In the past I have talked about The Gay Virgin Player Rapist canard, how men who stand up for themselves against gynocratic thinking get accused of being multiple contradictory bad things at once. For example, being gay yet also a rapist of women. A gay man would not have any interest in raping women. Or, being a virgin yet also a player or a rapist. How could a virgin be a player or a rapist since either would mean that the “virgin” can’t be a virgin? It’s inherently contradictory and impossible. The reason why a man gets attacked as a gay virgin player rapist is because the attackers are really saying, “this man doesn’t bow to gynocratic thinking”. Each part of gay virgin player rapist is something that negatively impacts women. Gay men and virgin men aren’t spending their money on women. Players play women which mean women don’t get what they want. And rapists are just evil. The gay virgin player rapist canard is the Just World Fallacy run amok by attempting to paint a man as maximally evil even though it makes no sense and is impossible due to the contradictions.
I have realized that the gay virgin player rapist canard needs in some cases to be expanded when I read this comment where I was simultaneously accused of being a loser, a virgin, and a (Jewish) overlord. (The author of that comment believes that Jews run the world and that I’m Jewish. Thus, according to him I am one of the rulers of the world.) Obviously, this is contradictory. If I was such a loser, how can I be a part of the group that rules the world? How could I be a virgin? My fellow Jewish overlords would just give me some sex slaves or something.
The Loser Overlord canard is very common among everyone from white vagina worshiping nationalists to feminists. All of anti-semetic thought argues that both the Jews are defective, yet they are so intelligent, capable, and powerful that they run the world. To feminists, men who disagree with them are both losers, yet these losers are a part of the patriarchy that rules the world. It’s all the same contradictory argument that is impossible due to the contradictions.
All this proves is that women and manginas are incapable of rational thought. Otherwise, I would get better attacks that would at least be internally consistent instead of mishmash of contradictions.
Back when I changed the name of this blog and my username to “The Black Pill”, no one used the term, “black pill”. I meant for it to stand for rationality, evidence based thinking and reasoning, freedom for men from the yoke of gynocracy, and all around rejection of being a mangina. Both the red and the blue pill concepts worship women (albeit in different ways), and male adherents of both pill are manginas. Others have adopted the term, “black pill”, to mean nihilism, giving up, and hopelessness. Many black pillers are manginas. Thus I need to separate myself from them. This requires changing my username and the name of this blog.
The blog is now called, “Freedom from the Gynocracy”. The content will not change as being free from the gynocracy has been what this blog is all about even before it was called the black pill. I’m changing my username to, “The Man In The Orbital Castle”. Those of you familiar with the book, “The Man In The High Castle”, will recognize it as a variant on that.
It’s time to give up the pills.
I found a picture that shows how massive female entitlement is. This is a picture of the womens march in Portland last weekend. On top are the entitled women protesting. Below is a camp of the homeless. Notice how all the homeless are all men.
Where I got this picture from made it clear that the women in the Portland womens march did nothing to help these homeless men. (If the women were aware of the homeless men at all, I’m sure that the women falsely accused the homeless men of male entitlement.) The women above are throwing a temper tantrum because they might have to pay for their own birth control & abortions instead of the government. The men below are suffering from actual problems including homelessness, unemployment, and in many cases mental illness. (And that’s actual mental illness not the bullshit women make up.)
This picture shows that any accusation of male entitlement is a lie, and that women are the entitled ones.
Over the holidays, I was able to get together with a friend I haven’t talked to in a while. His work takes him to the former Soviet Union, central Asia, and the Middle East a lot. Since he had the opportunity for more on the ground knowledge about the situation in the Middle East than anyone else I know, I asked him if he saw any groups worse than ISIS on the horizon. I expected him to either answer, “I don’t know”, “No”, or give the name of some Islamic Fundamentalist group. Instead he started talking about these groups in the former Soviet Union. These groups were all secular but had crazy beliefs such as strange mathematical theories. If these groups had the opportunity, they would do things like nuke cities that they thought their wacky mathematical theories said was in the wrong place, for example. I said to him that I was expecting him to name an Islamic Fundamentalist group not the groups that he did. He explained that as horrific as ISIS is, they still have to obey Islam. They still have to obey the Koran. They can’t diverge from Islam without causing problems for themselves so that puts a lid on just how bad ISIS or any Islamic Fundamentalist group can get. The groups from the former Soviet Union that he described have no such limitations because they are completely secular. They don’t have to worry about their coreligionists reigning them in or obeying a holy text. This gives them complete freedom to believe or do the most horrific things possible. My friend described them as secular cults. These groups all had many of the components of being a religious cult but without a belief in a god or gods.
As my friend described these groups from the former Soviet Union, I noticed how similar these groups were to everything from the alt-right, neoreaction, the manuresphere, white vagina worshipers, to social justice warriors/intersectional feminists and other feminists. All of these groups believe nonsense with religious fervor. Look at how often white vagina worshipers show up to comment on this blog despite it being a waste of time for them. They do it because they’re the secular equivalent of religious zealots, and they don’t understand how illogical it is to waste their time on this blog. I have even seen social justice warriors described as “if Pat Robertson was a woman born in 1990 to an atheist family in a deep blue state but otherwise was completely the same”. The actual Pat Robertson can’t diverge from the Bible without causing problems. On the other hand, social justice warriors don’t have that limitation.
We are living in the age of the secular cult, and secular cults are wrecking havoc with everything. Feminism, in particular, controls the political apparatus of western countries and uses that control to wage war on men. Russia is in a sorry state so expect the secular cults in the former Soviet Union to get popular when Russia falls apart. In fact, I expect with all of the anti-Russia paranoia going on now that the CIA or some other part of the government will start funding the secular cults in Russia to destabilize Russia. That may have already begun. It’s the same problem as with Syria where the US government has been so obsessed with getting Assad that the US government is funding Islamic terror groups it should be fighting against. Secular cults aren’t treated as the threat they are so they get propped up by people thinking they can control them for their own ends. Also, secular cults prop each other up so that they can fight endless wars with each other.
I have no idea on how to solve the problem of secular cults. The problem is global so there is no place to reasonably escape to except maybe Japan, and how long can the Japanese hold out against them?
StonerWithABoner asked, “Mr. Black Pill (or anyone else here) can you explain this too me?
When O’bama talked about a stimulus plan, all the “right leaning guys” like Bernie Chapin and Crappity Crapitalism said that it was Keynesian economics and was as irresponsible as using a credit card to buy yourself out of debt….
Now, Trumpy wants to borrow money to build, build,build because rates are low. But isn’t this essentially the same or at least 70% similar to O’bummer’s stimulus program? Why aren’t the alter-righties crying about fiscal responsibility, smaller gov’t and states rights? Is it because a domineering “alpha male” is suggesting these plans?
Unless I am confusing something, then they seem to be exhibiting similar behavior to feminists. When times are good, demand the high paying jobs but when they are on a sinking ship, demand women (and a far secondary children) first. Seems like they change colors on a whim and have no cohesive ideology except to scapgoat low status men with darker skin for all their massive personal failures…”
I can explain this. It’s the Horseshoe theory of politics in action where the farther right you go politically, you become more left and vice versa. This is a phenomena that I have noticed before in the manuresphere. In other words, the manuresphere’s politics is indistinguishable from the left they (claim to) abhor. They were only against massive spending when Obama wanted to do it. Now, that Trump is suggesting the same thing they are all for it.
This is something we see over and over again with nearly all political factions. They are all feminists and manginas. The only difference between all these political factions is that they have cosmetic differences between them. Everything they do is for the benefit of women and the subjugation of men (or what they believe to be the benefit of women and the subjugation of men). The manuresphere isn’t different than nearly all political factions.
That being said I expect that sooner or later (probably sooner), the manuresphere will start denouncing Trump once they figure out that Trump has no use for them. When that happens the manuresphere will be like, “We were always at war with
Eastasia Eurasia Trump.”
Dr. Van Nostrand brought up how Trump is the perfect caricature of a conservative opponent for the left and feminists similar to how Roosh is another ideal adversary for feminists. This is true and they used the same tactic of promoting Trump as they have promoted Roosh just to take him down. During the primaries feminists were all pro Trump. Amanda Marcotte even said that Trump was the least anti-woman candidate in the Republican primary field.
Why did the attempt to “Roosh” Trump fail? Because Trump was willing to fight to the bitter end and beyond even if it made no sense. On the other hand, Roosh was a coward who would collapse at the slightest real world challenge (outside of meaningless internet arguments against nobodies). This is exactly what happened when he went on the Dr. Oz show. Roosh had several avenues to fight back against Dr. Oz and his audience, but he failed to use them. If Trump was on the Dr. Oz show instead of Roosh, he would have insulted Dr. Oz and his audience instead. Sure it would have been a stupid tactic, but unlike Roosh, Trump would at least fight back. That puts Trump a step above Roosh.
While this worked to get Trump the presidency, it does show that Trump is less interested in winning than constantly engaging in arguments in the real world. Trump had many opportunities to knock out Hillary, particularly in the debates, but he failed to use them. Some of that can be explained by stupidity, but too many of those opportunities were incredibly obvious. Similar to Roosh, Trump would rather have a fight than obliterate his opponents. It also doesn’t help that at his core, Trump is a mangina.
The good news about this is that Trump has paved the way for a real pro-male individual who is willing to fight and obliterate feminists, manginas, and other gynocentrists. I don’t know who that man will be yet, but he is coming. He is going to go for the jugular. He will be smart and understand that this is a war so his goal will be the total destruction of feminists, manginas, and other gynocentrists. He won’t back down like Roosh or miss opportunities & fight for the sake of fighting like Trump.
Clemson University just banned Harambe memes. (Harambe was that gorilla that got shot when a boy fell into the gorilla habitat in the Cincinnati zoo.) Clemson gave two reasons for what they did.
- That Harambe memes are racist
- That Harambe memes are rape culture
Both are wrong, but the racism argument isn’t completely divorced from reality. One can understand how someone can not be insane and come to the conclusion that Harambe memes are racist even though they’re wrong.
On the other hand, believing that Harambe memes are rape culture is completely insane and totally divorced from reality. There was nothing sexual about what happened to Harambe. Also, don’t forget that it was a BOY that fell into gorilla habitat. Nothing about Harambe has to do with women, yet, women are trying to steal this situation from the actual victims with their lies about “rape culture”.
This is another example of how women are oppression thieves. Women are not now nor have they ever been oppressed for being women. To make themselves look oppressed, women steal oppression from actual oppressed peoples and make it about themselves. This is what intersectional feminism is all about. #BlackLivesMatter has the same problem. BLM might actually make sense if it was black men’s lives matter or men’s lives matter because it’s not like black women are dying at the hands of police.
Throughout history women have been the most protected and pampered group that has ever lived. Anything else is women stealing oppression from groups that have actually been oppressed.