Why The Attempt To “Roosh” Trump Failed

Dr. Van Nostrand brought up how Trump is the perfect caricature of a conservative opponent for the left and feminists similar to how Roosh is another ideal adversary for feminists.  This is true and they used the same tactic of promoting Trump as they have promoted Roosh just to take him downDuring the primaries feminists were all pro Trump.  Amanda Marcotte even said that Trump was the least anti-woman candidate in the Republican primary field.

Why did the attempt to “Roosh” Trump fail?  Because Trump was willing to fight to the bitter end and beyond even if it made no sense.  On the other hand, Roosh was a coward who would collapse at the slightest real world challenge (outside of meaningless internet arguments against nobodies).  This is exactly what happened when he went on the Dr. Oz show.  Roosh had several avenues to fight back against Dr. Oz and his audience, but he failed to use them.  If Trump was on the Dr. Oz show instead of Roosh, he would have insulted Dr. Oz and his audience instead.  Sure it would have been a stupid tactic, but unlike Roosh, Trump would at least fight back.  That puts Trump a step above Roosh.

While this worked to get Trump the presidency, it does show that Trump is less interested in winning than constantly engaging in arguments in the real world.  Trump had many opportunities to knock out Hillary, particularly in the debates, but he failed to use them.  Some of that can be explained by stupidity, but too many of those opportunities were incredibly obvious.  Similar to Roosh, Trump would rather have a fight than obliterate his opponents.  It also doesn’t help that at his core, Trump is a mangina.

The good news about this is that Trump has paved the way for a real pro-male individual who is willing to fight and obliterate feminists, manginas, and other gynocentrists.  I don’t know who that man will be yet, but he is coming.  He is going to go for the jugular.  He will be smart and understand that this is a war so his goal will be the total destruction of feminists, manginas, and other gynocentrists.  He won’t back down like Roosh or miss opportunities & fight for the sake of fighting like Trump.

Women Pretend Men Are Monsters To Avoid The Monster Within Themselves

This last week I watched a show on TV where an archaeologist traveled to Romania to investigate the source of the vampire myth, the strigoi.  He found out that nowadays in Romania no one living in the major cities believes in strigoi anymore.  In rural areas, its different.  The archaeologist investigated a recent case where a group of men desecrated the grave of a newly dead man who they believed to be a strigoi.  Besides desecrating the grave, the men preformed a bunch of anti-strigoi rituals including eating the dead man’s heart.  The archaeologist talked to one of the men who did this, and the man was convinced that he did the right thing.  He was absolutely certain of his own righteousness.  At the end of the episode the archaeologist concludes that vampires or strigoi are an attempt to believe monsters are outside of us and avoid dealing with the monster within.

This is an excellent metaphor for how women treat men.  Women whether feminist, traditionalist conservative, or in between have a million reasons why men are evil.  Those reasons may conflict with each other, but they believe men are evil.  Women even came up with the idea of “benevolent sexism” which is basically saying when men do things for women and are nice to women, men are still evil.  The relationship between women and men is like that between rural Romanians and the fictional strigoi.  Women fabricate all of these reasons why men are evil to avoid dealing with the monster within themselves.

The Hackers Should Release The Entire Ashley Madison Database

The group that hacked the Ashley Madison database has released a single name from the database.  They should release all of the names in the database.  If there was a kickstarter or something to pay them the hackers to release the names in the database, I would commit serious money to it.  That’s provided they didn’t include the credit card numbers because I’m against credit card fraud.

Every person who has ever used that website is guilty of defrauding their spouse so it’s not like there would be any victims here.

The Good Men Project Says It’s All Right To Punch A Woman Who Says That You Are A Loser Who Can’t Get Laid Or A Creep

Apparently, feminists are pissed that Black Widow, a character from Marvel comics/Marvel movies got called a slut.  When you consider the name, Black Widow, it’s clear that she is a slut.  However, pointing this out is making feminists very angry even though Black Widow doesn’t exist.  (Maybe feminists don’t realize that Black Widow isn’t an actual person.)  In particular, one of the authors at the Dickless Mangina Project wants to punch any man who uses the world slut.

You can call me a slut (fair warning – you might get punched in the face if you do)

The Dickless Mangina Project thinks it’s fine for women to punch men who use the word slut.  Since they’re fine with that, that must also mean that they fine with men punching women accuse them of being losers who can’t get laid or of being “creepy”.  Otherwise, they would be hypocrites.

So next time a woman says that you’re a loser who can’t get laid or accuses you of being a virgin (regardless of whether you are one or not) or says you’re creepy, punch her.  That’s how the Dickless Mangina Project says you should handle that.

More Evidence That “Creepy” Is A Pejorative Equivalent To Nigger

Whenever a woman uses the word, creepy, against a man, it’s equivalent to calling a black person a nigger.  Here’s an example that shows this to be true.

If a man takes a picture of a woman it’s “creepy”, but if the genders are reversed it’s perfectly fine.  This proves that “creepy” is no different than nigger because Anita Sarkeesian is not applying a consistent standard.  This is similar to applying a different standard to whites and blacks which is common is racist ideas.  Thus, “creepy” and nigger are being used in the same way.

50 Centillion Shades Of Black (Pill)

If you don’t know what a centillion is, here you go.

That 50 Shades of Grey movie is coming out this weekend.  Obviously, I won’t be watching it, and I’m sure that most people reading this won’t either.  The only reason I bring it up is because 50 Shades of Grey is a good example of what women really want.

50 Shades of Grey is a female fantasy of controlling men.  All the BDSM is just window dressing to provide surface level confusion of the issue.  Christian Grey one of the main characters is a victim of statutory rape by a woman who used him.  That’s why he’s so messed up.  Since he’s messed up, he ends up being controlled over time by Anastasia Steele.  (Now, you don’t need to read the book or watch the movie.)  What women want is to rule men and keep us as de facto slaves.  They’re plenty of disagreement about how to do that, but the goal is the same.  50 Shades of Grey is simply an example of this.

What would the opposite of 50 Shades of Grey look like?  Christian Grey instead of getting involved with Anastasia Steele would realize that women aren’t the solution to his problems but the case.  He would end up going his own way.  The lesson is that if you want to be free this Valentine’s Day (or the rest of the year), you must go your own way.

Why Didn’t ManginaBoobz Write About My World Of Ptavvs Post?

You may have noticed a few lame trolls today.  That’s because ManginaBoobz linked to my post about my desire to leave this planet of women and manginas behind.  Besides discovering that the readership of ManginaBoobz is homophobic (although they may only be homophobic against male homosexuals), I’m surprised that ManginaBoobz didn’t write about my World Of Ptavvs post or the related post, Zoe Quinn Is A Thrint.  I’m really disappointed.

Where Are The Grandmothers?

I asked a few years ago why all these supposed “good women” never do anything to show themselves and differentiate themselves from all the evil women out there.  The obvious answer is because there are so few good women out there as to make them practically nonexistent.  That there are so few female MRAs and similar women is proof of that.

The problem of the lack of “good women” is worse than you think because there are plenty of cases where it would benefit the “good women” to make themselves known and differentiate themselves.  We’re not just talking about cases where “good women” should be doing things to help men just out of the goodness of their hearts.  We’re talking about cases where if nothing else the “good women” should be doing things that would help men but generate benefits for them at the same time.

On another blog a while ago, I read about the perfect example of this.  During divorce, which happens frequently and is mostly caused by women, women get custody of the children most of the time.  This means that men lose access to their children especially since women can prevent men from seeing their children with impunity.  Even when courts order that men get visitation, they won’t bother enforcing it.  Thus, a divorced man’s access to his children is completely dependent on his ex-wife.  For many divorced men this means being completely shut out of their children’s lives.

A divorced man losing contact with his children isn’t the only victim here.  The divorced man’s parents also lose contact with his children.  The children lose a relationship with their paternal grandparents.  This brings up a question, why aren’t mothers of divorced men fighting for their sons when it comes to visitation and custody issues after a divorce?  You don’t see any organization of grandmothers fighting the divorce courts on this issue.  They aren’t joining any fathers’ rights groups.

This isn’t just a case of these mothers should be helping their divorced sons out of the goodness of their hearts (although that should be reason enough for them).  These grandmothers (presumably) lose contact with their grandchildren because their sons do.  It would benefit these women to help their sons on this issue because they would regain a relationship with their grandchildren.  It directly benefits grandmothers to fight for their sons visitation and custody rights.  Since this obviously isn’t happening even though it would benefit the mothers of divorced sons, there are only two possibilities why grandmothers aren’t doing this:

1. Women are willing to sacrifice a relationship with their grandchildren just to stick it to men, even their own sons.  In other words women hate men more than they love their grandchildren.
2. While the divorced son loses visitation with his children, the grandmother is getting visitation from her son’s ex-wife but is complicit in cutting her own son out of her grandchildren’s life.  A woman is willing to conspire with her son’s ex-wife against her own son, her own flesh and blood, because she hates men.

Either one of these is pretty evil.  Women don’t just hate men in general.  They hate their own sons (and other men in their own families).  Women are willing to sacrifice their own sons on the altar of supporting other women EVEN WHEN IT PERSONALLY HURTS THEM.  This example pretty much puts the issue of “good women” to bed.

On a side note, this is another reason why white vagina worshiping nationalists are full of shit.  They talk a lot about duty to kin and racial solidarity, but this example proves that women are stabbing their own male kin in the back.  They’re stupid to trust to their female kin or white women in general.  Of course, white vagina worshiping nationalists are fine with white men being stabbed in the back by white women as long as white babies are produced.

stoner and tarnished, your parents, while abusive, succeeded in producing White children. You would even call yourselves “normal” White children. But a Negro, even if he was one of the very few moral and talented negros, can never produce White children.

There you have it, an example that shows “good women” are incredibly few in number and shows another reason why white nationalists are white vagina worshipers.

Pufferfish Game

Pretty soon the new buzz in the so called manosphere will be pufferfish game.  It’s where you try to inflate yourself to take up as much room as possible because it’s alpha to take up as much room as possible.  This was the subject of today’s Dilbert comic so the so called manosphere is guaranteed to steal it.

Like everything else the so called manosphere does, it won’t work.  If the manosphere wants to take up as much space as possible, they should do what they’re already doing, being as fat as possible.