Peter Thiel and his defense of those weaker than himself against the Gawker media empire is still in the news. And that was true even before Gawker went into Chapter 11. Most of it is the media running scared that they would be held accountable for what they say and write as would be expected. The media is practically willing to organize a lynching of Peter Thiel by declaring what Peter Thiel did to be the beginning of the apocalypse. They are that scared of what Peter Thiel represents, that the media will be held accountable for their actions. But the mob that wants to lynch Peter Thiel is much bigger than the media. And calling them a lynch mob is not an exaggeration. Here is an example I found on alternatehistory.com that is all to common when it comes to Peter Thiel.
Click on the image to make it readable. This person wants the Justice Department to overturn the Hulk Hogan verdict and throw Peter Thiel in prison for 25 years as an example of someone who broke a total of zero laws and whose only “crime” is defending those weaker than him. This reminds me of the people who think that government agencies should track me despite the complete lack of legal basis to do so.
Not only are there people who want to lynch both Peter Thiel and myself even though we have both not broken any laws, our enemies are similar. Take a look at what Gawker has done and said as part of the Hulk Hogan trial.
- Gawker dealt in stolen property (if they didn’t steal the Hulk Hogan sex tape themselves). Hulk Hogan’s sex tape was not created by Hulk Hogan. Hulk Hogan was cheating on his wife with another woman, and the husband of that woman is the one who recorded them. Somehow the recording ended up in the hands of Gawker.
- There was a court order to take down Hulk Hogan’s sex tape. Everyone but Gawker who had the sex tape complied with the court order. Gawker outright refused and used the trick of redirecting removing it from their servers while redirecting to another server that hosted the tape.
- Gawker fabricated and promoted a conspiracy theory that the FBI was colluding with Hulk Hogan against Gawker.
- Gawker said that there was a public interest in sex tapes of children of celebrities who were above the age of four. While celebrities are publicly known people, that does not mean their children are. In other words, Gawker said that they have the right to post a sex tape of anyone including a sex tape involving children if there is at least some tenuous connection to “celebrity”. However, that is not the worst part about that. A sex tape involving a child, that is a person under 18, is child pornography so Gawker said that there was a public interest in promoting child porn if it involved the children of celebrities.
Gawker has committed multiple legal violations and actually defended the promotion of child porn. The worst thing anyone could accurately say about Peter Thiel is that his motives in helping Hulk Hogan (and others without the financial resources to take on the Gawker media empire) is that Peter Thiel’s motives may not be entirely pure. Yet, the media and many other people want us to believe that Peter Thiel is the bad guy here.
It’s the same with me and my enemies. It starts with the manuresphere and all the fraud and scams that they try to commit. And such fraud isn’t limited to the manuresphere. On top of that there is all of the anti-semitism and racism and conspiracy theory from the manuresphere and elsewhere. As bad as that is it gets worse. When it comes to SJWs, aka intersectional feminists, they are defending pedophiles and child porn. Despite the fact that my enemies commit fraud, are racist and anti-semitic, & defend pedophiles and child porn, somehow I am supposed to be the real threat according to them that needs 24/7 government surveillance. The only things they can accurately say about me are “you can’t get laid” and “you said things about women that aren’t nice”. In comparison, to the (attempted) crimes, racism, anti-semitism, and defense of child porn and pedophiles that my enemies have done, that’s nothing.
If a man can be defined in relation to his enemies, then Peter Thiel and I are both saints.
It was revealed that Peter Thiel was funding Hulk Hogan’s lawsuit against Gawker. Gawker outed Peter Thiel as gay. Most people think what Peter Thiel did was a simple act of revenge. It was not. While Peter Thiel was fighting for himself, he also fought for his friends who had their lives ruined because of Gawker and all those who did not have the resources to fight the Gawker juggernaut that was destroying the lives of innocent people.
Mr. Thiel added: “I can defend myself. Most of the people they attack are not people in my category. They usually attack less prominent, far less wealthy people that simply can’t defend themselves.” He said that “even someone like Terry Bollea who is a millionaire and famous and a successful person didn’t quite have the resources to do this alone.”
Part of the reason why Hulk Hogan (Terry Bollea) didn’t have the resources for the lawsuit was that Gawker destroyed Hulk Hogan’s career. Without the help of Peter Thiel, Hulk Hogan would be bankrupt and Gawker would have continued to destroy the lives of innocent people.
When Peter Thiel said that he can defend himself, but most people can’t, that resonated with me. That is similar to my relationship to the Incel/ForeverAlone/ForeverUnwanted/WizardChan/etc. community. I am the Peter Thiel of the Incel/FA/FU/WizardChan/etc. community. My work on this blog and elsewhere helps protect the men in that community.
How do I protect these men? In multiple ways. From the manusphere, to Dr.
NerdLoveManginaLove, to white vagina worshiping nationalists, there are many groups trying to scam and prey on Incel/ForeverAlone/ForeverUnwanted/WizardChan/etc. community. Besides documenting their scams, I act as a honeypot for them. Look at how often white vagina worshiping nationalists come here. All that time they spend here is time they don’t prey on other men. I’m also a target for attacks from everyone from the manuresphere to the white vagina worshiping nationalists. I can laugh off their pitiful attacks. Other men in the Incel/ForeverAlone/ForeverUnwanted/WizardChan/etc. community are suffering from things like depression. They can’t handle attacks like I can. Every time I’m attacked another man who can’t handle it is saved.
And saved is a good way to put it because too many men in the Incel/ForeverAlone/ForeverUnwanted/WizardChan/etc. community are depressed to the point of being suicidal. There are probably cases where I’m the difference between a suicide happening or not happening. This isn’t hyperbole. It’s likely that Zoe Quinn’s false flag raid of WizardChan caused a few wizards to kill themselves. Feminists on reddit were trying to get incel men on the /r/ForeverFucked to kill themselves. I don’t know if what Zoe Quinn and the feminists on reddit are doing is just man slaughter or outright murder. It is evil either way. When they focus on me, they aren’t trying to get incel men to kill themselves.
Peter Thiel had to keep his strategy secret until now. I don’t think that’s necessary for me. I anticipate that what I have written will not cause my enemies to ignore me, but to redouble their attacks on me. I apologize in advance if the comments section gets out of hand for a while.
What happens to a man who stays in The Reserves long enough without realizing that he’s better off without women? Eventually, he will suffer from what I call Reserves Desperation Derangement Syndrome from the waiting. The ForeverAlone subreddit (which is no longer about being forever alone since it is now controlled by women in relationships and maginas who worship them) has good examples of Reserves Desperation Derangement Syndrome.
One one end, we have a forever alone man who found a girlfriend. Sounds good, right? Except that she’s 10 years older than him, and she using him just to have a kid.
Basically she is 10 years older than me and absolutely desperate to have a kid before it’s too late, if it’s not already.
She keeps telling me how much having a child will change me for the better and she thinks we will have kids soon
The man who wrote this is aware that he is just being used so that his girlfriend can have a kid. His follow up comments make it clear that he know that he is just being used for his money. It’s previous obvious that as soon as she has his kid and his money, she will dump him and go back to the men she actually wants to have sex with. This sounds pretty bad but compared to the next example, this was a weak case of Reserves Desperation Derangement Syndrome.
Someone decided to ask the ForeverAlone subreddit if they would rather be single forever or be married to a woman that cuckolds them. A significant fraction of the responses were men who would be willing to be married to a woman that cuckolded them even though they would get nothing they wanted from the deal. (Fortunately, a lot of men still had their self respect and chose to be single forever instead.) The men willing to be cuckolds are the ultimate in Reserves Desperation Derangement Syndrome. They are so desperate that they are willing to be cuckolded by a woman. They won’t get want they want because being cuckolded especially in their case is just play acting at a sexual relationship with a woman. These men represent the ultimate goal of keeping men in The Reserves, conditioning men to accept any behavior from a woman, no matter how abusive. And that is what cuckolding is, particularly in this case, abuse.
Someone may say that these men have a sexual fetish. That is clearly not the case. Holding these men in The Reserves has
conditioned brainwashed them into willing to be cuckolded and abused. Their own words make it clear that they do not get off on a woman cuckolding them. It’s clear that they are so desperate for female contact of any kind that they are willing to let themselves be abused by women. There are plenty of women ready to take advantage of these men from dominatrices trying to find more customers to women who get off on small penis humiliation.
The only answer to this is to refuse to be a part of The Reserves and GYOW. When a man goes his own way, he won’t be abused by a woman (at least not directly, being abused by the state working on behalf of women is a different matter). He will also have his self respect intact.
I have talked about how dating advice is used as a scam to convince people to believe in a particular ideology. While the manuresphere is a good example of this, using dating advice to make men believe in a particular ideology is not limited to them. The Dickless Mangina Project has a page about how going green will makes men attractive and sexy (and by extension get men laid).
If going green will get a man laid, then it should be easy to show examples of ugly and poor men who go green and become attractive to women. The page has no examples. In fact, the two examples the page gives of guys who are going green are a rock star and a rich and famous actor. Both men are good looking. Women would be attracted to them whether they were going green or industrial level polluters. This shows that going green has no effect on a man’s attractiveness. If a man is already attractive, then going green won’t have a negative effect, but it won’t have a positive effect either. If an unattractive man goes green, women won’t care and will treat him the same as they did before.
A while ago, I was in downtown Vancouver for several days. There was this homeless guy who was picking up trash and trying to keep part of the downtown area clean and green. (He was doing this as a form of panhandling, but he was trying to do something rather than just hold his hand out.) It was pretty obvious that this homeless guy was not getting laid at all. His decision to be green did not help him proving the page at The Dickless Mangina Project to be a complete lie. This is just another example of trying to use dating advice to manipulate men into a political ideology.
Why are there all these attempts to link being successful at getting women with believing in the “right” political ideology? It is because most people believe in the Just World Fallacy when it comes to men and dating/relationships/sex. They believe that a man who is successful at getting women must have the “right” politics whatever they believe the “right” politics to be. This is because having the “right” politics is believed by most people to be equivalent to being moral and virtuous. In the page from The Dickless Mangina Project, the “right” politics happens to be environmentalism. For others it is feminism. For the manuresphere, it is racism and anti-semitism. The reality is that the Just World Fallacy is a fallacy for a reason. There is no connection between being attractive to women and having a particular set of political beliefs. In fact, there is no connection between being attractive to women and being moral and virtuous.
I have wondered why white vagina worshiping nationalists keep commenting on this blog. They are wasting their time because no one here is convinced by their arguments. I don’t go to white vagina worshiping nationalist blogs and forms so they are not following me back here because I was trolling them. Thanks to Herbert Marcuse of the Frankfurt School (H/T Boxer), I now know the reason why.
Herbert Marcuse wrote about something he named “the defeated logic of protest”. His ideas are applicable here. By going to these mainstream feminist churches and raising hell, the protestor is actually entering into a dialogue with them, and in effect strengthening them. The fact that he shows up means that (at some level) he recognizes their authority. The feminists get lots of media time when people do this and their feminist message grows stronger.
White Vagina Worshiping Nationalists recognize my authority. Unconsciously, they know I am correct about everything. Thus they continually protest me despite their inability to convince me or the readership of this blog of anything. White vagina worshiping nationalism has nothing to offer men. It is filled with man hating women. Because of this they already defeated before they start saying anything to me. They protest me since their own women have them on a leash, and they can’t do anything else. I have already defeated them by pointing out these facts before they attempt to protest me.
When taking about “the defeated logic of protest”, Marcuse had a suggestion to deal with that. In a general sense it is MGTOW.
I guarantee you that Marcuse’s suggestion here will be used as a basis for a conspiracy theory that MGTOW is a Cultural Marxist plot. At least with this, they will be referencing something someone in the Frankfurt School actually said instead of making shit up about the Frankfurt School
I found something that explains why you can’t trust women.
This is why women can’t be trusted. In the end a woman will always side with another woman over a man no matter how vile and evil, the other woman is.
We have been talking a lot lately about the Cultural Marxism/Frankfurt School conspiracy theory. With this conspiracy theory, there is a lack of original references about cultural marxism from the Frankfurt School’s own texts. (This is common in a lot of conspiracy theories besides the cultural marxism conspiracy theory.) If you want to know what happens when you ask for an original source reference from cultural marxism conspiracy theorists, take a look at what happened when Boxer tried asked for a original source reference on the subject. (This was after another person who tried to pass off a youtube video as “proof” of the cultural marxism conspiracy theory which didn’t reference any original sources.)
Boxer, knock off the faux-scepticism. The Frankfurt School’s influence on Cultural Marxism is undeniable. They literally *invented the term*; they talk about it in their papers. The idea that it’s a conspiracy theory is Leftist whitewashing, and an attempt at covering their tracks to delude the masses.
Boxer then asks for the specific source where the Frankfurt School invented the term, “cultural marxism”. After that the conspiracy theorists do nothing but throw links at Boxer that have no references to any original source material and attack Boxer for asking for references to original source material. Boxer describes what is happening with an excellent analogy.
Citing sources that you’ve never read is a problem, no? It’d be like arguing that the author of Dalrock blog is a misogynist who has written articles on his blog encouraging men to play grab-ass with random chicks on the street. When (and it’d be when, not if) the claimant was asked for a source, he’d post links to Amanda Marcotte and Manboobz, who made that claim.
The problem with all these conspiracy theories is that the sources are mostly online, free for anyone to read. You’re going to run into people like me, who have read them all and written peer-reviewed journal articles on the original sources, who will have to say “he’s an internet kook” when people wonder where you’re pulling all this nonsense from. Sadly, it makes everything else you say suspect.
Whenever you ask a conspiracy theorist for a reference to original source material, they will almost never provide it. Instead they will give you youtube videos and other links that provide no references to original source material. They love youtube videos because they are trying to hide the fact that what they are saying has no connection to original source material. In the rare cases, you get a reference to a piece of original source material, one of two things will happen. Either the original source material never existed, or the original source material says something completely different.
Boxer makes an apt comparison to feminism. Feminists want you to “listen and believe” instead of investigating and evaluating evidence. Conspiracy theorists want you to “listen and believe” instead of investigating and evaluating evidence, too. This is another example of how feminism and conspiracy theory is similar. Never listen and believe. Always demand evidence and original source material. If someone whether a feminist or a conspiracy theorist refuses to produce references to original source material or produces false references to original source material, assume they are lying because most likely, they are.