There’s this professor at MIT, Scott Aaronson. On his personal blog, he talked about how feminist rhetoric scared him from dating women for a long time. It was causing him so much trouble that he was seriously considering castration as a solution. Yes, castration. He got over it, sort of. He says that he is on board with “97% of feminism”. Even though he fixed the problem of feminism preventing him from dating, he internalized their misandry. In other words, he’s a mangina suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
Feminists found out about Scott Aaronson’s past dating woes and used it to attack him. Some of the worst came from Amanda Marcotte who outright lied about what Scott Aaronson said. The comments are just as bad. Many of them say that it’s a good thing that Aaronson isn’t getting laid because he’s such a misogynist. They’re invoking the feminist time machine on a man who agrees with 97% of feminism. This alone shows how absurd the idea that being a good feminist means getting laid.
One problem is here is that women weren’t rejecting Scott Aaronson. He had internalized misandry from feminists so he never approached women. Women never had the opportunity to reject him for being a supposed misogynist.
However, there’s another problem. Feminists attacking Scott Aarsonson accuse him of failing to get laid at the present time. That isn’t true. Scott Aaronson has gotten laid, plenty of times I’m sure. That’s because he is married. The feminist time machine didn’t just crash on Scott Aaronson. It collapsed in on itself. Scott Aaronson isn’t supposed to be getting laid according to feminists, but he is. According to feminists women were rejecting Scott Aaronson because of his misogyny, yet women never had the opportunity because he was too busy trying to be a good feminist by avoiding women.
Scott Aaronson’s life story doesn’t even fit the pattern of the feminist time machine. Yet, feminists are trying to force his life story into it. This proves that it doesn’t matter what a man’s actual life story is to feminists. Feminists will accuse a man of failing to get laid because he’s a misogynist even if he is choosing to not to try to get laid or is actually getting laid. Feminists are so invested in the Just World Fallacy of the feminist time machine that they can’t see when a man such as Scott Aaronson is actually getting laid.
This nonsense was written a few days ago.
Only an autistic who has never spoken to a woman could buy the ridiculous notion that they run the world or are even capable of running the world. Any organization run by them is bound to collapse due to that gender’s lack of competence, intelligence, and leadership ability. I’ve known that since elementary school for chissakes.
This was written in response to my entry about the Orions from Star Trek. Something I noticed in this comment was the word “organization”. While Orion women secretly rule and enslave Orion men, there is no organization, hidden or otherwise, of Orion women. That would defeat the purpose. Orion women rule via their pheromones.
This made me realize that a common problem in the manuresphere, among tradcons, and among many others is their inability to understand something like this. These groups are obsessed with conspiracy theories, and one reason for that is that they can’t understand anything else. They can’t understand how group A can rule group B without group A being a conspiracy. The conspiratorial model does not reflect reality so they have to believe in absurd things to make their theories work. Anyone like me who uses a non-conspiratorial model of things that reflects reality will get reactions like the one above. I am doing the equivalent of trying to explain a heliocentric model to people who are incapable of understanding anything other than a geocentric model of the cosmos.
I have noticed that metaphors for women in science fiction seem to involve green skinned aliens a lot. The Thrint are green skinned aliens. Star Trek has green skinned aliens called the Orions. Orion women have these ultra powerful pheromones they use to manipulate Orion men and men from other species, including human men.
The real nature of Orion women is fleshed out in Star Trek: Enterprise. Initially in Star Trek: Enterprise we learn that Orion women and only Orion women are sold as slaves. That along with everything else we see about that Orions makes it look like Orion men are in charge and that Orion women are virtual slaves if not outright slaves. However, that’s not the case. Several episodes later we discover it’s actually the reverse. Orion women secretly rule and enslave Orion men, and things like Orion women being sold into slavery is just a cover for the Orion women’s scam. Orion women use their pheromones and sex in general to control men similar to how the Thrint used their telepathic “power” to make slaves of aliens.
I’m surprised that something so accurate about the nature of women was ever shown on TV. However, that’s the beauty of science fiction. If someone were to accurately depict the nature of women, it would never be shown on TV. Instead use green skinned aliens, and it doesn’t get noticed by the gynocrats who would normally put a stop to such things.
I got asked my opinion about AVFM’s latest attack on MGTOW. Until now, I hadn’t been following it due to a lack of time and an assumption that it was nothing more than the usual tension between MRAs and MGTOW. Obviously, I oppose what AVFM is trying to do. By trying to include married men as MGTOW, AVFM is trying to create a MGTOW- and call that “MGTOW”, so they can actual MGTOW, MGTOW+ to make actual MGTOW look like Atheism+. What AVFM is doing is a very despicable and underhanded thing.
While this is about throwing out actual MGTOW to include tradcons at AVFM, it represents a deeper connection between AVFM and tradcons. AVFM is adopting a tradcon strategy I am now calling, “The Middle Of The Road Alternative Scam”. What tradcons try to do is present themselves as different from both feminists and MRAs/MGTOW. Tradcons will tell you that they are neither pro-male nor pro-female, but pro-“family” or pro-“community”. “Family” and “community” are words that really mean women and/or socialism depending on context, so it’s a way for tradcons try to trick men into supporting women. Plus, it’s also a way for tradcons to present themselves as the group “in the middle” trying to “bring men and women together” and “fight the extremists on both sides” (i.e. the feminists on one side and the MRAs/MGTOW on the other).
AVFM is now using the same scam. Effectively they’re trying to say, “See we have both men and women. We’re trying to bring men and women together. We’re neither those feminist extremists nor those MGTOW extremists.” Since AVFM is supposed to be a MRA organization, they can’t include MRAs as one of the “extremes” they’re supposedly against, so MGTOW exclusively get that “honor”. Thats the only real difference between the tradcon application of “the middle of the road alternative” scam and AVFM’s application of it. Since AVFM’s use of this scam effectively aligns AVFM with tradcon ideology, now tradcons are very much at home at AVFM.
There may be some people reading this who are wondering, “what’s wrong with bringing men and women together?” They think that I’m just an extremist who is trying to promote a war between men and women. The problem with a middle of the road position (in the best case scenario) is that it’s a compromise position. On one side, the position is “men should have no rights”. The other side says, “men should have rights”. The middle of the road position is to take half of men’s rights away. Clearly, that’s unacceptable and absurd. A man’s rights should never be up for compromise or negotiation. It’s like you trying to compromise with someone who wants to poison your food. You don’t want your food to be poisoned, but they do. Are you actually going to meet in the middle and let them use half as much poison? Of course not. Don’t forget this description of the “middle of the road alternative” is assuming the best case scenario. In reality, it’s worse. The “middle of the road alternative” is really used as a scam or a trojan horse to subjugate men.
AVFM and the tradcons aren’t the only to use this scam. The white vagina worshipping nationalists also use this scam, albeit only for white men and white women. Conspiracy theorists also use this scam, but that is part some of larger issues with conspiracy theory that require a separate post. Anytime you see this scam being used, don’t trust whoever is using it. Many groups are using it or will use it in the future so you have to be vigilant for it.
Something I have been meaning to start talking about is the Christian dating advice industry, but I haven’t gotten around to it until now. What finally got me to start writing about it was a pair of articles by Milo Yiannopoulos about MGTOW. Both of those articles had a good number of comments (although it’s now buried in thousands of comments) where tradcons would try and convince MGTOW that there were plenty of “good women” in churches. This is not true, and Christian dating advice isn’t true either. Just because something is “Christian” does not mean its any better than the non-Christian equivalent if it involves women.
While Christian dating advice has its own unique quirks, most of the differences between Christian dating advice and regular dating advice are cosmetic. The “go to church” dating advice is a good example of this. It’s equivalent to feminist dating advice which says you should date feminists, “red pill” dating advice that says you should date “red pill” women, etc. None of the women in any of these groups are any different. They’re all the same. I can tell you from personal experience that single women in church are the same types of single women you will find outside of church. They’re desperate to get married because either they have kids, are otherwise divorced, or are otherwise “former” sluts whose looks are starting to fade. It’s the reserves problem, but churches are worse because the single women there are actively trying to mine the reserves even more so than outside of church.
You might think that because Christianity says no sex until marriage, that would mitigate the problem. It does not. No sex until marriage only applies to men. Women in church are given a pass for all their sexual sins because the church teaches that fornication is that man’s fault because of “male headship”. It’s worse than that because the men Christian women fornicate with aren’t in church. The single men in church are all part of the reserves so they aren’t getting any. Since men get blamed for women’s sexual sins in churches, it’s the men in the reserves that are getting attacked from the pulpit for sins that women and men outside of church commit. These men are doing the time, but don’t get the benefit of doing the crime/sin. It’s a really perverse form of the gay virgin player rapist problem. “Male headship” is also an excuse for churches to blame men and only men for divorce. The divorce rate in churches is practically the same outside of church proving again that women are all the same.
Churches are as feminist as anything else in our gynocentric and gynocratic society. They’re a misandrist institution. They’re aren’t going to produce dating advice that’s fundamentally different from the rest of the dating advice industry. Christian dating advice is a scam like almost all other dating advice.
There’s more to the Christian dating advice industry than I have covered here. I will be covering that in future blog entries.
Comments are closed since this post is a copy of a page. Comment on the page here.
We have talked about how Anita Sarkeesian is involved with online marketing scams. It turns out she’s worse than that. Anita Sarkeesian is connected to the dating advice industry. Sarkeesian worked with a man named Bart Baggett. Baggett was listed as an author on a PUA directory since he wrote books on how to get laid using NLP, neuro-linguistic programming. NLP is pseudoscience and a scam.
I’m both surprised and not surprised by this. I’m surprised that Sarkeesian would so obviously be proof of everything I have been saying for a long time. On the other hand, Anita Sarkeesian is involved in online marketing scams so it’s not surprising she would be involved with people engaging in dating advice scams. After all, there is sort of a common link between the dating advice industry, feminism, and the war on gamers. Dating advice is used as a ideological scam to trick men into joining up with various ideologies from feminism to misandrist forms of Christianity. Anything that is an alternative to dating advice (and dating in general) is the enemy of the dating advice industry and anyone trying to use dating advice as a form of recruitment. Thus, M(H)RAs and MGTOW are obvious enemies of the dating advice industry and anyone that uses dating advice to recruit men. In this context, video games are similar to the M(H)RM and MGTOW. This makes the dating advice industry, feminism, and anyone else invested in the MDAD (Misandrist Dating Advice Distraction) allies against video games. Connections between the dating advice industry to feminism and other misandrist groups should be expected so if Anita Sarkeesian wasn’t a connection, it would be someone else.
This Thanksgiving I’m thankful for #GamerGate because #GamerGate is everything the so called manosphere is not. #GamerGate is actually anti-feminist. #GamerGate actually does things instead of starting meaningless internet fights and trying to con men out of their money.
#GamerGate has accomplished more in 3 months than the so called manosphere could accomplish in 3 centuries. #GamerGate’s latest accomplishment is getting the Federal Trade Commission to take action against the feminists masquerading as game journalists. This may not seem like much, but the so called manosphere has never gotten the FTC to do anything. Consider how much fraud and corruption feminists engage in. Action by FTC will lead to larger actions by the FTC and other government agencies. This is only the beginning, so this Thanksgiving be thankful for #GamerGate.