There is no difference between AVFM, the Dickless Mangina Project, and the Manuresphere. AVFM used to take a strong stand against the Manuresphere and game, but now it has Manurespherians like Obsidian writing for it and now wants to work with other manurespherians. Similarly, the Dickless Mangina Project also says that it is against the Manuresphere and game, but it has had manurespherians write for it. Plus, the Dickless Mangina Project has Kezia Noble writing for it now, a con artist who peddles game as a “female game guru”.
What about all of the white vagina worshipping nationalism and conspiracy theory of the manuresphere? AVFM has posted conspiracy theory material. The Dickless Mangina Project has “rudyducetruth”, a conspiracy theorist whose rantings are indistinguishable from the conspiracy theorists in the manuresphere except for the fact that “rudyducetruth” brings up being a Native American a lot. The Dickless Mangina Project has also had Jack Donovan write for it. Jack Donovan is a manurespheerian and a (gay) white vagina worshipping nationalist.
The real nail in the coffin is that all three groups hate MGTOW. The Manuresphere and the Dickless Mangina Project have hated MGTOW since their beginnings. AVFM pretended to be pro-MGTOW for a while but is now showing its true colors on what it believes about MGTOW which is exactly what the Manuresphere and the Dickeless Mangina Project think about MGTOW.
I could go on with examples, but it’s obvious. There’s no difference between AVFM, the Dickless Mangina Project, and the Manuresphere. Knowing this, it should not be a surprise that Paul Elam does not think men are oppressed. It’s the same view that the Manuresphere and the Dickless Mangina Project have on the subject.
The only thing missing is that AVFM hasn’t had any white vagina worshipping nationalists write for it yet. I’m sure that will happen sooner or later.
Recently, we got another white vagina worshiping troll here. While I don’t know why they keep coming, but I have noticed something. Their technique does not work to get them new adherents to their ideology because they don’t offer anything. Putting aside the vile and gynocentric nature of white vagina worshiping nationalism, they don’t make a case for how a man’s life will improve by being a white vagina worshiping nationalist. Even if everything the white vagina worshiping nationalists were saying about the Jews was true (which it isn’t), most men would still be better off supporting the Jews.
I have noticed the same phenomena from feminists. Like the white vagina worshiping nationalists, feminists offer nothing as well. For most men, embracing feminism will not improve his life. It will make it much worse. In fact, feminists have created a phrase for this, “Do you want a cookie?” Yes, I want a cookie. I want lots of cookies. If feminists want men to become feminists, then feminism must produce real tangible improvements in men’ lives. In other words, feminists need to start handing out cookies. Since feminists refuse to hand out cookies, men have no reason to become feminists and every reason to oppose feminism with every fiber of their being.
The techniques that both white vagina worshiping nationalists and feminist use can be summed up with one phrase, “The beatings will continue until morale improves.” It’s a stupid plan to get more adherents to their respective ideologies. On the other hand, if they’re goal is to alienate men from their respective ideologies, then they’re doing a really good job.
StonerWithABoner brought this article to our attention written by a dominatrix who thinks that the reason why men aren’t lining up to be abused by her is because of misogyny and the mythical “patriarchy”. The reality is that most men have no interest in being abused by women, being pissed on by women, or being ass raped by women. That’s not because of misogyny. It’s common sense. Any man claiming to want to engage in that sort of thing needs psychological help not abusive feminism.
But why is the author of that article trying to convince men that they really want that sort of thing? It is because she is a sexual predator preying on vulnerable men and using feminism to justify her abuse and sadism. While we know that there are men (really manginas) that go to dominatrixes to be abused, how come we never hear about this type of thing with the genders reversed? Where are the male dominators doing the same things to women? They don’t exist because any such man would be arrested for abuse.
There’s also another aspect of this we need to consider, how this relates to the reserves. Men in the reserves aren’t getting that much action from women until a woman needs him to clean up her life. This creates a fertile ground for predators like the author of the linked article. It reminds me of something I saw on a dating advice forum several years ago. On that dating advice forum was a man who wasn’t a virgin, but might as well have been. He disappeared for a while, but came back. While he vanished, he got involved with something involving small penis humiliation. What happened was that he was so desperate for any kind of sexual contact, he got involved with in small penis humiliation just so he could be “sexual” for a while. Chances are he didn’t even have a small penis, but he was willing to be humiliated and abused just for a little sexual contact. Reading what he wrote about the women he was involved with was as disturbing as the linked article. He was even banned from the forum because they didn’t want to attract porn. Unfortunately, this was pre-MGTOW so there wasn’t any real help for him.
This is why MGTOW is so important. There are a lot of female predators out there whether they’re financial predators or sexual predators. They’re all dangerous.
I always knew that Dr.
Nerdlove Manginalove should also be called Dr. Hypocrisy. It’s pretty obvious, but the Scott Aaronson situation has provided some spectacular examples on how deep Dr. Manginalove’s hypocrisy goes.
Manginalove attacks Scott Aaronson because Aaronson wanted examples of behavior that is guaranteed not to be sexual harassment and not cause women to think he’s creepy. There’s a big problem with Manginalove’s attack. Manginalove actually tried to answer this problem back in March of last year.
It gets worse than that. Scott Alexander had written in support of Scott Aaronson and called Amanda Marcotte a “vogon spy in a skin suit. Manginalove attacked Alexander for that, accusing Alexander of slagging on Marcotte’s appearance, but that’s not what Alexander meant. And Manginalove knows this since he has used the phrase, “alien in a human suit”.
Manginalove is a liar and a hypocrite. This proves it. He changes his positions on a day to day basis. The only consistent position he holds is, “women good, men bad”. You can’t trust Manginalove to give you dating advice. He will tell you one thing one day and tell you the opposite the next day depending on what man he is attacking that day.
Manginalove is not interested in helping you gets dates or a relationship with a woman. His dating advice is a cover to generate traffic for his website by attacking men.
AVFM hasn’t gotten as bad as any of you think. It’s actually gotten a whole lot worse than you think.
Since I rarely read AVFM, I had no idea that Obsidian had been writing for it for several months (under his real name Mumia Ali) until it was brought up on SpawnySpace. Not only is Obsidian’s antipathy for MGTOW well known, he was run off both The Spearhead and Just4Guys because the readership of both blogs got tired of his shtick and insults. I have no idea why Paul Elam thought it was a good idea to add Obsidian to AVFM’s roster given his history.
You may think this is just another example of Paul Elam’s anti-MGTOW stance. It’s much worse than that. Obsidian is a male version of Susan Walsh. Let’s not forget that Susan Walsh engaged in a Stalinist purge of most of the men (including manurespherians) that were commenting on Hooking Up Stupid. Obsidian tried to do the same thing with Just Four Guys (under the cover of night without the consent of the other guys that write for J4G). He even used the same excuse of women complaining about male commentors that Susan Walsh did. This didn’t work at J4G, but it looks like it’s working at AVFM.
AVFM is over. It’s slowly becoming not just a clone of the Dickless Mangina Project but also a male version of Hooking Up Stupid. Fortunately, the future of anti-feminism does not depend on AVFM or old men like Paul Elam or Obsidian.
There’s this professor at MIT, Scott Aaronson. On his personal blog, he talked about how feminist rhetoric scared him from dating women for a long time. It was causing him so much trouble that he was seriously considering castration as a solution. Yes, castration. He got over it, sort of. He says that he is on board with “97% of feminism”. Even though he fixed the problem of feminism preventing him from dating, he internalized their misandry. In other words, he’s a mangina suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
Feminists found out about Scott Aaronson’s past dating woes and used it to attack him. Some of the worst came from Amanda Marcotte who outright lied about what Scott Aaronson said. The comments are just as bad. Many of them say that it’s a good thing that Aaronson isn’t getting laid because he’s such a misogynist. They’re invoking the feminist time machine on a man who agrees with 97% of feminism. This alone shows how absurd the idea that being a good feminist means getting laid.
One problem is here is that women weren’t rejecting Scott Aaronson. He had internalized misandry from feminists so he never approached women. Women never had the opportunity to reject him for being a supposed misogynist.
However, there’s another problem. Feminists attacking Scott Aarsonson accuse him of failing to get laid at the present time. That isn’t true. Scott Aaronson has gotten laid, plenty of times I’m sure. That’s because he is married. The feminist time machine didn’t just crash on Scott Aaronson. It collapsed in on itself. Scott Aaronson isn’t supposed to be getting laid according to feminists, but he is. According to feminists women were rejecting Scott Aaronson because of his misogyny, yet women never had the opportunity because he was too busy trying to be a good feminist by avoiding women.
Scott Aaronson’s life story doesn’t even fit the pattern of the feminist time machine. Yet, feminists are trying to force his life story into it. This proves that it doesn’t matter what a man’s actual life story is to feminists. Feminists will accuse a man of failing to get laid because he’s a misogynist even if he is choosing to not to try to get laid or is actually getting laid. Feminists are so invested in the Just World Fallacy of the feminist time machine that they can’t see when a man such as Scott Aaronson is actually getting laid.
This nonsense was written a few days ago.
Only an autistic who has never spoken to a woman could buy the ridiculous notion that they run the world or are even capable of running the world. Any organization run by them is bound to collapse due to that gender’s lack of competence, intelligence, and leadership ability. I’ve known that since elementary school for chissakes.
This was written in response to my entry about the Orions from Star Trek. Something I noticed in this comment was the word “organization”. While Orion women secretly rule and enslave Orion men, there is no organization, hidden or otherwise, of Orion women. That would defeat the purpose. Orion women rule via their pheromones.
This made me realize that a common problem in the manuresphere, among tradcons, and among many others is their inability to understand something like this. These groups are obsessed with conspiracy theories, and one reason for that is that they can’t understand anything else. They can’t understand how group A can rule group B without group A being a conspiracy. The conspiratorial model does not reflect reality so they have to believe in absurd things to make their theories work. Anyone like me who uses a non-conspiratorial model of things that reflects reality will get reactions like the one above. I am doing the equivalent of trying to explain a heliocentric model to people who are incapable of understanding anything other than a geocentric model of the cosmos.