Does The Manuresphere Even Lift?

One thing the manuresphere will tell you to do is lift weights.  Unlike the rest of what the manuresphere tells you, lifting weights is a fine hobby.  Yet, it’s not the requirement that the manuresphere makes it out to be.  Given how much the manuresphere hypes lifting weights, you would expect manurespherians to be serious about lifting weights and exercise in general.  However, you would be wrong.

Fatt Fuck Fornedarmu says you’re a loser who masturbates and eats Cheetos all day and doesn’t understand why you and many other people are laughing at him.

All you need to do is look at pictures of manurespherians to see that they don’t lift or even care about excercise.  Fatt Fuck Fornedarmu is one such example, but the manuresphere is filled with fat blobs like Fatt Fuck Fornedarmu.  (Barbarossa has pointed out that the picture to the left was taken after Fatt Fuck Fornedarmu was supposed to have been on a two year diet and exercise regimen that failed.) They are even too stupid to see their own hypocrisy when they accuse MGTOWs of eating Cheetos and masturbating all day and attacking others for being fat.  (Ironically, it’s likely that the targets of the manuresphere’s fat shaming campaigns are less fat than the fat blobs of the manuresphere.)

Given that the manuresphere is incapable of exercising, it’s no surprise they fall for scams like the paleo diet.  It promises a quick cure all to being a fat blob.  Yet, as we see from the fat blobs of the manuresphere, it does not work.  Beyond that we have to wonder how man manurespherians say they’re on the paleo diet, but are too lazy to actually follow that scam diet.  Why should you listen to diet advice from guys who either can’t follow through with a scam diet like the paleo diet or conclusively prove that it doesn’t work?

This “do as I say, not as I do” attitude is prevalent throughout the manuresphere.  Some of the biggest proponents of game, are guys who have never actually tried game themselves to see if it actually works.  They just heard it does from other manurespherians.  Why should you listen to dating advice from guys who haven’t even tried it themselves but heard it works from someone else?  The manuresphere can’t even follow its own advice when it comes to something everyone knows is healthy like lifting weights.  If they can’t do that, then there is no reason to listen to them on bullshit like the paleo diet or game or any other weird shit they believe.

The problem of not following their own dating advice extends beyond the manuresphere and into the dating advice industry in general.  Pretty much any dating advice you get is going to be from someone who hasn’t tried it themselves.  (This is not surprising as most dating advice is designed to keep you in The Reserves and not actually help you get dates/sex/girlfriends.)  There is the alternative of actually running experiments with dating advice and gathering data to see how it works, but such things are kryptonite to the dating advice industry.  Since they’re unwilling to perform experiments and gather data, their unwillingness to use their own dating advice proves it’s bullshit.

Predatory Sex Therapists In Silicon Valley

I found this article about how sex therapy in Silicon Valley is a booming business.  What it doesn’t tell you is that these sex therapists are preying on male techies in a way that should be considered malpractice. Let’s look at what these sex therapists have to say.

There’s something else at play here, though: In general, tech workers are more vulnerable to issues around love and intimacy, according to several local sex therapists I’ve interviewed. The reasons for this are wide-ranging, but in Dan’s particular case, it resulted from being tagged as a prodigy at a young age. He excelled in science and was encouraged to pursue it to the exclusion of all else.

“These are the tropes of tech development,” says Elizabeth McGrath, his sex therapist, who shared his story with me. (McGrath did not give me her patient’s name, and asked me to use a pseudonym when writing about him.) “To his mind, and his processing, there was no desire to prioritize anything other than that.”

No, this is not a trope of tech development. Even by the sex therapist’s admission, tech guys are in a path created by external forces, yet she tries to make this the fault of tech guys. What actually happened is that these men were being groomed for The Reserves. However, it worked a little too well. These guys managed to avoid getting ensnared by used up women in a bizarre form of good luck for these guys. As we will see these sex therapists aren’t acting in the best interests of their male tech clients, but instead are trying to reroute them back into The Reserves.

“[These men] often spend their time in environments that are mostly male, like in school and tech offices,” explains another therapist, Celeste Hirschman. “So they don’t have a lot of practice just relating to women, period, let alone learning how to meet, pickup, seduce, touch.”

Of course, this is true, but that’s because women don’t want them until they need a chump with money to pay their bills. How do these sex therapists help men get practice with women?

Hirschman follows a less-traditional therapy method known as Somatica, which is “body-based” and allows for non-genital touch between the counselor and client, the idea being that there are things that can’t be learned through talk alone. For example, she will wrestle with clients just to get them out of their heads and into their bodies.

“Less traditional” likely means crackpot in this case.

“Getting them out of their heads” does not get them experience interacting with women. It certainly does not get these men experience actually having sex with women. And if they’re like the 40 year old male virgin that the article talks about, he is going to need significant sexual experience to have relationships with age appropriate women. Adult women who are virgins are practically nonexistent.

Another reason that a lack of sexual experience is a problem is that these tech guys won’t recognize women who are out to steal their money. The sex therapists say that such women don’t exist.

Hirschman says some of her clients will downplay or hide the money they make out of fear that it’s the primary reason a woman will be interested in them. “I had one client I was just talking to the other day, he said, ‘I don’t know if I want to bring women to my house right away because it’s a big, huge house and suddenly they’re wanting to nest after the second date and they haven’t even gotten to know me yet!’”

McGrath believes that while there may be women out there on the prowl for a Google billionaire, these men’s fears largely come from deep-seated personal insecurity. “Part of that is, ‘A woman couldn’t be interested in me for me,’” she says. “That is a common thread for many men who are in the tech industry. They have never been seen as ‘the boyfriend’ or felt attractive or sexy. They felt dorky or like outsiders.”

This is not personal insecurity. It is what they have observed not only in their own lives but in the lives of many other men. Playing this off as a problem that only affects “Google billionaires” is like saying that bank robbers only try to rob Fort Knox and not small town banks with lax security.

One thing that gets repeated over and over is how these tech guys are “too much in their own heads”. In other words, these sex therapists don’t want them thinking. In fact, these sex therapists attack everything that made the tech guys so successful.

Another common issue that these therapists encounter with tech clients is they treat sex like a line of broken code in need of debugging, or a mathematical equation. “That’s the crux of trying to interact with a human, though: there isn’t a formula,” says McGrath. “Human connection is not formulaic. Does it have statistics, can you look at data, can you research it and quantify it? Sure. But in one-to-one, it is always variable. That’s where those things fail.”

This is an admission that these sex therapists don’t want their male tech clients using their best asset, their brains, making observations, or using the scientific method. (As we know attacking the scientific method is common to purveyors of dating advice.) The tech guys might actually notice the real nature of women and how vile it is, not to mention that they are being scammed by their sex therapists.

However, there is a big problem for the sex therapists when they attack data and the scientific method. If the tech guys are wrong for using those tools, then sex therapy can’t be based on science which uses those tools. It means that what these sex therapists are doing is no better than voodoo. By selling their voodoo as therapy, these sex therapists are quacks and con artists. The reason they are in Silicon Valley is for the same reason that bank robbers rob banks. That’s because banks are where the money is, and in this case it has little to no security protecting it.

If Game Just Works Why Can’t It Be Completely Independent Of Ideology?

I have talked about how in many cases dating advice is a scam to sell an ideology.  Anyone who is doing that will deny that so I was surprised to find that Roosh basically admitted it.

Game is a collection of tactics/rules/behaviors that work, but it can’t exist in isolation without an ideology that complements it and gives men guidance besides just sex. Hence, neomasculinity, which even touches on the political nature of societies.

If game just works, why can’t it be completely independent of ideology?  In fact, if game did just work, it would have to be completely independent of ideology.  Otherwise game’s effectiveness would be dependent on belief in a particular ideology.

We can take away from this that game doesn’t exist because if it did there would be no attempt to tie an ideology to it.  By saying that game has to be tied to an ideology, Roosh pretty much just admitted that game is a scam.

The Reserves Attracts Predators

StonerWithABoner brought this article to our attention written by a dominatrix who thinks that the reason why men aren’t lining up to be abused by her is because of misogyny and the mythical “patriarchy”.  The reality is that most men have no interest in being abused by women, being pissed on by women, or being ass raped by women.  That’s not because of misogyny.  It’s common sense.  Any man claiming to want to engage in that sort of thing needs psychological help not abusive feminism.

But why is the author of that article trying to convince men that they really want that sort of thing?  It is because she is a sexual predator preying on vulnerable men and using feminism to justify her abuse and sadism.  While we know that there are men (really manginas) that go to dominatrixes to be abused, how come we never hear about this type of thing with the genders reversed?  Where are the male dominators doing the same things to women?  They don’t exist because any such man would be arrested for abuse.

There’s also another aspect of this we need to consider, how this relates to the reserves.  Men in the reserves aren’t getting that much action from women until a woman needs him to clean up her life.  This creates a fertile ground for predators like the author of the linked article.  It reminds me of something I saw on a dating advice forum several years ago.  On that dating advice forum was a man who wasn’t a virgin, but might as well have been.  He disappeared for a while, but came back.  While he vanished, he got involved with something involving small penis humiliation.  What happened was that he was so desperate for any kind of sexual contact, he got involved with in small penis humiliation just so he could be “sexual” for a while.  Chances are he didn’t even have a small penis, but he was willing to be humiliated and abused just for a little sexual contact.  Reading what he wrote about the women he was involved with was as disturbing as the linked article.  He was even banned from the forum because they didn’t want to attract porn.  Unfortunately, this was pre-MGTOW so there wasn’t any real help for him.

This is why MGTOW is so important.  There are a lot of female predators out there whether they’re financial predators or sexual predators.  They’re all dangerous.

Dr. Manginalove Should Be Named Dr. Hypocrisy

I always knew that Dr. Nerdlove Manginalove should also be called Dr. Hypocrisy.  It’s pretty obvious, but the Scott Aaronson situation has provided some spectacular examples on how deep Dr. Manginalove’s hypocrisy goes.

Manginalove attacks Scott Aaronson because Aaronson wanted examples of behavior that is guaranteed not to be sexual harassment and not cause women to think he’s creepy.  There’s a big problem with Manginalove’s attack.  Manginalove actually tried to answer this problem back in March of last year.

It gets worse than that.  Scott Alexander had written in support of Scott Aaronson and called Amanda Marcotte a “vogon spy in a skin suit.  Manginalove attacked Alexander for that, accusing Alexander of slagging on Marcotte’s appearance, but that’s not what Alexander meant.  And Manginalove knows this since he has used the phrase, “alien in a human suit”.

Manginalove is a liar and a hypocrite.  This proves it.  He changes his positions on a day to day basis.  The only consistent position he holds is, “women good, men bad”.  You can’t trust Manginalove to give you dating advice.  He will tell you one thing one day and tell you the opposite the next day depending on what man he is attacking that day.

Manginalove is not interested in helping you gets dates or a relationship with a woman.  His dating advice is a cover to generate traffic for his website by attacking men.

The Feminist Time Machine Crashes On Scott Aaronson

There’s this professor at MIT, Scott Aaronson.  On his personal blog, he talked about how feminist rhetoric scared him from dating women for a long time.  It was causing him so much trouble that he was seriously considering castration as a solution.  Yes, castration.  He got over it, sort of.  He says that he is on board with “97% of feminism”.  Even though he fixed the problem of feminism preventing him from dating, he internalized their misandry.  In other words, he’s a mangina suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.

Feminists found out about Scott Aaronson’s past dating woes and used it to attack him.  Some of the worst came from Amanda Marcotte who outright lied about what Scott Aaronson said.  The comments are just as bad.  Many of them say that it’s a good thing that Aaronson isn’t getting laid because he’s such a misogynist.  They’re invoking the feminist time machine on a man who agrees with 97% of feminism.  This alone shows how absurd the idea that being a good feminist means getting laid.

One problem is here is that women weren’t rejecting Scott Aaronson.  He had internalized misandry from feminists so he never approached women.  Women never had the opportunity to reject him for being a supposed misogynist.

However, there’s another problem.  Feminists attacking Scott Aarsonson accuse him of failing to get laid at the present time.  That isn’t true.  Scott Aaronson has gotten laid, plenty of times I’m sure.  That’s because he is married.  The feminist time machine didn’t just crash on Scott Aaronson.  It collapsed in on itself.  Scott Aaronson isn’t supposed to be getting laid according to feminists, but he is.  According to feminists women were rejecting Scott Aaronson because of his misogyny, yet women never had the opportunity because he was too busy trying to be a good feminist by avoiding women.

Scott Aaronson’s life story doesn’t even fit the pattern of the feminist time machine.  Yet, feminists are trying to force his life story into it.  This proves that it doesn’t matter what a man’s actual life story is to feminists.  Feminists will accuse a man of failing to get laid because he’s a misogynist even if he is choosing to not to try to get laid or is actually getting laid.  Feminists are so invested in the Just World Fallacy of the feminist time machine that they can’t see when a man such as Scott Aaronson is actually getting laid.

The Christian Dating Advice Industry

Something I have been meaning to start talking about is the Christian dating advice industry, but I haven’t gotten around to it until now.  What finally got me to start writing about it was a pair of articles by Milo Yiannopoulos about MGTOW.  Both of those articles had a good number of comments (although it’s now buried in thousands of comments) where tradcons would try and convince MGTOW that there were plenty of “good women” in churches.  This is not true, and Christian dating advice isn’t true either.  Just because something is “Christian” does not mean its any better than the non-Christian equivalent if it involves women.

While Christian dating advice has its own unique quirks, most of the differences between Christian dating advice and regular dating advice are cosmetic.  The “go to church” dating advice is a good example of this.  It’s equivalent to feminist dating advice which says you should date feminists, “red pill” dating advice that says you should date “red pill” women, etc.  None of the women in any of these groups are any different.  They’re all the same.  I can tell you from personal experience that single women in church are the same types of single women you will find outside of church.  They’re desperate to get married because either they have kids, are otherwise divorced, or are otherwise “former” sluts whose looks are starting to fade.  It’s the reserves problem, but churches are worse because the single women there are actively trying to mine the reserves even more so than outside of church.

You might think that because Christianity says no sex until marriage, that would mitigate the problem.  It does not.  No sex until marriage only applies to men.  Women in church are given a pass for all their sexual sins because the church teaches that fornication is that man’s fault because of “male headship”.  It’s worse than that because the men Christian women fornicate with aren’t in church.  The single men in church are all part of the reserves so they aren’t getting any.  Since men get blamed for women’s sexual sins in churches, it’s the men in the reserves that are getting attacked from the pulpit for sins that women and men outside of church commit.  These men are doing the time, but don’t get the benefit of doing the crime/sin.  It’s a really perverse form of the gay virgin player rapist problem.  “Male headship” is also an excuse for churches to blame men and only men for divorce.  The divorce rate in churches is practically the same outside of church proving again that women are all the same.

Churches are as feminist as anything else in our gynocentric and gynocratic society.  They’re a misandrist institution.  They’re aren’t going to produce dating advice that’s fundamentally different from the rest of the dating advice industry.  Christian dating advice is a scam like almost all other dating advice.

There’s more to the Christian dating advice industry than I have covered here.  I will be covering that in future blog entries.

Comments are closed since this post is a copy of a page.  Comment on the page here.