38 comments on “Hating Women Can Save Your Life

  1. hate gets a bad rap, most especially because people are afraid of what a motivated person can do when driven by hate. they should be afraid, but they should also be ready to ask themselves what caused the hate. no one’s willing to do that anymore.

  2. Bourdian was an entirely uninteresting man. His superficial career was primarily aimed at enteraining women. Other than noticing this, I paid him no attention.

    Hate makes sense only if it means a separation from women. A “cutting-away”, if you will, because, after thinking seriously about them, you conclude, correctly, that they are not to be regarded highly.

    Hate isn’t the right emotion if it is the mirror-side of love. Men who love women hate that the women are not how they want them to be in order to love them. Those men who hate women in that manner are still obsessed with women.

    • hate always comes first, but when it’s exhausted any normal or sane person will ask themselves what comes next.

      and what comes next is usually that fallout 76 is coming in 5 months and I’m gonna build a settlement with my brother and nuke giant sloths. but I get it, some people don’t want to play an online fallout. some people don’t like fallout at all. whatever.

  3. “Bourdain was not different from many incels whose self image and mental state is completely dependent on women.”

    why do you think I politely tried to tell you guys to leave the “incels” behind?

    “Incels” worship womyn and think of themselves as incomplete without one…

    • incel is the label they created to demonize people who don’t worship the biological impulse to procreate.

      ironically, the most incel people I have ever seen tend to be women.

    • Incomplete? Why, no, not at all. Worship women? Are you running a high fever, Stoner?
      I don’t worship poison oak, or crave chocolate that’s been laced with rat poison.
      You put yourself on thin ice when you try to make statements that apply to all incels.

      “Generalizations and absolutes are always false”, he said, laughing at himself.

      • y’know what dude, there used to be a condescending blog called “feminist critics” and this dude Ballgame used to always police my speech. (At least I think BG was a dude, but they subscribed to the notion there are 87.95321 gendars so maybe Ballgame was zir/zheng squared by the nth degree quadrapled.)

        SWAB: “I really think it’s hypocritical when feminists say f#ck depression after Robin Williams death but a week before they were parading around in their I Bath In Male Tears T-Shirt.”

        Ballgame: “SWAB, I am getting really tired of playing police man to you sloppy language and I will put you on moderation if you do not put the qualifier **many feminists** because, y’know not all feminists are like that…”

        SWAB: “Okay, Ballgame, I find it hypocritical that many, if not most feminists…”

        Ballgame: “Your testing my patience, permanent moderation for you, you little, little man!!!”

        SWAB (In Moderation): “I don’t appreciate being called a little, little man. In fact it almost feels like fat shaming.”

        Ballgame (In notes onyl moderation hell guy can see): “You kyriarchical misogynist. You cannot compare being short for a man to a woman being fat. YOU COULD GO GET AN OPERATION TO RAISE YOUR HEIGHT. Asking a fat woman to eat less is misogyny!!!! You are not welcome at our progressive blog. Now do remember to vote for Hillary Clinton, we cahn’t let that monster Donald Trump win. And do remember to laugh when Bill Maher is on TV otherwise you are a worse bigot than I thought….

        • Educated in public schools after the 1970s, weren’t you?

          It’s not your fault, then.

        • Stoner, this could be a topic for a thread of its own. The debasement of language, that is, the role of the public school system to push the feminist agenda.
          I was lucky. I was educated in both public and private schools before the radicalization of the curriculum, and my parents and teachers demanded a very high standard of academic performance from me.
          George Orwell prophetically foresaw the utility of controlling the language as a form of mind-control. In effect, if you don’t know the word, you can’t think the thought.
          Ray Bradbury saw it happening, also. ‘Fahrenheit 451’ isn’t just a sci-fi novel, it’s a warning.

        • “In effect, if you don’t know the word, you can’t think the thought.”

          I actually think thought is more powerful than words. My understanding is Einstein visualized the theory of relativity. Of course he had the language to describe it and maybe even the salesmanship to sell the ideas. Similar to the idea that musical notation isn’t music…

          But I do understand that if you don’t have the “language” it will be difficult to communicate ideas, that was why it was so frustrating discussing gender stuff with feminists and MRA’s. Feminists invented the lingo and MRA’s were stuck in that wrold view, just in reverse, MGTOW looked promising but turned into libertarian tough guy posturing and obsessing over womyn…

          oh, well…

  4. I would argue that going through a phase of hate is necessary to distance one from their emotional crutch on women/their indoctrinated perception of them. However, My tastes personally advocate disdain, wariness or apathy.

    Either love or hate is giving yourself into the feminine imperative – remember that women are eternal victims signalers and narcissists. So, I give them nothing. That said, I certainly don’t won’t chastise any man who ends up hating women. Frankly, its an logical reaction to the actions we witness from females on a daily basis. I’m shocked more men DON’T despise women.

    Furthermore, I’ve been accused of this by other MGTOW and various men. Citing that my posts are predicated on misogyny.

    As we know, society is feminine focused so any opinion critical of women is vilified and the term misogyny is invoked as a shaming tactic and ultimately shut down any opposing views. In that sense, you bring up a good point. They subtlety prove that men are second class citizens in relation to women and that any negative perception of women is not allowed. Its like religious people and the concept of blasphemy.

    An adequate response to these appeals to emotion is state that regardless of your hate, it doesn’t mean it isn’t justified nor does it mean you are wrong. Its like shaming Jews for hating the Nazis, or Japanese Americans for being bitter after their disgusting treatment following the pearl harbor incident.

    It is perfectly normal and just to be angry, or even hate those that have wronged you. In women’s case, they do this repeatedly and often maliciously.

    Any attempt to shame men who point this out is gaslighting. Stand your ground.

  5. Moving on from hatred of women to utter indifference is part of freeing one’s self, it seems to me.

    I’m allergic to poison oak, for example. If I come into contact with it, I end up looking (and feeling!) like somebody with bad radiation burns (hatred). The wounds heal, but I don’t go on a mad rampage to eradicate poison oak. I just avoid it (indifference, or aversion, if you like).

  6. A lot of men especially the manosphere (like Aaron Clarey) say they love women but I think most of them hate women and just try to hide behind them when arguing. This may be a stretch, but I think such guys are like Hamas and other terrorist groups of the Middle East. When fighting against the U.S. or other groups, they shoot behind and hide behind among civilians especially women and children. Yet such terrorist groups claim they love women and are fighting to protect them from the enemy.

    For example, in a video by Rocking Mr. E on YouTube, I said how most people who preach traditional monogamy are hypocrites and liars. I said one can’t go from just the privilege of polygamy to only the responsibility of traditional monogamy. Suddenly, someone responded to me basically screaming misogynist at me, just accusing me of hating all women, calling me sick and yucky, and so on. I wasn’t going to waste my time responding back to an emotional response with no substance. I wasn’t really thinking of women at the time. I was thinking of men like Aaron Clarey and Rocking Mr. E.
    Overall, this commentor runs behind women in a cyber arguement so I couldn’t say anything without appearing to hate women.

    • @ GargoyleVirgin:

      My advice, don’t waste your time with the likes of Rocking Mr. E or Aaron “Captain Capitalism” Clarey or other YewToob alt-right tards. The last person I would take any kind of advice or elucidation from, let alone take seriously, is some transparent closet homosexual NEET metalhead loser manchild who LARPs as a Greek (despite not knowing a syllable of Greek, not looking like ANY Greek I have ever seen (and I’ve known plenty but none look like hook-nosed “camel jockeys” to me), or never having any affiliation with the Greek Orthodox Church), a LITERAL CUCKOLD who spends his days in his cuckshed producing shitty autistic vidya rants, begging for Patreon shekels, while his wife works, earns the family’s revenue, and rides alpha cock.

      His latest bunch of videos seem to have taken a surprisingly anti-Semitic turn. What is he, a self-hating Jew now all of a sudden? Is he trying to be the next Bobby Fischer? [Or was RME an Arab crypto-Muslim practicing taqiyya all along?] Funny, he was such a staunch Zionist, fairly consistently pro-Israel and anti-Islam, but he has one video promoting the long-discredited Khazar hypothesis for the origin of Ashkenazim, and, perhaps more ironically, attacking Christian Zionism of all things. (Does this Dunning-Kruger shitskin even realize what he’s doing? Is he that hard up for views that he would literally overturn almost everything he purported to believe like that?) Does that parasitic, ungrateful Mizrahi kike not realize who much Ashkenazim (i.e. “Khazars” and therefore “not Semitic”) have strove and sacrificed and worked to get where Israel is today? Who do you thing bore the brunt of the Holocaust? Millions of Jews? Millions of Ashkenazim. The millions of Jews slaughtered by the Nazis were overwhelmingly Ashkenazic. Not to discount the suffering of, say the Sephardic Jews from Axis-occupied Greece, but while millions of people who Rocking Mystery-Meat Cuckold denounces as “not Semitic therefore not really Jewish” were living in terror, fleeing, suffering, perishing, RME’s inbred Mizrahi ancestors were busy roaming the Middle East living as beggars… which fits because that’s all he is today, a filthy beggar, who married some skank to {A} conceal his painfully obvious homosexuality, and {B} live a carefree NEET lifestyle where all he does is babysit his wife’s kids of mysterious paternity and retreat to his cuckshed once a week for some vlogging. And don’t forget that the foundation of Israel was largely an Ashkenazic enterprise. Theodor Herzl? Chaim Weizmann? If not for those Ashkenazi “fake” Jews, there would be no safe haven for Mizrahi kikes like him to retreat to.

      Rant over, but that’s just what I think about Rocking Mr. Cuck and Craptain Crapitalism…

      • Being pro-Israel and anti Islam does not equate to being a Zionist.

        After looking at the facts and the real reason for the middle east conflict, the sides turn out to be far more black and white than progressives and moderates would have us believe.

        Supporting Israel’s right not to be attacked by religious madmen due to insane doctrine and irrational hatred, combined with propaganda aimed at the west for handouts is simply having a modicum of sense.

        • @ Ergeniz:

          What is Israel then? The Jewish State, an entity founded by repatriating a diasporic people to their ostensible homeland. If you are pro-Israel, then you are by definition a “Zionist” in a literal, not pejorative sense. If you agree that Israel should exist, that founding it was the right move and that the struggle to preserve it is worth fighting for, then I would say you are a Zionist, at least in a minimalistic sense. I support the State of Israel on the grounds that we deserve a home country. Ideally, every people should have a homeland.

          That of course does not mean I support EVERYTHING about Israel. Jews, as a people, are entitled to a nation-state, a homeland, ideally more-or-less where it is. Beyond that, I don’t support more subversive actions of the Israeli regime (right off the top of my head, the de facto Israeli alignment with the Sunni powers, the “Judeo-Sunni axis” that forces the USA, Israel, and Saudi Arabia into a fucked-up love triangle to the detriment of Shiite & Alawite powers…). Of course, the conflict is not some fairy tale Manichean struggle between Light and Dark [as if this were fucking “Star Wars”] as you seem to present it. Personally, I see Israel as being on somewhat of a moral higher ground, but the truth is, the Jews inherited a shit situation, establishing Israel in a very volatile part of the world, and stuck with the aftermath of rather hastily and poorly setting up the enterprise, an aftermath worsened by Bloods-and-Crips style cyclical hatred. [If anything, I would blame the British, (((le Eternal Anglo))), Perfidious Albion, more than the Jews on that one.] BUT THAT IS A WHOLE ‘NOTHER POINT.

          (I am still not sure whether he is a dirty Mizrahi Jew, once zealous but now jealous, or if he is an Arab practicing taqiyya. He claims to be Greek, but I know for a fact that is not the case. I had many Greek friends over the years, not one who looked anything like Rocking Mystery Meat.)

          I think the point went over your head. I was merely pointing out the irony that Rocking Mystery Meat would argue passionately for Israel to the point of denying that Palestine ever existed (even though, it was the British more so than any Arab who founded “Palestine” in the first place), only to make a Face-Heel Turn. Going from being an apologist to a critic of Judaism, denouncing Christian Zionism (which was literally the 100% extent of whatever religious views that vacuous retard held), and promoting the ridiculous, long-debunked Khazar theory… Granted, there is probably SOMETHING to the Khazar hypothesis, in that there WAS a short-lived Jewish Khazar polity. I am sure some conversion and intermarriage occurred both ways, though Khazaria was an ethnically and racially mixed nation, and the Khazar Jews were, as I understand it, more of an endogamous elite lording over the Khazar Turks. Plus, Khazaria was not really the urheimat of Ashkenazic Jewry, the most likely candidate being the eastern fringes of the Carolingian Empire (particularly the tributary provinces), essentially the Germanic-Slavic boundary. The Yiddish language itself is evidence of this, originating as a German dialect that was heavily Slavicized. If there is anything to the Khazar hypothesis, it is greatly exaggerated. At most a large subset of Ashkenazic Jewry have non-negligible Turkic and other admixture from that brief chapter of history, still does not make the Ashkenazim “not Semitic” or “not really Jewish” though. [Then again, we Ashkenazim are notorious for our lead in Nobel prize count. Mizrahi kebabs like RME only serve to drag down the national IQ of Israel, indicating that perhaps Operation Magic Carpet was a big fucking mistake.]

          My POINT is that Rocking MrE is NEVER to be taken seriously. He is a whore who will say anything for Patreon shekels. It is best to let him languish in obscurity, yet GV was practically spamming that clown as if he is now, or ever really was, relevant.

          General takeaway, disregard anything from a man who:
          > lives in the UK, LARPs as some kind of “White Nationalist” against globalism when he is some kind of smelly Semitic wog living where he does purely due to globalism.
          > is very painfully obviously a homosexual (given away by his laughably effete mannerisms and his unnecessary homophobia, i.e. defensive posturing) and a literal cuckold, not to mention a crypto-feminist who tells other men to “man up” and be “TRADITIONAL”(TM) whilst his feminist wife works out in the corporate world, riding Chad cock, and earning the family income all the while he is a lazy NEET parasite who vlogs and begs from his cuck shed when he is not busy babysitting his wife’s kids.
          > is literally too stupid to argue, so insults all dissenters and threatens to block any who dare to disagree, only allowing cock-sucking sycophants to post fawning praise. (Most notably by his gay lover Bernard Chapin and the rest of his small but zealous core of homoerotic fanboys.)

          I think the bigger issue is that this effeminate literal cuckold SHAMES ANY AND ALL MEN WHO DO NOT LIVE A GYNOCENTRIC EXISTENCE despite being a “libertarian” or “classical liberal” or whatever the fuck inane ideology he claims to hold. [Apparently, an eclectic blend of free market capitalism, civic nationalism, and Islam-tier sharia (…but mostly for men, as his crypto-feminism lends him a soft spot when it comes to women), but I am pretty sure he is too stupid to maintain a coherent ideology.] Certainly more relevant than arguments in favor of or antagonistic to Israel.

        • We are more in agreement than you think.

          I’m simply saying that one can make an argument for Israel without necessarily agreeing with the Jewish state, let alone everything they do. That does not constitute being Zionist. That’s like saying frowning upon any violation of human rights makes one Zionist. There need not be a word for it other than being called ‘sane’.

          In terms of human rights violations, Israel is the only middle eastern country that actually engages in democracy and where people of all faiths can live and contribute with insane religious laws threatening them for trivial and ridiculous reasons. Israel goes out of their way to minimize civilian causalities and only respond to attacks by HAMAS and other Muslim majority countries; they even (stupidly) surrendered Gaza among other things in an attempt to appease these madmen. Which of course simply resulted in Gaza becoming a base for rocket barrages aimed at Israel, all the while the incompetent and corrupt UN and western media bang the drum for the non-existent country of Palestine.

          I’ve thought the Jews occupying the so-called holy land was outrageous from the start. The only reason they’ve put themselves into such a position is because of the stupidest reason one could ever conceive: Religion. In the vein, they’re as irrational as the Arabs. I’m in full agreement Jews deserve their own state however, and I support them ignoring the ridiculous UN ‘resolutions’, especially when its obvious they are in the Arab’s back pocket.

          Regardless, they’ve never set out to attack anyone and Israel is a world technological leader. This conflict could have ended ages ago if the Arabs put down their weapons, but the last thing the Muslims desire is peace. Its in the HAMAS charter; that this isn’t even about the so-called Holy Land but about Jewish extermination and genocide. They’re not interested in land or even the well-being of their own people. Every peace settlement has been de-railed with more and more excuses by the Arabs.

          This is simply a war based on Islamic scripture and irrational hatred of Jews. And so, it doesn’t take being a Zionist shill to agree with Israel’s stance.

        • Point taken! My only issue is that your account is hopelessly biased and one-sided. You see Israeli Jewry as fundamentally blameless and the Arabs as mindless Islamic fundamentalists, when the truth is a lot muddier than that. I grant that Israel is the closest thing to a modern nation-state in that hellhole called the Middle East. The closest to a functioning democracy, a SECULAR entity that actually respects human rights (including women’s rights, gay rights, etc.) when many Arabs seem to be reverting to sharia ideologies. On this basis alone, one might favor Israel, (are you by chance a Jew?) and I have my personal preference towards Israel given my own Ashkenazi Jewish origin…

          That said…
          “I’m simply saying that one can make an argument for Israel without necessarily agreeing with the Jewish state, let alone everything they do. That does not constitute being Zionist. That’s like saying frowning upon any violation of human rights makes one Zionist. There need not be a word for it other than being called ‘sane’.”

          The above makes absolutely NO SENSE!


          “…an international movement originally for the establishment of a Jewish national or religious community in Palestine and later for the support of modern Israel…”

          Makes you a Zionist by definition, in a literal and tautological sense, yet you seem to project a pejorative connotation to the term “Zionist.” I would venture that most people are “Zionist” to some extent or other. In my case, I am all for Jewish Israel, but in a way that acknowledges Palestine. Two-state solution? Alternately, maybe the “three state solution” is the best… {1. Israel fucks off behind their 1967 borders. All neighboring Arab countries fuck off in turn, agreeing to cease all aggression and hostility against the Jewish State and leaving it in peace. 2. Egypt annexes the Gaza Strip, Jordan annexes the West Bank. All “Palestinians” granted citizenship in either country. The Golan Heights is returned to Syria.}

          I am aware that any solution to the Middle East is likely to be idealistic. I can easily draw up dozens of solutions, but essentially all of them involve TIME TRAVEL. The problem is that the whole region is fucked to the core, not merely because of “Islam” but more so because of the fucking British! The British Empire is the most evil empire ever to befall this world. Perhaps the number one problem in the Arab world is the lack of any organic nationalism, forcing Arabs to chose between Ba’athism and Islamism. Remember that the Middle East is made up of non-countries, essentially neo-colonies. Fake countries like Lebanon, Syria, “Iraq,” “Palestine,” and the various Arab monarchies, all created, directly or indirectly, by the British (or French in some cases) out of former Ottoman clay. Palestinians who claim that Jews stole Palestine from the Muslims might be incorrect but they’re not far off. It was the Eternal Anglo who stole “Palestine” from the “Muslims” (Ottomans) and invented the modern concept of Palestine, issuing contradictory promises to the Jews (Balfour Declaration) and the Arabs. [Also, le Eternal Anglo is directly responsible for the evil Islamic Republic of Iran existing when they used their agent, the Anglo-Indian Khomeini, to undermine the Shah in the “Iranian” Islamic Revolution of 1979. But that’s a whole ‘nother story.] It is unfortunate that the Jews trusted le (((Eternal Anglo))) to topple the Ottoman Empire and release Palestine overnight, when perhaps a gradualist approach would have worked better. I envision a world where the Ottoman Empire survived for most of the 20th century, during which Jews could have subtly settled Palestine, perhaps getting an autonomous but loyal Jewish Autonomous Sanjak around Jerusalem, which could form the core of an independent Jewish state upon the (invetiable?) breakup of the Ottoman Empire [whether this process would have been peaceful like Czechoslovakia or violent like Yugoslavia is another question].

          My ideal Middle East would consist of: one Syriac Christian country comprising Mesopotamia (most of Iraq, major parts of Syria and Turkey, parts of Iran and Jordan, perhaps part of Kuwait; essentially the Euphrates-Tigris watershed minus the Karun-Zagros basin, which would go to Iran) for Assyrians and Chaldeans; one Jewish state centered on Jerusalem, roughly corresponding to where it is now; the Arab Republic of Egypt; Turkey; Iran (ideally a constitutional monarchy); one Lebanese Christian state (“Greater Lebanon”) corresponding to historic Phoenicia; one Alawite state in northwest Syria, presumably with the Hatay area of southern Turkey (I can see this entity being a de-facto monarchy and “hereditary republic” under the Assad clan, but absent ethnic and sectarian violence, nobody would likely have any issue); one single pan-Arab state, the Hashemite Kingdom of Arabia, consisting of essentially the entire Arabian Peninsula plus Transjordan / the Syrian Desert, so much the worse for the perfidious House of Saud… But alas, none of this is likely to transpire!

          But whatever your or opinion, or mine, that is besides the point. Rocking MrE once took a hardline stance, going so far as to deny the very existence of “Palestinians” when, ironically, that filthy wog constantly shills for the Eternal Anglo (fitting as he resides in the UK, where he was born, and seems to have no sense of identity or heritage beyond his obviously fake “Greek” identity) and it was Perfidious Albion who is more responsible for the concept of an Arab Palestinian national identity (via their mandate of Palestine) than anyone else. He once took a hardline stance pro-Israel, but recently released no fewer than three (3) videos attacking Judaism / Christian Zionism / the Jewishness of Ashkenazim. Needless to say, I found this very bizarre! Perhaps he has been a crypto-Muslim practicing taqiyya all along!

          Only problem with this hypothesis is that Rocking Mystery Meat is too much of a feminist mangina to be the type of Muslim to practice taqiyya. If anyone is a taqiyya agent it would be Roosh. He is the type of over-the-top nut who would demand that women go burka’d. Perhaps his PUA manslut schtick was all a cover for his Islamist agenda (then again it could just be a cover for his obvious down-low homosexuality). At least Roosh is a NEET or semi-NEET who lives with his mother. RME is a NEET who lives with his feminist working “wife” (READ: beard and ersatz “mother” for purpose of maintaining a parasitic NEET lifestyle). Personally, I believe that both Rocking MrE and Roosh V are Mizrahi Jews (…they both look so much alike! both have that ambiguously brown über-Semitic mystery meat look…) and incidentally both are transparent closet homosexuals. (Roosh hides it with his PUA manslut schtick and his retarded chest-thumping hyper-masculine posturing, which he in turn attempted to monetize with his astoundingly shitty “Bang” books. RME hides behind “muh-wife-n-kieds-n-shiet” while hypocritically promoting a Tradcon lifestyle.) I personally think Roosh V. is an Iranian Jew (he produced so much contradictory information on his ethnic and religious background, there is no telling what the truth is!) but would not be TOO surprised if he turned out to be a crypto-Muslim with a taqiyya agenda. As to RME, I am unable to imagine any man being happy living as a stay-at-home cuckold, let alone the type of Muslim to do taqiyya, so don’t see how that would account for his sudden anti-Jewish streak.

          MY ISSUE, MR. ERGENIZ, AND MY POINT ALL ALONG, is that Rocking MrE is not, and never was, credible on ANYTHING! You keep bringing up Israel and the Middle East, but whether or not the Jewish State of Israel should even exist, and the where/when/how/why of it all, is not really on topic and beyond the scope of this Blog. I merely meant to point out how RME went from a staunch supporter to a rival of Jewry out of left field. The idiot contradicts himself with virtually every new video. (Yet ironically he refuses to change his mind in the context of honest debate.) My last word RE: Rocking Mystery Meat is that he should not be taken seriously by anyone ever, that he is deserving of nothing short of derision, mockery, and scorn… or better yet being ignored altogether. The man is as stupid as he is ugly. I suppose he may have an agenda on YouTube (besides begging for Patreon shekels while babysitting his wife’s kids), but who knows what? If he is a Hasbara agent then that would beg the question of his last few videos. If he is an undercover Islamist, that begs the question why he would live a feminist househusband lifestyle without even bothering to hide it.

        • I’m not a Jew.

          I thought it made it clear that I don’t subscribe to the notion that the Jews are baseless victims and somehow shining white paragons of virtue. I said explicitly that the Jews settling in that area was stupidly provocative (intentional or not) and they were fully aware of it. This decision was made completely based on religious ideology and ‘divine right’. A thinking process that I cannot at all sympathize with or support.

          The appropriate place for Israel would be in Europe, if anything. If there were need for reparations, that would be it. Considering the travesty that was the Holocaust and European countries pathetic cowardice at allowing it to occur.

          However, it is objectively true that Israel has gone out of its way to otherwise remain peaceful in the face of irrational Arab hatred and genocidal tendencies. The sole perpetrators of the middle eastern conflict are the Muslims as a result of their Jew hating indoctrination. One can see how they raise young Arabs in Muslim majority countries – brainwashing them into thinking the Jews are obsessed oppressors, that they are subhuman and inferior and there are actually schools that teach children to be suicide bombers with the notion of an martyr that has wasted his life to extinguish an Jew is the highest achievement one can attain.

          As I mentioned before, Israel has never gone out of its way to initiate violence against its neighbors and the entire conflict was started by several Muslim nations that converged on the nation of Israel with the intention of committing genocide – entirely out of baseless, religious hatred. Before Israel had relinquished Gaza, they had initiated a peace treaty with the previous Egyptian president. Guess what happened to him?

          From a practical standpoint, Israel is an civilized nation with many technological and scientific contributions to society as a whole. As opposed to Arabs, who only have monopolies on oil and are using it to force their poisonous Wahhabi doctrine into western territories.

          So no, while the Jews are hardly saints this conflict is as pretty close to white and black as one can get. There are numerous, demonstrable reasons to support Israel over any of its neighbors.

  7. Oh, and about Andrew B. –

    I don’t give a flying figleaf about anything that so-called ‘celebrities’ think, say, or do. They never call, text, or come over for coffee – they simply have zero effect on what I think, say or do.
    Too bad the guy killed himself, though. That is sad.

  8. Here is a video from Rocking Mr. E discussing incels, MGTOW, male virgins, and much more. I didn’t watch the video, at least not yet, because of all the hatred in the comments toward single, virgin men. I don’t think I can stomach it. Rocking Mr. E and so many others,, in the comments, has insulted and attacked physically unattractive men and men in the bottom 5%. He and the others are practically screaming for Holocaust for low-status, virgin, men. Notice in the thumbnail he has a picture of Elliot Rodger dressed up like a god, passing off propaganda that he worshiped by undesirable men.

    • I watched the video. He basically says all of the shooters were incels/male virgins and the incels/male virgins see Elliot Rodger as a hero.
      Rocking Mr. E also says that there is very little truth to hypergamy, and he says any man who talks about hypergamy is a misogynist and a loser who can’t get laid.
      Me (in sarcastic tone): “Really? I didn’t know there were princesses marrying street rats” (reference to Disney’s Aladdin.) “So, we’re back to the old, “Oh, women only care about confidence and personality. Any man can get any girl he wants as long as he has social skills

      • “Any man can get any girl he wants as long as he has social skills.’

        Sounds like he missed the idea.

        I know how to make sure that I get tetanus by wounding myself with a piece of rusty iron, but that doesn’t mean that I want to. Truth be told, I have fairly good manners, and can be charming.
        What I won’t do is deliberately bring yet another parasitic female into my life. I had a hell of a time dealing with the last one.

  9. Sloppy Joe “Where’s the Beef” Rogan….

    “They have to become men….”

    “Marriage won’t help “incels”

    No, Brogan, marriage won’t help MEN!

    and notice how Barbarbarrossa and Stardusk would line up to give these two dudes blowjobs….

      • That was a figure of speech. A shot at Barbs and Ziggy Stardusk for all their libertarian tough guy talk. (And you have seen even more of that talk than I have.) Barbie seems like an MMA type guy who would love Rogan though I never met the guy, just get that impression from his tough guy personna and incredibly arrogant manner of speech. Ironically, for all Rogan’s faults, I think he is much more open minded and politically moderate than Barbs and Ziggy.

  10. Here is a question I would like to ask the manosphere guys like Rocking Mr. E (who has two daughters):
    When your daughters enter the teen years, hit puberty, (whatever you want to call it), are you going to become suspicious of every guy who flirts, hits on, (whatever you want to call it), your daughters. Are you going to demand only the best of the best for your daughter? What if a man entices your daughter and gets her to have consent sex with him? What if he puts her on birth control pills or other drugs risking doing damage to her body? What if the man leaves her under the guise of “Oh, she wasn’t the one. After all, one has to date a few times before finding their wife, right?” (Kind of like you did.)
    Would this all be okay or are your daughters suddenly special snowflakes?
    Funny thing is, a guy claims that Roosh V said that if any man practiced game/PUA on any of his female relatives, Roosh V would kill them. Well, not much of a surprise there.

    • Here is a question I would like to ask the manosphere guys like Rocking Mr. E (who has two daughters):
      When your daughters enter the teen years, hit puberty, (whatever you want to call it)

      Correction, his “wife” (read: beard) has two daughters, which I guarantee are NOT his biologically. [Alpha fucks, Beta bucks… or in this case; Alpha fucks, Omega NEET babysitter, I guess]

      What will most happen well before that point, “Rocking Mrs. E” will divorce Rocking Mr. E’s lazy, parasitic, greasy NEET ass and throw him out of the fucking house. Presumably, the family will conduct DNA testing proving what we all knew all along, depending on the nature of RME’s denial, confirming that he is not the father of either of the girls. (Fortunately, in this case, I would hope the poor schmuck is not liable for any sort of alimony or child support payments. As much as I hate that man and would take pleasure at his suffering, it would be a travesty of justice for him to support kids that are obviously not his, but I am not sure how the laws in the UK operate in that regard. I know that in the USA there are cases where genetic testing proving that the assumed father is not the biological father does not necessarily get the man off the hook.)

      I mean how old is “their” youngest daughter by now? Four, five years old? Figure when the youngest is old enough to be independent (not necessarily to live on her own as an adult, but where she will not require constant supervision when she is back from school), “Rocking Mrs. E” will be able to continue working fulltime at her corporate job and, not needing a live-in babysitter, could kick RME’s worthless ass out of the house so that she does not need to bother sending him to his cuckshed whenever corporate Chad after Chad visits. After which he will attempt suicide in various hilarious ways, hopefully succeeding. [Emphasis on “hilarious” because living in the UK, where firearms are rare and English bobbies do not generally carry guns, neither self-inflicted gunshot nor suicide-by-cop are viable options.]

      P.S. Yes, apologies in advance. I am aware that Tamerlame, and perhaps you, maybe even The Man in the Orbital Castle will hate this. Tamerlame in particular, partially owing to his socialist (NOT “Marxist” or “communist” I mean, I see him as a social democrat, no I am NOT RME…) leanings, he might misread something as racist (or homophobic, anti-Semitic, whatever) in my comments, but more so for my schadenfreude at Rocking Mr. Cuck’s expense he might call me anti-male.

      Ordinarily I feel nothing but sympathy for any man who got cucked (literally or figuratively) by his wife and/or divorce-raped. However, in the case of schmucks like Rocking Mystery Meat, or really anyone who engages in all the chest-thumping tradcon faggotry, if, no WHEN, the worst befalls them, I can’t help but smirk and laugh at their plight. For someone who shames MGTOW men, or anyone who does not fall for the LifeScript or the “Vaginal Jew” like he does… HA! Told ya so! Don’t say we didn’t warn you. [Funny, I thought he was a libertarian, or so he styled himself, I have no idea what he calls himself now, but for an alleged “libertarian” he sure loves to spew reactionary horseshit about how you must live your life. Nothing libertarian about that!] This goes beyond my seething hatred of that “man” on a molecular level, for reasons too numerous to elucidate here. I mean, I believe the whole entire world would be better off with him dead, most of all him, considering what an abject failure of a man, of a “human” being he is, but such an outcome would be deliciously ironic. As a NEET Mr. Mom, once his wife evicts him, he will be forced to live as a street musician, but when his shitty guitar playing does not earn him enough pounds or pence he will have to prostitute himself to random men of Wales, some of whom would pay him for a blow job just to avoid hearing his shitty singing in his disgusting, whiny nasal voice.

      • LOL look at this facebook post I found from Rocking Mr.E

        Here is a small piece of it, “They play first person war games, while hypocritically complaining that men are forced to get involved in war, as they play simulation war games. Oh, the male disposability!”

        This is hypocrisy?!?! Are these video game characters alive? Is he saying that men who play video games are killing actual people, spilling their blood, while whining and complaining about male disposablility in war???? Am I missing something here??????

        This is like saying someone who wants to save endangered animals is a hypocrite by playing a Mario game where he jumps on and kills goombas.

        Woah, sounds like RME sounds really desperate to demonize male virgins and this was back in April 2014.

        Below is the link.

    • This is like arguing that I’m a hypocrite because I buy Amazon products but won’t buy Amazon stock. Would I want my daughter to be a slut?(speaking hypothetically, I’m MGTOW) No. But if other girls are gonna be sluts, I don’t see why I should leave them to other men.

  11. This is an important article, and it’s relevant to the ongoing incel-demonization. The people who are labeled as incels compose a spectrum, and at least one shade of this set are people who are better known as wannabe simps, who worship wimminz, rather than dismiss them.

  12. hey The artist formerly known as black pill. When do you think of the current banning of Alex Jones from youtube?

  13. From a October 2018 magazine, Angelie Jolie, when asked about feminism, is quoted saying, “I think it is not said enough how much we need the men in our lives to be strong and capable and the best they can be.” I think we can all tell what she and so many other women and men (like the manosphere) who say similar things are really saying about men today.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.