Over the holidays, I was able to get together with a friend I haven’t talked to in a while. His work takes him to the former Soviet Union, central Asia, and the Middle East a lot. Since he had the opportunity for more on the ground knowledge about the situation in the Middle East than anyone else I know, I asked him if he saw any groups worse than ISIS on the horizon. I expected him to either answer, “I don’t know”, “No”, or give the name of some Islamic Fundamentalist group. Instead he started talking about these groups in the former Soviet Union. These groups were all secular but had crazy beliefs such as strange mathematical theories. If these groups had the opportunity, they would do things like nuke cities that they thought their wacky mathematical theories said was in the wrong place, for example. I said to him that I was expecting him to name an Islamic Fundamentalist group not the groups that he did. He explained that as horrific as ISIS is, they still have to obey Islam. They still have to obey the Koran. They can’t diverge from Islam without causing problems for themselves so that puts a lid on just how bad ISIS or any Islamic Fundamentalist group can get. The groups from the former Soviet Union that he described have no such limitations because they are completely secular. They don’t have to worry about their coreligionists reigning them in or obeying a holy text. This gives them complete freedom to believe or do the most horrific things possible. My friend described them as secular cults. These groups all had many of the components of being a religious cult but without a belief in a god or gods.
As my friend described these groups from the former Soviet Union, I noticed how similar these groups were to everything from the alt-right, neoreaction, the manuresphere, white vagina worshipers, to social justice warriors/intersectional feminists and other feminists. All of these groups believe nonsense with religious fervor. Look at how often white vagina worshipers show up to comment on this blog despite it being a waste of time for them. They do it because they’re the secular equivalent of religious zealots, and they don’t understand how illogical it is to waste their time on this blog. I have even seen social justice warriors described as “if Pat Robertson was a woman born in 1990 to an atheist family in a deep blue state but otherwise was completely the same”. The actual Pat Robertson can’t diverge from the Bible without causing problems. On the other hand, social justice warriors don’t have that limitation.
We are living in the age of the secular cult, and secular cults are wrecking havoc with everything. Feminism, in particular, controls the political apparatus of western countries and uses that control to wage war on men. Russia is in a sorry state so expect the secular cults in the former Soviet Union to get popular when Russia falls apart. In fact, I expect with all of the anti-Russia paranoia going on now that the CIA or some other part of the government will start funding the secular cults in Russia to destabilize Russia. That may have already begun. It’s the same problem as with Syria where the US government has been so obsessed with getting Assad that the US government is funding Islamic terror groups it should be fighting against. Secular cults aren’t treated as the threat they are so they get propped up by people thinking they can control them for their own ends. Also, secular cults prop each other up so that they can fight endless wars with each other.
I have no idea on how to solve the problem of secular cults. The problem is global so there is no place to reasonably escape to except maybe Japan, and how long can the Japanese hold out against them?
StonerWithABoner asked, “Mr. Black Pill (or anyone else here) can you explain this too me?
When O’bama talked about a stimulus plan, all the “right leaning guys” like Bernie Chapin and Crappity Crapitalism said that it was Keynesian economics and was as irresponsible as using a credit card to buy yourself out of debt….
Now, Trumpy wants to borrow money to build, build,build because rates are low. But isn’t this essentially the same or at least 70% similar to O’bummer’s stimulus program? Why aren’t the alter-righties crying about fiscal responsibility, smaller gov’t and states rights? Is it because a domineering “alpha male” is suggesting these plans?
Unless I am confusing something, then they seem to be exhibiting similar behavior to feminists. When times are good, demand the high paying jobs but when they are on a sinking ship, demand women (and a far secondary children) first. Seems like they change colors on a whim and have no cohesive ideology except to scapgoat low status men with darker skin for all their massive personal failures…”
I can explain this. It’s the Horseshoe theory of politics in action where the farther right you go politically, you become more left and vice versa. This is a phenomena that I have noticed before in the manuresphere. In other words, the manuresphere’s politics is indistinguishable from the left they (claim to) abhor. They were only against massive spending when Obama wanted to do it. Now, that Trump is suggesting the same thing they are all for it.
This is something we see over and over again with nearly all political factions. They are all feminists and manginas. The only difference between all these political factions is that they have cosmetic differences between them. Everything they do is for the benefit of women and the subjugation of men (or what they believe to be the benefit of women and the subjugation of men). The manuresphere isn’t different than nearly all political factions.
That being said I expect that sooner or later (probably sooner), the manuresphere will start denouncing Trump once they figure out that Trump has no use for them. When that happens the manuresphere will be like, “We were always at war with
Eastasia Eurasia Trump.”
Dr. Van Nostrand brought up how Trump is the perfect caricature of a conservative opponent for the left and feminists similar to how Roosh is another ideal adversary for feminists. This is true and they used the same tactic of promoting Trump as they have promoted Roosh just to take him down. During the primaries feminists were all pro Trump. Amanda Marcotte even said that Trump was the least anti-woman candidate in the Republican primary field.
Why did the attempt to “Roosh” Trump fail? Because Trump was willing to fight to the bitter end and beyond even if it made no sense. On the other hand, Roosh was a coward who would collapse at the slightest real world challenge (outside of meaningless internet arguments against nobodies). This is exactly what happened when he went on the Dr. Oz show. Roosh had several avenues to fight back against Dr. Oz and his audience, but he failed to use them. If Trump was on the Dr. Oz show instead of Roosh, he would have insulted Dr. Oz and his audience instead. Sure it would have been a stupid tactic, but unlike Roosh, Trump would at least fight back. That puts Trump a step above Roosh.
While this worked to get Trump the presidency, it does show that Trump is less interested in winning than constantly engaging in arguments in the real world. Trump had many opportunities to knock out Hillary, particularly in the debates, but he failed to use them. Some of that can be explained by stupidity, but too many of those opportunities were incredibly obvious. Similar to Roosh, Trump would rather have a fight than obliterate his opponents. It also doesn’t help that at his core, Trump is a mangina.
The good news about this is that Trump has paved the way for a real pro-male individual who is willing to fight and obliterate feminists, manginas, and other gynocentrists. I don’t know who that man will be yet, but he is coming. He is going to go for the jugular. He will be smart and understand that this is a war so his goal will be the total destruction of feminists, manginas, and other gynocentrists. He won’t back down like Roosh or miss opportunities & fight for the sake of fighting like Trump.
Clemson University just banned Harambe memes. (Harambe was that gorilla that got shot when a boy fell into the gorilla habitat in the Cincinnati zoo.) Clemson gave two reasons for what they did.
- That Harambe memes are racist
- That Harambe memes are rape culture
Both are wrong, but the racism argument isn’t completely divorced from reality. One can understand how someone can not be insane and come to the conclusion that Harambe memes are racist even though they’re wrong.
On the other hand, believing that Harambe memes are rape culture is completely insane and totally divorced from reality. There was nothing sexual about what happened to Harambe. Also, don’t forget that it was a BOY that fell into gorilla habitat. Nothing about Harambe has to do with women, yet, women are trying to steal this situation from the actual victims with their lies about “rape culture”.
This is another example of how women are oppression thieves. Women are not now nor have they ever been oppressed for being women. To make themselves look oppressed, women steal oppression from actual oppressed peoples and make it about themselves. This is what intersectional feminism is all about. #BlackLivesMatter has the same problem. BLM might actually make sense if it was black men’s lives matter or men’s lives matter because it’s not like black women are dying at the hands of police.
Throughout history women have been the most protected and pampered group that has ever lived. Anything else is women stealing oppression from groups that have actually been oppressed.
Conspiracy theories are more pervasive among women than you realize. The reason you may not have noticed this fact is because a conspiracy theory only tends to get called a conspiracy theory if a man says it. For example, you don’t see skeptics spending time on exposing conspiracy theories like the incel virgin domestic terrorist organization conspiracy theories or the conspiracy theory that the MRM has taken over local, state, & federal law enforcement along with the national security & intelligence agencies.
Another reason you may not realize how pervasive conspiracy theories are among women because it involves pointless shit you don’t care about. For example, there are conspiracy theories about the action, Benedict Cumberbatch, and his wife, Sophie Hunter. There is a legion of female fans of Benedict Cumberbatch obsessed with him that believe Sophie Hunter is either a prostitute, a hired PR girlfriend, a blackmailer, a con artist, a domestic abuser, or mentally ill. They also believe that his marriage, his wife’s pregnancy, and the existence of their child are are fake. They even believe that anytime Benedict Cumberbatch has been seen with his child, that he was actually carrying around a plastic doll.
The conspiracy theories that women believe in are no better than the conspiracy theories that the manuresphere believes in. The only difference is that when it comes to conspiracy theories women are not getting called out like men do. Women are getting a pussy pass when it comes to conspiracy theories and are not being held to the same standard as men.
What happens to a believer in game when they realize it is a lie? What happens when a pusher of game can’t deal with the knowledge that they are nothing more than a con artist? One possibility is that they will have a massive psychological breakdown. That is what happened to the PUA, Mystery. At first he seemed to vanish (like many gamers do), but he turned up on Facebook where he had his epic meltdown.
Why would Mystery have an epic meltdown? Perhaps he was presented with hard evidence that game is a lie, such as this video of him “practicing game”. Maybe being associated with an internet marketing scam organization got to him. Regardless, it is pretty clear that his involvement with the game community led to Mystery’s epic breakdown.
Read the new page, Evidence That Virgins Are Not Murderers Or Terrorists. Comments are closed here so comment on the page.