad hom attacks.

      I would advise you to stop before you carry on making a further fool of yourself.

    • You say.

      “That is the basic difference between an individuated man (like me) and a couple of losers like you and Tamerlame, who is amazed that I don’t hate my own commenters even when I debate them. More generally, that is one of the reasons that my life is enjoyable, and your lives are miserable.”

      You say you do not hate me, but then you call me a cockroach?

      You are gone in the head.

      More personal attacks.

      • Right, right. You are amazed that I’m treating you the way you’ve treated me for a year, now.

        In other words, you expect the double standard and the female privilege, like any feminist. Again, only a woman would do this.

    • Jordan is a Jungian, his waffling on about archetypes all the time.

      Also he believes in cultural Marxism, he posts tweets about Cultural Marxism destroying america.

      • I’m not saying he has perfect beliefs, I am saying *this* argument sounds like a MGTOW argument. Walk away from that which is hurting you. Oh, yeah, when I say MGTOW, I mean a man looking out for his own self interests, not whatever those weirdoes Barbarabroski and Starduskiepoops are pedaling at whatever moment. I renounce the manuresphere and Youtube MGTOW 100%.

        And I was unaware of his “cultural marxism” tweets….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s