Alex Jones was one of the conspiracy theorist morons promoting PizzaGate. (PizzaGate was the false accusation that Comet Pizza in DC was child sex abuse ring for the Democrats.) A few days ago, Alex Jones “apologized” for promoting PizzaGate. Why did Alex Jones issue an “apology” for PizzaGate? It has to be the first time he has ever done so. It is because he was about to run into real legal trouble. The day he “apologized” was the last day he could “apologize” for PizzaGate and not be sued for libel under Texas law.
In other words, Alex Jones is a coward if he actually believes in conspiracy theory. Regardless Alex Jones proved that conspiracy theory is bullshit since this is just an example of how conspiracy theorists won’t stand up for their beliefs if they run into any real trouble. (What else can you expect from a man who was against government surveillance but then changed his mind as long as Trump was in charge?) It gets in the way of their scams selling “male enhancement” products and other garbage.
We have been talking a lot lately about the Cultural Marxism/Frankfurt School conspiracy theory. With this conspiracy theory, there is a lack of original references about cultural marxism from the Frankfurt School’s own texts. (This is common in a lot of conspiracy theories besides the cultural marxism conspiracy theory.) If you want to know what happens when you ask for an original source reference from cultural marxism conspiracy theorists, take a look at what happened when Boxer tried asked for a original source reference on the subject. (This was after another person who tried to pass off a youtube video as “proof” of the cultural marxism conspiracy theory which didn’t reference any original sources.)
Boxer, knock off the faux-scepticism. The Frankfurt School’s influence on Cultural Marxism is undeniable. They literally *invented the term*; they talk about it in their papers. The idea that it’s a conspiracy theory is Leftist whitewashing, and an attempt at covering their tracks to delude the masses.
Boxer then asks for the specific source where the Frankfurt School invented the term, “cultural marxism”. After that the conspiracy theorists do nothing but throw links at Boxer that have no references to any original source material and attack Boxer for asking for references to original source material. Boxer describes what is happening with an excellent analogy.
Citing sources that you’ve never read is a problem, no? It’d be like arguing that the author of Dalrock blog is a misogynist who has written articles on his blog encouraging men to play grab-ass with random chicks on the street. When (and it’d be when, not if) the claimant was asked for a source, he’d post links to Amanda Marcotte and Manboobz, who made that claim.
The problem with all these conspiracy theories is that the sources are mostly online, free for anyone to read. You’re going to run into people like me, who have read them all and written peer-reviewed journal articles on the original sources, who will have to say “he’s an internet kook” when people wonder where you’re pulling all this nonsense from. Sadly, it makes everything else you say suspect.
Whenever you ask a conspiracy theorist for a reference to original source material, they will almost never provide it. Instead they will give you youtube videos and other links that provide no references to original source material. They love youtube videos because they are trying to hide the fact that what they are saying has no connection to original source material. In the rare cases, you get a reference to a piece of original source material, one of two things will happen. Either the original source material never existed, or the original source material says something completely different.
Boxer makes an apt comparison to feminism. Feminists want you to “listen and believe” instead of investigating and evaluating evidence. Conspiracy theorists want you to “listen and believe” instead of investigating and evaluating evidence, too. This is another example of how feminism and conspiracy theory is similar. Never listen and believe. Always demand evidence and original source material. If someone whether a feminist or a conspiracy theorist refuses to produce references to original source material or produces false references to original source material, assume they are lying because most likely, they are.
The Men’s Rights subreddit found information from the EEOC about how many sexual harassment accusations are false. The EEOC is willing to admit that more than half of all sexual harassment accusations have “no reasonable cause”. In other words, they’re false accusations.
Unfortunately, there is no breakdown by gender how many of the sexual harassment accusations are false even though they list how many sexual harassment accusations were made by men. We can assume that sexual harassment accusations by men have reasonable cause because men know they would be laughed at if they made sexual harassment accusations like women do. Based on that and the numbers provided by the EEOC, that means that at least two thirds of sexual harassment accusations from women have “no reasonable cause” or are false.
The EEOC probably used every trick they could to keep a sexual harassment accusation from a woman from being classified as having “no reasonable cause”. We can reasonably conclude that nearly all sexual harassment accusations from women are completely false.
In the comments of the last post, there has been a conversation about the importance of our rights instead of worrying about getting laid. This is why we must fight the MDAD (the Misandrist Dating Advice Distraction). While idiots are talking about how to get laid (and failing to do so) or complaining about women are not being attracted to them, they are creating a distraction from the real problem. And that real problem is that women are coming up with new strategies to take away our rights.
Here is a good example of that. Back in 2011 the manuresphere was saying (as it still does) that game will prevent false rape accusations. In 2011 women were creating a new way to take away the rights of men, by using Title IX to move rape cases from the criminal justice system to college “courts”. The Dear Colleague letter that started the whole college “courts” mess was written in 2011 while the manuresphere and others were busy trying to sell (fraudulent) ways to get laid. Now, we have a human rights travesty where men can get thrown out of college simply on woman pointing a finger at them. Worse, men attending college can have their lives ruined simply for resembling an alleged rapist.
We need to stop giving a shit about getting laid. We need to stop giving a shit whether women find us attractive or not. Instead we need to put a stop to the loss of our human rights. Otherwise, we men will all end up in concentration camps. Many men wouldn’t care if they ended up in a concentration camp. The manuresphere would start writing books about “concentration camp game”.
This is why we must fight the MDAD. If we expose dating advice (AKA all of this how to get laid bullshit) as a fraud (which it is), then there will be no way for men to ignore the loss of their human rights. There will be no way for women and manginas to hide what they’re doing behind, “You’re just pissed that you can’t get laid”.
It’s as simple as asking the question, “Do you want a blow job or do you want freedom and human rights?” And you’re not going to get the blow job, so you might as well pick freedom and human rights.
When it comes to the gay virgin player rapist accusations, they are usually the result of throwing a bunch of accusations that a man is gay, a virgin, a player, and a rapist semi-separately and seeing what works the best against that man. When it comes to Paul Nungesser, the victim of mattress girl’s false rape accusations, it looks like feminists might be trying to make false accusations against where he is gay, a virgin, a player, and a rapist (of women) all at the same time.
First, we all know about the false rape accusations against Paul Nungesser. Those false rape accusations make him out to be a player abusing women. Paul Nungesser has also been the victim of the false accusation bandwagon effect because mattress girl’s friends also made false rape accusations against him. Part of the false accusation bandwagon against Paul Nungesser has been a false rape accusation against him by a guy. Already, feminists and manginas have tried to turn Paul Nungesser into a gay player rapist (of women).
The only thing missing is virgin. Sooner or later, I expect that feminists and manginas will say that Paul Nungesser has only had sex when he was raping someone. Thus they will accuse him of being a virgin. With all of their other accusations, that will mean they will be accusing him of being a gay virgin player rapist. This may be the first time that feminists and manginas have tried to make all of their contradictory accusations against a man (i.e. being gay but also a rapist of women, being a rapist but also a player, being a virgin but also a rapist, etc.) into a merged false accusation against a man. I’m sure it won’t be the last.
After Eric S. Raymond revealed that women were planning to falsely accuse open source leaders of sexual assault, a woman decided to falsely accuse ESR of groping her. She provides no evidence whatsoever, but she also says a lot of other things that make it clear she’s lying. She refers to open source as “open sores”. What is the point of that? She also tries to use ESR’s pro second amendment beliefs against him as evidence that he groped her. None of that compares to the most absurd thing she said that proves she’s lying.
The fact he’s a swinger and I couldn’t get a date until 25 is still something I puzzle over as surely there’s a lesson to be had in that
She couldn’t get a date until she was 25? We know that’s bullshit. A woman would have to be locked in a cage for that to be true. The lesson to be learned is that this woman is a liar.
There’s another problem with this woman trying to use ESR’s status as a swinger against him. Women have spent a lot of time trying to trick everyone that any man who stands up to women is a loser who can’t get laid. As we know, people are accusing ESR of being a loser who can’t get laid. So which one is it? Is ESR is a loser who can’t get laid or a predatory womanizer preying on virginal women? It can’t be both.
Even though ESR can’t be both a loser who can’t get laid and a predatory womanizer at the same time, women and manginas will accuse him of being both at the same time. What is happening to ESR is another example of women and manginas attacking a man with so many contradictory accusations that effectively they accuse that man of being a gay virgin player rapist. (I’m sure if I looked long enough I would find accusations that ESR both raped women and was gay.)
This isn’t the first time a man will be accused of being a gay virgin player rapist nor will it be the last.
Originally, I was going to write about conspiracy theorists and their obsession with imaginary pedophilia today. However, that needs to be preempted for this post.
When I started suggesting several years ago that men need to avoid women as much as possible, I was accused of being paranoid many times. Yet over time, there are more and more examples of men who agree with me. They don’t agree with me because they read my blog. They chose the most rational path for their lives based on what they saw with their own two eyes. For example, “Hank”, one of the two men who were the victims of Donglegate, is now choosing to avoid female software developers.
In the last couple of days, another major example has come to light proving the need to avoid women. Eric S. Raymond or ESR, a big name in the open source software community, found out that the ADA initiative, a feminist tech organization which thankfully no longer exists, had a plan to go after well known people in the open source community by getting them alone and then falsely accusing them of sexual assault. Linus Torvalds, the creator of the Linux kernel, was one of their main targets. They tried their scheme on him several times, but it failed. ESR said, “if you are any kind of open-source leader or senior figure who is male, do not be alone with any female, ever, at a technical conference. Try to avoid even being alone, ever, because there is a chance that a “women in tech” advocacy group is going to try to collect your scalp”. The conversation at ESR’s blog also brings up mentoring women in tech and how that should be avoided as well.
While this is particularly shocking, more and more men are choosing to avoid women to one degree or another. Men from members to Congress to college professors are avoiding being alone with women now. It happens enough that women are creating a conspiracy theory that men are trying to shut them out instead of protect themselves.
The next step for these men is to realize that they need to avoid women as much as possible. I realized that several years ago, and we will see more and more men realize this over time. The reality is that women are dangerous, and the only way for men to protect themselves is to avoid women. Many men are coming to this conclusion independently of each other because it is simply reality.