I’m sure all of you have seen eHarmony’s commercials (such as this) where eHarmony claims to use a “scientific” system. Tamerlame let us know that eHarmony was banned from saying their system was scentifically proven since eHarmony failed to provide any evidence that science was involved in their system. This should not be a surprise to anyone who reads this blog as this is no different to how gamers tried to claim game was “scientific” and failed to provide evidence.
There is no science to be found in any form of dating advice because they are all scams. This is not obvious to most people as most people’s understanding of science is a combination of yelling “SCIENCE!” like in the “She blinded me with science” song, fake science such as that from the “I fucking love science” crowd/site, and Neil deGrasse Tyson memes. In reality, science is a process involving such things as gathering evidence, testing hypotheses in experiments, and verification by attempting to replicate results.
In other words, most people wouldn’t know what science is even if science bitchslapped facts into people. Most people just yell, “SCIENCE!” to maintain the pretense that they didn’t manufacture their beliefs out of thin air because it benefitted them. This is why when dealing with scams like dating advice we can never let up when it comes to demanding that they produce evidence that shows their claims are correct (even though we know they are unable to do so).
With all the false rape and false sexual harassment accusations out there such as the #MeToo movement and it being Christmas soon, how long will it be until Santa is falsely accused of sexual harassment or rape? I am not joking. Facts like Santa not exististing will not stop women from saying that Santa groped them or that Santa raped them.
There are already women saying that girls sitting on Santa’s lap leads to women getting raped. (Boys also sit on Santa’s lap but that fact is conviently left out.) Rubbish like that is a small step to women making false accusations against Santa. Listen and believe is going to take on a new dimension.
I found the like above by coming with a totally insane idea, women falsely accusing Santa, a mythical person, of raping them. Then I did a google search. That was enough.
Next Easter, I’m sure women will be falsely accusing the Easter bunny of raping them. That will be followed by women making false accusations of rape against mythical gods like Zeus.
Andrea Ramsey, a Democrat who was going to run for Congress, was forced to drop out of the race because she was accused of sexually harassing a man. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) refused to support Ramsey’s campaign because of the sexual harassment accusation. This is not a joke. This has actually happened.
It gets even better when you read what Ramsey said about this.
“In its rush to claim the high ground in our roiling national conversation about harassment, the Democratic Party has implemented a zero tolerance standard. For me, that means a vindictive, terminated employee’s false allegations are enough for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) to decide not to support our promising campaign. We are in a national moment where rough justice stands in place of careful analysis, nuance and due process.”
No one heard Ramsey talk about “careful analysis” when Al Franken was forced to resign.
No one heard Ramsey talk about “nuance” when Garrison Keillor was thrown into a 1984 style memory hole for an accident.
No one heard Ramsey talk about “due process” when Trump was (and still is) being falsely accused of sexual assault or when Emily Lindin said that it would be necessary for innocent men to lose their jobs due to false accusations of sexual assault and harassment to “fight the patriarchy”.
Instead of whining about it, Ramsey could try to take some action. She could support some Republican candidates for Congress or perhaps even run as one herself. Or she could try suing the DCCC. At a minimum the Democrats aren’t applying the same standard to all of their elected representatives. Chuck Schumer has been accused of sexual harassment. Of course, it’s an incredibly obvious false accusation. However, that does not matter. The Democrats should force him to resign since that is the policy of the Democratic party now. Ramsey could claim that she is being discriminated against.
I am certain Ramsey will not do any of that or anything else to actually fight back. Like with mangina Al Franken she will decide that its more important for women that she falls on her sword. I will shed no tears for her even if she’s innocent. Like Franken, she’s getting exactly what she deserves for her refusal to fight.
Al Franken said the following in his speech announcing his resignation.
“Over the last few weeks, a number of women have come forward to talk about how they felt my actions had affected them. I was shocked. I was upset. But in responding to their claim, I also wanted to be respectful of that broader conversation. Because all women deserve to be heard and their experiences taken seriously. I think that was the right thing to do. I also think it gave some people the false impression that I was admitting to doing things that in fact I haven’t done. Some of the allegations against me are simply not true. Others I remember very differently.”
This can be shortened to “Listen and believe women except the women who are accusing me of groping them”. Obviously, this is inherently contradictory. Franken is trying to have it both ways, but he can’t. Either you don’t listen and believe women or Franken is guilty. Those are the only two options. This contradiction appears again later in his speech.
“I am leaving while a man who has bragged on tape about his history of sexual assault sits in the Oval Office and a man who repeatedly preyed on young girls campaigns for the Senate with the full support of his party. But this decision is not about me. It’s about the people of Minnesota.”
If Franken is innocent then why should believe the women who accuse Trump and Moore? If we’re always supposed to believe women then Franken is guilty. Again, Franken can’t have it both ways. The reason why Trump is president and that Moore is likely to be in the Senate is not because they’re evil like Franken would have you believe. It’s because Trump and Moore both fought back, even if it was pretty minimal. Trump and Moore made a stand against the women accusing them instead of trying to promote two ideas that directly contradict each other.
Franken had two choices, commit mangina seppeku for women or fight back and defend himself (which would include fighting back against women in his own party who want him to resign). Franken chose mangina seppeku. I tend to think Franken is innocent (although we can’t discount the possiblity that Franken is Hugo Schwyzer lite) so this is really something that could be found in 1984 by George Orwell. It’s reminiscent of Winston Smith changing historical records when someone fell out of favor with the Party. Since Franken is not living in the world of 1984, he had a choice. Franken could have chosen facts over lies that benefitted his party, but he did not because he is a mangina feminist. If Franken is innocent, I still have no sympathy for him because he did not have to be a case study in gynocentric orwellianism. Franken could have chosen facts over gynocentric orwellianism, but he decided being a mangina was more important.
I found this on the internet.
I totally get this. Women are just like hurricanes. Hurricanes cause wanton destruction wherever they go. If you live in a place without hurricanes, you are better off. Hurricanes are also not smart enough to realize that they are attacking the descendants of slaves and that there were male slaves. None of this is any different than women.
Since women want to own hurricanes, let them.
The last couple of weeks have really bad for women and manginas attempting to hide female incompetence. First, Amazon has been caught deleting negative reviews of Hillary Clinton’s new book. Amazon can’t hide the facts. Hillary was a shitty candidate who ran a shitty campaign last year and then wrote a shitty book about it.
Second, there has been an attempt to hide the incompetence of Susan Maudlin, the now former CISO (Chief Information Security Officer) of Equifax, in the recent Equifax data breach by scrubbing the internet of information about Susan Maudlin. Clearly, that’s not working since the attempt was noticed. It’s pretty obvious that Susan Maudlin only got the CISO job at Equifax because she’s a woman. She lacked the experience and aptitude necessary for such a job, and that is one reason why the Equifax data breach happened.
More and more, men are waking up to the fact that women don’t belong in the jobs they have. It’s not surprising women and manginas would try to hide female incompetence to stop this trend. Since the internet never forgets, they got caught.
Yesterday, I was out getting lunch that recently added gazpacho, a cold Spanish tomato soup, to their menu. I overheard two women ahead of me in line talking about the new gazpacho. One of the women asks the other what gazpacho is. The other woman says that it’s like salsa that you drink. The first woman says that gazpacho is creepy. The second woman agreed. After that I made sure to get some gazpacho with my lunch because I was not going to let women ruin gazpacho especially by calling gazpacho creepy.
I have been saying for a long time that women calling men creepy is bullshit. However, this proves it. Women are willing to call traditional Spanish cuisine creepy which is complete rubbish by itself. If a soup can be creepy, than any man being called creepy is meaningless.