Evidence That Virgins Are Not Murderers Or Terrorists

For years, women have said that the government should be tracking me because supposedly one of these days I’m going to go on a shooting rampage.  Why?  Because I’m unwanted by women.  This isn’t unique to me.  Women have been saying that there is a domestic terrorist organization made up of involuntarily celibate virgin men.  Of course, it’s obvious that such a thing is nothing more than an absurd conspiracy theory except to these women.  They believe that this incel virgin domestic terrorist organization (or MRAs which they probably believe to be one and the same) has taken over local and state police, the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, and the Dept. of Homeland Security.  Obviously, the police, FBI, CIA, NSA, and Homeland Security wouldn’t waste their time going after a fictitious terrorist organization, but women refuse to believe it.

The reason that the police, FBI, CIA, NSA, and Homeland Security don’t go after incel virgin men is because that they have to deal with reality, not women’s fantasies based on the just world fallacy.  These women believe that incel virgin men must be a terrorist group because these women irrationally hate incel virgin men.  According to their belief system, incel virgin men must be criminals.  Yet, that is not what happens in reality.  In fact, reality is the opposite.

I will have to use virginity statistics as a proxy for the harder-to-measure romancelessness statistics, but these are bad enough. In high school each extra IQ point above average increases chances of male virginity by about 3%. 35% of MIT grad students have never had sex, compared to only 20% of average nineteen year old men. Compared with virgins, men with more sexual experience are likely to drink more alcohol, attend church less, and have a criminal history. A Dr. Beaver (nominative determinism again!) was able to predict number of sexual partners pretty well using a scale with such delightful items as “have you been in a gang”, “have you used a weapon in a fight”, et cetera. An analysis of the psychometric Big Five consistently find that high levels of disagreeableness predict high sexual success in both men and women.

If you’re smart, don’t drink much, stay out of fights, display a friendly personality, and have no criminal history – then you are the population most at risk of being miserable and alone. “At risk” doesn’t mean “for sure”, any more than every single smoker gets lung cancer and every single nonsmoker lives to a ripe old age – but your odds get worse. In other words, everything that “nice guys” complain of is pretty darned accurate. But that shouldn’t be too hard to guess…

These women have it backwards.  The evidence says so.  Since the police, FBI, CIA, NSA, and Homeland Security reality, they won’t go after incel virgin men, since incel virgin men don’t murder anyone or commit other crimes.  The more likely a man is to be criminal or be oriented toward criminality, the more likely women want him.  Ironically (or maybe not so ironically) women blame the opposite group of men.

6 thoughts on “Evidence That Virgins Are Not Murderers Or Terrorists

  1. “The more likely a man is to be a criminal or be oriented toward criminality, the more likely women want him.”

    I’m leaning toward the argument that human mating is subconscious. In other words, women find a man attractive, then they say “I like that you’re a bad boy.” But that verbal phrase is a rationalization. First they found him attractive.

    Here’s the basic argument.

    Chicks Dig Jerks?
    The Human Mating blog
    http://archive.is/DEbsD

    It’s like getting on a train first and then deciding whether or not you should get on the train and buy a ticket when the train has already started moving. Once people find someone attractive, they start down towards mating behavior and rationalize about their feelings along the way.

    High-impulsivity may be the common factor correlated with low IQ, high criminality, and alcohol abuse. And those behaviors are linked to higher partner count. Low-impulsivity may be correlated to staying at home and doing chores. Who gets more girs? Well, high-impulsive attractive people find each other quite quickly and maybe even switch partners if this behavior is also correlated with promiscuity.

    Thus, women (and manginas) will continue to attack Nice Guys and virgin men they find unattractive because they will continue to rationalize their own behaviors simply based on their attraction cues. Furthermore, women will rationalize where their partner gets the money they give to the women, whether it is tattooed bank robbers, or upper class bank executives committing fraud.

  2. They don’t have it backwards.

    Women use deliberate obfuscation to avoid taking responsibility for their actions just like with everything else. They know exactly what they’re doing.

    It wouldn’t sound so good if women admitted openly that they like assholes and the like, so they instead attempt to do things such what you described and also label ‘nice guys’ as men that are not really agreeable, but secretly passive-aggressive manipulators that just want to get in a female’s pants. Which is generally nonsense and bullshit.

    • I have wrote this before, but I’ll write it again. This all reminds me of 1 Samual 18 in the Bible where all of Israel’s women gather together singing that Saul killed his thousands while David killed his tens of thousands. And King Saul became angry that the women preferred David over him.
      LOL Saul’s anger reminds me so many in the manosphere.

  3. I look at it as convenient scapegoating which masks a moral cowardice on part of these women. Violent Criminals to a considerable degree are glorified though mostly implicitly by the media and the women being creatures of the herd simply listen to all the dog whistles. At the same time , it is easier to blame low status men who mind their own business since they are unlikely to rape and slit their throats of those women. And the media doesn’t care if they are unfairly vilified.
    So it all works out pretty well for women.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s