Why The “Black Pill”?

Why is this blog called “The Black Pill”?  Originally, it started out as a blog called OmegaVirginRevolt (which is still evident from the URL), but over time it became clear to me that I had gone beyond a blog called “OmegaVirginRevolt”.  The name, “OmegaVirginRevolt”, had outlived its usefulness.  When I first started writing as OmegaVirginRevolt, I believed that we were on the verge of the Mens’ Rights Movement (MRM) actually begining to rollback feminism.  While I think that is still true, it is taking longer than I thought.  That was because there was additional threats to the MRM besides the main enemy of feminism/women.  Since around 2009 or so, the biggest such threat to the advancement of the MRM has been what I call The Paleo-Game Cult, an intersection of the paleo diet, conspiracy theory, Roissysphere game, and several other things.  (This has also led me to investigate more how feminists are interested in game and how it could be used by feminists to block the advancement of the MRM.)

It became clear to me that taking on The Paleo-Game Cult (and other similar threats to the MRM) was the most important thing that can be done right now for the MRM.  These groups are trying to attach themselves and take over the MRM for their own purposes which do not benefit men or advance Mens’ Rights.  I wanted to name the blog with a concept that would encompass all of this.  Paragon came up with the idea of “The Black Pill”.  Lots of people like to use the analogy from the Matrix movies of the “blue pill” and the “red pill”.  The “blue pill” represents mainstream feminism which is a delusion whereas the “red pill” is supposed to represent the anti-feminist truth.  What has happened with the “red pill” is that the concept has been colonized by the Paleo-Game Cult.  The “red pill” instead of meaning anti-feminist truth, now means alternate/non-mainstream delusion that still pedestalizes women.  It now means non-mainstream feminism of the Paleo-Game Cult form.  Just because something isn’t mainstream like the Paleo-Game Cult does not make it truth or anti-feminist.  The “red pills” believe incorrectly that they are anti-feminist, and the delusion that feminism can be solved using personal solutions.  They believe that using game and the paleo diet they can expel feminism from their lives.  This is a delusion.  When Paragon came up with the idea of the “black pill”, he recognized the nature of feminism/women being a systemic problem.  Systemic problems have no personal solutions.  The “black pill” is about that principle and more.  It is about reality as it is and facts.  It stands in opposition to both mainstream feminist delusions (the “blue pill”) and non-mainstream feminist delusions (the “red pill”).  Disagreeing with the mainstream does not automatically make something truth.

For the record, there are those such as A Voice For Men who still use the “red pill” idea.  AVFM does not subscribe to the Paleo-Game Cult delusions and is about reality and facts.  Even though it calls itself a “red pill” site, AVFM (and many other true MRM sites that call themselves “red pill” sites) are actually “black pill” sites.

The “black pill” represents the main focus of this blog that provides a true anti-feminist option beyond the mainstream and non-mainstream feminist delusions.  Since this is my personal blog, it will also include my personal experiences dealing with feminism and any topic I consider to be related.

Advertisements

39 comments on “Why The “Black Pill”?

  1. Pingback: Updates | The Black Pill

  2. Hey, are you going to do a piece on the recent obsession of sexbots? Or artificial wombs? As a chick myself, I don’t think this is doing anything for men’s rights. Soon the MRM will become a bunch of mechanophiles.

    • Please direct us to the specific people in question. If you are new to this blog you will find a great divergence of opinion on what commentators on this blog consider to be “MRM” writers and what gamesphere writers consider “MRM” blogs.

    • I’ve honestly not seen an “obsession with sexbots” anywhere.

      First, of all the manosphere sites that have mentioned sex-bots, they might have like 1 sex-bot post per 1000 other posts.

      Secondly, even when sexbots are mentioned, it’s only talked about in the sense that it will be a revolution in diminishing the drive to chase lays for a lot of the male population. Think of it is a fancy sex-toy.

      The word “obsession” and “mechanophiles” betrays more about you feel endangered by the idea, than it does about the men writing about the sexbots. Are women who use dildos “plasticophiles”?

      I once wrote an article that was like 15 pages long, and it mentioned dozens of things men will use in the future as substitutes for “chasing pussy”, including video games, escorts, sugar babies,  sex dolls, fleshlights, deeper male friendships, hobbies… And every single woman who read that freaking article fucking commented on the article being about “sex dolls”. It’s like, the fucking article is like 2% about sex-dolls, but all women critiqued it AS IF it were about sex dolls, and they conveniently left out everything else in the article.

      You seem to be doing the same with sex bots.

      • I once wrote an article that was like 15 pages long, and it mentioned dozens of things men will use in the future as substitutes for “chasing pussy”, including video games, escorts, sugar babies, sex dolls, fleshlights, deeper male friendships, hobbies… And every single woman who read that freaking article fucking commented on the article being about “sex dolls”. It’s like, the fucking article is like 2% about sex-dolls, but all women critiqued it AS IF it were about sex dolls, and they conveniently left out everything else in the article.

        You seem to be doing the same with sex bots.

        I think what is going on is that women see sexbots (and to a lesser extent sex dolls) as an existential threat. For whatever reason video games, escorts, going ghost, and whatever else does not register with women at the same level, even though those things are a greater threat to women right now. Sexbots are decades away. I think the reason why women fear sexbots is because they are or are close to being a “woman replacement” at least from the perspective of women. Video games, escorts, going ghost, and the rest can be dealt with via shaming language (and the law where possible in cases like with escorts by making it illegal because “women are exploited”). Sexbots can’t be dealt with in that matter. No man is going to care about anti-sexbot shaming language.

        Of course, women don’t realize why men would consider sexbots to be a woman replacement. It’s the same reason that everything else from video games to going ghost is a “woman replacement” to growing numbers of men. I found this guy who talked about how more and more men have no net positive experiences with women. Women are becoming so vile (and literally filthy) that the only thing women offer to men is sex (and babies). For growing numbers of men, that isn’t enough because who wants to have sex with a vile woman covered in dirt. Women are making it easier for everything from video games to sexbots to replace them because those things don’t treat men like crap and they are clean. That’s especially important when it comes to escorts and sexbots. Would you rather have sex with a escort that takes a shower every day or a filthy woman? The answer is obvious to men, but not to women. It’s easier for women to blame the sexbot that won’t be here until 2050 than to examine their own behavior (and hygiene).

        • Sexbots can actually be an excellent strategy. As you said video games, ghosting, escorts, and ONS are all good examples of things man would rather have then date. Sexbots make a nice strawman argument that women can get all hopping mad over, while the other, more realistic “women replacements” are emphasized.

          In essence:
          1.) Emphasize sex-bots to create a strawman for women to argue/shame against and divert their attention away from other, more culturally significant strategies.

          They can waste their time whining and complaining about sexbots while the real work at getting men to abandon the current dynamic. Essentially, create a nominal head to divert their attention from everything else.

      • Will Black Pill do a piece on sexbots? I doubt it; it’s not something he’s talked about on his blog so far.

        Never say never because there might be an angle with sexbots I wish to cover at some point, but you are right. A true “sexbot” is decades away, so it’s not really in my field of vision.

        The ironic thing is that to create a sexbot, what is needed among many other things is quite a few advances in computer vision. A sexbot needs to see after all. My career, business, and life’s work outside of rational anti-feminism is computer vision. My work will end up helping to make sexbots a reality.

    • Maybe I should do a post on the sexbot obsession. It would be interesting to explore why women are so obsessed with something that consists of less than 0.3% of anti-feminist discourse.

      • Because then discussion can be derailed and they can call people “creepy” to shut down discussion about relevant topics.

      • I agree. You don’t see them getting worked up over women and dildos, just over something that threatens the pussy monopoly.

      • I think that one’s easy: any “alternative good” is very bad news for the pussy cartel. Sexbots are net positive nuclear fusion to our lovely Organization of Perpetually Exploitative Cunts.

        One would think the very real and immediate prospect of a male birth control pill would be far more threatening. But I’m not a chick, so what do I know?

      • “It would be interesting to explore why women are so obsessed with something that consists of less than 0.3% of anti-feminist discourse.”

        Because the sexbot constitutes a threat to womans monopoly on sex. It’s the same reason that women are hostile to masturbation, and to pornography, and to fleshlights, and to foreign brides (disparagingly called ‘mail order brides’), and to prostitution. All of these threaten womans monopoly on sex. If women don’t have a monopoly on sex, then it’s like any other commercial product – it becomes cheap and get’s devalued. Women can’t stand that. It’s why they also hate men who don’t chase them for sex, because those men are saying to them “We don’t want to buy your product”, which is basically devaluing women/sex by saying it’s unnecessary.

      • It’s subtle. If I met you in real life and we went put together I’d be able to point out girls who are sending subtle “approach me peterman” signals.

        At the same time, this displays how spoiled women are by society. Most women can afford to be super insecure and lazy, to the point where their signals are super-duper-subtle and unclear yet nobody calls them up their social incompetence and lack of flirting skills. It takes two to tango; and women are as much at fault for failed shit, but all the responsibility is put onto men.

        If a man can’t communicate interest boldly and confidently and to be direct but not too direct, he  “lacks social skills”…

        But if a woman, who likes a guy doesn’t have the confidence to make a wide-open-smile and direct look toward a guy she fancies, nobody calls her “socially incompetent” now do they?

        It’s pure bullshit. She can afford these super-subtle signals that allow her to save face and ego. How come we don’t say “women’s fragile ego” like we say “men’s fragile egos”. It’s bullshit. 

        • ‘How come we don’t say “women’s fragile ego” like we say “men’s fragile egos”. It’s bullshit.’

          Over time, I’ve come to the conclusion that every such pronouncement is, in fact, defensive projection. From “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle,” to “heroic single moms” (wow, that’s a whopper!), on down to demonstrably false canards like the recent “man flu” meme, and so on. It’s hilarious.

        • “If a man can’t communicate interest boldly and confidently and to be direct but not too direct, he “lacks social skills”…”

          If he does this and he is unattractive he is an entitled creep.

        • I picked up this signal yesterday. She only gave it out once, when I waited for her to give out another one to make sure, she didn’t bother, so I didn’t bother approaching her.

  3. “There is no personal solution to systemic problems”

    To the extent that a single individual cannot change a social system, I agree with your slogan. But if a man wants to increase his chances of reproduction and lengthen the extent of his survival under the current social system, he can change his behavior and employ several strategies such as:
    * Socialize
    * Tell lies to women. Sell them a dream like a modern snake-oil salesmen
    * Don’t tell women your real name, nor your real address
    * Don’t spend more than $5 on a woman, unless you are willing to sell them a dream
    * Have unprotected sex with women
    * Impregnate married women
    * Let your bastard children be taken care of by her husband or the state
    * Lie on your tax forms to pay zero taxes or receive refunds. The easiest way is by not disclosing all your sales
    * Steal money from the municipality, the state or the federal government by way of overpriced contracts
    Most likely, some of these strategies go against your morals and those of your audience. At the beginning, your conscience will put some resistance, but, after that, you will be able to be consistent in your actions.

  4. Pingback: Should dating advice be a boys-only club? One self-described Omega Virgin says “yes.” « man boobz

  5. Ordinarily I have a “don’t feed the trolls” policy, but since you seem to have a lot of followers, who are always trolling my blog, I just want to ask, what is this website all about?

    You oppose feminism, yet you never say why beyond juvenile descriptions of women and a persecution complex. I guess in your world NOBODY gets laid, or something. If game doesn’t get you laid, and being an “MRM” doesn’t get you laid, what does?

    • I’m such a beta nice guy that I let my cat sit on my computer chair sleeping while I stand next to it.

    • Ordinarily I have a “don’t feed the trolls” policy, but since you seem to have a lot of followers, who are always trolling my blog

      Really, where is your blog?

      If game doesn’t get you laid, and being an “MRM” doesn’t get you laid, what does?

      Who cares?

        • What doesn’t get this nice beta laid? The simple fact that I don’t care. I don’t give two shits about you and your vagina. If you don’t want to give it to me, why would I waste my time pursuing it when I don’t even want it? That requires effort and my efforts could go to doing something productive rather than wasting valuable time on something most of you can’t even use right. I can “love” myself, better than any of you have ever “loved” me. It’s not worth pursuing. “Who cares” may not appeal to you, but if you want to make me care, actually do some of the work rather than complain about how doing work doesn’t appeal to you.

  6. I’ve got an idea for a slogan for this Site.

    Women are Men.
    Black is White.
    Traditionalism is Feminism.

    The first refers to BP theories about women’s sexuality, that it is no different from men’s. The second refers to “anti-racism,” i.e. totally cool with mass immigration and rejecting all theories of race difference because those are racist and therefore wrong. The third refers to the central idea of the blog, that traditionalism, Christianity, “red pill,” ect, are really feminism.

    • The first refers to BP theories about women’s sexuality, that it is no different from men’s.

      Nice straw man. If I think women are evil like you said (and not men like you implied), then how I can’ think that women’s and men’s sexuality are the same? If they were then both men and women would be evil. You have to pick one. Either I think women are evil or women’s and men’s sexuality are the same. You have to pick one.

      The second refers to “anti-racism,” i.e. totally cool with mass immigration and rejecting all theories of race difference because those are racist and therefore wrong.

      Feminism has been ruining all races so I can’t see a meaningful difference. In fact, the only difference is what degree of feminist rot each racial community has. Some have more advanced rot than others.

      The third refers to the central idea of the blog, that traditionalism, Christianity, “red pill,” ect, are really feminism.

      If it panders to women, it’s feminism. And traditionalism, Christianity (or at least the modern Christian Church), the red pill, etc. all pander to feminism.

  7. Nice page. I have been wondering why the name got changed…glad to see it’s a decent reason. Makes complete sense as to why a different blog name was needed.

    Re: Sexbots
    The only potential issue I see with such a creation has more to do with the ethics of AI. If the future sexbots are going to simply be very complex and expensive toys, that’s fine and I kinda look forward to seeing how realistic they can get while simultaneously avoiding the “uncanny valley” problem.
    But if they are going to be actual androids with advanced AI, decision making capabilities, emotions, and even pleasure receptors, I feel that goes too far in creating another type of slavery.

    The future is full of moral dilemmas based around technology, and I fear so few of us are thinking these things through while we still have time

  8. The feminist orthodoxy like men and women are exactly the same has been scientifically disproved for some time now, the cutting edge quite a ways beyond the common politically correct ideas that solved old social problems. People are not at all the same. As in the past mainstream common cud chewing thinking is decades behind. For now self hating cultural Marxism is the norm, you must take care not get branded a heretic for you may loose your livelihood or worse if caught.

    Realistic sex-bots will happen at some point in the future. First we would have to cross what has been called the singularity in artificial intelligence, conservatively at least a lifetime away. The brain would have to be fully mapped, all of its operations and hidden subsystems down cold. Neurobiology, neuro-adaptabilities, politically incorrect to discuss chick behaviors and more well understood hard science.

    A sex-bot would of coarse have a perfect body, muscle tone and vagina. Enhanced (beyond normal) coordination, optimally tuned bio feedback, integrated into the super AI.

    Because all the neurobiology for guys, would also be know, like exactly all the mechanisms that make guys fall in love, a sex-bot with a super AI would know exactly how to work this. Such a Machiavellian sex-bot would know your a little short of certain hormones and trans-dermal transfer the necessary amounts to ensure maximum effect. When the bot is giving sex its taking EEG readings to optimize sexual peak intensity.

    If this was not enough the sex-bot would also have all the standard chick behaviors and of coarse the ability for extreme enhanced manipulation of guys.

    Someone running a group of these sex bots could rob the hell out of guys, a new kind of criminal syndicate. A guy could use such a sex-bot to motivate and inspire themselves to excel in life. Using something so addictive mindlessly would open one up for exploitation.

    With the advent of social media, which is obsessive porn for women, its true women do willingly fall into dependence via technology. It seems its almost impossible for women to see there own vices. Of coarse what about male sex bots or pimp bots? Women could also be controlled very effectively. Perhaps women will be even more addicted and controlled by technology.

    Another thing that will come is something called trans-humans, which is neuro-enhancements that will surly come even sooner.

  9. So, I’ve heard that AVfM isn’t a “black pill” site anymore. Looks, like this blog entry needs a small update.

  10. I used to read Roissy in 2009 when he still went by Roissy in DC. It was fucking brilliant back then. Now I just can’t wrap my head around who the fuck all these dorks are and why they can’t just be cool.

  11. Are you going to replace the link on your nav with “It’s Time To Give Up The Pills”?

    Off topic, but the new design is so wasteful. Half the screen is just the space elevator background.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s